Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Iso's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Iso
43.6% WR
VS
Sova
56.4% WR
Who Wins the Iso vs Sova Matchup?
Winner
Sova
Matches: 94
43.6%
Win Rate
56.4%
1.20
Avg KDA
1.36
16.0
Avg Kills
14.4
16.6
Avg Deaths
14.8
146.0
DMG/Round
133.3
32.0%
HS %
31.1%
218
Combat Score
195
47.4%
Attack WR
49.0%
51.0%
Defense WR
52.6%
Iso vs Sova Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 94 matches reveals that Sova holds a clear advantage over Iso in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Iso shows strength in one category, Sova's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.20Iso
1.36Sova
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Iso and Sova, with KDA ratios of 1.20 and 1.36 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
146.0Iso
133.3Sova
Iso outputs 146.0 average damage per round, edging out Sova's 133.3 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Iso secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
47.4%Iso
49.0%Sova
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Iso at 47.4% and Sova at 49.0% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
51.0%Iso
52.6%Sova
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Iso posting a 51.0% win rate and Sova at 52.6%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Iso vs Sova matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 94 competitive matches analyzed, Sova wins 56.4% of the time compared to Iso's 43.6%, a 12.8 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Sova consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Initiator matchup, Sova has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Iso should never take isolated fights against Sova and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Iso vs Sova Fragging Analysis
Iso edges out Sova in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in kill production, damage output, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 94 matches analyzed, this Iso vs Sova matchup remains contestable for both sides. Sova shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Sova's favor.
Avg KDA
1.20Iso
1.36Sova
Sova holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.36 compared to Iso's 1.20. While this 0.15 point difference indicates Sova tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Iso players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Sova's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Iso players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
16.0Iso
14.4Sova
Iso substantially outfrags Sova in this matchup, averaging 16.0 kills compared to 14.4 — a difference of nearly 1.6 eliminations per match. When Iso faces Sova, the data clearly shows Iso finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. Sova players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Iso in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
16.6Iso
14.8Sova
Sova demonstrates markedly better survivability against Iso, recording 14.8 deaths per game versus 16.6. Dying nearly 1.8 fewer times per match gives Sova significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Iso players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
146.0Iso
133.3Sova
Iso significantly outdamages Sova in head-to-head encounters, posting 146.0 ADR versus 133.3. This 12.6 damage-per-round advantage means Iso consistently wins the damage exchange in firefights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. Sova players should avoid prolonged dueling with Iso — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage weapons or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate for the raw gunfight disadvantage.
HS %
32.0%Iso
31.1%Sova
Iso lands headshots at a slightly higher rate (32.0% vs 31.1%), providing a modest but meaningful advantage in time-to-kill during duels. This 0.9 percentage point edge translates to Iso more frequently one-tapping or two-tapping opponents before Sova can fully react. Sova players should counter this by avoiding predictable angle holds, using movement to throw off Iso's crosshair placement, and prefiring common positions to negate the accuracy gap.
Iso vs Sova Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Sova
47.4%
49.0%
Defense Side
Sova
51.0%
52.6%
Attack Side Breakdown
Sova demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Iso in this matchup, converting 49.0% of attacking rounds versus 47.4%. While this 1.6 point edge gives Sova slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Iso players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 94 competitive games suggests Sova's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Iso teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.6% gap.
When taking entry duels, Sova holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Iso players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Sova can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Iso has favorable matchups against 11 agents and unfavorable matchups against 14 agents in Valorant. Iso's strongest matchup is against Omen with a 66.7% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Sage at 12.5% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Iso matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Iso's best matchup is against Omen, achieving a 66.7% win rate. Iso excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Iso's hardest matchup?
Iso's hardest matchup is against Sage, with only a 12.5% win rate. Against this opponent, Iso should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Iso have?
Iso has 11 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 14 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Iso in difficult matchups?
When playing Iso in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Iso's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Iso's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Iso's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Sova's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Iso should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.6 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Sova shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Iso, winning 52.6% of defense rounds compared to 51.0%. This 1.6 percentage point edge suggests Sova's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Iso players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Sova can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.6% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Iso should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Sova demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Sova converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Iso should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Sova when you can wait for teammates. Sova can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.6% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Iso should be more conservative with eco aggression against Sova and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Sova can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Sova holds clear advantages on both attack (49.0%) and defense (52.6%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Iso vs Sova matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Sova doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Sova's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Sova performs better. Iso teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Iso with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Iso's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Sova is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Sova provides a measurable ranked advantage. Iso players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Sova confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Sova wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 3.3 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Iso isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Duelist vs Initiator Dynamics
The Duelist (Iso) vs Initiator (Sova) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Iso's Duelist abilities serve different purposes than Sova's Initiator kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Duelist abilities interact with Initiator counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Iso's Duelist toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Sova's Initiator kit counters others. The Sova advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Iso vs Sova matchup guide: Sova leads with a 56.4% win rate, but Iso can still win. Learn how Iso's 146 ADR creates opportunities to turn this 94-match dataset into ranked wins.
