Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Iso's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Iso
40.7% WR
VS
Neon
59.3% WR
Who Wins the Iso vs Neon Matchup?
Winner
Neon
Matches: 27
40.7%
Win Rate
59.3%
1.28
Avg KDA
1.20
17.0
Avg Kills
15.2
16.4
Avg Deaths
16.6
149.5
DMG/Round
131.1
33.3%
HS %
21.9%
221
Combat Score
203
44.8%
Attack WR
51.5%
48.5%
Defense WR
55.2%
Iso vs Neon Performance Breakdown
The Iso vs Neon matchup is closely contested, with each agent winning 2 of 4 key metrics across 27 analyzed games. Both agents bring competitive strengths to this duel, making individual skill and team composition crucial factors in determining round outcomes.
Fragging Power
1.28Iso
1.20Neon
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Iso and Neon, with KDA ratios of 1.28 and 1.20 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
149.5Iso
131.1Neon
Iso delivers substantially higher damage per round (149.5 ADR) compared to Neon's 131.1 ADR. This 18.4 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Iso a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
44.8%Iso
51.5%Neon
On the attacking side, Neon dominates with a 51.5% win rate compared to Iso's 44.8%. This 6.6 percentage point gap indicates Neon is significantly more effective at executing onto sites, whether through superior entry fragging, better utility usage for site takes, or stronger post-plant positioning.
Defense Side
48.5%Iso
55.2%Neon
Neon excels on the defensive half with a commanding 55.2% win rate, far surpassing Iso's 48.5%. This 6.6 percentage point advantage demonstrates Neon's superior ability to anchor sites, gather information, and deny enemy executes through effective utility and positioning.
The Iso vs Neon matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 27 competitive matches analyzed, Neon wins 59.3% of the time compared to Iso's 40.7%, a 18.5 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Iso consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Duelist matchup, Neon has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Iso should never take isolated fights against Neon and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Iso vs Neon Fragging Analysis
Iso achieves a clean sweep in the fragging department, winning all five combat metrics against Neon in the Iso vs Neon matchup. This comprehensive dominance across KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability demonstrates that Iso holds systematic mechanical advantages in these encounters. Based on analysis of 27 competitive matches, Iso players can approach duels against Neon with confidence, while Neon players must completely avoid fair fights and instead focus on utility-based contributions, information gathering, and team coordination to remain impactful.
Avg KDA
1.28Iso
1.20Neon
The KDA comparison between Iso and Neon reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Iso averaging 1.28 and Neon posting 1.20. This razor-thin margin of just 0.08 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
17.0Iso
15.2Neon
Iso substantially outfrags Neon in this matchup, averaging 17.0 kills compared to 15.2 — a difference of nearly 1.8 eliminations per match. When Iso faces Neon, the data clearly shows Iso finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. Neon players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Iso in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
16.4Iso
16.6Neon
Survivability metrics are nearly equal between Iso (16.4 deaths/game) and Neon (16.6 deaths/game). Neither agent demonstrates a clear advantage in staying alive during these matchups, suggesting both have similar risk profiles and neither kit provides notably better escape tools or defensive utility against the other. Round outcomes in this matchup hinge on which player makes fewer critical positioning errors rather than any agent-based survival advantage.
DMG/Round
149.5Iso
131.1Neon
Iso significantly outdamages Neon in head-to-head encounters, posting 149.5 ADR versus 131.1. This 18.4 damage-per-round advantage means Iso consistently wins the damage exchange in firefights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. Neon players should avoid prolonged dueling with Iso — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage weapons or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate for the raw gunfight disadvantage.
HS %
33.3%Iso
21.9%Neon
The headshot percentage disparity between Iso and Neon is substantial: 33.3% compared to 21.9%, a 11.4 point difference. Iso consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Neon, challenging Iso in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Iso's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.
Iso vs Neon Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Neon
44.8%
51.5%
Defense Side
Neon
48.5%
55.2%
Attack Side Breakdown
Neon significantly outperforms Iso on attack side, achieving a 51.5% round win rate versus 44.8%. This 6.6 point disparity reveals Neon as the clearly superior offensive agent in this head-to-head, with advantages that Iso cannot easily overcome through individual skill alone.
Based on 27 matches analyzed, Neon dominates attack-side scenarios through multiple vectors. Entry success rate, post-plant conversion, and mid-round adaptability all favor Neon significantly. Iso teams must make structural adjustments to their attack approach: rely less on Iso for key fragging roles, design executes that minimize Iso's direct engagement with Neon, and consider how team composition can cover Iso's offensive weaknesses. Simply "playing better" isn't enough to overcome a 6.6% gap.
