Best Average Placement TFT Double Up Compositions

This table ranks TFT Double Up team compositions by their average placement finish, showing which comps consistently achieve top placements. Top 9-champion Double Up Set 17 compositions: N.O.V.A. (97.9% WR, 2.2 avg), Replicator (87.2% WR, 2.5 avg), Replicator (88.7% WR, 2.7 avg). N.O.V.A./Brawler leads with 97.87% win rate and 2.19 average placement. Replicator follows at 87.18% win rate. Analyzing 88 9-comp Double Up compositions with real-time performance statistics.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
2.19
Avg Place
97.87%
Top 4 Rate
34.04%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.46
Avg Place
87.18%
Top 4 Rate
28.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.72
Avg Place
88.68%
Top 4 Rate
22.64%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.78
Avg Place
82.42%
Top 4 Rate
26.37%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.71
Avg Place
88.61%
Top 4 Rate
24.05%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.80
Avg Place
83.67%
Top 4 Rate
26.53%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.93
Avg Place
82.61%
Top 4 Rate
28.26%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.83
Avg Place
82.81%
Top 4 Rate
26.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.94
Avg Place
81.48%
Top 4 Rate
22.22%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.11
Avg Place
78.57%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.80
Avg Place
63.41%
Top 4 Rate
17.07%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.97
Avg Place
81.20%
Top 4 Rate
22.22%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.10
Avg Place
65.00%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.11
Avg Place
80.00%
Top 4 Rate
23.08%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.12
Avg Place
80.23%
Top 4 Rate
20.93%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
73.51%
Top 4 Rate
18.54%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.72
Avg Place
59.80%
Top 4 Rate
14.71%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.21
Avg Place
71.43%
Top 4 Rate
14.29%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.27
Avg Place
72.73%
Top 4 Rate
18.18%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.52
Avg Place
87.50%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.68
Avg Place
65.81%
Top 4 Rate
18.80%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.21
Avg Place
76.32%
Top 4 Rate
21.05%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.32
Avg Place
68.61%
Top 4 Rate
23.36%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.99
Avg Place
82.93%
Top 4 Rate
21.95%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.04
Avg Place
75.94%
Top 4 Rate
21.80%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.24
Avg Place
52.94%
Top 4 Rate
5.88%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.59
Avg Place
64.86%
Top 4 Rate
21.62%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.97
Avg Place
80.73%
Top 4 Rate
22.28%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.47
Avg Place
71.88%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Low Contested
3.63
Avg Place
63.89%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.79
Avg Place
57.34%
Top 4 Rate
20.63%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.49
Avg Place
67.44%
Top 4 Rate
23.26%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.47
Avg Place
67.94%
Top 4 Rate
23.66%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.59
Avg Place
64.43%
Top 4 Rate
27.52%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.55
Avg Place
54.55%
Top 4 Rate
36.36%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.56
Avg Place
65.93%
Top 4 Rate
20.88%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.17
Avg Place
76.74%
Top 4 Rate
21.86%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.61
Avg Place
66.07%
Top 4 Rate
21.43%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.71
Avg Place
62.22%
Top 4 Rate
24.44%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.59
Avg Place
68.25%
Top 4 Rate
20.63%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.81
Avg Place
59.46%
Top 4 Rate
18.92%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.55
Avg Place
71.05%
Top 4 Rate
15.79%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.33
Avg Place
71.05%
Top 4 Rate
14.04%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.63
Avg Place
59.26%
Top 4 Rate
22.22%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.93
Avg Place
57.89%
Top 4 Rate
22.81%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.98
Avg Place
59.52%
Top 4 Rate
13.10%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.38
Avg Place
72.73%
Top 4 Rate
22.73%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.69
Avg Place
64.14%
Top 4 Rate
19.31%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.46
Avg Place
68.10%
Top 4 Rate
27.62%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.98
Avg Place
58.49%
Top 4 Rate
16.60%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.26
Avg Place
70.37%
Top 4 Rate
20.37%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.53
Avg Place
71.05%
Top 4 Rate
18.42%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.81
Avg Place
59.74%
Top 4 Rate
12.99%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.85
Avg Place
65.38%
Top 4 Rate
19.23%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.85
Avg Place
65.00%
Top 4 Rate
20.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.66
Avg Place
67.95%
Top 4 Rate
18.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.65
Avg Place
64.65%
Top 4 Rate
17.32%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.15
Avg Place
53.27%
Top 4 Rate
14.74%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.19
Avg Place
55.93%
Top 4 Rate
15.68%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.38
Avg Place
54.17%
Top 4 Rate
16.67%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.38
Avg Place
45.59%
Top 4 Rate
11.76%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.93
Avg Place
57.94%
Top 4 Rate
15.89%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.07
Avg Place
46.67%
Top 4 Rate
33.33%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.54
Avg Place
41.67%
Top 4 Rate
8.33%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.04
Avg Place
62.50%
Top 4 Rate
12.50%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.06
Avg Place
58.68%
Top 4 Rate
16.77%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.83
Avg Place
39.66%
Top 4 Rate
8.62%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.13
Avg Place
52.08%
Top 4 Rate
14.58%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.04
Avg Place
54.35%
Top 4 Rate
13.04%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.23
Avg Place
29.55%
Top 4 Rate
9.09%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.08
Avg Place
60.27%
Top 4 Rate
15.07%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.31
Avg Place
50.72%
Top 4 Rate
12.92%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.35
Avg Place
55.00%
Top 4 Rate
15.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.40
Avg Place
50.94%
Top 4 Rate
7.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.97
Avg Place
59.78%
Top 4 Rate
20.65%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.47
Avg Place
50.53%
Top 4 Rate
12.37%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.50
Avg Place
48.80%
Top 4 Rate
13.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.38
Avg Place
50.85%
Top 4 Rate
12.41%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.60
Avg Place
60.00%
Top 4 Rate
20.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.68
Avg Place
44.30%
Top 4 Rate
10.53%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.67
Avg Place
53.85%
Top 4 Rate
2.56%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.49
Avg Place
47.06%
Top 4 Rate
7.84%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.78
Avg Place
36.96%
Top 4 Rate
8.70%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.20
Avg Place
53.06%
Top 4 Rate
22.45%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.78
Avg Place
43.84%
Top 4 Rate
6.85%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.96
Avg Place
36.97%
Top 4 Rate
11.52%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.40
Avg Place
27.27%
Top 4 Rate
9.09%
First Place
Highly Contested
6.06
Avg Place
18.75%
Top 4 Rate
6.25%
First Place
Highly Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 88 team compositions sorted by average placement to find the most consistent compositions for reliable top 4 finishes, based on 11.3K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 63.1% and average placement of 3.76 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is N.O.V.A./Brawler with Viktor as the primary carry, achieving a 97.9% win rate. Following closely is Replicator/N.O.V.A. at 88.7% win rate, and Rogue/N.O.V.A. at 88.6%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • N.O.V.A./Brawler (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Viktor
  • Replicator/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Pantheon
  • Rogue/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Jax

