Iso vs Sova matchup in Valorant
Win Rate
55.9%
Matches
34
Avg KDA
1.35
Avg ADR
156

Iso vs SovaMatchup

Duelist
Patch12.01
Matches82,189
RegionAll Regions
RankAll Ranks
PlatformAll Platforms
ModeCompetitive
Last UpdatedFeb 3, 2026
MethodologyData Methodology

Iso vs Sova matchup breakdown: Iso dominates with a 55.9% win rate across 34 matches. Superior fragging (1.35 KDA) gives Iso a clear edge. See attack/defense stats and combat analysis.

Iso Matchup Breakdown

Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Iso's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.

Compare against an opponent
Sova - 55.9% win rateSova(55.9%)
Iso - 55.9% win rate in this matchup
Iso
55.9% WR
VS
Sova vs Iso matchup - 44.1% win rate
Sova
44.1% WR

Who Wins the Iso vs Sova Matchup?

Iso wins the Iso vs Sova matchup
Winner
Iso
Matches: 34
55.9%
Win Rate
44.1%
1.35
Avg KDA
1.15
16.7
Avg Kills
12.6
15.4
Avg Deaths
14.7
155.9
DMG/Round
123.3
32.4%
HS %
31.8%
236
Combat Score
180
47.8%
Attack WR
43.3%
56.7%
Defense WR
52.2%

Iso vs Sova Performance Breakdown

Iso vs Sova matchup breakdown - overall performance winner

In the Iso vs Sova matchup, Iso demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 34 analyzed matches, Iso outperforms Sova in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Iso the statistically favored pick when facing Sova in ranked Valorant matches.

Fragging Power
1.35Iso
1.15Sova
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Iso and Sova, with KDA ratios of 1.35 and 1.15 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
155.9Iso
123.3Sova
Iso delivers substantially higher damage per round (155.9 ADR) compared to Sova's 123.3 ADR. This 32.6 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Iso a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
47.8%Iso
43.3%Sova
Iso shows stronger attack-side performance with a 47.8% win rate versus Sova's 43.3%. When your team needs to plant the spike, Iso provides more reliable site execution and entry potential in this specific matchup.
Defense Side
56.7%Iso
52.2%Sova
Defensive capabilities favor Iso at 56.7% win rate compared to Sova's 52.2%. When holding sites against enemy pushes, Iso provides more reliable defensive presence and retake potential in this matchup.

Iso vs Sova Matchup Summary

The Iso vs Sova matchup in Valorant is a heavily one-sided matchup. Based on 34 competitive matches analyzed, Iso wins 55.9% of the time compared to Sova's 44.1%, a 11.8 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in damage output, where Iso consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Initiator matchup, Iso has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Sova should never take isolated fights against Iso and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.

Iso vs Sova Fragging Analysis

Iso wins fragging stats against Sova in Valorant

Iso claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Iso vs Sova matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, damage output. Our analysis of 34 ranked games reveals Iso consistently outperforms Sova in direct combat scenarios. While Sova manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Iso in gunfights. Sova players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Iso dominates.

KDA
1.35Iso
1.15Sova
Iso holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.35 compared to Sova's 1.15. While this 0.20 point difference indicates Iso tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Sova players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Iso's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Sova players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
16.7Iso
12.6Sova
The kill differential between Iso and Sova is dramatic: 16.7 versus 12.6, representing 4.1 additional kills per game for Iso. This massive gap shows Iso consistently dominates the kill feed when these agents meet. For Sova players, this data suggests a fundamental mismatch in direct combat scenarios. Success against Iso requires reimagining your role — become the setup player, the information gatherer, the utility specialist — rather than trying to match Iso's fragging output head-to-head.
Avg Deaths
15.4Iso
14.7Sova
Sova survives longer in this matchup, dying 14.7 times per game compared to Iso's 15.4 deaths. This 0.6 death difference per match means Sova is available for more rounds, contributing to late-round scenarios and clutch situations more frequently. Iso players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests Sova's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
DMG/Round
155.9Iso
123.3Sova
The damage differential between Iso and Sova is exceptional: 155.9 ADR compared to just 123.3. Iso deals 32.6 more damage per round on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests Iso's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while Sova struggles to even trade effectively. Sova players should treat Iso as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or utility-based damage.
Headshot %
32.4%Iso
31.8%Sova
Iso lands headshots at a slightly higher rate (32.4% vs 31.8%), providing a modest but meaningful advantage in time-to-kill during duels. This 0.6 percentage point edge translates to Iso more frequently one-tapping or two-tapping opponents before Sova can fully react. Sova players should counter this by avoiding predictable angle holds, using movement to throw off Iso's crosshair placement, and prefiring common positions to negate the accuracy gap.

Iso vs Sova Attack and Defense Performance

Attack Side
Iso
Iso47.8%
Sova43.3%
Defense Side
Iso
Iso56.7%
Sova52.2%

Attack Side Breakdown

Iso holds a meaningful attack-side advantage in the Iso vs Sova matchup, winning 47.8% of offensive rounds compared to 43.3% for Sova. This 4.5 percentage point gap translates to real tactical implications that both sides should account for in their attack-side strategies.

Our analysis of 34 matches reveals Iso's kit enables more effective site executions across multiple dimensions. Whether through superior entry tools, better post-plant utility, or stronger mid-round adaptability, Iso consistently converts attack rounds at a higher rate. Sova teams need to acknowledge this disadvantage and adjust accordingly — consider running more coordinated executes, prioritizing trades over individual plays, and using utility to create advantages before committing to site takes.

