
Zacvs Rell
Zac vs Rell is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Rell wins with a 60.0% win rate (+20.0%) over Zac based on 5 games. Rell wins the early laning phase while Zac scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Zac build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Zac vs Rell matchup.
Zac Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Zac performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Zac vs Rell Matchup?

Zac vs Rell Matchup Summary
The Zac vs Rell matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 5 recent matches analyzed, Rell wins with a 60.0% win rate compared to Zac's 40.0%, giving Rell a 20.0 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Rell controls the early laning stage, but Zac outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Rell needs to press advantages before Zac reaches their power spikes, while Zac should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in CS, where Zac leads by 0.9 CS/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Rell has a strong advantage in this matchup. Zac players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Rell overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Zac vs Rell Laning Phase Breakdown
Zac is favored during the laning phase against Rell, winning 5 out of 5 key stat categories. Zac holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Zac Build Against Rell
Ionian Boots of Lucidity is the optimal boots choice against Rell, providing the mobility and stats Zac needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Zac against Rell are Sunfire Aegis, Spirit Visage and Zeke's Convergence. This combination gives Zac an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 1 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Rell. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Zac vs Rell matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Rell dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 100.0% win rate — a 100.0 percentage point lead over Zac. This lopsided early game means Rell can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Zac is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 66.7% win rate — 33.3 points above Rell. Extended games heavily favor Zac, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Rell must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Zac reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Zac survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Zac Runes Against Rell
The Resolve and Precision rune setup gives Zac the best tools to compete against Rell in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Zac matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Zac's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Zac build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57.26% | 117 | 1.3 | 578 | 12,357 | 58.8% | 56.1% | |
| 44.04% | 109 | 1.1 | 580 | 11,092 | 46.0% | 42.4% | |
| 48.96% | 96 | 1.0 | 551 | 11,179 | 51.1% | 46.9% | |
| 50.00% | 84 | 1.1 | 664 | 11,710 | 39.5% | 58.7% | |
| 48.19% | 83 | 1.0 | 540 | 11,290 | 47.1% | 49.0% | |
| 47.30% | 74 | 1.1 | 558 | 10,189 | 35.1% | 59.5% | |
| 45.95% | 74 | 1.1 | 524 | 11,138 | 33.3% | 57.9% | |
| 58.21% | 67 | 1.0 | 584 | 11,666 | 60.7% | 56.4% | |
| 37.70% | 61 | 1.1 | 616 | 11,792 | 40.0% | 36.1% | |
| 56.67% | 60 | 1.1 | 484 | 11,416 | 51.7% | 61.3% | |
| 46.55% | 58 | 1.0 | 600 | 11,086 | 38.7% | 55.6% | |
| 58.49% | 53 | 1.3 | 596 | 11,726 | 57.1% | 59.4% | |
| 42.86% | 49 | 1.3 | 659 | 10,665 | 29.6% | 59.1% | |
| 54.55% | 44 | 1.0 | 508 | 10,592 | 52.2% | 57.1% | |
| 48.84% | 43 | 1.6 | 609 | 10,628 | 54.5% | 42.9% | |
| 46.34% | 41 | 1.2 | 574 | 10,836 | 38.9% | 52.2% | |
| 51.22% | 41 | 1.1 | 620 | 11,939 | 61.5% | 46.4% | |
| 33.33% | 36 | 2.5 | 616 | 11,478 | 38.5% | 30.4% | |
| 48.57% | 35 | 1.2 | 585 | 11,602 | 33.3% | 60.0% | |
| 47.06% | 34 | 1.6 | 654 | 12,878 | 50.0% | 45.8% | |
| 36.36% | 33 | 1.1 | 569 | 12,533 | 40.0% | 34.8% | |
| 48.48% | 33 | 0.9 | 533 | 11,571 | 46.7% | 50.0% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 1.6 | 584 | 11,015 | 72.7% | 42.9% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 1.2 | 680 | 12,814 | 50.0% | 55.0% | |
| 51.61% | 31 | 1.1 | 575 | 11,389 | 41.7% | 57.9% | |
| 30.00% | 30 | 1.2 | 561 | 11,026 | 23.1% | 35.3% | |
| 43.33% | 30 | 0.9 | 562 | 10,936 | 40.0% | 46.7% | |
| 55.17% | 29 | 1.0 | 606 | 11,684 | 54.5% | 55.6% | |
| 51.72% | 29 | 3.4 | 645 | 12,221 | 44.4% | 55.0% | |
| 44.83% | 29 | 1.3 | 560 | 9,746 | 47.1% | 41.7% | |
| 39.29% | 28 | 0.9 | 491 | 10,045 | 23.5% | 63.6% | |
| 42.86% | 28 | 0.9 | 574 | 11,619 | 50.0% | 38.9% | |
| 55.56% | 27 | 1.6 | 548 | 10,977 | 54.5% | 56.3% | |
| 50.00% | 26 | 1.2 | 651 | 10,372 | 46.7% | 54.5% | |
| 30.43% | 23 | 3.0 | 603 | 11,120 | 22.2% | 35.7% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 1.8 | 485 | 9,299 | 58.3% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 1.2 | 570 | 13,021 | 33.3% | 56.3% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 1.3 | 493 | 10,077 | 36.4% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 20 | 2.0 | 558 | 11,270 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 1.1 | 524 | 10,502 | 45.5% | 62.5% | |
| 78.95% | 19 | 1.6 | 609 | 12,601 | 100.0% | 63.6% | |
| 36.84% | 19 | 1.1 | 567 | 12,521 | 57.1% | 25.0% | |
| 44.44% | 18 | 1.8 | 562 | 11,720 | 50.0% | 41.7% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 1.4 | 636 | 13,727 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 44.44% | 18 | 1.8 | 562 | 11,569 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 1.2 | 609 | 12,488 | 0.0% | 46.7% | |
| 33.33% | 18 | 4.1 | 699 | 10,795 | 42.9% | 27.3% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 3.1 | 627 | 10,970 | 63.6% | 66.7% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 2.1 | 694 | 11,041 | 66.7% | 45.5% | |
| 23.53% | 17 | 1.7 | 535 | 11,181 | 40.0% | 16.7% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 5.6 | 832 | 11,255 | 28.6% | 70.0% | |
