Iso vs Sage matchup in Valorant
Win Rate
36.8%
Matches
19
KDA
1.24

Iso vs SageMatchups

Duelist
Patch13.06
Matches845,270
RegionAll Regions
RankAll Ranks
PlatformAll Platforms
ModeCompetitive
Last UpdatedOct 3, 2026 UTC
MethodologyData Methodology

Iso vs Sage matchup guide: Sage leads with a 63.2% win rate, but Iso can still win. Learn how Iso's 146 ADR creates opportunities to turn this 19-match dataset into ranked wins.

Iso Matchup Breakdown

Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Iso's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.

Compare against an opponent
Iso - 36.8% win rate in this matchup
Iso
36.8% WR
VS
Sage vs Iso matchup - 63.2% win rate
Sage
63.2% WR

Who Wins the Iso vs Sage Matchup?

Sage wins the Iso vs Sage matchup
Winner
Sage
Matches: 19
36.8%
Win Rate
63.2%
1.24
Avg KDA
1.44
16.2
Avg Kills
15.4
16.8
Avg Deaths
15.6
145.6
DMG/Round
139.1
28.5%
HS %
27.4%
218
Combat Score
208
49.3%
Attack WR
53.4%
46.6%
Defense WR
50.7%

Iso vs Sage Performance Breakdown

Iso vs Sage matchup breakdown - overall performance winner

Analysis of 19 matches reveals that Sage holds a clear advantage over Iso in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Iso shows strength in one category, Sage's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.

Fragging Power
1.24Iso
1.44Sage
Sage maintains a noticeable fragging advantage with a 1.44 KDA versus Iso's 1.24. This difference in kill-death-assist ratio suggests Sage players are more reliable in clutch situations and contribute more consistently to round wins through individual playmaking.
Damage Output
145.6Iso
139.1Sage
Iso outputs 145.6 average damage per round, edging out Sage's 139.1 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Iso secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
49.3%Iso
53.4%Sage
Sage shows stronger attack-side performance with a 53.4% win rate versus Iso's 49.3%. When your team needs to plant the spike, Sage provides more reliable site execution and entry potential in this specific matchup.
Defense Side
46.6%Iso
50.7%Sage
Defensive capabilities favor Sage at 50.7% win rate compared to Iso's 46.6%. When holding sites against enemy pushes, Sage provides more reliable defensive presence and retake potential in this matchup.

Iso vs Sage Matchup Summary

The Iso vs Sage matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 19 competitive matches analyzed, Sage wins 63.2% of the time compared to Iso's 36.8%, a 26.3 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Sage consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Sentinel matchup, Sage has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Iso should never take isolated fights against Sage and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.

Iso vs Sage Fragging Analysis

Iso wins fragging stats against Sage in Valorant

Iso edges out Sage in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in kill production, damage output, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 19 matches analyzed, this Iso vs Sage matchup remains contestable for both sides. Sage shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Sage's favor.

Avg KDA
1.24Iso
1.44Sage
Sage holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.44 compared to Iso's 1.24. While this 0.21 point difference indicates Sage tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Iso players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Sage's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Iso players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
16.2Iso
15.4Sage
Iso secures approximately 0.8 more kills per match than Sage in this head-to-head (16.2 vs 15.4). Over the course of a typical 20+ round game, this translates to Iso contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Iso's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Sage can compensate through superior utility assistance, site anchoring, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
16.8Iso
15.6Sage
Sage demonstrates markedly better survivability against Iso, recording 15.6 deaths per game versus 16.8. Dying nearly 1.2 fewer times per match gives Sage significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Iso players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
145.6Iso
139.1Sage
Iso applies 6.5 more damage per round than Sage in this matchup (145.6 vs 139.1 ADR). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: Iso contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. Sage can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
HS %
28.5%Iso
27.4%Sage
Iso lands headshots at a slightly higher rate (28.5% vs 27.4%), providing a modest but meaningful advantage in time-to-kill during duels. This 1.0 percentage point edge translates to Iso more frequently one-tapping or two-tapping opponents before Sage can fully react. Sage players should counter this by avoiding predictable angle holds, using movement to throw off Iso's crosshair placement, and prefiring common positions to negate the accuracy gap.

Iso vs Sage Attack and Defense Performance

Attack Side
Sage
Iso49.3%
Sage53.4%
Defense Side
Sage
Iso46.6%
Sage50.7%

Attack Side Breakdown

Sage holds a meaningful attack-side advantage in the Iso vs Sage matchup, winning 53.4% of offensive rounds compared to 49.3% for Iso. This 4.1 percentage point gap translates to real tactical implications that both sides should account for in their attack-side strategies.

Our analysis of 19 matches reveals Sage's kit enables more effective site executions across multiple dimensions. Whether through superior entry tools, better post-plant utility, or stronger mid-round adaptability, Sage consistently converts attack rounds at a higher rate. Iso teams need to acknowledge this disadvantage and adjust accordingly — consider running more coordinated executes, prioritizing trades over individual plays, and using utility to create advantages before committing to site takes.

Entry fragging dynamics shift noticeably in Sage's favor in this matchup. When Sage takes the first duel on a site execute, they convert at a meaningfully higher rate than Iso. For Iso players, this means being more selective about entry timings — wait for utility to clear angles, ensure a teammate is positioned to trade, or look for off-angle entries that negate Sage's advantages. Sage can confidently take entries knowing the data supports aggressive play.

Post-plant is where Sage's advantage becomes most pronounced. The 4.1% attack-side gap suggests Sage excels at converting spike plants into round wins through superior defuse denial or retake resistance. Iso should stack post-plants with multiple players when possible, communicate molly and utility timings precisely, and avoid isolated post-plant positions where Sage's kit advantages become decisive. For Sage, recognize your post-plant strength and play confidently for spike after successful takes.

