Veigarvs Xin Zhao
Veigar vs Xin Zhao is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.11. Xin Zhao wins with a 54.7% win rate (+9.4%) over Veigar based on 64 games. Xin Zhao holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Veigar build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Veigar vs Xin Zhao matchup.
Veigar Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Veigar performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Veigar vs Xin Zhao Matchup?
Veigar vs Xin Zhao Matchup Summary
The Veigar vs Xin Zhao matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 64 recent matches analyzed, Xin Zhao wins with a 54.7% win rate compared to Veigar's 45.3%, giving Xin Zhao a 9.4 percentage point advantage. Xin Zhao dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Veigar players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Xin Zhao leads by 1,205 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Xin Zhao has a strong advantage in this matchup. Veigar players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Xin Zhao overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Veigar vs Xin Zhao Laning Phase Breakdown
Xin Zhao is favored during the laning phase against Veigar, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Xin Zhao holds advantages in damage, gold income, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Veigar Build Against Xin Zhao
Spellslinger's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Xin Zhao, providing the mobility and stats Veigar needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Veigar against Xin Zhao are Rod of Ages, Rabadon's Deathcap and Seraph's Embrace. This combination gives Veigar an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 75.0% win rate across 4 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Xin Zhao. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Veigar vs Xin Zhao matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Veigar42.4%
Xin Zhao57.6%Veigar48.4%Xin Zhao51.6%Xin Zhao dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 57.6% win rate — a 15.2 percentage point lead over Veigar. This lopsided early game means Xin Zhao can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
In the late game (25+ minutes), Xin Zhao takes over with a 51.6% win rate, leading Veigar by 3.2 percentage points. Xin Zhao scales more effectively into team fights and objective contests.
Xin Zhao holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Veigar players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Veigar Runes Against Xin Zhao
Inspiration
Sorcery
The Inspiration and Sorcery rune setup gives Veigar the best tools to compete against Xin Zhao in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Veigar matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.11. The table below shows Veigar's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Veigar build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.77% | 323 | 6.7 | 925 | 12,711 | 40.8% | 57.5% | |
| 53.57% | 308 | 6.6 | 943 | 12,491 | 51.6% | 55.0% | |
| 47.20% | 250 | 5.8 | 860 | 12,545 | 44.4% | 48.8% | |
| 46.35% | 233 | 6.4 | 855 | 12,027 | 43.4% | 48.8% | |
| 42.13% | 197 | 6.3 | 903 | 11,817 | 40.7% | 43.4% | |
| 38.95% | 190 | 6.2 | 826 | 11,467 | 31.8% | 45.1% | |
| 48.66% | 187 | 6.3 | 837 | 11,738 | 37.5% | 57.0% | |
| 52.97% | 185 | 6.2 | 920 | 12,895 | 53.9% | 52.5% | |
| 55.74% | 183 | 6.5 | 929 | 12,243 | 59.7% | 53.1% | |
| 51.98% | 177 | 6.7 | 881 | 12,654 | 47.6% | 54.4% | |
| 51.79% | 168 | 6.4 | 900 | 12,025 | 51.4% | 52.0% | |
| 52.80% | 161 | 6.4 | 842 | 11,885 | 49.2% | 55.2% | |
| 56.64% | 143 | 6.1 | 1,000 | 12,326 | 60.9% | 53.2% | |
| 49.25% | 134 | 6.1 | 872 | 12,178 | 40.7% | 55.0% | |
| 44.80% | 125 | 6.3 | 945 | 11,894 | 34.7% | 51.3% | |
| 53.39% | 118 | 6.7 | 903 | 13,486 | 58.5% | 49.2% | |
| 52.25% | 111 | 5.7 | 910 | 12,332 | 53.5% | 51.5% | |
| 58.88% | 107 | 6.5 | 1,006 | 13,829 | 45.5% | 64.9% | |
| 50.00% | 100 | 6.9 | 913 | 12,197 | 46.7% | 52.7% | |
| 48.00% | 100 | 6.4 | 870 | 12,110 | 41.5% | 52.5% | |
| 56.00% | 100 | 6.6 | 983 | 13,932 | 68.6% | 49.2% | |
| 53.06% | 98 | 6.4 | 882 | 11,591 | 53.3% | 52.8% | |
| 42.86% | 98 | 6.7 | 922 | 13,081 | 44.1% | 42.2% | |
| 64.58% | 96 | 6.5 | 1,107 | 12,522 | 52.6% | 72.4% | |
| 61.70% | 94 | 6.6 | 916 | 12,125 | 64.8% | 57.5% | |
| 49.44% | 89 | 6.5 | 881 | 12,875 | 45.7% | 51.9% | |
| 48.28% | 87 | 6.5 | 1,021 | 13,546 | 53.6% | 45.8% | |
| 53.49% | 86 | 6.3 | 793 | 11,504 | 42.5% | 63.0% | |
| 52.50% | 80 | 6.8 | 889 | 12,462 | 55.6% | 50.0% | |
| 51.28% | 78 | 6.1 | 837 | 12,716 | 53.1% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 77 | 6.3 | 922 | 13,917 | 65.2% | 53.7% | |
