Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Iso's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Iso
52.6% WR
VS
Raze
47.4% WR
Who Wins the Iso vs Raze Matchup?
Winner
Iso
Matches: 19
52.6%
Win Rate
47.4%
1.23
Avg KDA
1.57
16.2
Avg Kills
20.0
16.7
Avg Deaths
15.5
146.5
DMG/Round
177.0
32.6%
HS %
24.5%
217
Combat Score
265
55.0%
Attack WR
54.6%
45.4%
Defense WR
45.0%
Iso vs Raze Performance Breakdown
The Iso vs Raze matchup is closely contested, with each agent winning 2 of 4 key metrics across 19 analyzed games. Both agents bring competitive strengths to this duel, making individual skill and team composition crucial factors in determining round outcomes.
Fragging Power
1.23Iso
1.57Raze
Raze maintains a noticeable fragging advantage with a 1.57 KDA versus Iso's 1.23. This difference in kill-death-assist ratio suggests Raze players are more reliable in clutch situations and contribute more consistently to round wins through individual playmaking.
Damage Output
146.5Iso
177.0Raze
Raze delivers substantially higher damage per round (177.0 ADR) compared to Iso's 146.5 ADR. This 30.5 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Raze a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
55.0%Iso
54.6%Raze
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Iso at 55.0% and Raze at 54.6% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
45.4%Iso
45.0%Raze
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Iso posting a 45.4% win rate and Raze at 45.0%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Iso vs Raze matchup in Valorant is a moderately favorable matchup. Based on 19 competitive matches analyzed, Iso wins 52.6% of the time compared to Raze's 47.4%, a 5.3 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Iso consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Duelist matchup, Iso has meaningful advantages in this agent head-to-head. Raze players should avoid isolated duels when possible and rely on team utility and trading to overcome the statistical disadvantage.
Iso vs Raze Fragging Analysis
Raze claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Iso vs Raze matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability. Our analysis of 19 ranked games reveals Raze consistently outperforms Iso in direct combat scenarios. While Iso manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Raze in gunfights. Iso players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Raze dominates.
Avg KDA
1.23Iso
1.57Raze
Raze demonstrates noticeably stronger kill-death-assist performance against Iso, maintaining a 1.57 KDA versus 1.23. This 0.34 point gap reflects Raze's superior ability to secure eliminations while avoiding death in these head-to-head encounters. Iso players facing Raze should prioritize team coordination over solo aggression — look for 2v1 situations, coordinate utility usage with teammates, and focus on trading rather than taking isolated duels where Raze's statistical advantage becomes most pronounced.
Avg Kills
16.2Iso
20.0Raze
The kill differential between Raze and Iso is dramatic: 20.0 versus 16.2, representing 3.8 additional kills per game for Raze. This massive gap shows Raze consistently dominates the kill feed when these agents meet. For Iso players, this data suggests a fundamental mismatch in direct combat scenarios. Success against Raze requires reimagining your role — become the setup player, the information gatherer, the utility specialist — rather than trying to match Raze's fragging output head-to-head.
Avg Deaths
16.7Iso
15.5Raze
Raze demonstrates markedly better survivability against Iso, recording 15.5 deaths per game versus 16.7. Dying nearly 1.2 fewer times per match gives Raze significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Iso players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
146.5Iso
177.0Raze
The damage differential between Raze and Iso is exceptional: 177.0 ADR compared to just 146.5. Raze deals 30.5 more damage per round on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests Raze's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while Iso struggles to even trade effectively. Iso players should treat Raze as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or utility-based damage.
HS %
32.6%Iso
24.5%Raze
The headshot percentage disparity between Iso and Raze is substantial: 32.6% compared to 24.5%, a 8.1 point difference. Iso consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Raze, challenging Iso in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Iso's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.
Iso vs Raze Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Iso
55.0%
54.6%
Defense Side
Iso
45.4%
45.0%
Attack Side Breakdown
The attack-side comparison between Iso and Raze reveals near-perfect parity, with Iso winning 55.0% of attacking rounds compared to Raze's 54.6%. This negligible 0.4 percentage point difference indicates neither agent possesses inherent advantages when executing onto sites or pushing through chokepoints. When these agents meet on attack, success depends almost entirely on team coordination, execute timing, and individual mechanical skill rather than agent kit superiority.
