Highest Win Rate TFT Team Compositions
This table showcases the TFT team compositions with the highest win rates, helping you identify the most successful comps for climbing ranked. Top 8-champion Set 18 compositions: Defender (89.8% WR, 2.3 avg), Brawler (88.5% WR, 2.3 avg), Defender (87.3% WR, 2.4 avg). Defender/Elderwood leads with 89.84% win rate and 2.25 average placement. Brawler follows at 88.55% win rate. Analyzing 71 8-comp compositions with real-time performance statistics.
The Best Comps, Right in Your Game
The Recommended Comps overlay shows the strongest meta comps matched to the traits and units you're already running — with win rate, average placement, and 1st-place odds — without ever leaving TFT.
- Meta comps without alt-tabbing
- Matched to your current traits
- Win rate, avg place & 1st odds

Primary | Champions | Avg | Top 4 | First | Contested | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Avg Place 2.25 | Top 4 89.84% | First Place 33.61% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.27 | Top 4 88.55% | First Place 35.14% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.39 | Top 4 87.28% | First Place 36.00% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.48 | Top 4 87.16% | First Place 37.26% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.62 | Top 4 85.31% | First Place 33.09% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.57 | Top 4 85.15% | First Place 28.11% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.82 | Top 4 82.35% | First Place 25.21% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.90 | Top 4 81.32% | First Place 22.92% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.90 | Top 4 81.11% | First Place 24.69% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.02 | Top 4 80.37% | First Place 18.09% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.10 | Top 4 80.28% | First Place 16.95% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.12 | Top 4 80.19% | First Place 15.17% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.86 | Top 4 80.15% | First Place 28.20% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.71 | Top 4 80.03% | First Place 37.64% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.01 | Top 4 79.18% | First Place 24.64% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.07 | Top 4 78.91% | First Place 19.92% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.04 | Top 4 77.87% | First Place 19.45% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.20 | Top 4 76.47% | First Place 17.20% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.48 | Top 4 75.01% | First Place 8.95% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.46 | Top 4 72.85% | First Place 14.02% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.04 | Top 4 72.19% | First Place 37.44% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.18 | Top 4 71.15% | First Place 24.01% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.54 | Top 4 70.95% | First Place 10.44% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.24 | Top 4 70.35% | First Place 38.76% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.36 | Top 4 69.74% | First Place 16.96% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.45 | Top 4 68.89% | First Place 19.48% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.67 | Top 4 68.78% | First Place 10.40% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.43 | Top 4 68.32% | First Place 19.16% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.46 | Top 4 68.17% | First Place 20.67% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.79 | Top 4 66.89% | First Place 7.94% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.87 | Top 4 66.26% | First Place 4.91% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.77 | Top 4 65.34% | First Place 10.27% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.73 | Top 4 63.97% | First Place 12.52% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.96 | Top 4 63.50% | First Place 5.96% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.93 | Top 4 61.71% | First Place 8.63% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.94 | Top 4 61.60% | First Place 8.55% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.90 | Top 4 61.04% | First Place 10.20% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.15 | Top 4 59.90% | First Place 4.33% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.11 | Top 4 57.87% | First Place 11.38% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.17 | Top 4 57.27% | First Place 8.19% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.16 | Top 4 56.50% | First Place 4.72% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.37 | Top 4 55.17% | First Place 7.04% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.33 | Top 4 53.83% | First Place 8.22% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.42 | Top 4 51.71% | First Place 5.99% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.64 | Top 4 50.01% | First Place 7.78% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.57 | Top 4 49.75% | First Place 5.84% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.56 | Top 4 49.39% | First Place 7.85% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.76 | Top 4 48.82% | First Place 1.00% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.62 | Top 4 48.22% | First Place 5.75% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.78 | Top 4 44.88% | First Place 5.41% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.79 | Top 4 44.19% | First Place 3.68% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.85 | Top 4 43.12% | First Place 2.43% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.89 | Top 4 42.94% | First Place 1.88% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.08 | Top 4 39.52% | First Place 5.69% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.13 | Top 4 38.40% | First Place 3.08% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.26 | Top 4 37.74% | First Place 3.28% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.27 | Top 4 36.00% | First Place 3.29% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.22 | Top 4 35.48% | First Place 3.18% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.29 | Top 4 33.94% | First Place 3.48% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.28 | Top 4 33.58% | First Place 2.25% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.29 | Top 4 32.89% | First Place 1.39% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.47 | Top 4 32.40% | First Place 1.29% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.37 | Top 4 32.03% | First Place 3.07% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.45 | Top 4 31.49% | First Place 1.98% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.48 | Top 4 29.86% | First Place 3.48% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.40 | Top 4 29.05% | First Place 3.78% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.53 | Top 4 28.74% | First Place 2.79% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.57 | Top 4 28.69% | First Place 2.36% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.59 | Top 4 27.68% | First Place 0.96% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 6.10 | Top 4 22.04% | First Place 2.38% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 6.07 | Top 4 18.18% | First Place 0.87% | High Contested Risk | |||
Get the Winning Edge
Real-time overlays, automatic match tracking, and exclusive tools — everything you need to climb, free on your PC.
- In-game overlays
- Automatic match tracking
- Desktop-exclusive tools
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
TFT Team Comps - Set 18 FAQ
What is the best TFT comp in TFT Set 18?
The best TFT comp in TFT Set 18 is Defender/Elderwood with Rakan as the primary carry, achieving a 89.8% win rate and 2.25 average placement. This composition is effective for climbing ranked and consistently places in top 4.
How do I play the Defender/Elderwood comp?
To play Defender/Elderwood, focus on building around Rakan as your main carry. Look for Rakan and supporting units early, prioritize items that synergize with your carry, and aim to hit your power spike by level 7-8. This comp has a 0.1% pick rate, making it a relatively uncontested option.
What comps are good for climbing in TFT Set 18?
For consistent LP gains in TFT Set 18, Defender/Elderwood offers the best average placement at 2.25. Other reliable options include Brawler/Invoker (2.27 avg) and Defender/Elderwood (2.39 avg). Consistent comps minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing.
What is the easiest TFT comp to play?
Defender/Elderwood is a great option for players looking for an easier climb. With a 89.8% win rate but only 0.1% pick rate, you're unlikely to be contested, making the game easier to navigate. Low contestation means you can naturally find your units without having to force pivots.
When should I force a comp vs flex in TFT Set 18?
In TFT Set 18, Monolith/Blackthorn has a 1.7% pick rate, meaning it's heavily contested. If you see others going for it, consider flexing into alternatives like Defender/Elderwood. Force a comp when you hit early units and items, or when it's uncontested. Flex when you see 2+ players competing for the same units.
Which comps have the highest win rates in TFT Set 18?
The top 3 win rate comps are: 1) Defender/Elderwood (89.8%), 2) Brawler/Invoker (88.5%), and 3) Defender/Elderwood (87.3%). These represent the strongest compositions for maximizing LP in ranked games.
Why does win rate matter for TFT comps?
Win rate shows how often a composition achieves top 4 placement, which gains LP in ranked. High win rate comps like Defender/Elderwood (89.8%) consistently perform well across many games. However, also consider pick rate—heavily contested comps may underperform in your games if multiple players force them.