
Zac vs Thresh is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.15. Zac wins with a 83.3% win rate (+66.7%) over Thresh based on 6 games. Zac holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Zac build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Zac vs Thresh matchup.
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Zac performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.

The Zac vs Thresh matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 6 recent matches analyzed, Zac wins with a 83.3% win rate compared to Thresh's 16.7%, giving Zac a 66.7 percentage point advantage. Zac dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Thresh players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Zac leads by 1,054 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Zac players can confidently pick into Thresh and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Thresh away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Zac is favored during the laning phase against Thresh, winning 5 out of 5 key stat categories. Zac holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Ionian Boots of Lucidity is the optimal boots choice against Thresh, providing the mobility and stats Zac needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Zac against Thresh are Randuin's Omen, Thornmail and Sunfire Aegis. This combination gives Zac an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 1 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Thresh. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Zac vs Thresh matchup.
Zac dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 100.0% win rate — a 100.0 percentage point lead over Thresh. This lopsided early game means Zac can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Zac is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 80.0% win rate — 60.0 points above Thresh. Extended games heavily favor Zac, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Zac holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Thresh players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Running Resolve primary with Precision secondary allows Zac to press their advantage against Thresh, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Zac matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.15. The table below shows Zac's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Zac build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.42% | 124 | 1.0 | 564 | 11,585 | 55.4% | 50.0% | |
| 58.65% | 104 | 1.0 | 566 | 11,536 | 61.2% | 56.4% | |
| 54.79% | 73 | 1.1 | 597 | 11,937 | 58.1% | 52.4% | |
| 42.42% | 66 | 1.1 | 567 | 11,433 | 51.6% | 34.3% | |
| 37.50% | 64 | 0.9 | 534 | 9,914 | 35.0% | 41.7% | |
| 43.75% | 64 | 1.0 | 570 | 11,625 | 32.1% | 52.8% | |
| 55.00% | 60 | 1.1 | 540 | 11,942 | 53.3% | 56.7% | |
| 40.35% | 57 | 1.0 | 571 | 12,460 | 34.6% | 45.2% | |
| 50.00% | 56 | 1.0 | 603 | 12,074 | 63.2% | 43.2% | |
| 48.21% | 56 | 1.1 | 552 | 12,721 | 40.0% | 51.2% | |
| 70.00% | 50 | 1.8 | 652 | 11,346 | 66.7% | 73.9% | |
| 62.50% | 48 | 1.0 | 603 | 12,900 | 86.7% | 51.5% | |
| 52.17% | 46 | 1.4 | 684 | 11,522 | 48.0% | 57.1% | |
| 43.48% | 46 | 1.2 | 680 | 12,439 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 65.79% | 38 | 1.1 | 565 | 12,289 | 46.1% | 76.0% | |
| 62.16% | 37 | 1.0 | 624 | 12,249 | 62.5% | 61.9% | |
| 66.67% | 36 | 0.9 | 505 | 10,211 | 57.9% | 76.5% | |
| 64.71% | 34 | 1.1 | 569 | 11,009 | 61.1% | 68.8% | |
| 36.36% | 33 | 1.1 | 542 | 11,178 | 44.4% | 26.7% | |
| 43.75% | 32 | 1.2 | 653 | 12,380 | 56.3% | 31.3% | |
| 41.38% | 29 | 1.7 | 722 | 13,238 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 44.83% | 29 | 1.0 | 607 | 12,737 | 50.0% | 42.1% | |
| 39.29% | 28 | 1.0 | 674 | 12,161 | 45.5% | 35.3% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 2.0 | 733 | 13,864 | 42.9% | 57.1% | |
| 57.69% | 26 | 1.9 | 504 | 10,729 | 30.8% | 84.6% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 1.2 | 577 | 12,582 | 58.3% | 50.0% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 2.4 | 621 | 11,610 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 1.0 | 629 | 12,825 | 75.0% | 43.8% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 1.1 | 576 | 11,272 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 41.67% | 24 | 1.7 | 553 | 9,410 | 40.0% | 44.4% | |
| 39.13% | 23 | 1.4 | 724 | 11,916 | 54.5% | 25.0% | |
| 47.83% | 23 | 2.1 | 575 | 11,331 | 60.0% | 38.5% | |
| 65.22% | 23 | 1.0 | 628 | 12,297 | 50.0% | 76.9% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 1.2 | 635 | 12,195 | 45.5% | 66.7% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 0.9 | 568 | 10,929 | 44.4% | 60.0% | |