Defense Side Breakdown

Sage demonstrates notably stronger defensive performance against Iso, holding 50.7% of rounds versus 46.6%. This 4.1 point advantage represents meaningful tactical superiority that should influence how both agents approach CT-side play in this matchup.

Site anchor assignments should account for Sage's defensive advantage. Sage can confidently solo anchor sites, knowing their kit enables effective stalling and information gathering. Iso should avoid solo anchor positions against Sage — instead, pair with a teammate who can provide support utility, or play positions that allow quick rotates to avoid extended 1v1 holds. When attackers target Iso's site with Sage on the execute, expect faster site falls.

Retake scenarios meaningfully favor Sage in this matchup. Our 19 match analysis shows Sage converts retakes at a significantly higher rate, whether through better clearing utility, superior positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics. Iso should never attempt solo retakes against Sage — always wait for teammates, coordinate utility, and take the retake together. Sage can confidently take 1vX retakes that Iso should avoid.

Economy rounds highlight Sage's defensive advantages. Iso should prioritize full saves over force buys when facing Sage, as the defensive utility gap compounds on limited economy. Sage can play more aggressively on eco rounds, pushing for information or early picks knowing their kit provides advantages even without full utility. On full buy rounds, Iso should ensure teammate utility covers their defensive gaps.

Overall Side Analysis

Sage demonstrates commanding superiority on both attack (53.4%) and defense (50.7%), comprehensively outperforming Iso across all phases of the game. Based on our analysis of 19 competitive matches, this is one of the more one-sided agent matchups in Valorant, with Sage holding advantages at every stage.

Map selection and team composition cannot fix Iso's disadvantage in this matchup. Sage outperforms across all map types and team structures. If you're playing Iso into Sage, your team composition needs to compensate heavily: strong fragging agents to carry Iso's weight, utility-heavy supports to cover their positioning, and coordination to avoid leaving Iso in isolated Sage encounters.

For ranked climbing, avoid playing Iso when you expect to face Sage frequently. The 8.2 combined percentage point disadvantage across both sides is too large to overcome through individual skill improvement. If Sage is meta in your rank bracket, strongly consider adding them to your agent pool or playing agents that have more neutral matchups.

Final verdict: Sage decisively wins the Iso vs Sage matchup. This isn't a skill check or a "play better" situation — Sage has systematic advantages that manifest across thousands of games. Iso players facing Sage should adjust expectations, play more supportively, and recognize that direct confrontations are statistically unfavorable at every stage of the game.

Duelist vs Sentinel Dynamics

The Duelist (Iso) vs Sentinel (Sage) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Iso's Duelist abilities serve different purposes than Sage's Sentinel kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.

Understanding how Duelist abilities interact with Sentinel counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Iso's Duelist toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Sage's Sentinel kit counters others. The Sage advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.

MetaBot Desktop

Build the Perfect Team Comp

Assemble both teams in Comp Lab, pick a map, and see role balance, per-agent map fit, and matchup edges — all computed from real competitive matches before the round starts.

  • Full 5v5 comp builder
  • Per-agent map fit & win rates
  • Matchup edges vs enemy picks
Comp Lab in the MetaBot Desktop app analyzing a Valorant team composition on Haven

Iso has favorable matchups against 12 agents and unfavorable matchups against 15 agents in Valorant. Iso's strongest matchup is against Vyse with a 75.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is KAY/O at 20.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.

Iso matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.06)
Opponent
Win Rate
Matches
KDA
DMG/​Rnd
HS %
Atk WR
Def WR
46.95%1641.27149.230.7%49.9%48.9%
41.10%1631.31155.932.4%48.0%47.7%
44.52%1461.29150.831.1%47.9%49.7%
48.09%1311.27149.132.0%48.9%51.8%
48.81%841.33154.731.7%49.0%49.4%
44.78%671.37155.932.8%48.1%48.4%
50.00%601.30149.633.1%50.0%48.6%
35.09%571.21146.031.5%43.4%49.2%
42.31%521.29150.933.4%47.2%49.1%
25.00%281.18152.428.4%41.7%44.7%
57.69%261.30154.533.0%53.2%48.8%
44.00%251.26143.531.7%53.5%43.3%
73.91%231.42154.630.8%59.0%52.4%
52.38%211.08134.232.1%44.3%53.4%
42.86%211.34149.829.3%42.6%53.9%
57.89%191.38158.632.6%49.2%52.5%
36.84%191.24145.628.5%49.3%46.6%
60.00%151.32155.834.1%56.9%53.2%
64.29%141.36165.133.9%51.3%54.0%
66.67%121.11139.735.6%55.0%50.0%
75.00%121.71177.529.4%53.1%62.4%
33.33%91.16143.029.6%44.8%48.1%
71.43%71.21147.133.8%67.5%43.4%
20.00%51.24155.334.7%38.5%41.7%
50.00%41.19158.531.4%59.6%39.0%
33.33%31.22161.627.2%30.0%50.0%
66.67%31.48179.835.4%51.4%55.3%
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Iso's best matchup in Valorant?

Iso's best matchup is against Vyse, achieving a 75.0% win rate. Iso excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.

What is Iso's hardest matchup?

Iso's hardest matchup is against KAY/O, with only a 20.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Iso should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.

How many favorable matchups does Iso have?

Iso has 12 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 15 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.

How should I play Iso in difficult matchups?

When playing Iso in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Iso's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.

What stats matter most in Iso's matchups?

Key stats to analyze in Iso's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.

See Also: Other Duelists