Best Average Placement TFT Double Up Compositions

This table ranks TFT Double Up team compositions by their average placement finish, showing which comps consistently achieve top placements. Top 8-champion Double Up Set 17 compositions: N.O.V.A. (74.2% WR, 3.4 avg), N.O.V.A. (67.6% WR, 3.5 avg), N.O.V.A. (63.8% WR, 4.0 avg). N.O.V.A./Brawler leads with 74.19% win rate and 3.37 average placement. N.O.V.A. follows at 67.65% win rate. Analyzing 68 8-comp Double Up compositions with real-time performance statistics.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
3.37
Avg Place
74.19%
Top 4 Rate
24.19%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.53
Avg Place
67.65%
Top 4 Rate
12.75%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.96
Avg Place
63.83%
Top 4 Rate
8.51%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.65
Avg Place
62.97%
Top 4 Rate
21.20%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.69
Avg Place
58.06%
Top 4 Rate
19.35%
First Place
Low Contested
3.93
Avg Place
58.33%
Top 4 Rate
11.67%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.51
Avg Place
67.57%
Top 4 Rate
21.62%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.89
Avg Place
56.88%
Top 4 Rate
16.88%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.91
Avg Place
60.00%
Top 4 Rate
18.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.05
Avg Place
58.62%
Top 4 Rate
11.49%
First Place
Low Contested
4.00
Avg Place
50.00%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.02
Avg Place
59.09%
Top 4 Rate
13.64%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.51
Avg Place
69.77%
Top 4 Rate
16.28%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.08
Avg Place
57.14%
Top 4 Rate
14.29%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.09
Avg Place
58.46%
Top 4 Rate
15.38%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.83
Avg Place
62.45%
Top 4 Rate
16.49%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.99
Avg Place
60.00%
Top 4 Rate
14.00%
First Place
Low Contested
3.84
Avg Place
55.97%
Top 4 Rate
18.66%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.89
Avg Place
61.63%
Top 4 Rate
15.59%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.75
Avg Place
60.00%
Top 4 Rate
20.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.13
Avg Place
33.33%
Top 4 Rate
5.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.30
Avg Place
52.17%
Top 4 Rate
10.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.19
Avg Place
37.50%
Top 4 Rate
6.25%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.43
Avg Place
50.00%
Top 4 Rate
17.39%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.44
Avg Place
46.67%
Top 4 Rate
15.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.44
Avg Place
49.02%
Top 4 Rate
10.83%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.31
Avg Place
49.20%
Top 4 Rate
16.04%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.12
Avg Place
42.42%
Top 4 Rate
3.03%
First Place
Low Contested
4.14
Avg Place
57.14%
Top 4 Rate
19.05%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.59
Avg Place
48.87%
Top 4 Rate
11.65%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.24
Avg Place
54.45%
Top 4 Rate
10.68%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.68
Avg Place
46.77%
Top 4 Rate
6.45%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.65
Avg Place
47.80%
Top 4 Rate
8.29%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.36
Avg Place
52.17%
Top 4 Rate
15.44%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.77
Avg Place
45.54%
Top 4 Rate
13.39%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.22
Avg Place
33.33%
Top 4 Rate
5.88%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.81
Avg Place
37.21%
Top 4 Rate
13.95%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.69
Avg Place
45.24%
Top 4 Rate
16.67%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.49
Avg Place
46.15%
Top 4 Rate
10.26%
First Place
Low Contested
4.80
Avg Place
40.96%
Top 4 Rate
9.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.82
Avg Place
62.50%
Top 4 Rate
19.64%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.02
Avg Place
41.67%
Top 4 Rate
8.33%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.03
Avg Place
36.21%
Top 4 Rate
8.62%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.73
Avg Place
47.13%
Top 4 Rate
8.49%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.71
Avg Place
44.12%
Top 4 Rate
8.82%
First Place
Low Contested
5.63
Avg Place
36.84%
Top 4 Rate
5.26%
First Place
Moderately Contested
-
5.18
Avg Place
32.97%
Top 4 Rate
7.14%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.80
Avg Place
25.00%
Top 4 Rate
5.95%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.00
Avg Place
32.35%
Top 4 Rate
8.82%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.95
Avg Place
41.67%
Top 4 Rate
6.67%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.21
Avg Place
34.15%
Top 4 Rate
9.76%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.23
Avg Place
32.14%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.24
Avg Place
29.41%
Top 4 Rate
5.88%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.97
Avg Place
39.39%
Top 4 Rate
9.09%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.30
Avg Place
32.54%
Top 4 Rate
7.69%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.36
Avg Place
28.57%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.37
Avg Place
32.61%
Top 4 Rate
8.70%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.40
Avg Place
27.91%
Top 4 Rate
9.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.83
Avg Place
18.75%
Top 4 Rate
4.17%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.52
Avg Place
28.26%
Top 4 Rate
4.35%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.87
Avg Place
23.38%
Top 4 Rate
7.79%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.57
Avg Place
29.13%
Top 4 Rate
4.85%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.49
Avg Place
26.38%
Top 4 Rate
5.51%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.80
Avg Place
20.00%
Top 4 Rate
6.67%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.87
Avg Place
19.49%
Top 4 Rate
4.24%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.57
Avg Place
28.57%
Top 4 Rate
2.86%
First Place
Moderately Contested
6.22
Avg Place
12.70%
Top 4 Rate
3.17%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.52
Avg Place
25.81%
Top 4 Rate
3.23%
First Place
Moderately Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 68 team compositions sorted by average placement to find the most consistent compositions for reliable top 4 finishes, based on 9.9K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 44.5% and average placement of 4.68 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is N.O.V.A./Brawler with Viktor as the primary carry, achieving a 74.2% win rate. Following closely is Replicator/N.O.V.A. at 69.8% win rate, and N.O.V.A./Brawler at 67.6%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • N.O.V.A./Brawler (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Viktor
  • Replicator/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Jax
  • N.O.V.A./Brawler (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Viktor

