- Avg Place
- 4.27
- 1st Place
- 13.47%
- Top 4 Rate
- 54.17%
Flickerblades TFT Team Comps
- Set
- 18
- Matches
- 623,923
- Tier
- All Tiers
- Rank
- All Ranks
- Last Updated
- Oct 25, 2026 UTC
- Methodology
- Data Methodology
- Author
- Dakota Chinnick
Team compositions using Flickerblades in TFT Set 18. View comps where carry units equip this item for maximum effectiveness.
Discover the best TFT team compositions that utilize Flickerblades as a core item on carry champions. Our data shows 41 viable team comps currently building Flickerblades, with an average win rate of 61.04% across all compositions. The highest performing Flickerblades comp achieves a 91.03% win rate, primarily featuring Brawler, Invoker, Riftbeast traits with Pebbles as the item holder. This table displays all team compositions where Flickerblades is built on a carry unit, sorted by win rate to help you identify the strongest builds. Each comp shows the full team lineup, recommended item builds, active traits, and key performance metrics including placement average, win rate, and pick rate. Use the filters above to toggle between 8 and 9 champion compositions based on your preferred late-game board size.
Avg Place 2.20 | Top 4 91.03% | First Place 41.21% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.32 | Top 4 89.35% | First Place 39.63% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.65 | Top 4 85.22% | First Place 31.44% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.63 | Top 4 84.58% | First Place 30.81% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.88 | Top 4 82.02% | First Place 25.60% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.84 | Top 4 81.39% | First Place 30.24% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.97 | Top 4 80.80% | First Place 22.75% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.15 | Top 4 77.43% | First Place 22.30% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.20 | Top 4 76.88% | First Place 15.45% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.15 | Top 4 75.85% | First Place 24.85% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.33 | Top 4 75.50% | First Place 13.57% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.40 | Top 4 74.15% | First Place 15.21% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.43 | Top 4 71.86% | First Place 14.70% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.41 | Top 4 70.76% | First Place 18.53% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.68 | Top 4 68.96% | First Place 10.26% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.46 | Top 4 67.96% | First Place 18.35% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.67 | Top 4 67.59% | First Place 8.55% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.43 | Top 4 66.70% | First Place 30.31% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.71 | Top 4 66.67% | First Place 14.70% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.58 | Top 4 66.01% | First Place 14.95% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.70 | Top 4 65.94% | First Place 15.76% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.74 | Top 4 65.69% | First Place 13.99% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.88 | Top 4 62.14% | First Place 14.51% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.91 | Top 4 61.98% | First Place 14.51% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.27 | Top 4 54.99% | First Place 6.63% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.35 | Top 4 53.93% | First Place 6.96% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.38 | Top 4 52.39% | First Place 7.74% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.50 | Top 4 50.04% | First Place 5.55% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.63 | Top 4 47.58% | First Place 4.01% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.63 | Top 4 46.36% | First Place 5.83% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.79 | Top 4 45.68% | First Place 3.47% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.68 | Top 4 45.34% | First Place 5.74% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.78 | Top 4 44.90% | First Place 6.40% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.78 | Top 4 43.47% | First Place 6.46% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.90 | Top 4 41.03% | First Place 6.24% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.03 | Top 4 38.78% | First Place 2.99% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.03 | Top 4 38.50% | First Place 5.09% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.26 | Top 4 36.16% | First Place 3.48% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.30 | Top 4 33.91% | First Place 3.69% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.41 | Top 4 32.35% | First Place 3.00% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.91 | Top 4 20.98% | First Place 1.20% | High Contested Risk | |||
Get the Winning Edge
Real-time overlays, automatic match tracking, and exclusive tools — everything you need to climb, free on your PC.
- In-game overlays
- Automatic match tracking
- Desktop-exclusive tools
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Flickerblades Team Comps - Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best team comp for Flickerblades in TFT Set 18?
The best team comp featuring Flickerblades in TFT Set 18 achieves a 91.03% win rate with a 0.23% pick rate. This composition uses Brawler, Invoker, and Riftbeast traits and is picked in 0.23% of games featuring Flickerblades.
How many team comps use Flickerblades in TFT?
There are 41 viable team compositions that commonly build Flickerblades in TFT Set 18. Flickerblades appears in comps with an average win rate of 61.04% across 44,275 total matches analyzed.
Which comp uses Flickerblades most often in TFT?
The most popular comp for Flickerblades in TFT Set 18 uses the Defender, Elderwood, and Lunar traits with a 0.86% pick rate. This composition achieves a 75.85% win rate and average placement of 3.15.
What traits work well with Flickerblades in TFT?
The best traits that synergize with Flickerblades in TFT Set 18 are Brawler, Invoker, Riftbeast, Vanguard, Emerald Aspect, and Apex Predator. These trait combinations appear in the highest win rate Flickerblades team compositions.