Entry fragging dynamics shift noticeably in Iso's favor in this matchup. When Iso takes the first duel on a site execute, they convert at a meaningfully higher rate than Sova. For Sova players, this means being more selective about entry timings — wait for utility to clear angles, ensure a teammate is positioned to trade, or look for off-angle entries that negate Iso's advantages. Iso can confidently take entries knowing the data supports aggressive play.

Post-plant is where Iso's advantage becomes most pronounced. The 4.5% attack-side gap suggests Iso excels at converting spike plants into round wins through superior defuse denial or retake resistance. Sova should stack post-plants with multiple players when possible, communicate molly and utility timings precisely, and avoid isolated post-plant positions where Iso's kit advantages become decisive. For Iso, recognize your post-plant strength and play confidently for spike after successful takes.

Defense Side Breakdown

Iso demonstrates notably stronger defensive performance against Sova, holding 56.7% of rounds versus 52.2%. This 4.5 point advantage represents meaningful tactical superiority that should influence how both agents approach CT-side play in this matchup.

Site anchor assignments should account for Iso's defensive advantage. Iso can confidently solo anchor sites, knowing their kit enables effective stalling and information gathering. Sova should avoid solo anchor positions against Iso — instead, pair with a teammate who can provide support utility, or play positions that allow quick rotates to avoid extended 1v1 holds. When attackers target Sova's site with Iso on the execute, expect faster site falls.

Retake scenarios meaningfully favor Iso in this matchup. Our 34 match analysis shows Iso converts retakes at a significantly higher rate, whether through better clearing utility, superior positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics. Sova should never attempt solo retakes against Iso — always wait for teammates, coordinate utility, and take the retake together. Iso can confidently take 1vX retakes that Sova should avoid.

Economy rounds highlight Iso's defensive advantages. Sova should prioritize full saves over force buys when facing Iso, as the defensive utility gap compounds on limited economy. Iso can play more aggressively on eco rounds, pushing for information or early picks knowing their kit provides advantages even without full utility. On full buy rounds, Sova should ensure teammate utility covers their defensive gaps.

Overall Side Analysis

Iso demonstrates commanding superiority on both attack (47.8%) and defense (56.7%), comprehensively outperforming Sova across all phases of the game. Based on our analysis of 34 competitive matches, this is one of the more one-sided agent matchups in Valorant, with Iso holding advantages at every stage.

Map selection and team composition cannot fix Sova's disadvantage in this matchup. Iso outperforms across all map types and team structures. If you're playing Sova into Iso, your team composition needs to compensate heavily: strong fragging agents to carry Sova's weight, utility-heavy supports to cover their positioning, and coordination to avoid leaving Sova in isolated Iso encounters.

For ranked climbing, avoid playing Sova when you expect to face Iso frequently. The 8.9 combined percentage point disadvantage across both sides is too large to overcome through individual skill improvement. If Iso is meta in your rank bracket, strongly consider adding them to your agent pool or playing agents that have more neutral matchups.

Final verdict: Iso decisively wins the Iso vs Sova matchup. This isn't a skill check or a "play better" situation — Iso has systematic advantages that manifest across thousands of games. Sova players facing Iso should adjust expectations, play more supportively, and recognize that direct confrontations are statistically unfavorable at every stage of the game.

Duelist vs Initiator Dynamics

The Duelist (Iso) vs Initiator (Sova) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Iso's Duelist abilities serve different purposes than Sova's Initiator kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.

Understanding how Duelist abilities interact with Initiator counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Iso's Duelist toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Sova's Initiator kit counters others. The Iso advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.

Iso has favorable matchups against 10 agents and unfavorable matchups against 12 agents in Valorant. Iso's strongest matchup is against Omen with a 80.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Phoenix at 0.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.

Iso matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 12.01)
Opponent
Win Rate
Matches
KDA
DMG/Rnd
HS %
Atk WR
Def WR
48.89%451.22144.629.1%50.4%47.7%
37.14%351.27146.128.0%46.1%48.3%
25.71%351.23144.933.4%47.2%41.9%
55.88%341.35155.932.4%47.8%56.7%
47.62%211.29155.834.2%51.2%47.8%
29.41%171.14141.432.1%45.9%42.0%
35.29%171.39165.531.8%52.9%37.9%
42.86%141.15140.431.6%52.1%44.4%
23.08%131.10137.133.0%42.3%44.7%
37.50%81.23139.229.7%42.4%48.2%
60.00%51.68181.228.5%43.3%63.8%
60.00%51.61171.023.6%43.6%61.7%
80.00%51.51156.229.5%60.0%54.9%
40.00%50.89124.130.4%42.9%43.1%
50.00%41.17151.336.1%54.2%43.6%
75.00%41.38165.147.9%65.0%55.3%
50.00%41.20146.935.4%58.5%51.0%
50.00%41.68180.034.4%58.5%47.9%
66.67%31.59187.730.4%51.3%51.6%
66.67%31.28164.932.2%62.9%43.8%
0.00%31.02161.432.5%33.3%27.6%
33.33%31.37156.325.9%47.4%42.1%
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Iso's best matchup in Valorant?

Iso's best matchup is against Omen, achieving a 80.0% win rate. Iso excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.

What is Iso's hardest matchup?

Iso's hardest matchup is against Phoenix, with only a 0.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Iso should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.

How many favorable matchups does Iso have?

Iso has 10 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 12 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.

How should I play Iso in difficult matchups?

When playing Iso in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Iso's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.

What stats matter most in Iso's matchups?

Key stats to analyze in Iso's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.

See Also: Other Duelists