Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Iso's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Iso
66.7% WR
VS
Veto
33.3% WR
Who Wins the Iso vs Veto Matchup?
Winner
Iso
Matches: 6
66.7%
Win Rate
33.3%
1.17
Avg KDA
1.22
17.2
Avg Kills
19.3
17.8
Avg Deaths
17.8
141.1
DMG/Round
155.8
34.4%
HS %
31.4%
216
Combat Score
237
66.2%
Attack WR
53.5%
46.5%
Defense WR
33.8%
Iso vs Veto Performance Breakdown
The Iso vs Veto matchup is closely contested, with each agent winning 2 of 4 key metrics across 6 analyzed games. Both agents bring competitive strengths to this duel, making individual skill and team composition crucial factors in determining round outcomes.
Fragging Power
1.17Iso
1.22Veto
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Iso and Veto, with KDA ratios of 1.17 and 1.22 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
141.1Iso
155.8Veto
Veto outputs 155.8 average damage per round, edging out Iso's 141.1 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Veto secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
66.2%Iso
53.5%Veto
On the attacking side, Iso dominates with a 66.2% win rate compared to Veto's 53.5%. This 12.6 percentage point gap indicates Iso is significantly more effective at executing onto sites, whether through superior entry fragging, better utility usage for site takes, or stronger post-plant positioning.
Defense Side
46.5%Iso
33.8%Veto
Iso excels on the defensive half with a commanding 46.5% win rate, far surpassing Veto's 33.8%. This 12.6 percentage point advantage demonstrates Iso's superior ability to anchor sites, gather information, and deny enemy executes through effective utility and positioning.
The Iso vs Veto matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 6 competitive matches analyzed, Iso wins 66.7% of the time compared to Veto's 33.3%, a 33.3 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in attack-side performance, where Iso consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Sentinel matchup, Iso has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Veto should never take isolated fights against Iso and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Iso vs Veto Fragging Analysis
Veto edges out Iso in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, damage output. With only a 3-2 margin based on 6 matches analyzed, this Iso vs Veto matchup remains contestable for both sides. Iso shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Iso's favor.
Avg KDA
1.17Iso
1.22Veto
The KDA comparison between Iso and Veto reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Iso averaging 1.17 and Veto posting 1.22. This razor-thin margin of just 0.06 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
17.2Iso
19.3Veto
Veto substantially outfrags Iso in this matchup, averaging 19.3 kills compared to 17.2 — a difference of nearly 2.2 eliminations per match. When Veto faces Iso, the data clearly shows Veto finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. Iso players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Veto in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
17.8Iso
17.8Veto
Survivability metrics are nearly equal between Iso (17.8 deaths/game) and Veto (17.8 deaths/game). Neither agent demonstrates a clear advantage in staying alive during these matchups, suggesting both have similar risk profiles and neither kit provides notably better escape tools or defensive utility against the other. Round outcomes in this matchup hinge on which player makes fewer critical positioning errors rather than any agent-based survival advantage.
DMG/Round
141.1Iso
155.8Veto
Veto significantly outdamages Iso in head-to-head encounters, posting 155.8 ADR versus 141.1. This 14.7 damage-per-round advantage means Veto consistently wins the damage exchange in firefights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. Iso players should avoid prolonged dueling with Veto — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage weapons or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate for the raw gunfight disadvantage.
HS %
34.4%Iso
31.4%Veto
Iso demonstrates notably superior headshot accuracy against Veto: 34.4% versus 31.4%. This 2.9 percentage point gap in precision means Iso ends gunfights faster, conserves more ammo, and wins more 50-50 duels where both players see each other simultaneously. Veto faces a real disadvantage in aim duels and should compensate through utility, positioning, or weapon choices that don't require headshot precision (shotguns, Odin spraying through smokes, etc.).
Iso vs Veto Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Iso
66.2%
53.5%
Defense Side
Iso
46.5%
33.8%
Attack Side Breakdown
The attack-side performance gap between Iso and Veto is dramatic: 66.2% versus 53.5%, a commanding 12.6 percentage point advantage. Iso dominates offensive scenarios in this matchup to a degree that requires Veto to fundamentally change their approach to attack-side play.
Our analysis of 6 competitive matches reveals Iso has overwhelming attack-side superiority in every measurable category. Site executions, entry success, post-plant conversion, and mid-round adaptability all massively favor Iso. This isn't a gap that Veto can overcome through practice or "playing better" — it's a structural matchup disadvantage. Veto teams must build their entire attack strategy around protecting Veto from direct Iso engagement: give Veto lurk roles, put them in trade positions rather than entry, and design executes where Veto's weaknesses are covered by teammate utility.
