Iso vs Jett matchup in Valorant
Win Rate
25.7%
Matches
35
Avg KDA
1.23
Avg ADR
145

Iso vs JettMatchup

Duelist
Patch12.01
Matches82,189
RegionAll Regions
RankAll Ranks
PlatformAll Platforms
ModeCompetitive
Last UpdatedFeb 3, 2026
MethodologyData Methodology

Iso vs Jett matchup guide: Jett leads with a 74.3% win rate, but Iso can still win. Learn how Iso's 145 ADR creates opportunities to turn this 35-match dataset into ranked wins.

Iso Matchup Breakdown

Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Iso's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.

Compare against an opponent
Jett - 25.7% win rateJett(25.7%)
Iso - 25.7% win rate in this matchup
Iso
25.7% WR
VS
Jett vs Iso matchup - 74.3% win rate
Jett
74.3% WR

Who Wins the Iso vs Jett Matchup?

Jett wins the Iso vs Jett matchup
Winner
Jett
Matches: 35
25.7%
Win Rate
74.3%
1.23
Avg KDA
1.16
16.3
Avg Kills
16.1
16.6
Avg Deaths
16.6
144.9
DMG/Round
141.5
33.4%
HS %
27.6%
214
Combat Score
213
47.2%
Attack WR
58.1%
41.9%
Defense WR
52.8%

Iso vs Jett Performance Breakdown

Iso vs Jett matchup breakdown - overall performance winner

The Iso vs Jett matchup is closely contested, with each agent winning 2 of 4 key metrics across 35 analyzed games. Both agents bring competitive strengths to this duel, making individual skill and team composition crucial factors in determining round outcomes.

Fragging Power
1.23Iso
1.16Jett
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Iso and Jett, with KDA ratios of 1.23 and 1.16 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
144.9Iso
141.5Jett
Damage output is evenly distributed in this matchup, with Iso averaging 144.9 ADR and Jett at 141.5 ADR. Neither agent holds a decisive firepower advantage, making utility usage and team coordination the key differentiators.
Attack Side
47.2%Iso
58.1%Jett
On the attacking side, Jett dominates with a 58.1% win rate compared to Iso's 47.2%. This 11.0 percentage point gap indicates Jett is significantly more effective at executing onto sites, whether through superior entry fragging, better utility usage for site takes, or stronger post-plant positioning.
Defense Side
41.9%Iso
52.8%Jett
Jett excels on the defensive half with a commanding 52.8% win rate, far surpassing Iso's 41.9%. This 11.0 percentage point advantage demonstrates Jett's superior ability to anchor sites, gather information, and deny enemy executes through effective utility and positioning.

Iso vs Jett Matchup Summary

The Iso vs Jett matchup in Valorant is a heavily one-sided matchup. Based on 35 competitive matches analyzed, Jett wins 74.3% of the time compared to Iso's 25.7%, a 48.6 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in attack-side performance, where Jett consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Duelist matchup, Jett has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Iso should never take isolated fights against Jett and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.

Iso vs Jett Fragging Analysis

Iso wins fragging stats against Jett in Valorant

Iso achieves a clean sweep in the fragging department, winning all five combat metrics against Jett in the Iso vs Jett matchup. This comprehensive dominance across KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability demonstrates that Iso holds systematic mechanical advantages in these encounters. Based on analysis of 35 competitive matches, Iso players can approach duels against Jett with confidence, while Jett players must completely avoid fair fights and instead focus on utility-based contributions, information gathering, and team coordination to remain impactful.

