Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Iso's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Iso
12.5% WR
VS
Sage
87.5% WR
Who Wins the Iso vs Sage Matchup?
Winner
Sage
Matches: 8
12.5%
Win Rate
87.5%
0.98
Avg KDA
1.49
15.0
Avg Kills
15.6
19.8
Avg Deaths
15.6
132.7
DMG/Round
128.9
26.7%
HS %
29.3%
192
Combat Score
194
46.5%
Attack WR
59.8%
40.2%
Defense WR
53.5%
Iso vs Sage Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 8 matches reveals that Sage holds a clear advantage over Iso in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Iso shows strength in one category, Sage's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
0.98Iso
1.49Sage
Sage significantly outperforms Iso in fragging efficiency with a 1.49 KDA compared to 0.98. This 0.51 KDA differential indicates that Sage players consistently secure more eliminations while dying less frequently, translating to more impactful rounds and better economy management throughout matches.
Damage Output
132.7Iso
128.9Sage
Damage output is evenly distributed in this matchup, with Iso averaging 132.7 ADR and Sage at 128.9 ADR. Neither agent holds a decisive firepower advantage, making utility usage and team coordination the key differentiators.
Attack Side
46.5%Iso
59.8%Sage
On the attacking side, Sage dominates with a 59.8% win rate compared to Iso's 46.5%. This 13.3 percentage point gap indicates Sage is significantly more effective at executing onto sites, whether through superior entry fragging, better utility usage for site takes, or stronger post-plant positioning.
Defense Side
40.2%Iso
53.5%Sage
Sage excels on the defensive half with a commanding 53.5% win rate, far surpassing Iso's 40.2%. This 13.3 percentage point advantage demonstrates Sage's superior ability to anchor sites, gather information, and deny enemy executes through effective utility and positioning.
The Iso vs Sage matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 8 competitive matches analyzed, Sage wins 87.5% of the time compared to Iso's 12.5%, a 75.0 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Sage consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Sentinel matchup, Sage has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Iso should never take isolated fights against Sage and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Iso vs Sage Fragging Analysis
Sage claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Iso vs Sage matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability. Our analysis of 8 ranked games reveals Sage consistently outperforms Iso in direct combat scenarios. While Iso manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Sage in gunfights. Iso players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Sage dominates.
Avg KDA
0.98Iso
1.49Sage
The KDA disparity between Sage and Iso is substantial: 1.49 versus 0.98, a commanding 0.51 point difference that reveals Sage's dominance in direct combat exchanges. This matchup data from 8 games shows Sage consistently outfragging and outliving Iso in these encounters. For Iso players, the strategic implication is clear: avoid 1v1 gunfights against Sage whenever possible. Instead, leverage team utility, information gathering, and multi-person pushes to neutralize Sage's mechanical advantage. Playing for trades and crossfires becomes essential rather than optional.
Avg Kills
15.0Iso
15.6Sage
Sage secures approximately 0.6 more kills per match than Iso in this head-to-head (15.6 vs 15.0). Over the course of a typical 20+ round game, this translates to Sage contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Sage's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Iso can compensate through superior utility assistance, site anchoring, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
19.8Iso
15.6Sage
The death disparity between Sage and Iso is stark: 15.6 versus 19.8 deaths per game. Iso dies 4.1 more times per match on average, fundamentally impacting their ability to influence rounds. This suggests Iso either takes unfavorable fights against Sage or lacks the tools to disengage safely. Iso players must completely rethink their aggression patterns — prioritize information and utility over kills, always have an exit plan, and never take coin-flip duels against Sage.
DMG/Round
132.7Iso
128.9Sage
Iso applies 3.8 more damage per round than Sage in this matchup (132.7 vs 128.9 ADR). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: Iso contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. Sage can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
HS %
26.7%Iso
29.3%Sage
Sage demonstrates notably superior headshot accuracy against Iso: 29.3% versus 26.7%. This 2.6 percentage point gap in precision means Sage ends gunfights faster, conserves more ammo, and wins more 50-50 duels where both players see each other simultaneously. Iso faces a real disadvantage in aim duels and should compensate through utility, positioning, or weapon choices that don't require headshot precision (shotguns, Odin spraying through smokes, etc.).
Iso vs Sage Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Sage
46.5%
59.8%
Defense Side
Sage
40.2%
53.5%
Attack Side Breakdown
The attack-side performance gap between Sage and Iso is dramatic: 59.8% versus 46.5%, a commanding 13.3 percentage point advantage. Sage dominates offensive scenarios in this matchup to a degree that requires Iso to fundamentally change their approach to attack-side play.