| 44.16% | 77 | 6.6 | 900 | 13,287 | 43.2% | 45.0% | |
| 55.26% | 76 | 7.0 | 1,026 | 13,142 | 55.9% | 54.8% | |
| 50.00% | 74 | 6.5 | 920 | 12,122 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 54.93% | 71 | 6.7 | 1,028 | 13,885 | 55.2% | 54.8% | |
| 43.66% | 71 | 6.3 | 902 | 11,413 | 43.3% | 43.9% | |
| 52.11% | 71 | 6.9 | 1,051 | 13,824 | 52.6% | 51.9% | |
| 50.72% | 69 | 6.6 | 865 | 12,072 | 64.3% | 41.5% | |
| 58.21% | 67 | 6.7 | 909 | 13,606 | 64.5% | 52.8% | |
| 45.31% | 64 | 6.3 | 981 | 11,233 | 42.4% | 48.4% | |
| 67.19% | 64 | 6.7 | 1,013 | 13,507 | 70.6% | 63.3% | |
| 61.29% | 62 | 6.8 | 1,070 | 12,917 | 52.2% | 66.7% | |
| 45.76% | 59 | 4.1 | 754 | 11,334 | 39.1% | 50.0% | |
| 50.85% | 59 | 6.6 | 1,026 | 13,169 | 42.1% | 55.0% | |
| 51.85% | 54 | 5.5 | 826 | 12,577 | 47.4% | 54.3% | |
| 52.83% | 53 | 5.4 | 930 | 13,600 | 50.0% | 54.0% | |
| 45.10% | 51 | 6.5 | 1,025 | 13,500 | 40.0% | 47.2% | |
| 55.10% | 49 | 6.3 | 801 | 12,396 | 43.8% | 60.6% | |
| 63.83% | 47 | 5.6 | 909 | 13,499 | 68.4% | 60.7% | |
| 59.57% | 47 | 6.6 | 910 | 11,879 | 62.1% | 55.6% | |
| 54.35% | 46 | 5.3 | 860 | 11,986 | 58.8% | 51.7% | |
| 45.45% | 44 | 6.6 | 947 | 14,144 | 42.9% | 46.7% | |
| 41.86% | 43 | 6.1 | 1,007 | 11,970 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 55.81% | 43 | 7.1 | 914 | 12,223 | 63.2% | 50.0% | |
| 52.50% | 40 | 6.3 | 970 | 14,323 | 53.9% | 51.9% | |
| 61.54% | 39 | 6.0 | 928 | 13,049 | 54.5% | 64.3% | |
| 48.72% | 39 | 5.8 | 777 | 10,960 | 36.8% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 38 | 7.0 | 902 | 14,516 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 38.24% | 34 | 5.7 | 810 | 13,345 | 36.4% | 39.1% | |
| 48.39% | 31 | 6.3 | 968 | 13,230 | 41.7% | 52.6% | |
| 54.84% | 31 | 6.7 | 912 | 12,132 | 41.2% | 71.4% | |
| 63.33% | 30 | 6.5 | 892 | 11,881 | 53.9% | 70.6% | |
| 37.93% | 29 | 2.6 | 791 | 11,867 | 9.1% | 55.6% | |
| 37.93% | 29 | 2.9 | 742 | 11,564 | 36.4% | 38.9% | |
| 51.72% | 29 | 6.4 | 896 | 13,580 | 71.4% | 45.5% | |
| 62.96% | 27 | 4.6 | 724 | 11,564 | 87.5% | 52.6% | |
| 22.22% | 27 | 6.3 | 1,056 | 11,561 | 0.0% | 35.3% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 6.5 | 1,055 | 14,105 | 42.9% | 58.8% | |
| 65.22% | 23 | 6.5 | 998 | 12,278 | 60.0% | 69.2% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 6.6 | 787 | 13,539 | 37.5% | 46.7% | |
| 47.83% | 23 | 6.8 | 872 | 11,963 | 57.1% | 43.8% | |
| 47.83% | 23 | 2.5 | 733 | 10,811 | 50.0% | 46.1% | |
| 54.55% | 22 | 6.6 | 987 | 13,796 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 6.5 | 892 | 13,322 | 71.4% | 53.3% | |
| 66.67% | 21 | 6.2 | 1,003 | 15,270 | 50.0% | 73.3% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 4.7 | 845 | 10,477 | 54.5% | 30.0% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 6.9 | 933 | 12,291 | 76.9% | 28.6% | |
| 30.00% | 20 | 2.1 | 584 | 8,834 | 16.7% | 50.0% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 6.4 | 1,132 | 12,625 | 50.0% | 36.4% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 6.6 | 776 | 11,390 | 37.5% | 54.5% | |
| 68.42% | 19 | 6.1 | 1,317 | 14,098 | 71.4% | 66.7% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 6.5 | 970 | 13,447 | 100.0% | 21.4% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 6.1 | 899 | 13,060 | 50.0% | 54.5% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 6.4 | 918 | 13,789 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 31.25% | 16 | 6.4 | 1,276 | 13,745 | 20.0% | 36.4% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 3.7 | 1,036 | 10,398 | 55.6% | 57.1% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 6.4 | 1,096 | 13,422 | 33.3% | 77.8% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 3.6 | 691 | 10,016 | 62.5% | 16.7% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 6.4 | 831 | 10,675 | 20.0% | 75.0% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 6.3 | 879 | 11,983 | 75.0% | 30.0% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 2.9 | 662 | 10,122 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 6.1 | 773 | 11,613 | 42.9% | 28.6% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 2.1 | 656 | 10,281 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 7.2 | 882 | 15,527 | 60.0% | 57.1% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 2.4 | 566 | 10,750 | 33.3% | 83.3% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 7.1 | 1,091 | 12,251 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 5.8 | 1,165 | 10,453 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 2.5 | 670 | 10,703 | 50.0% | 71.4% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 2.5 | 730 | 11,061 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 6.4 | 966 | 12,601 | 71.4% | 25.