Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Gekko's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Gekko
25.0% WR
VS
Omen
75.0% WR
Who Wins the Gekko vs Omen Matchup?
Winner
Omen
Matches: 4
25.0%
Win Rate
75.0%
1.05
Avg KDA
1.59
13.8
Avg Kills
14.0
18.5
Avg Deaths
15.8
115.9
DMG/Round
110.2
24.6%
HS %
30.4%
168
Combat Score
166
39.6%
Attack WR
41.7%
58.3%
Defense WR
60.4%
Gekko vs Omen Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 4 matches reveals that Omen holds a clear advantage over Gekko in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Gekko shows strength in one category, Omen's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.05Gekko
1.59Omen
Omen significantly outperforms Gekko in fragging efficiency with a 1.59 KDA compared to 1.05. This 0.53 KDA differential indicates that Omen players consistently secure more eliminations while dying less frequently, translating to more impactful rounds and better economy management throughout matches.
Damage Output
115.9Gekko
110.2Omen
Gekko outputs 115.9 average damage per round, edging out Omen's 110.2 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Gekko secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
39.6%Gekko
41.7%Omen
Omen shows stronger attack-side performance with a 41.7% win rate versus Gekko's 39.6%. When your team needs to plant the spike, Omen provides more reliable site execution and entry potential in this specific matchup.
Defense Side
58.3%Gekko
60.4%Omen
Defensive capabilities favor Omen at 60.4% win rate compared to Gekko's 58.3%. When holding sites against enemy pushes, Omen provides more reliable defensive presence and retake potential in this matchup.
The Gekko vs Omen matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 4 competitive matches analyzed, Omen wins 75.0% of the time compared to Gekko's 25.0%, a 50.0 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Omen consistently outperforms. In this Initiator vs Controller matchup, Omen has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Gekko should never take isolated fights against Omen and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Gekko vs Omen Fragging Analysis
Omen claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Gekko vs Omen matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability. Our analysis of 4 ranked games reveals Omen consistently outperforms Gekko in direct combat scenarios. While Gekko manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Omen in gunfights. Gekko players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Omen dominates.
Avg KDA
1.05Gekko
1.59Omen
The KDA disparity between Omen and Gekko is substantial: 1.59 versus 1.05, a commanding 0.53 point difference that reveals Omen's dominance in direct combat exchanges. This matchup data from 4 games shows Omen consistently outfragging and outliving Gekko in these encounters. For Gekko players, the strategic implication is clear: avoid 1v1 gunfights against Omen whenever possible. Instead, leverage team utility, information gathering, and multi-person pushes to neutralize Omen's mechanical advantage. Playing for trades and crossfires becomes essential rather than optional.
Avg Kills
13.8Gekko
14.0Omen
Kill production between Gekko and Omen is virtually identical, with Gekko averaging 13.8 kills per game and Omen securing 14.0. This parity suggests both agents are equally capable of finding frags in this matchup, and round outcomes depend more heavily on objective play, utility usage, and team coordination than raw elimination numbers. Players should focus on impactful kills — entries, clutch situations, and trading — rather than simply padding their kill count.
Avg Deaths
18.5Gekko
15.8Omen
The death disparity between Omen and Gekko is stark: 15.8 versus 18.5 deaths per game. Gekko dies 2.8 more times per match on average, fundamentally impacting their ability to influence rounds. This suggests Gekko either takes unfavorable fights against Omen or lacks the tools to disengage safely. Gekko players must completely rethink their aggression patterns — prioritize information and utility over kills, always have an exit plan, and never take coin-flip duels against Omen.
DMG/Round
115.9Gekko
110.2Omen
Gekko applies 5.7 more damage per round than Omen in this matchup (115.9 vs 110.2 ADR). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: Gekko contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. Omen can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
HS %
24.6%Gekko
30.4%Omen
The headshot percentage disparity between Omen and Gekko is substantial: 30.4% compared to 24.6%, a 5.8 point difference. Omen consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Gekko, challenging Omen in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Omen's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.
Gekko vs Omen Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Omen
39.6%
41.7%
Defense Side
Omen
58.3%
60.4%
Attack Side Breakdown
Omen demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Gekko in this matchup, converting 41.7% of attacking rounds versus 39.6%. While this 2.1 point edge gives Omen slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Gekko players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 4 competitive games suggests Omen's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Gekko teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 2.1% gap.
When taking entry duels, Omen holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Gekko players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Omen can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Gekko has favorable matchups against 6 agents and unfavorable matchups against 7 agents in Valorant. Gekko's strongest matchup is against Astra with a 75.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Reyna at 20.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Gekko matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Gekko's best matchup is against Astra, achieving a 75.0% win rate. Gekko excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Gekko's hardest matchup?
Gekko's hardest matchup is against Reyna, with only a 20.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Gekko should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Gekko have?
Gekko has 6 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 7 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Gekko in difficult matchups?
When playing Gekko in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Gekko's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Gekko's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Gekko's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Omen's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Gekko should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 2.1 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Omen shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Gekko, winning 60.4% of defense rounds compared to 58.3%. This 2.1 percentage point edge suggests Omen's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Gekko players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Omen can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 2.1% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Gekko should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Omen demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Omen converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Gekko should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Omen when you can wait for teammates. Omen can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 2.1% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Gekko should be more conservative with eco aggression against Omen and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Omen can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Omen holds clear advantages on both attack (41.7%) and defense (60.4%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Gekko vs Omen matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Omen doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Omen's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Omen performs better. Gekko teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Gekko with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Gekko's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Omen is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Omen provides a measurable ranked advantage. Gekko players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Omen confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Omen wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 4.2 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Gekko isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Initiator vs Controller Dynamics
The Initiator (Gekko) vs Controller (Omen) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Gekko's Initiator abilities serve different purposes than Omen's Controller kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Initiator abilities interact with Controller counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Gekko's Initiator toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Omen's Controller kit counters others. The Omen advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Gekko vs Omen matchup guide: Omen leads with a 75.0% win rate, but Gekko can still win. Learn how Gekko's 116 ADR creates opportunities to turn this 4-match dataset into ranked wins.