Our analysis of 8 competitive matches reveals Sage has overwhelming attack-side superiority in every measurable category. Site executions, entry success, post-plant conversion, and mid-round adaptability all massively favor Sage. This isn't a gap that Iso can overcome through practice or "playing better" — it's a structural matchup disadvantage. Iso teams must build their entire attack strategy around protecting Iso from direct Sage engagement: give Iso lurk roles, put them in trade positions rather than entry, and design executes where Iso's weaknesses are covered by teammate utility.
Under no circumstances should Iso take entry duels against Sage. The 13.3% attack gap makes entry fragging against Sage one of the lowest-percentage plays in Valorant. Iso must exclusively play support roles on attack: flash for teammates, smoke for executes, trade after entries, or create map pressure through lurks that don't involve Sage confrontation. Sage should actively hunt Iso entries, knowing the statistical advantage is overwhelming.
Iso has favorable matchups against 11 agents and unfavorable matchups against 14 agents in Valorant. Iso's strongest matchup is against Omen with a 66.7% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Sage at 12.5% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Iso matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Iso's best matchup is against Omen, achieving a 66.7% win rate. Iso excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Iso's hardest matchup?
Iso's hardest matchup is against Sage, with only a 12.5% win rate. Against this opponent, Iso should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Iso have?
Iso has 11 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 14 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Iso in difficult matchups?
When playing Iso in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Iso's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Iso's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Iso's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Iso's post-plant conversion rate against Sage is catastrophic. The data shows Iso fails to hold spike plants at a dramatically higher rate than Sage. Never leave Iso alone post-plant — they need constant teammate support, crossfire setups, and utility coordination to have any chance of winning these scenarios. Consider not planting at all if Iso is the only survivor. Sage should play extremely confidently in post-plants, knowing Iso struggles to convert even favorable positions.
Defense Side Breakdown
The defensive disparity between Sage and Iso is substantial: 53.5% versus 40.2%, a 13.3 point chasm. Sage absolutely dominates CT side in this matchup — their site holds are significantly harder to break, their retake contributions more impactful, and their defensive utility more effective at every level.
Iso cannot be trusted with traditional site anchor responsibilities against Sage. The 13.3% defensive gap is too large to overcome through positioning or individual skill. Teams must protect Iso: pair them with multiple teammates, give them off-site lurk positions, or have them rotate immediately when Sage's presence is identified on their site. Sage should aggressively anchor the most difficult sites on any map, knowing their defensive capability is overwhelming.
Iso should avoid retake scenarios against Sage entirely when possible. The data from 8 matches shows Iso's retake conversion rate against Sage is dramatically lower than average. If Iso must retake, require 3+ player numbers advantage and full utility coordination. Sage should play post-plant positions knowing Iso lacks the capability to effectively contest them. In clutch scenarios, Sage wins at overwhelming rates.
Economy decisions for Iso must account for their defensive inadequacy. Force buying against Sage is essentially throwing away credits — the defensive gap makes partial buys nearly unwinnable. Iso should always advocate for full saves, building toward rounds where team utility can compensate for their individual defensive weakness. Sage can confidently force and half-buy, knowing their defensive advantages persist across all economy states.
Overall Side Analysis
Sage demonstrates commanding superiority on both attack (59.8%) and defense (53.5%), comprehensively outperforming Iso across all phases of the game. Based on our analysis of 8 competitive matches, this is one of the more one-sided agent matchups in Valorant, with Sage holding advantages at every stage.
Map selection and team composition cannot fix Iso's disadvantage in this matchup. Sage outperforms across all map types and team structures. If you're playing Iso into Sage, your team composition needs to compensate heavily: strong fragging agents to carry Iso's weight, utility-heavy supports to cover their positioning, and coordination to avoid leaving Iso in isolated Sage encounters.
For ranked climbing, avoid playing Iso when you expect to face Sage frequently. The 26.6 combined percentage point disadvantage across both sides is too large to overcome through individual skill improvement. If Sage is meta in your rank bracket, strongly consider adding them to your agent pool or playing agents that have more neutral matchups.
Final verdict: Sage decisively wins the Iso vs Sage matchup. This isn't a skill check or a "play better" situation — Sage has systematic advantages that manifest across thousands of games. Iso players facing Sage should adjust expectations, play more supportively, and recognize that direct confrontations are statistically unfavorable at every stage of the game.
Duelist vs Sentinel Dynamics
The Duelist (Iso) vs Sentinel (Sage) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Iso's Duelist abilities serve different purposes than Sage's Sentinel kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Duelist abilities interact with Sentinel counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Iso's Duelist toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Sage's Sentinel kit counters others. The Sage advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Iso vs Sage matchup guide: Sage leads with a 87.5% win rate, but Iso can still win. Learn how Iso's 133 ADR creates opportunities to turn this 8-match dataset into ranked wins.
