
White Foxvs cloak & dagger
The White Fox vs Cloak & Dagger matchup is closely contested, with White Fox edging out a 48.6% win rate in 72 games. Support duel goes to Cloak & Dagger—Cloak & Dagger provides 11,738 healing versus White Fox's 8,950, often determining which team sustains longer. In this even matchup, White Fox players should focus on team coordination and timing abilities for maximum impact against Cloak & Dagger.
White Fox Matchup Breakdown
Select an opponent from the dropdown to see detailed matchup statistics for White Fox. Compare win rates, KDA, damage dealt, and more to understand each head-to-head matchup.
Who Wins the White Fox vs Cloak & Dagger Matchup?

White Fox vs Cloak & Dagger Matchup Analysis
The White Fox vs Cloak & Dagger matchup is extremely close according to data from 72 analyzed matches. Cloak & Dagger holds a slim advantage with a 51.4% win rate compared to White Fox's 48.6%, representing just a 2.8% differential. While Cloak & Dagger has a slight statistical edge, both heroes are viable picks and the outcome often depends on execution. As a Strategist mirror matchup between White Fox and Cloak & Dagger, this comes down to mechanical skill and ability usage timing. Cloak & Dagger has proven slightly more effective in these head-to-head encounters. Cloak & Dagger posts a notably stronger KDA of 12.65 versus White Fox's 11.68 in this matchup. This gap suggests Cloak & Dagger either secures more eliminations, dies less frequently, or both. The most significant statistical disparity is in damage output, where White Fox averages 1,773 more damage per match, translating to faster eliminations and more team fight presence. White Fox is slightly unfavored against Cloak & Dagger. While not a hard counter, you should play more cautiously, look for favorable trades, and lean on team support when possible. As a Strategist, White Fox's matchup against Cloak & Dagger is heavily influenced by team protection. Stay positioned near allies who can peel, and communicate when you're being pressured.
White Fox vs Cloak & Dagger Combat Statistics
White Fox edges out Cloak & Dagger in combat statistics, but only by 2 categories (Kills and Deaths). This close margin means individual skill and positioning often determine fight outcomes.
White Fox vs Cloak & Dagger Impact Comparison
Interestingly, Strategist White Fox leads damage with 5,157 average, suggesting strong offensive capabilities or sustained poke patterns against Cloak & Dagger.
In this Strategist matchup, Cloak & Dagger significantly outpaces White Fox with 2,788 more healing per match. This sustain advantage allows Cloak & Dagger's team to win attrition fights and extended engagements.
Strategist vs Strategist Role Matchup
In this Strategist mirror matchup, Cloak & Dagger has demonstrated a 51.4% win rate advantage. Mirror matchups are the purest test of hero mastery - success comes down to ability timing, positioning, and understanding your hero's specific strengths. Study Cloak & Dagger's common patterns to improve your mirror match performance.
Complete matchup data for White Fox in Marvel Rivals (Season 2 season). Browse all hero matchups sorted by win rate, filter by role, or search for specific opponents.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | Kills | Deaths | Damage | Healing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54.7% | 296 | 11.58 | 23.5 | 5.5 | 5,269 | 9,500 | |
| 47.4% | 215 | 10.85 | 21.7 | 5.4 | 4,928 | 9,187 | |