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 2.4 | 652 | 10,841 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 6.7 | 780 | 12,938 | 50.0% | 28.6% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 2.3 | 716 | 10,200 | 50.0% | 16.7% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 6.7 | 1,023 | 14,136 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 6.0 | 949 | 15,150 | 66.7% | 85.7% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 4.5 | 1,130 | 14,149 | 0.0% | 57.1% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 1.9 | 623 | 8,767 | 16.7% | 66.7% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 2.2 | 618 | 10,699 | 50.0% | 16.7% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 3.4 | 804 | 11,204 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 5.7 | 897 | 11,894 | 50.0% | 16.7% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 6.1 | 1,104 | 12,740 | 33.3% | 20.0% | |
| 87.50% | 8 | 2.8 | 677 | 12,640 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 2.5 | 584 | 10,498 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 3.9 | 869 | 12,446 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.2 | 1,118 | 10,927 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 7.3 | 1,027 | 14,577 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.4 | 1,089 | 12,731 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.6 | 857 | 11,507 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.5 | 914 | 14,805 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.2 | 948 | 11,407 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.4 | 831 | 13,484 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 4.3 | 1,063 | 11,870 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 3.0 | 994 | 13,204 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 6.5 | 1,053 | 13,010 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 4.8 | 534 | 7,554 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.9 | 857 | 11,760 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 7.2 | 897 | 13,295 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 7.1 | 925 | 16,347 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.4 | 984 | 12,400 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.2 | 1,128 | 14,267 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.6 | 696 | 8,662 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.5 | 1,100 | 13,527 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.3 | 1,155 | 12,540 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 1,154 | 12,827 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 6.5 | 870 | 11,681 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Veigar vs Xin Zhao - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Veigar do against Xin Zhao in League of Legends?
Xin Zhao wins the Veigar vs Xin Zhao matchup with a 54.7% win rate compared to Veigar's 45.3%, a 9.4 percentage point difference. This data is based on 64 recent ranked games in patch 26.11.
How does Veigar do against Xin Zhao in the early game?
In the early game, Xin Zhao has the advantage against Veigar with a 57.6% win rate versus 42.4%. Xin Zhao players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Veigar do against Xin Zhao in the late game?
In the late game, Xin Zhao takes over the Veigar vs Xin Zhao matchup with a 51.6% win rate compared to 48.4%. Xin Zhao scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Veigar vs Xin Zhao matchup?
Xin Zhao wins the matchup against Veigar with a 54.7% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.11. The 9.4 percentage point advantage means Xin Zhao is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 64 games analyzed.
What is the best Veigar build against Xin Zhao?
The best Veigar build against Xin Zhao includes Rod of Ages, Rabadon's Deathcap, Seraph's Embrace with Spellslinger's Shoes. This build achieves a 75.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Veigar runes against Xin Zhao?
The best Veigar runes against Xin Zhao use the Inspiration primary tree with Sorcery secondary. This rune setup achieves a 48.1% win rate in the Veigar vs Xin Zhao matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Veigar counter Xin Zhao?
No, Veigar struggles against Xin Zhao with only a 45.3% win rate. Xin Zhao has the advantage in this matchup. Veigar players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Xin Zhao's lead.
How do I play Veigar against Xin Zhao?
When playing Veigar against Xin Zhao, play cautiously and avoid Xin Zhao's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Xin Zhao has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.