Iso should avoid entry fragging roles against Neon whenever possible. The data clearly shows Neon wins a disproportionate share of first contacts on attack. Iso players should volunteer for support roles — flashing for teammates, trading entries, or lurking to create map pressure without direct Neon confrontation. If forced to entry, wait for maximum utility support and ensure a trade is guaranteed. Neon can and should take aggressive entries, knowing statistical backing supports confident play.
Iso has favorable matchups against 11 agents and unfavorable matchups against 14 agents in Valorant. Iso's strongest matchup is against Omen with a 66.7% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Sage at 12.5% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Iso matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Iso's best matchup is against Omen, achieving a 66.7% win rate. Iso excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Iso's hardest matchup?
Iso's hardest matchup is against Sage, with only a 12.5% win rate. Against this opponent, Iso should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Iso have?
Iso has 11 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 14 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Iso in difficult matchups?
When playing Iso in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Iso's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Iso's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Iso's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant scenarios heavily favor Neon in this matchup. Iso struggles to convert spike plants into round wins at the same rate, whether due to weaker defuse denial, inferior retake resistance, or less effective post-plant positioning. Iso teams should never leave Iso alone in post-plant — always have teammates nearby for crossfires and trades. Consider giving the spike to a different player when possible. Neon should recognize their post-plant dominance and play for spike aggressively after site takes.
Defense Side Breakdown
Neon substantially outclasses Iso on defense, achieving 55.2% round wins compared to 48.5%. This 6.6 percentage point gap indicates Neon excels at core defensive tasks — anchoring sites, gathering information, stalling executes, and contributing to retakes — at a level Iso cannot match.
Iso should never solo anchor against Neon. The 6.6% defensive gap makes isolated site holds extremely unfavorable for Iso. Instead, pair Iso with a teammate, give them off-site positions that allow early rotates, or have them play supportive roles that don't require extended site holds. Neon should actively anchor difficult sites, knowing their defensive capabilities significantly exceed Iso's.
Retake dynamics heavily favor Neon. When Iso needs to retake against Neon, success requires overwhelming numbers and utility coordination — never attempt equal-number retakes and absolutely avoid solo retakes. Neon should play post-plant positions confidently, knowing Iso struggles to clear them effectively. In clutch scenarios, Neon has a significant statistical edge that Iso cannot overcome through individual skill alone.
Economy management becomes critical for Iso in this matchup. Force buying against Neon is mathematically unfavorable — the defensive gap compounds when utility is limited. Iso should advocate for full saves, ensuring full buy rounds have maximum utility to compensate for their defensive disadvantages. Neon can confidently force buy, knowing their defensive kit provides advantages that partially compensate for economic disadvantages.
Overall Side Analysis
Neon demonstrates commanding superiority on both attack (51.5%) and defense (55.2%), comprehensively outperforming Iso across all phases of the game. Based on our analysis of 27 competitive matches, this is one of the more one-sided agent matchups in Valorant, with Neon holding advantages at every stage.
Map selection and team composition cannot fix Iso's disadvantage in this matchup. Neon outperforms across all map types and team structures. If you're playing Iso into Neon, your team composition needs to compensate heavily: strong fragging agents to carry Iso's weight, utility-heavy supports to cover their positioning, and coordination to avoid leaving Iso in isolated Neon encounters.
For ranked climbing, avoid playing Iso when you expect to face Neon frequently. The 13.3 combined percentage point disadvantage across both sides is too large to overcome through individual skill improvement. If Neon is meta in your rank bracket, strongly consider adding them to your agent pool or playing agents that have more neutral matchups.
Final verdict: Neon decisively wins the Iso vs Neon matchup. This isn't a skill check or a "play better" situation — Neon has systematic advantages that manifest across thousands of games. Iso players facing Neon should adjust expectations, play more supportively, and recognize that direct confrontations are statistically unfavorable at every stage of the game.
Duelist vs Duelist Dynamics
Both Iso and Neon fill the Duelist role in Valorant team compositions. This role mirror means teams won't face composition issues from having both agents — the question is purely which Duelist performs better in direct competition. Our data clearly indicates Neon is the stronger Duelist pick when these agents face each other.
In Duelist vs Duelist encounters, similar ability timing and usage patterns mean both agents often use their kits in comparable ways. The winner typically comes down to which player uses their abilities more efficiently and wins the mechanical duels that follow. Neon's statistical advantage suggests their specific Duelist kit translates slightly better to winning these mirror encounters.
47.0%
48.4%
51.0%
49.6%
50.8%
47.4%
48.0%
48.5%
44.4%
45.4%
38.5%
52.9%
50.4%
60.1%
51.9%
49.2%
52.6%
55.9%
40.2%
46.5%
67.6%
46.7%
39.0%
50.0%
Iso vs Neon matchup guide: Neon leads with a 59.3% win rate, but Iso can still win. Learn how Iso's 149 ADR creates opportunities to turn this 27-match dataset into ranked wins.
