Zacvs Vi
Zac vs Vi is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Vi wins with a 60.5% win rate (+21.1%) over Zac based on 38 games. Vi wins the early laning phase while Zac scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Zac build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Zac vs Vi matchup.
Zac Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Zac performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Zac vs Vi Matchup?
Zac vs Vi Matchup Summary
The Zac vs Vi matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 38 recent matches analyzed, Vi wins with a 60.5% win rate compared to Zac's 39.5%, giving Vi a 21.1 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Vi controls the early laning stage, but Zac outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Vi needs to press advantages before Zac reaches their power spikes, while Zac should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Zac leads by 1,791 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Vi has a strong advantage in this matchup. Zac players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Vi overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Zac vs Vi Laning Phase Breakdown
Vi is favored during the laning phase against Zac, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Vi holds advantages in farming, damage and gold income, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Zac Build Against Vi
Plated Steelcaps is the optimal boots choice against Vi, providing the mobility and stats Zac needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Zac against Vi are Randuin's Omen, Thornmail and Sunfire Aegis. This combination gives Zac an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 66.7% win rate across 3 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Vi. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Zac vs Vi matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Zac23.5%
Vi76.5%Zac52.4%Vi47.6%Vi dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 76.5% win rate — a 52.9 percentage point lead over Zac. This lopsided early game means Vi can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
In the late game (25+ minutes), Zac takes over with a 52.4% win rate, leading Vi by 4.8 percentage points. Zac scales more effectively into team fights and objective contests.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Vi must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Zac reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Zac survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Zac Runes Against Vi
Precision
Resolve
The Precision and Resolve rune setup gives Zac the best tools to compete against Vi in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Zac matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Zac's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Zac build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 42.31% | 104 | 1.1 | 598 | 11,466 | 45.5% | 40.0% | |
| 52.63% | 95 | 1.4 | 592 | 11,848 | 54.2% | 51.1% | |
| 48.86% | 88 | 1.2 | 667 | 11,870 | 48.7% | 49.0% | |
| 40.70% | 86 | 1.0 | 550 | 11,317 | 51.3% | 31.9% | |
| 48.15% | 81 | 1.3 | 551 | 10,415 | 37.2% | 60.5% | |
| 47.44% | 78 | 1.0 | 509 | 10,944 | 33.3% | 59.5% | |
| 54.79% | 73 | 1.0 | 584 | 11,745 | 61.3% | 50.0% | |
| 53.62% | 69 | 1.0 | 548 | 11,693 | 65.4% | 46.5% | |
| 50.75% | 67 | 1.0 | 486 | 11,725 | 50.0% | 51.4% | |
| 42.59% | 54 | 1.2 | 689 | 11,593 | 30.8% | 53.6% | |
| 57.41% | 54 | 1.3 | 646 | 11,187 | 53.6% | 61.5% | |
| 46.15% | 52 | 1.4 | 544 | 10,939 | 30.4% | 58.6% | |
| 45.10% | 51 | 1.1 | 601 | 11,354 | 42.3% | 48.0% | |
| 40.00% | 45 | 1.5 | 600 | 11,488 | 33.3% | 45.8% | |
| 52.27% | 44 | 0.9 | 559 | 11,495 | 40.0% | 62.5% | |
| 52.50% | 40 | 1.1 | 656 | 12,216 | 40.0% | 60.0% | |
| 39.47% | 38 | 1.0 | 577 | 10,516 | 23.5% | 52.4% | |
| 62.16% | 37 | 1.7 | 650 | 13,003 | 83.3% | 52.0% | |
| 45.95% | 37 | 1.2 | 628 | 11,111 | 44.4% | 47.4% | |
| 54.29% | 35 | 3.2 | 586 | 11,988 | 55.6% | 53.9% | |
| 50.00% | 34 | 1.3 | 628 | 11,729 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.58% | 33 | 1.0 | 525 | 10,751 | 57.9% | 57.1% | |
| 43.75% | 32 | 1.4 | 560 | 10,827 | 40.0% | 47.1% | |
| 58.06% | 31 | 1.1 | 560 | 11,598 | 46.1% | 66.7% | |
| 48.39% | 31 | 1.1 | 647 | 12,579 | 45.5% | 50.0% | |
| 48.39% | 31 | 1.1 | 619 | 11,362 | 36.4% | 55.0% | |
| 36.67% | 30 | 2.0 | 648 | 11,706 | 41.7% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 30 | 1.8 | 613 | 12,643 | 77.8% | 38.1% | |
| 58.62% | 29 | 1.0 | 556 | 12,378 | 72.7% | 50.0% | |
| 77.78% | 27 | 1.9 | 623 | 11,948 | 91.7% | 66.7% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 1.3 | 587 | 11,243 | 61.5% | 46.1% | |
| 61.54% | 26 | 0.9 | 547 | 11,937 | 50.0% | 68.8% | |
| 37.50% | 24 | 2.5 | 617 | 11,308 | 30.0% | 42.9% | |
| 41.67% | 24 | 4.0 | 688 | 11,266 | 60.0% | 28.6% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 1.7 | 501 | 10,499 | 50.0% | 36.4% | |
| 54.55% | 22 | 1.9 | 701 | 12,378 | 55.6% | 53.9% | |
| 54.55% | 22 | 1.8 | 473 | 9,176 | 54.5% | 54.5% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 1.2 | 533 | 12,443 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 1.5 | 576 | 11,449 | 40.0% | 41.7% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 1.0 | 494 | 9,664 | 45.5% | 40.0% | |
| 71.43% | 21 | 1.0 | 509 | 11,409 | 72.7% | 70.0% | |
| 40.00% | 20 | 1.5 | 624 | 12,057 | 30.0% | 50.0% | |
| 65.00% | 20 | 2.4 | 638 | 11,458 | 66.7% | 62.5% | |
| 35.00% | 20 | 2.0 | 547 | 13,120 | 60.0% | 26.7% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 1.0 | 569 | 9,306 | 41.7% | 50.0% | |
| 36.84% | 19 | 2.7 | 776 | 12,574 | 50.0% | 30.8% | |
| 66.67% | 18 | 1.4 | 495 | 9,786 | 71.4% | 63.6% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 1.0 | 601 | 12,251 | 50.0% | 58.3% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 2.3 | 544 | 10,233 | 85.7% | 45.5% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 1.0 | 491 | 10,787 | 28.6% | 60.0% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 3.3 | 730 | 11,975 | 55.6% | 62.5% | |
