Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Vyse's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Vyse
50.0% WR
VS
Veto
50.0% WR
Who Wins the Vyse vs Veto Matchup?
Winner
Vyse
Matches: 8
50.0%
Win Rate
50.0%
1.30
Avg KDA
1.15
16.8
Avg Kills
16.3
15.4
Avg Deaths
16.4
141.9
DMG/Round
133.8
33.6%
HS %
33.6%
212
Combat Score
203
52.7%
Attack WR
50.6%
49.4%
Defense WR
47.3%
Vyse vs Veto Performance Breakdown
In the Vyse vs Veto matchup, Vyse demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 8 analyzed matches, Vyse outperforms Veto in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Vyse the statistically favored pick when facing Veto in ranked Valorant matches.
Fragging Power
1.30Vyse
1.15Veto
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Vyse and Veto, with KDA ratios of 1.30 and 1.15 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
141.9Vyse
133.8Veto
Vyse outputs 141.9 average damage per round, edging out Veto's 133.8 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Vyse secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
52.7%Vyse
50.6%Veto
Vyse shows stronger attack-side performance with a 52.7% win rate versus Veto's 50.6%. When your team needs to plant the spike, Vyse provides more reliable site execution and entry potential in this specific matchup.
Defense Side
49.4%Vyse
47.3%Veto
Defensive capabilities favor Vyse at 49.4% win rate compared to Veto's 47.3%. When holding sites against enemy pushes, Vyse provides more reliable defensive presence and retake potential in this matchup.
The Vyse vs Veto matchup in Valorant is an extremely balanced duel where aim and game sense determine the winner. Based on 8 competitive matches analyzed, Vyse wins 50.0% of the time compared to Veto's 50.0%, a 0.0 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Vyse consistently outperforms. In this Sentinel vs Sentinel matchup, Neither Vyse nor Veto has a clear statistical advantage. Victory comes down to individual mechanical skill, utility usage timing, and reading your opponent's positioning. Focus on winning your aim duels and making smart rotations.
Vyse vs Veto Fragging Analysis
Vyse achieves a clean sweep in the fragging department, winning all five combat metrics against Veto in the Vyse vs Veto matchup. This comprehensive dominance across KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability demonstrates that Vyse holds systematic mechanical advantages in these encounters. Based on analysis of 8 competitive matches, Vyse players can approach duels against Veto with confidence, while Veto players must completely avoid fair fights and instead focus on utility-based contributions, information gathering, and team coordination to remain impactful.
Avg KDA
1.30Vyse
1.15Veto
Vyse holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.30 compared to Veto's 1.15. While this 0.16 point difference indicates Vyse tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Veto players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Vyse's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Veto players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
16.8Vyse
16.3Veto
Vyse secures approximately 0.5 more kills per match than Veto in this head-to-head (16.8 vs 16.3). Over the course of a typical 20+ round game, this translates to Vyse contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Vyse's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Veto can compensate through superior utility assistance, site anchoring, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
15.4Vyse
16.4Veto
Vyse demonstrates markedly better survivability against Veto, recording 15.4 deaths per game versus 16.4. Dying nearly 1.0 fewer times per match gives Vyse significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Veto players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
141.9Vyse
133.8Veto
Vyse applies 8.1 more damage per round than Veto in this matchup (141.9 vs 133.8 ADR). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: Vyse contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. Veto can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
HS %
33.6%Vyse
33.6%Veto
Headshot percentages are remarkably similar between Vyse (33.6%) and Veto (33.6%). This indicates both agents' players display equivalent aim precision when these matchups occur, and neither has a systematic accuracy advantage. Duels come down to reaction time, crosshair pre-placement, and micro-positioning rather than one side consistently hitting more heads. Both agents can confidently challenge long-range angles where headshots become decisive.
Vyse vs Veto Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Vyse
52.7%
50.6%
Defense Side
Vyse
49.4%
47.3%
Attack Side Breakdown
Vyse demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Veto in this matchup, converting 52.7% of attacking rounds versus 50.6%. While this 2.1 point edge gives Vyse slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Veto players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 8 competitive games suggests Vyse's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Veto teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 2.1% gap.
When taking entry duels, Vyse holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Veto players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Vyse can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Vyse has favorable matchups against 16 agents and unfavorable matchups against 10 agents in Valorant. Vyse's strongest matchup is against Breach with a 100.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Iso at 33.3% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Vyse matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Vyse's best matchup is against Breach, achieving a 100.0% win rate. Vyse excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Vyse's hardest matchup?
Vyse's hardest matchup is against Iso, with only a 33.3% win rate. Against this opponent, Vyse should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Vyse have?
Vyse has 16 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 10 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Vyse in difficult matchups?
When playing Vyse in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Vyse's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Vyse's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Vyse's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Vyse's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Veto should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 2.1 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Vyse shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Veto, winning 49.4% of defense rounds compared to 47.3%. This 2.1 percentage point edge suggests Vyse's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Veto players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Vyse can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 2.1% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Veto should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Vyse demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Vyse converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Veto should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Vyse when you can wait for teammates. Vyse can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 2.1% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Veto should be more conservative with eco aggression against Vyse and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Vyse can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Vyse holds clear advantages on both attack (52.7%) and defense (49.4%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Vyse vs Veto matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Vyse doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Vyse's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Vyse performs better. Veto teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Veto with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Veto's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Vyse is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Vyse provides a measurable ranked advantage. Veto players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Vyse confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Vyse wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 4.2 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Veto isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Sentinel vs Sentinel Dynamics
Both Vyse and Veto fill the Sentinel role in Valorant team compositions. This role mirror means teams won't face composition issues from having both agents — the question is purely which Sentinel performs better in direct competition. Our data clearly indicates Vyse is the stronger Sentinel pick when these agents face each other.
In Sentinel vs Sentinel encounters, similar ability timing and usage patterns mean both agents often use their kits in comparable ways. The winner typically comes down to which player uses their abilities more efficiently and wins the mechanical duels that follow. Vyse's statistical advantage suggests their specific Sentinel kit translates slightly better to winning these mirror encounters.
Vyse vs Veto head-to-head analysis. Vyse holds a 50.0% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 8 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
