Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Yoru's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Yoru
47.5% WR
VS
Neon
51.4% WR
Who Wins the Yoru vs Neon Matchup?
Winner
Neon
Matches: 177
47.5%
Win Rate
51.4%
1.28
Avg KDA
1.21
16.5
Avg Kills
16.4
16.1
Avg Deaths
17.2
142.1
DMG/Round
136.7
28.2%
HS %
20.5%
216
Combat Score
218
48.9%
Attack WR
49.8%
50.2%
Defense WR
51.1%
Yoru vs Neon Performance Breakdown
The Yoru vs Neon matchup is closely contested, with each agent winning 2 of 4 key metrics across 177 analyzed games. Both agents bring competitive strengths to this duel, making individual skill and team composition crucial factors in determining round outcomes.
Fragging Power
1.28Yoru
1.21Neon
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Yoru and Neon, with KDA ratios of 1.28 and 1.21 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
142.1Yoru
136.7Neon
Yoru outputs 142.1 average damage per round, edging out Neon's 136.7 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Yoru secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
48.9%Yoru
49.8%Neon
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Yoru at 48.9% and Neon at 49.8% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
50.2%Yoru
51.1%Neon
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Yoru posting a 50.2% win rate and Neon at 51.1%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Yoru vs Neon matchup in Valorant is a moderately favorable matchup. Based on 177 competitive matches analyzed, Neon wins 51.4% of the time compared to Yoru's 47.5%, a 4.0 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Yoru consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Duelist matchup, Neon has meaningful advantages in this agent head-to-head. Yoru players should avoid isolated duels when possible and rely on team utility and trading to overcome the statistical disadvantage.
Yoru vs Neon Fragging Analysis
Yoru achieves a clean sweep in the fragging department, winning all five combat metrics against Neon in the Yoru vs Neon matchup. This comprehensive dominance across KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability demonstrates that Yoru holds systematic mechanical advantages in these encounters. Based on analysis of 177 competitive matches, Yoru players can approach duels against Neon with confidence, while Neon players must completely avoid fair fights and instead focus on utility-based contributions, information gathering, and team coordination to remain impactful.
Avg KDA
1.28Yoru
1.21Neon
The KDA comparison between Yoru and Neon reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Yoru averaging 1.28 and Neon posting 1.21. This razor-thin margin of just 0.07 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
16.5Yoru
16.4Neon
Kill production between Yoru and Neon is virtually identical, with Yoru averaging 16.5 kills per game and Neon securing 16.4. This parity suggests both agents are equally capable of finding frags in this matchup, and round outcomes depend more heavily on objective play, utility usage, and team coordination than raw elimination numbers. Players should focus on impactful kills — entries, clutch situations, and trading — rather than simply padding their kill count.
Avg Deaths
16.1Yoru
17.2Neon
Yoru demonstrates markedly better survivability against Neon, recording 16.1 deaths per game versus 17.2. Dying nearly 1.0 fewer times per match gives Yoru significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Neon players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
142.1Yoru
136.7Neon
Yoru applies 5.4 more damage per round than Neon in this matchup (142.1 vs 136.7 ADR). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: Yoru contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. Neon can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
HS %
28.2%Yoru
20.5%Neon
The headshot percentage disparity between Yoru and Neon is substantial: 28.2% compared to 20.5%, a 7.7 point difference. Yoru consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Neon, challenging Yoru in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Yoru's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.
Yoru vs Neon Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Neon
48.9%
49.8%
Defense Side
Neon
50.2%
51.1%
Attack Side Breakdown
The attack-side comparison between Yoru and Neon reveals near-perfect parity, with Yoru winning 48.9% of attacking rounds compared to Neon's 49.8%. This negligible 0.9 percentage point difference indicates neither agent possesses inherent advantages when executing onto sites or pushing through chokepoints. When these agents meet on attack, success depends almost entirely on team coordination, execute timing, and individual mechanical skill rather than agent kit superiority.
From a tactical standpoint, neither Yoru nor Neon should adjust their standard attacking approach based on this matchup. Both agents can run their typical execute patterns, default rotations, and lurk timings without worrying about a statistical disadvantage. The data from 177 matches suggests that whichever player has better game sense, utility timing, and raw mechanical aim will win attack-side encounters — there's no agent-based shortcut to victory here.
