
Chain VestTFT Team Comps
Team compositions using Chain Vest in TFT Set 16.19. View comps where carry units equip this item for maximum effectiveness.
Discover the best TFT team compositions that utilize Chain Vest as a core item on carry champions. Our data shows 60 viable team comps currently building Chain Vest, with an average win rate of 57.19% across all compositions. The highest performing Chain Vest comp achieves a 89.51% win rate, primarily featuring Brawler, Invoker, Riftbeast traits with Cinderling as the item holder. This table displays all team compositions where Chain Vest is built on a carry unit, sorted by win rate to help you identify the strongest builds. Each comp shows the full team lineup, recommended item builds, active traits, and key performance metrics including placement average, win rate, and pick rate. Use the filters above to toggle between 8 and 9 champion compositions based on your preferred late-game board size.
Avg Place 2.25 | Top 4 89.51% | First Place 38.87% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.45 | Top 4 86.75% | First Place 37.61% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.76 | Top 4 83.15% | First Place 30.41% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.69 | Top 4 81.88% | First Place 31.06% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.86 | Top 4 80.56% | First Place 22.58% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.96 | Top 4 80.25% | First Place 20.18% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.12 | Top 4 79.60% | First Place 14.86% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.14 | Top 4 79.33% | First Place 19.94% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.08 | Top 4 76.35% | First Place 21.58% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.14 | Top 4 76.01% | First Place 25.40% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.31 | Top 4 74.03% | First Place 19.25% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.45 | Top 4 73.35% | First Place 10.74% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.50 | Top 4 72.88% | First Place 10.06% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.51 | Top 4 71.65% | First Place 10.02% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.36 | Top 4 71.63% | First Place 16.77% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.28 | Top 4 70.85% | First Place 30.26% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.47 | Top 4 70.75% | First Place 16.81% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.66 | Top 4 70.34% | First Place 6.10% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.50 | Top 4 70.21% | First Place 18.06% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.24 | Top 4 69.92% | First Place 32.94% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.53 | Top 4 68.78% | First Place 17.66% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.42 | Top 4 68.55% | First Place 23.78% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.68 | Top 4 67.98% | First Place 11.04% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.83 | Top 4 67.44% | First Place 4.69% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.66 | Top 4 67.33% | First Place 16.05% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.70 | Top 4 67.24% | First Place 7.91% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.84 | Top 4 63.94% | First Place 8.43% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.92 | Top 4 63.92% | First Place 8.09% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.94 | Top 4 63.67% | First Place 7.16% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.91 | Top 4 63.22% | First Place 10.77% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.91 | Top 4 62.50% | First Place 11.73% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.97 | Top 4 58.99% | First Place 10.75% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.19 | Top 4 58.30% | First Place 4.46% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.36 | Top 4 54.54% | First Place 3.11% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.36 | Top 4 54.52% | First Place 6.95% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.57 | Top 4 50.16% | First Place 3.96% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.58 | Top 4 49.56% | First Place 7.36% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.55 | Top 4 49.51% | First Place 6.49% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.57 | Top 4 47.74% | First Place 8.30% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.72 | Top 4 44.82% | First Place 6.92% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.91 | Top 4 44.42% | First Place 3.08% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.99 | Top 4 43.00% | First Place 2.94% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.87 | Top 4 42.89% | First Place 3.60% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.95 | Top 4 41.88% | First Place 2.69% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.85 | Top 4 41.02% | First Place 5.68% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.91 | Top 4 40.63% | First Place 2.41% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.99 | Top 4 39.68% | First Place 5.08% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.15 | Top 4 36.19% | First Place 3.02% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.14 | Top 4 35.65% | First Place 3.62% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.23 | Top 4 34.54% | First Place 1.93% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.31 | Top 4 33.87% | First Place 4.66% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.37 | Top 4 33.80% | First Place 2.30% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.31 | Top 4 32.60% | First Place 2.55% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.31 | Top 4 32.35% | First Place 3.92% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.30 | Top 4 32.21% | First Place 3.03% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.37 | Top 4 31.35% | First Place 2.05% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.42 | Top 4 29.97% | First Place 2.27% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.48 | Top 4 28.89% | First Place 2.13% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.56 | Top 4 27.74% | First Place 2.21% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.68 | Top 4 26.84% | First Place 1.85% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Get the Winning Edge
Real-time overlays, automatic match tracking, and exclusive tools — everything you need to climb, free on your PC.
- In-game overlays
- Automatic match tracking
- Desktop-exclusive tools
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Chain Vest Team Comps - Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best team comp for Chain Vest in TFT Set 18?
The best team comp featuring Chain Vest in TFT Set 18 achieves a 89.51% win rate with a 0.07% pick rate. This composition uses Brawler, Invoker, and Riftbeast traits and is picked in 0.07% of games featuring Chain Vest.
How many team comps use Chain Vest in TFT?
There are 60 viable team compositions that commonly build Chain Vest in TFT Set 18. Chain Vest appears in comps with an average win rate of 57.19% across 65,688 total matches analyzed.
Which comp uses Chain Vest most often in TFT?
The most popular comp for Chain Vest in TFT Set 18 uses the Adaptor, Inferno, and Invoker traits with a 2.27% pick rate. This composition achieves a 49.51% win rate and average placement of 4.55.
What traits work well with Chain Vest in TFT?
The best traits that synergize with Chain Vest in TFT Set 18 are Brawler, Invoker, Riftbeast, Vanguard, Emerald Aspect, and Apex Predator. These trait combinations appear in the highest win rate Chain Vest team compositions.