| 29.41% | 17 | 3.6 | 729 | 10,514 | 50.0% | 18.2% | |
| 62.50% | 16 | 2.6 | 720 | 10,863 | 42.9% | 77.8% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 0.9 | 522 | 11,742 | 28.6% | 77.8% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 2.1 | 688 | 13,053 | 83.3% | 44.4% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 2.7 | 686 | 10,994 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 5.1 | 711 | 10,621 | 55.6% | 33.3% | |
| 73.33% | 15 | 1.8 | 459 | 9,612 | 57.1% | 87.5% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 1.4 | 519 | 10,045 | 66.7% | 12.5% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 1.7 | 492 | 11,311 | 80.0% | 44.4% | |
| 14.29% | 14 | 5.5 | 609 | 9,657 | 12.5% | 16.7% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 2.9 | 760 | 9,368 | 37.5% | 66.7% | |
| 78.57% | 14 | 4.5 | 849 | 13,242 | 80.0% | 77.8% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 1.5 | 538 | 9,843 | 57.1% | 57.1% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 2.1 | 668 | 10,854 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 3.4 | 661 | 11,463 | 100.0% | 42.9% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 5.2 | 796 | 10,699 | 50.0% | 77.8% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 3.7 | 661 | 11,998 | 20.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 1.0 | 558 | 10,895 | 57.1% | 80.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 2.1 | 530 | 9,208 | 42.9% | 40.0% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 1.0 | 489 | 10,739 | 50.0% | 28.6% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 5.2 | 832 | 12,273 | 75.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 6.3 | 774 | 10,784 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 1.5 | 420 | 8,599 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 3.3 | 874 | 12,354 | 33.3% | 42.9% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 1.6 | 587 | 9,652 | 75.0% | 83.3% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 1.9 | 456 | 10,400 | 33.3% | 57.1% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 2.9 | 586 | 11,828 | 60.0% | 60.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 1.8 | 423 | 6,730 | 37.5% | 0.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 5.5 | 659 | 9,887 | 40.0% | 75.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 1.7 | 504 | 8,852 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 5.9 | 623 | 8,937 | 20.0% | 25.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 4.8 | 994 | 14,079 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.4 | 444 | 7,779 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 5.1 | 743 | 10,567 | 20.0% | 66.7% | |
| 87.50% | 8 | 1.5 | 601 | 10,914 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 5.3 | 815 | 9,821 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.1 | 598 | 12,619 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 1.6 | 377 | 9,333 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 2.5 | 670 | 11,800 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.2 | 584 | 8,495 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 5.3 | 624 | 10,865 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 5.8 | 781 | 12,156 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 3.3 | 526 | 9,919 | 33.3% | 75.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.1 | 653 | 7,956 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 3.5 | 835 | 12,882 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 4.6 | 473 | 10,329 | 75.0% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.0 | 956 | 13,162 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 4.2 | 713 | 10,548 | 75.0% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 2.0 | 402 | 8,919 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.6 | 587 | 11,324 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 5.3 | 630 | 11,830 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 3.3 | 438 | 9,661 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 4.7 | 703 | 10,139 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.9 | 663 | 9,941 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 3.8 | 1,019 | 13,791 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.8 | 839 | 11,679 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Zac vs Rell - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Zac do against Rell in League of Legends?
Rell wins the Zac vs Rell matchup with a 60.0% win rate compared to Zac's 40.0%, a 20.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 5 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Zac do against Rell in the early game?
In the early game, Rell has the advantage against Zac with a 100.0% win rate versus 0.0%. Rell players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Zac do against Rell in the late game?
In the late game, Zac takes over the Zac vs Rell matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to 33.3%. Zac scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Zac vs Rell matchup?
Rell wins the matchup against Zac with a 60.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 20.0 percentage point advantage means Rell is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 5 games analyzed.
What is the best Zac build against Rell?
The best Zac build against Rell includes Sunfire Aegis, Spirit Visage, Zeke's Convergence with Ionian Boots of Lucidity. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Zac runes against Rell?
The best Zac runes against Rell use the Resolve primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 50.0% win rate in the Zac vs Rell matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Zac counter Rell?
No, Zac struggles against Rell with only a 40.0% win rate. Rell has the advantage in this matchup. Zac players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Rell's lead.
How do I play Zac against Rell?
When playing Zac against Rell, play cautiously and avoid Rell's power spikes. Focus on safe farming — you outscale Rell in the late game. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.