Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Vyse's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Vyse
33.3% WR
VS
Gekko
66.7% WR
Who Wins the Vyse vs Gekko Matchup?
Winner
Gekko
Matches: 3
33.3%
Win Rate
66.7%
1.16
Avg KDA
1.52
12.3
Avg Kills
14.3
14.3
Avg Deaths
14.0
118.5
DMG/Round
141.0
32.3%
HS %
27.2%
175
Combat Score
204
37.9%
Attack WR
58.1%
41.9%
Defense WR
62.1%
Vyse vs Gekko Performance Breakdown
In the Vyse vs Gekko matchup, Gekko demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 3 analyzed matches, Gekko outperforms Vyse in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Gekko the statistically favored pick when facing Vyse in ranked Valorant matches.
Fragging Power
1.16Vyse
1.52Gekko
Gekko maintains a noticeable fragging advantage with a 1.52 KDA versus Vyse's 1.16. This difference in kill-death-assist ratio suggests Gekko players are more reliable in clutch situations and contribute more consistently to round wins through individual playmaking.
Damage Output
118.5Vyse
141.0Gekko
Gekko delivers substantially higher damage per round (141.0 ADR) compared to Vyse's 118.5 ADR. This 22.5 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Gekko a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
37.9%Vyse
58.1%Gekko
On the attacking side, Gekko dominates with a 58.1% win rate compared to Vyse's 37.9%. This 20.1 percentage point gap indicates Gekko is significantly more effective at executing onto sites, whether through superior entry fragging, better utility usage for site takes, or stronger post-plant positioning.
Defense Side
41.9%Vyse
62.1%Gekko
Gekko excels on the defensive half with a commanding 62.1% win rate, far surpassing Vyse's 41.9%. This 20.1 percentage point advantage demonstrates Gekko's superior ability to anchor sites, gather information, and deny enemy executes through effective utility and positioning.
The Vyse vs Gekko matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 3 competitive matches analyzed, Gekko wins 66.7% of the time compared to Vyse's 33.3%, a 33.3 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in attack-side performance, where Gekko consistently outperforms. In this Sentinel vs Initiator matchup, Gekko has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Vyse should never take isolated fights against Gekko and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Vyse vs Gekko Fragging Analysis
Gekko claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Vyse vs Gekko matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability. Our analysis of 3 ranked games reveals Gekko consistently outperforms Vyse in direct combat scenarios. While Vyse manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Gekko in gunfights. Vyse players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Gekko dominates.
Avg KDA
1.16Vyse
1.52Gekko
Gekko demonstrates noticeably stronger kill-death-assist performance against Vyse, maintaining a 1.52 KDA versus 1.16. This 0.36 point gap reflects Gekko's superior ability to secure eliminations while avoiding death in these head-to-head encounters. Vyse players facing Gekko should prioritize team coordination over solo aggression — look for 2v1 situations, coordinate utility usage with teammates, and focus on trading rather than taking isolated duels where Gekko's statistical advantage becomes most pronounced.
Avg Kills
12.3Vyse
14.3Gekko
Gekko substantially outfrags Vyse in this matchup, averaging 14.3 kills compared to 12.3 — a difference of nearly 2.0 eliminations per match. When Gekko faces Vyse, the data clearly shows Gekko finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. Vyse players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Gekko in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
14.3Vyse
14.0Gekko
Gekko survives longer in this matchup, dying 14.0 times per game compared to Vyse's 14.3 deaths. This 0.3 death difference per match means Gekko is available for more rounds, contributing to late-round scenarios and clutch situations more frequently. Vyse players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests Gekko's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
DMG/Round
118.5Vyse
141.0Gekko
The damage differential between Gekko and Vyse is exceptional: 141.0 ADR compared to just 118.5. Gekko deals 22.5 more damage per round on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests Gekko's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while Vyse struggles to even trade effectively. Vyse players should treat Gekko as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or utility-based damage.
HS %
32.3%Vyse
27.2%Gekko
The headshot percentage disparity between Vyse and Gekko is substantial: 32.3% compared to 27.2%, a 5.1 point difference. Vyse consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Gekko, challenging Vyse in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Vyse's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.
Vyse vs Gekko Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Gekko
37.9%
58.1%
Defense Side
Gekko
41.9%
62.1%
Attack Side Breakdown
The attack-side performance gap between Gekko and Vyse is dramatic: 58.1% versus 37.9%, a commanding 20.1 percentage point advantage. Gekko dominates offensive scenarios in this matchup to a degree that requires Vyse to fundamentally change their approach to attack-side play.