From a tactical standpoint, neither Iso nor Raze should adjust their standard attacking approach based on this matchup. Both agents can run their typical execute patterns, default rotations, and lurk timings without worrying about a statistical disadvantage. The data from 19 matches suggests that whichever player has better game sense, utility timing, and raw mechanical aim will win attack-side encounters — there's no agent-based shortcut to victory here.
For entry fragging specifically, both Iso and Raze players can confidently take the first duel when executing onto sites. Neither agent's abilities create meaningful first-contact advantages over the other, so entry success comes down to crosshair placement, pre-aim quality, and jiggle-peeking technique. Whether you're playing Iso or Raze, approach site entries with the same confidence you'd have in any other matchup.
Iso has favorable matchups against 11 agents and unfavorable matchups against 14 agents in Valorant. Iso's strongest matchup is against Omen with a 66.7% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Sage at 12.5% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Iso matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Iso's best matchup is against Omen, achieving a 66.7% win rate. Iso excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Iso's hardest matchup?
Iso's hardest matchup is against Sage, with only a 12.5% win rate. Against this opponent, Iso should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Iso have?
Iso has 11 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 14 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Iso in difficult matchups?
When playing Iso in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Iso's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Iso's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Iso's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant scenarios in this matchup are similarly balanced. Neither agent demonstrates superior spike defense or retake denial capabilities against the other based on our attack-side data. When the spike is down, focus on standard post-plant fundamentals: positioning for crossfires, using utility to delay defuses, and communicating enemy positions to teammates. The 0.4% difference is small enough to be statistical noise rather than a meaningful advantage.
Defense Side Breakdown
Defensive performance between Iso and Raze is virtually identical, with Iso holding 45.4% of rounds on CT side and Raze at 45.0%. This 0.4 point margin indicates both agents contribute equally when anchoring sites, retaking, or denying post-plants. Neither possesses defensive utility advantages significant enough to swing matchup outcomes.
Both Iso and Raze can anchor sites with equal effectiveness in this matchup. Whether holding A, B, or mid on any map, neither agent's defensive kit provides meaningful advantages over the other. Site anchor decisions should be based on map knowledge, team composition needs, and personal preference rather than matchup considerations. The 0.4% difference is too small to influence site assignment choices.
Retake scenarios are similarly balanced between Iso and Raze. Neither agent demonstrates superior retake utility, post-plant clearing ability, or clutch potential against the other based on our defensive data from 19 matches. When retaking against either agent, focus on standard retake fundamentals: utility to clear common spots, coordinated timing with teammates, and trading effectively. Don't adjust your retake approach based on whether you're facing Iso or Raze.
Economy decisions and utility usage shouldn't change based on this specific matchup during defense. Both agents have comparable force buy success rates, full buy conversion, and utility effectiveness against each other. Make economy calls based on team needs and general defensive principles rather than Iso vs Raze specific considerations. Your standard defensive utility timing and placement will be equally effective regardless of which agent you're facing.
Overall Side Analysis
Iso maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 55.0% attack win rate and 45.4% defense win rate. While Iso is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Raze remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Iso vs Raze specific factors. The slight Iso advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Iso and Raze are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Iso has a slight statistical edge, but Raze is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Raze, don't switch to Iso just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Duelist vs Duelist Dynamics
Both Iso and Raze fill the Duelist role in Valorant team compositions. This role mirror means teams won't face composition issues from having both agents — the question is purely which Duelist performs better in direct competition. Our data clearly indicates Iso is the stronger Duelist pick when these agents face each other.
In Duelist vs Duelist encounters, similar ability timing and usage patterns mean both agents often use their kits in comparable ways. The winner typically comes down to which player uses their abilities more efficiently and wins the mechanical duels that follow. Iso's statistical advantage suggests their specific Duelist kit translates slightly better to winning these mirror encounters.
47.0%
48.4%
51.0%
49.6%
50.8%
47.4%
48.0%
48.5%
44.4%
45.4%
38.5%
52.9%
50.4%
60.1%
51.9%
49.2%
52.6%
55.9%
40.2%
46.5%
67.6%
46.7%
39.0%
50.0%
Iso vs Raze head-to-head analysis. Iso holds a 52.6% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 19 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