KDA
1.23Iso
1.16Jett
The KDA comparison between Iso and Jett reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Iso averaging 1.23 and Jett posting 1.16. This razor-thin margin of just 0.07 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
16.3Iso
16.1Jett
Kill production between Iso and Jett is virtually identical, with Iso averaging 16.3 kills per game and Jett securing 16.1. This parity suggests both agents are equally capable of finding frags in this matchup, and round outcomes depend more heavily on objective play, utility usage, and team coordination than raw elimination numbers. Players should focus on impactful kills — entries, clutch situations, and trading — rather than simply padding their kill count.
Avg Deaths
16.6Iso
16.6Jett
Survivability metrics are nearly equal between Iso (16.6 deaths/game) and Jett (16.6 deaths/game). Neither agent demonstrates a clear advantage in staying alive during these matchups, suggesting both have similar risk profiles and neither kit provides notably better escape tools or defensive utility against the other. Round outcomes in this matchup hinge on which player makes fewer critical positioning errors rather than any agent-based survival advantage.
DMG/Round
144.9Iso
141.5Jett
Iso applies 3.4 more damage per round than Jett in this matchup (144.9 vs 141.5 ADR). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: Iso contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. Jett can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
Headshot %
33.4%Iso
27.6%Jett
The headshot percentage disparity between Iso and Jett is substantial: 33.4% compared to 27.6%, a 5.7 point difference. Iso consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Jett, challenging Iso in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Iso's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.

Iso vs Jett Attack and Defense Performance

Attack Side
Jett
Iso47.2%
Jett58.1%
Defense Side
Jett
Iso41.9%
Jett52.8%

Attack Side Breakdown

The attack-side performance gap between Jett and Iso is dramatic: 58.1% versus 47.2%, a commanding 11.0 percentage point advantage. Jett dominates offensive scenarios in this matchup to a degree that requires Iso to fundamentally change their approach to attack-side play.

Our analysis of 35 competitive matches reveals Jett has overwhelming attack-side superiority in every measurable category. Site executions, entry success, post-plant conversion, and mid-round adaptability all massively favor Jett. This isn't a gap that Iso can overcome through practice or "playing better" — it's a structural matchup disadvantage. Iso teams must build their entire attack strategy around protecting Iso from direct Jett engagement: give Iso lurk roles, put them in trade positions rather than entry, and design executes where Iso's weaknesses are covered by teammate utility.

Under no circumstances should Iso take entry duels against Jett. The 11.0% attack gap makes entry fragging against Jett one of the lowest-percentage plays in Valorant. Iso must exclusively play support roles on attack: flash for teammates, smoke for executes, trade after entries, or create map pressure through lurks that don't involve Jett confrontation. Jett should actively hunt Iso entries, knowing the statistical advantage is overwhelming.

Iso's post-plant conversion rate against Jett is catastrophic. The data shows Iso fails to hold spike plants at a dramatically higher rate than Jett. Never leave Iso alone post-plant — they need constant teammate support, crossfire setups, and utility coordination to have any chance of winning these scenarios. Consider not planting at all if Iso is the only survivor. Jett should play extremely confidently in post-plants, knowing Iso struggles to convert even favorable positions.

Defense Side Breakdown

The defensive disparity between Jett and Iso is substantial: 52.8% versus 41.9%, a 11.0 point chasm. Jett absolutely dominates CT side in this matchup — their site holds are significantly harder to break, their retake contributions more impactful, and their defensive utility more effective at every level.

Iso cannot be trusted with traditional site anchor responsibilities against Jett. The 11.0% defensive gap is too large to overcome through positioning or individual skill. Teams must protect Iso: pair them with multiple teammates, give them off-site lurk positions, or have them rotate immediately when Jett's presence is identified on their site. Jett should aggressively anchor the most difficult sites on any map, knowing their defensive capability is overwhelming.

Iso should avoid retake scenarios against Jett entirely when possible. The data from 35 matches shows Iso's retake conversion rate against Jett is dramatically lower than average. If Iso must retake, require 3+ player numbers advantage and full utility coordination. Jett should play post-plant positions knowing Iso lacks the capability to effectively contest them. In clutch scenarios, Jett wins at overwhelming rates.

Economy decisions for Iso must account for their defensive inadequacy. Force buying against Jett is essentially throwing away credits — the defensive gap makes partial buys nearly unwinnable. Iso should always advocate for full saves, building toward rounds where team utility can compensate for their individual defensive weakness. Jett can confidently force and half-buy, knowing their defensive advantages persist across all economy states.