Our analysis of 3 competitive matches reveals Gekko has overwhelming attack-side superiority in every measurable category. Site executions, entry success, post-plant conversion, and mid-round adaptability all massively favor Gekko. This isn't a gap that Vyse can overcome through practice or "playing better" — it's a structural matchup disadvantage. Vyse teams must build their entire attack strategy around protecting Vyse from direct Gekko engagement: give Vyse lurk roles, put them in trade positions rather than entry, and design executes where Vyse's weaknesses are covered by teammate utility.
Under no circumstances should Vyse take entry duels against Gekko. The 20.1% attack gap makes entry fragging against Gekko one of the lowest-percentage plays in Valorant. Vyse must exclusively play support roles on attack: flash for teammates, smoke for executes, trade after entries, or create map pressure through lurks that don't involve Gekko confrontation. Gekko should actively hunt Vyse entries, knowing the statistical advantage is overwhelming.
Vyse has favorable matchups against 16 agents and unfavorable matchups against 10 agents in Valorant. Vyse's strongest matchup is against Breach with a 100.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Iso at 33.3% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Vyse matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Vyse's best matchup is against Breach, achieving a 100.0% win rate. Vyse excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Vyse's hardest matchup?
Vyse's hardest matchup is against Iso, with only a 33.3% win rate. Against this opponent, Vyse should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Vyse have?
Vyse has 16 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 10 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Vyse in difficult matchups?
When playing Vyse in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Vyse's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Vyse's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Vyse's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Vyse's post-plant conversion rate against Gekko is catastrophic. The data shows Vyse fails to hold spike plants at a dramatically higher rate than Gekko. Never leave Vyse alone post-plant — they need constant teammate support, crossfire setups, and utility coordination to have any chance of winning these scenarios. Consider not planting at all if Vyse is the only survivor. Gekko should play extremely confidently in post-plants, knowing Vyse struggles to convert even favorable positions.
Defense Side Breakdown
The defensive disparity between Gekko and Vyse is substantial: 62.1% versus 41.9%, a 20.1 point chasm. Gekko absolutely dominates CT side in this matchup — their site holds are significantly harder to break, their retake contributions more impactful, and their defensive utility more effective at every level.
Vyse cannot be trusted with traditional site anchor responsibilities against Gekko. The 20.1% defensive gap is too large to overcome through positioning or individual skill. Teams must protect Vyse: pair them with multiple teammates, give them off-site lurk positions, or have them rotate immediately when Gekko's presence is identified on their site. Gekko should aggressively anchor the most difficult sites on any map, knowing their defensive capability is overwhelming.
Vyse should avoid retake scenarios against Gekko entirely when possible. The data from 3 matches shows Vyse's retake conversion rate against Gekko is dramatically lower than average. If Vyse must retake, require 3+ player numbers advantage and full utility coordination. Gekko should play post-plant positions knowing Vyse lacks the capability to effectively contest them. In clutch scenarios, Gekko wins at overwhelming rates.
Economy decisions for Vyse must account for their defensive inadequacy. Force buying against Gekko is essentially throwing away credits — the defensive gap makes partial buys nearly unwinnable. Vyse should always advocate for full saves, building toward rounds where team utility can compensate for their individual defensive weakness. Gekko can confidently force and half-buy, knowing their defensive advantages persist across all economy states.
Overall Side Analysis
Gekko demonstrates commanding superiority on both attack (58.1%) and defense (62.1%), comprehensively outperforming Vyse across all phases of the game. Based on our analysis of 3 competitive matches, this is one of the more one-sided agent matchups in Valorant, with Gekko holding advantages at every stage.
Map selection and team composition cannot fix Vyse's disadvantage in this matchup. Gekko outperforms across all map types and team structures. If you're playing Vyse into Gekko, your team composition needs to compensate heavily: strong fragging agents to carry Vyse's weight, utility-heavy supports to cover their positioning, and coordination to avoid leaving Vyse in isolated Gekko encounters.
For ranked climbing, avoid playing Vyse when you expect to face Gekko frequently. The 40.3 combined percentage point disadvantage across both sides is too large to overcome through individual skill improvement. If Gekko is meta in your rank bracket, strongly consider adding them to your agent pool or playing agents that have more neutral matchups.
Final verdict: Gekko decisively wins the Vyse vs Gekko matchup. This isn't a skill check or a "play better" situation — Gekko has systematic advantages that manifest across thousands of games. Vyse players facing Gekko should adjust expectations, play more supportively, and recognize that direct confrontations are statistically unfavorable at every stage of the game.
Sentinel vs Initiator Dynamics
The Sentinel (Vyse) vs Initiator (Gekko) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Vyse's Sentinel abilities serve different purposes than Gekko's Initiator kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Sentinel abilities interact with Initiator counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Vyse's Sentinel toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Gekko's Initiator kit counters others. The Gekko advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Vyse vs Gekko matchup guide: Gekko leads with a 66.7% win rate, but Vyse can still win. Learn the combat stats and strategies to turn this 3-match dataset into ranked wins.