| 68.75% | 16 | 3.8 | 630 | 9,680 | 88.9% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 5.1 | 828 | 11,821 | 57.1% | 44.4% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 5.0 | 694 | 10,503 | 20.0% | 60.0% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 1.8 | 613 | 12,266 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 1.0 | 571 | 11,070 | 55.6% | 83.3% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 1.6 | 503 | 10,522 | 60.0% | 44.4% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 6.3 | 873 | 11,265 | 20.0% | 66.7% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 1.6 | 549 | 11,514 | 57.1% | 14.3% | |
| 28.57% | 14 | 1.9 | 505 | 10,285 | 40.0% | 22.2% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 2.1 | 776 | 11,455 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 1.6 | 632 | 13,133 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 4.6 | 710 | 10,548 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 2.0 | 677 | 10,823 | 57.1% | 16.7% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 2.5 | 666 | 11,052 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 83.33% | 12 | 1.2 | 635 | 12,751 | 60.0% | 100.0% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 5.0 | 891 | 13,595 | 50.0% | 22.2% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 3.3 | 832 | 12,083 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 5.9 | 822 | 11,519 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 6.4 | 866 | 9,737 | 42.9% | 50.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 2.8 | 655 | 12,436 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 1.6 | 403 | 7,058 | 62.5% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 2.7 | 743 | 12,758 | 80.0% | 40.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 1.4 | 579 | 9,250 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 6.1 | 694 | 9,287 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 1.8 | 605 | 10,431 | 20.0% | 60.0% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 1.6 | 437 | 8,497 | 71.4% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 1.6 | 581 | 10,067 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 2.0 | 559 | 9,993 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 3.3 | 765 | 7,956 | 20.0% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 2.0 | 486 | 11,326 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 2.5 | 572 | 11,170 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 5.1 | 619 | 10,036 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.2 | 631 | 10,644 | 66.7% | 25.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 3.4 | 544 | 11,696 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 4.5 | 680 | 10,994 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 0.9 | 592 | 11,607 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 4.7 | 741 | 10,861 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 5.1 | 754 | 12,751 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 5.9 | 804 | 12,533 | 0.0% | 71.4% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.8 | 422 | 9,913 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 0.00% | 6 | 3.0 | 464 | 10,031 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 1.5 | 590 | 11,010 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 2.1 | 601 | 10,919 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.2 | 681 | 10,007 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.9 | 586 | 6,056 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.1 | 751 | 12,987 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.6 | 743 | 11,055 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.2 | 662 | 11,928 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.9 | 489 | 7,251 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 5.1 | 619 | 9,242 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 2.2 | 488 | 8,480 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.1 | 565 | 9,728 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.6 | 587 | 11,324 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.8 | 399 | 7,413 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 2.1 | 598 | 11,323 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.0 | 1,021 | 12,755 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Zac vs Vi - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Zac do against Vi in League of Legends?
Vi wins the Zac vs Vi matchup with a 60.5% win rate compared to Zac's 39.5%, a 21.1 percentage point difference. This data is based on 38 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Zac do against Vi in the early game?
In the early game, Vi has the advantage against Zac with a 76.5% win rate versus 23.5%. Vi players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Zac do against Vi in the late game?
In the late game, Zac takes over the Zac vs Vi matchup with a 52.4% win rate compared to 47.6%. Zac scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Zac vs Vi matchup?
Vi wins the matchup against Zac with a 60.5% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 21.1 percentage point advantage means Vi is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 38 games analyzed.
What is the best Zac build against Vi?
The best Zac build against Vi includes Randuin's Omen, Thornmail, Sunfire Aegis with Plated Steelcaps. This build achieves a 66.7% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Zac runes against Vi?
The best Zac runes against Vi use the Precision primary tree with Resolve secondary. This rune setup achieves a 57.1% win rate in the Zac vs Vi matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Zac counter Vi?
No, Zac struggles against Vi with only a 39.5% win rate. Vi has the advantage in this matchup. Zac players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Vi's lead.
How do I play Zac against Vi?
When playing Zac against Vi, play cautiously and avoid Vi's power spikes. Focus on safe farming — you outscale Vi in the late game. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.