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider N.O.V.A./Fateweaver which achieves first place in 25.0% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • N.O.V.A./Brawler: 74.2% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Replicator/N.O.V.A.: 69.8% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • N.O.V.A./Brawler: 67.6% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Rogue/N.O.V.A. with a 2.1% pick rate, and it maintains a strong 61.6% win rate despite high contestation. Challenger/N.O.V.A. follows at 1.4% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

TFT Double Up Comps - Set 17 FAQ

What is the best TFT Double Up comp in TFT Set 17?

The best TFT Double Up comp in TFT Set 17 is N.O.V.A./Brawler with Viktor as the primary carry, achieving a 74.2% win rate and 3.37 average placement. This composition is effective for climbing ranked with a partner.

How do I play the N.O.V.A./Brawler comp in Double Up?

To play N.O.V.A./Brawler in Double Up, coordinate with your partner. Focus on building around Viktor as your main carry. This comp has a 0.1% pick rate, making it a relatively uncontested option. Coordinate assists and shared items with your duo partner for best results.

What Double Up comps are good for climbing in TFT Set 17?

For consistent LP gains in TFT Set 17 Double Up, N.O.V.A./Brawler offers the best average placement at 3.37. Other reliable options include Replicator/N.O.V.A. (3.51 avg) and Rogue/N.O.V.A. (3.51 avg). Coordinate with your partner to avoid contesting each other.

What is the easiest TFT Double Up comp to play?

N.O.V.A./Brawler is a great option for players looking for an easier climb. With a 74.2% win rate but only 0.1% pick rate, you're unlikely to be contested, making the game easier to navigate. Low contestation means you can naturally find your units without having to force pivots.

Should my duo partner and I play the same comp in Double Up?

In TFT Set 17 Double Up, it is generally better to play different comps to avoid contesting units. Rogue/N.O.V.A. is the most popular at 2.1% pick rate. Consider having your partner play N.O.V.A./Brawler as a complementary option.