Under no circumstances should Veto take entry duels against Iso. The 12.6% attack gap makes entry fragging against Iso one of the lowest-percentage plays in Valorant. Veto must exclusively play support roles on attack: flash for teammates, smoke for executes, trade after entries, or create map pressure through lurks that don't involve Iso confrontation. Iso should actively hunt Veto entries, knowing the statistical advantage is overwhelming.
Iso has favorable matchups against 11 agents and unfavorable matchups against 14 agents in Valorant. Iso's strongest matchup is against Omen with a 66.7% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Sage at 12.5% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Iso matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Iso's best matchup is against Omen, achieving a 66.7% win rate. Iso excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Iso's hardest matchup?
Iso's hardest matchup is against Sage, with only a 12.5% win rate. Against this opponent, Iso should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Iso have?
Iso has 11 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 14 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Iso in difficult matchups?
When playing Iso in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Iso's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Iso's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Iso's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Veto's post-plant conversion rate against Iso is catastrophic. The data shows Veto fails to hold spike plants at a dramatically higher rate than Iso. Never leave Veto alone post-plant — they need constant teammate support, crossfire setups, and utility coordination to have any chance of winning these scenarios. Consider not planting at all if Veto is the only survivor. Iso should play extremely confidently in post-plants, knowing Veto struggles to convert even favorable positions.
Defense Side Breakdown
The defensive disparity between Iso and Veto is substantial: 46.5% versus 33.8%, a 12.6 point chasm. Iso absolutely dominates CT side in this matchup — their site holds are significantly harder to break, their retake contributions more impactful, and their defensive utility more effective at every level.
Veto cannot be trusted with traditional site anchor responsibilities against Iso. The 12.6% defensive gap is too large to overcome through positioning or individual skill. Teams must protect Veto: pair them with multiple teammates, give them off-site lurk positions, or have them rotate immediately when Iso's presence is identified on their site. Iso should aggressively anchor the most difficult sites on any map, knowing their defensive capability is overwhelming.
Veto should avoid retake scenarios against Iso entirely when possible. The data from 6 matches shows Veto's retake conversion rate against Iso is dramatically lower than average. If Veto must retake, require 3+ player numbers advantage and full utility coordination. Iso should play post-plant positions knowing Veto lacks the capability to effectively contest them. In clutch scenarios, Iso wins at overwhelming rates.
Economy decisions for Veto must account for their defensive inadequacy. Force buying against Iso is essentially throwing away credits — the defensive gap makes partial buys nearly unwinnable. Veto should always advocate for full saves, building toward rounds where team utility can compensate for their individual defensive weakness. Iso can confidently force and half-buy, knowing their defensive advantages persist across all economy states.
Overall Side Analysis
Iso demonstrates commanding superiority on both attack (66.2%) and defense (46.5%), comprehensively outperforming Veto across all phases of the game. Based on our analysis of 6 competitive matches, this is one of the more one-sided agent matchups in Valorant, with Iso holding advantages at every stage.
Map selection and team composition cannot fix Veto's disadvantage in this matchup. Iso outperforms across all map types and team structures. If you're playing Veto into Iso, your team composition needs to compensate heavily: strong fragging agents to carry Veto's weight, utility-heavy supports to cover their positioning, and coordination to avoid leaving Veto in isolated Iso encounters.
For ranked climbing, avoid playing Veto when you expect to face Iso frequently. The 25.3 combined percentage point disadvantage across both sides is too large to overcome through individual skill improvement. If Iso is meta in your rank bracket, strongly consider adding them to your agent pool or playing agents that have more neutral matchups.
Final verdict: Iso decisively wins the Iso vs Veto matchup. This isn't a skill check or a "play better" situation — Iso has systematic advantages that manifest across thousands of games. Veto players facing Iso should adjust expectations, play more supportively, and recognize that direct confrontations are statistically unfavorable at every stage of the game.
Duelist vs Sentinel Dynamics
The Duelist (Iso) vs Sentinel (Veto) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Iso's Duelist abilities serve different purposes than Veto's Sentinel kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Duelist abilities interact with Sentinel counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Iso's Duelist toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Veto's Sentinel kit counters others. The Iso advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
47.0%
48.4%
51.0%
49.6%
50.8%
47.4%
48.0%
48.5%
44.4%
45.4%
38.5%
52.9%
50.4%
60.1%
51.9%
49.2%
52.6%
55.9%
40.2%
46.5%
67.6%
46.7%
39.0%
50.0%
Iso vs Veto matchup breakdown: Iso dominates with a 66.7% win rate across 6 matches. Higher damage output (141 ADR) gives Iso a clear edge. See attack/defense stats and combat analysis.