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider Rogue/Meeple which achieves first place in 36.4% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • N.O.V.A./Brawler: 97.9% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Replicator/N.O.V.A.: 88.7% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Rogue/N.O.V.A.: 88.6% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Challenger/Rogue with a 1.3% pick rate, and it maintains a strong 80.7% win rate despite high contestation. Replicator/Dark Star follows at 1.3% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

TFT Double Up Comps - Set 17 FAQ

What is the best TFT Double Up comp in TFT Set 17?

The best TFT Double Up comp in TFT Set 17 is N.O.V.A./Brawler with Viktor as the primary carry, achieving a 97.9% win rate and 2.19 average placement. This composition is effective for climbing ranked with a partner.

How do I play the N.O.V.A./Brawler comp in Double Up?

To play N.O.V.A./Brawler in Double Up, coordinate with your partner. Focus on building around Viktor as your main carry. This comp has a 0.1% pick rate, making it a relatively uncontested option. Coordinate assists and shared items with your duo partner for best results.

What Double Up comps are good for climbing in TFT Set 17?

For consistent LP gains in TFT Set 17 Double Up, N.O.V.A./Brawler offers the best average placement at 2.19. Other reliable options include Replicator/N.O.V.A. (2.46 avg) and Dark Star/Brawler (2.52 avg). Coordinate with your partner to avoid contesting each other.

What is the easiest TFT Double Up comp to play?

N.O.V.A./Brawler is a great option for players looking for an easier climb. With a 97.9% win rate but only 0.1% pick rate, you're unlikely to be contested, making the game easier to navigate. Low contestation means you can naturally find your units without having to force pivots.

Should my duo partner and I play the same comp in Double Up?

In TFT Set 17 Double Up, it is generally better to play different comps to avoid contesting units. Challenger/Rogue is the most popular at 1.3% pick rate. Consider having your partner play N.O.V.A./Brawler as a complementary option.