For entry fragging specifically, both Yoru and Neon players can confidently take the first duel when executing onto sites. Neither agent's abilities create meaningful first-contact advantages over the other, so entry success comes down to crosshair placement, pre-aim quality, and jiggle-peeking technique. Whether you're playing Yoru or Neon, approach site entries with the same confidence you'd have in any other matchup.
Yoru has favorable matchups against 8 agents and unfavorable matchups against 19 agents in Valorant. Yoru's strongest matchup is against KAY/O with a 70.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Veto at 37.9% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Yoru matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Yoru's best matchup is against KAY/O, achieving a 70.0% win rate. Yoru excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Yoru's hardest matchup?
Yoru's hardest matchup is against Veto, with only a 37.9% win rate. Against this opponent, Yoru should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Yoru have?
Yoru has 8 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 19 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Yoru in difficult matchups?
When playing Yoru in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Yoru's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Yoru's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Yoru's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant scenarios in this matchup are similarly balanced. Neither agent demonstrates superior spike defense or retake denial capabilities against the other based on our attack-side data. When the spike is down, focus on standard post-plant fundamentals: positioning for crossfires, using utility to delay defuses, and communicating enemy positions to teammates. The 0.9% difference is small enough to be statistical noise rather than a meaningful advantage.
Defense Side Breakdown
Defensive performance between Yoru and Neon is virtually identical, with Yoru holding 50.2% of rounds on CT side and Neon at 51.1%. This 0.9 point margin indicates both agents contribute equally when anchoring sites, retaking, or denying post-plants. Neither possesses defensive utility advantages significant enough to swing matchup outcomes.
Both Yoru and Neon can anchor sites with equal effectiveness in this matchup. Whether holding A, B, or mid on any map, neither agent's defensive kit provides meaningful advantages over the other. Site anchor decisions should be based on map knowledge, team composition needs, and personal preference rather than matchup considerations. The 0.9% difference is too small to influence site assignment choices.
Retake scenarios are similarly balanced between Yoru and Neon. Neither agent demonstrates superior retake utility, post-plant clearing ability, or clutch potential against the other based on our defensive data from 177 matches. When retaking against either agent, focus on standard retake fundamentals: utility to clear common spots, coordinated timing with teammates, and trading effectively. Don't adjust your retake approach based on whether you're facing Yoru or Neon.
Economy decisions and utility usage shouldn't change based on this specific matchup during defense. Both agents have comparable force buy success rates, full buy conversion, and utility effectiveness against each other. Make economy calls based on team needs and general defensive principles rather than Yoru vs Neon specific considerations. Your standard defensive utility timing and placement will be equally effective regardless of which agent you're facing.
Overall Side Analysis
Neon maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 49.8% attack win rate and 51.1% defense win rate. While Neon is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Yoru remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Yoru vs Neon specific factors. The slight Neon advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Yoru and Neon are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Neon has a slight statistical edge, but Yoru is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Yoru, don't switch to Neon just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Duelist vs Duelist Dynamics
Both Yoru and Neon fill the Duelist role in Valorant team compositions. This role mirror means teams won't face composition issues from having both agents — the question is purely which Duelist performs better in direct competition. Our data clearly indicates Neon is the stronger Duelist pick when these agents face each other.
In Duelist vs Duelist encounters, similar ability timing and usage patterns mean both agents often use their kits in comparable ways. The winner typically comes down to which player uses their abilities more efficiently and wins the mechanical duels that follow. Neon's statistical advantage suggests their specific Duelist kit translates slightly better to winning these mirror encounters.
50.5%
51.4%
48.5%
52.4%
52.7%
52.0%
50.2%
50.6%
53.5%
54.7%
49.8%
51.0%
49.9%
50.0%
49.4%
54.5%
52.3%
48.1%
53.6%
49.1%
50.3%
56.3%
53.6%
59.3%
54.2%
62.5%
Yoru vs Neon is a skill matchup with near-even win rates (47.5% vs 51.4%). Based on 177 matches, see which agent wins in KDA, damage output, attack rounds, and defense rounds to find your edge.