Overall Side Analysis

Jett demonstrates commanding superiority on both attack (58.1%) and defense (52.8%), comprehensively outperforming Iso across all phases of the game. Based on our analysis of 35 competitive matches, this is one of the more one-sided agent matchups in Valorant, with Jett holding advantages at every stage.

Map selection and team composition cannot fix Iso's disadvantage in this matchup. Jett outperforms across all map types and team structures. If you're playing Iso into Jett, your team composition needs to compensate heavily: strong fragging agents to carry Iso's weight, utility-heavy supports to cover their positioning, and coordination to avoid leaving Iso in isolated Jett encounters.

For ranked climbing, avoid playing Iso when you expect to face Jett frequently. The 22.0 combined percentage point disadvantage across both sides is too large to overcome through individual skill improvement. If Jett is meta in your rank bracket, strongly consider adding them to your agent pool or playing agents that have more neutral matchups.

Final verdict: Jett decisively wins the Iso vs Jett matchup. This isn't a skill check or a "play better" situation — Jett has systematic advantages that manifest across thousands of games. Iso players facing Jett should adjust expectations, play more supportively, and recognize that direct confrontations are statistically unfavorable at every stage of the game.

Duelist vs Duelist Dynamics

Both Iso and Jett fill the Duelist role in Valorant team compositions. This role mirror means teams won't face composition issues from having both agents — the question is purely which Duelist performs better in direct competition. Our data clearly indicates Jett is the stronger Duelist pick when these agents face each other.

In Duelist vs Duelist encounters, similar ability timing and usage patterns mean both agents often use their kits in comparable ways. The winner typically comes down to which player uses their abilities more efficiently and wins the mechanical duels that follow. Jett's statistical advantage suggests their specific Duelist kit translates slightly better to winning these mirror encounters.

Iso has favorable matchups against 10 agents and unfavorable matchups against 12 agents in Valorant. Iso's strongest matchup is against Omen with a 80.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Phoenix at 0.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.

Iso matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 12.01)
Opponent
Win Rate
Matches
KDA
DMG/Rnd
HS %
Atk WR
Def WR
48.89%451.22144.629.1%50.4%47.7%
37.14%351.27146.128.0%46.1%48.3%
25.71%351.23144.933.4%47.2%41.9%
55.88%341.35155.932.4%47.8%56.7%
47.62%211.29155.834.2%51.2%47.8%
29.41%171.14141.432.1%45.9%42.0%
35.29%171.39165.531.8%52.9%37.9%
42.86%141.15140.431.6%52.1%44.4%
23.08%131.10137.133.0%42.3%44.7%
37.50%81.23139.229.7%42.4%48.2%
60.00%51.68181.228.5%43.3%63.8%
60.00%51.61171.023.6%43.6%61.7%
80.00%51.51156.229.5%60.0%54.9%
40.00%50.89124.130.4%42.9%43.1%
50.00%41.17151.336.1%54.2%43.6%
75.00%41.38165.147.9%65.0%55.3%
50.00%41.20146.935.4%58.5%51.0%
50.00%41.68180.034.4%58.5%47.9%
66.67%31.59187.730.4%51.3%51.6%
66.67%31.28164.932.2%62.9%43.8%
0.00%31.02161.432.5%33.3%27.6%
33.33%31.37156.325.9%47.4%42.1%
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Iso's best matchup in Valorant?

Iso's best matchup is against Omen, achieving a 80.0% win rate. Iso excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.

What is Iso's hardest matchup?

Iso's hardest matchup is against Phoenix, with only a 0.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Iso should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.

How many favorable matchups does Iso have?

Iso has 10 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 12 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.

How should I play Iso in difficult matchups?

When playing Iso in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Iso's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.

What stats matter most in Iso's matchups?

Key stats to analyze in Iso's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.

See Also: Other Duelists