| 70.59% | 17 | 0.9 | 531 | 11,653 | 42.9% | 90.0% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 1.9 | 469 | 10,498 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 2.9 | 702 | 11,906 | 44.4% | 75.0% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 1.1 | 561 | 11,748 | 42.9% | 50.0% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 1.2 | 683 | 13,504 | 71.4% | 60.0% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 5.0 | 924 | 12,584 | 71.4% | 62.5% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 1.4 | 555 | 12,029 | 42.9% | 33.3% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 1.4 | 599 | 11,915 | 33.3% | 57.1% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 1.7 | 521 | 8,324 | 40.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 1.8 | 534 | 7,682 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 1.0 | 478 | 11,749 | 33.3% | 37.5% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 0.8 | 548 | 11,801 | 33.3% | 25.0% | |
| 88.89% | 9 | 4.3 | 772 | 13,099 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 3.9 | 952 | 11,028 | 25.0% | 40.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 1.8 | 504 | 10,553 | 50.0% | 71.4% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 1.5 | 729 | 13,370 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 3.6 | 626 | 11,020 | 40.0% | 25.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 1.2 | 470 | 10,192 | 66.7% | 20.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 3.6 | 693 | 11,996 | 66.7% | 60.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 2.2 | 564 | 11,830 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 4.2 | 636 | 12,366 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 1.4 | 509 | 9,518 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.1 | 895 | 12,047 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.1 | 604 | 12,642 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 2.0 | 691 | 13,483 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 1.5 | 532 | 9,678 | 60.0% | 100.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 2.0 | 578 | 11,942 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 100.00% | 7 | 0.8 | 415 | 9,009 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.5 | 567 | 8,731 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 1.5 | 596 | 12,507 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 2.7 | 740 | 13,006 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 2.4 | 557 | 12,866 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 1.9 | 476 | 11,554 | 100.0% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.1 | 723 | 10,138 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 1.5 | 560 | 10,992 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.9 | 740 | 14,155 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.1 | 597 | 12,776 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.9 | 482 | 10,801 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.6 | 472 | 9,676 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.7 | 336 | 8,711 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.2 | 470 | 7,888 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 3.9 | 861 | 11,198 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
Real-time overlays, automatic match tracking, and exclusive tools — everything you need to climb, free on your PC.
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Zac wins the Zac vs Thresh matchup with a 83.3% win rate compared to Thresh's 16.7%, a 66.7 percentage point difference. This data is based on 6 recent ranked games in patch 26.15.
In the early game, Zac has the advantage against Thresh with a 100.0% win rate versus 0.0%. Zac players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
In the late game, Zac takes over the Zac vs Thresh matchup with a 80.0% win rate compared to 20.0%. Zac scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Zac wins the matchup against Thresh with a 83.3% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.15. The 66.7 percentage point advantage means Zac is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 6 games analyzed.
The best Zac build against Thresh includes Randuin's Omen, Thornmail, Sunfire Aegis with Ionian Boots of Lucidity. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
The best Zac runes against Thresh use the Resolve primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 75.0% win rate in the Zac vs Thresh matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Yes, Zac has a favorable matchup against Thresh with a 83.3% win rate. Zac strongly counters Thresh in lane based on current patch 26.15 data.
When playing Zac against Thresh, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.