| 40.4% | 188 | 9.54 | 21.0 | 5.7 | 4,405 | 8,748 | |
| 61.8% | 157 | 11.44 | 23.1 | 5.2 | 4,847 | 8,488 | |
| 37.4% | 155 | 9.46 | 20.7 | 6.0 | 4,540 | 8,840 | |
| 31.1% | 151 | 9.70 | 21.1 | 5.8 | 4,636 | 8,902 | |
| 45.6% | 147 | 10.60 | 20.8 | 5.4 | 4,725 | 9,031 | |
| 46.3% | 147 | 11.41 | 23.0 | 5.3 | 5,027 | 10,027 | |
| 41.4% | 145 | 11.25 | 22.4 | 5.4 | 5,175 | 9,996 | |
| 56.4% | 140 | 12.00 | 22.8 | 5.1 | 4,760 | 9,287 | |
| 34.8% | 135 | 9.55 | 21.0 | 6.0 | 4,686 | 9,417 | |
| 41.3% | 121 | 10.76 | 22.2 | 5.5 | 5,435 | 10,228 | |
| 54.3% | 116 | 12.84 | 22.8 | 4.9 | 4,684 | 9,050 | |
| 47.8% | 113 | 12.50 | 22.5 | 4.8 | 5,660 | 10,008 | |
| 52.3% | 107 | 10.47 | 22.4 | 5.8 | 4,874 | 9,244 | |
| 51.9% | 104 | 10.88 | 21.4 | 5.4 | 4,788 | 9,339 | |
| 50.5% | 101 | 11.89 | 23.5 | 5.3 | 5,431 | 9,827 | |
| 42.2% | 90 | 11.56 | 22.0 | 5.2 | 5,085 | 9,973 | |
| 48.9% | 88 | 13.89 | 23.8 | 4.3 | 5,576 | 9,788 | |
| 37.9% | 87 | 10.26 | 21.8 | 5.5 | 4,985 | 8,977 | |
| 44.2% | 86 | 10.21 | 21.7 | 5.8 | 4,783 | 9,468 | |
| 46.3% | 80 | 10.27 | 22.1 | 5.7 | 5,115 | 9,093 | |
| 46.6% | 73 | 11.02 | 21.4 | 5.1 | 4,660 | 9,111 | |
| 41.1% | 73 | 10.43 | 22.5 | 5.9 | 5,463 | 10,176 | |
| 48.6% | 72 | 11.68 | 23.1 | 5.2 | 5,157 | 8,950 | |
| 42.3% | 71 | 10.13 | 22.7 | 5.9 | 4,756 | 8,927 | |
| 44.3% | 70 | 10.09 | 20.3 | 5.5 | 4,090 | 8,263 | |
| 55.9% | 68 | 10.51 | 23.5 | 5.8 | 5,359 | 9,980 | |
| 43.9% | 66 | 11.25 | 21.6 | 5.2 | 4,562 | 8,513 | |
| 39.3% | 61 | 9.87 | 21.0 | 5.7 | 4,750 | 8,715 | |
| 41.1% | 56 | 11.29 | 24.4 | 5.6 | 5,568 | 8,837 | |
| 52.8% | 53 | 10.79 | 21.8 | 5.3 | 4,743 | 8,680 | |
| 46.2% | 52 | 10.36 | 21.8 | 5.5 | 5,529 | 9,389 | |
| 38.0% | 50 | 9.93 | 20.7 | 5.8 | 4,712 | 9,343 | |
| 40.4% | 47 | 9.20 | 20.7 | 5.9 | 4,596 | 9,404 | |
| 39.0% | 41 | 9.09 | 19.4 | 6.0 | 4,563 | 10,206 | |
| 60.0% | 40 | 12.43 | 23.8 | 5.0 | 4,985 | 9,020 | |
| 61.5% | 39 | 13.05 | 27.2 | 5.1 | 5,612 | 9,686 | |
| 52.8% | 36 | 13.57 | 25.4 | 4.7 | 6,557 | 9,675 | |
| 51.4% | 35 | 11.05 | 21.2 | 5.3 | 4,727 | 8,635 | |
| 52.9% | 34 | 10.85 | 23.5 | 5.8 | 4,900 | 9,227 | |
| 57.6% | 33 | 10.37 | 20.9 | 5.4 | 4,325 | 8,808 | |
| 59.3% | 27 | 13.13 | 25.7 | 5.2 | 5,945 | 11,147 | |
| 66.7% | 27 | 14.04 | 23.0 | 4.6 | 5,045 | 9,540 | |
| 26.1% | 23 | 10.41 | 23.4 | 6.0 | 4,383 | 9,911 | |
| 60.0% | 20 | 10.52 | 21.3 | 5.5 | 4,710 | 7,743 | |
| 40.0% | 15 | 11.44 | 24.7 | 5.6 | 5,464 | 9,200 | |
| 53.8% | 13 | 10.54 | 20.3 | 6.0 | 3,467 | 8,130 | |
| 60.0% | 5 | 10.96 | 17.8 | 5.6 | 3,448 | 8,313 |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
White Fox vs cloak & dagger FAQ
What are White Fox's best matchups in Marvel Rivals?
White Fox performs best against Devil Dinosaur, Black Cat, scarlet witch. The strongest matchup is against emma frost with a 66.7% win rate.
What are White Fox's worst matchups in Marvel Rivals?
White Fox struggles against moon knight, iron man, storm. The hardest counter is Peni Parker with only a 26.1% win rate.
How do I win more matchups with White Fox?
As a Strategist, White Fox wins 21 out of 52 matchups (>50% win rate). Focus on targeting favorable matchups and work with your team to handle difficult opponents.
How does White Fox perform against different roles?
As a Strategist, White Fox's matchup performance varies by opponent role. Use the role filters in the table above to compare win rates against Duelists, Vanguards, and Strategists.
