Composiciones de Equipo TFT con Mejor Colocación Promedio

Esta tabla clasifica las composiciones de equipo de TFT por su colocación promedio final, mostrando qué composiciones logran consistentemente las mejores posiciones. Composiciones de double-up campeones del Set 17: Bestia fiestera (96.0% WR, 1.6 avg), Pícaro (97.9% WR, 1.7 avg), Contendiente (99.3% WR, 1.7 avg). Bestia fiestera/N.O.V.A. lidera con 96.03% de win rate y 1.62 de placement promedio. Pícaro sigue con 97.86% de win rate. Analizando 100 composiciones de double-up campeones con estadísticas de rendimiento en tiempo real.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
1.62
Avg Place
96.03%
Top 4 Rate
66.40%
First Place
Moderately Contested
1.66
Avg Place
97.86%
Top 4 Rate
55.61%
First Place
Severely Contested
1.71
Avg Place
99.26%
Top 4 Rate
49.07%
First Place
Highly Contested
1.80
Avg Place
96.97%
Top 4 Rate
54.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
1.83
Avg Place
97.80%
Top 4 Rate
51.79%
First Place
Highly Contested
1.98
Avg Place
91.00%
Top 4 Rate
57.67%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.04
Avg Place
95.20%
Top 4 Rate
44.72%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.14
Avg Place
91.52%
Top 4 Rate
46.49%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.14
Avg Place
92.22%
Top 4 Rate
42.45%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.20
Avg Place
91.30%
Top 4 Rate
44.80%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.25
Avg Place
91.24%
Top 4 Rate
45.62%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.26
Avg Place
95.46%
Top 4 Rate
32.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.27
Avg Place
95.04%
Top 4 Rate
32.23%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.27
Avg Place
93.97%
Top 4 Rate
31.16%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.31
Avg Place
92.61%
Top 4 Rate
31.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.37
Avg Place
92.42%
Top 4 Rate
33.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.38
Avg Place
94.26%
Top 4 Rate
29.50%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.39
Avg Place
92.65%
Top 4 Rate
24.93%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.42
Avg Place
90.13%
Top 4 Rate
33.54%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.45
Avg Place
91.39%
Top 4 Rate
29.59%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.47
Avg Place
92.06%
Top 4 Rate
28.97%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.52
Avg Place
90.38%
Top 4 Rate
26.97%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.54
Avg Place
87.70%
Top 4 Rate
32.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.55
Avg Place
89.60%
Top 4 Rate
25.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.64
Avg Place
89.00%
Top 4 Rate
27.61%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.64
Avg Place
88.91%
Top 4 Rate
24.64%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.68
Avg Place
87.92%
Top 4 Rate
25.75%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.76
Avg Place
85.47%
Top 4 Rate
31.83%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.81
Avg Place
84.04%
Top 4 Rate
32.53%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.84
Avg Place
82.86%
Top 4 Rate
27.24%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.88
Avg Place
83.61%
Top 4 Rate
21.58%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.91
Avg Place
89.30%
Top 4 Rate
15.72%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.91
Avg Place
82.32%
Top 4 Rate
26.29%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.92
Avg Place
82.80%
Top 4 Rate
24.01%
First Place
Low Contested
2.95
Avg Place
81.54%
Top 4 Rate
24.86%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.95
Avg Place
77.73%
Top 4 Rate
27.50%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.98
Avg Place
79.95%
Top 4 Rate
24.70%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.98
Avg Place
83.60%
Top 4 Rate
18.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.99
Avg Place
79.29%
Top 4 Rate
26.43%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.01
Avg Place
76.08%
Top 4 Rate
33.63%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.07
Avg Place
83.74%
Top 4 Rate
16.56%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.08
Avg Place
77.54%
Top 4 Rate
23.19%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.10
Avg Place
81.35%
Top 4 Rate
12.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.10
Avg Place
80.65%
Top 4 Rate
18.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.13
Avg Place
76.66%
Top 4 Rate
25.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.13
Avg Place
81.76%
Top 4 Rate
12.79%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.17
Avg Place
77.46%
Top 4 Rate
24.10%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.17
Avg Place
77.53%
Top 4 Rate
22.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.18
Avg Place
78.25%
Top 4 Rate
18.31%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.18
Avg Place
77.70%
Top 4 Rate
17.88%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.18
Avg Place
79.86%
Top 4 Rate
20.49%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.19
Avg Place
81.05%
Top 4 Rate
16.49%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.22
Avg Place
75.80%
Top 4 Rate
23.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.22
Avg Place
73.93%
Top 4 Rate
25.57%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.22
Avg Place
79.28%
Top 4 Rate
13.81%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.22
Avg Place
74.02%
Top 4 Rate
25.47%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.23
Avg Place
79.36%
Top 4 Rate
12.06%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.24
Avg Place
73.53%
Top 4 Rate
17.91%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.25
Avg Place
73.75%
Top 4 Rate
18.15%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.25
Avg Place
79.28%
Top 4 Rate
12.29%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.26
Avg Place
76.38%
Top 4 Rate
20.70%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.27
Avg Place
78.65%
Top 4 Rate
16.34%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.27
Avg Place
79.14%
Top 4 Rate
17.27%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
77.08%
Top 4 Rate
19.48%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
75.39%
Top 4 Rate
16.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
77.34%
Top 4 Rate
15.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
76.14%
Top 4 Rate
14.05%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.30
Avg Place
71.20%
Top 4 Rate
23.73%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.32
Avg Place
73.63%
Top 4 Rate
18.75%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.32
Avg Place
76.43%
Top 4 Rate
16.25%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.34
Avg Place
74.47%
Top 4 Rate
18.24%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.34
Avg Place
72.98%
Top 4 Rate
22.46%
First Place
Low Contested
3.40
Avg Place
78.75%
Top 4 Rate
11.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.41
Avg Place
70.77%
Top 4 Rate
21.03%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.41
Avg Place
73.89%
Top 4 Rate
17.52%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.45
Avg Place
74.75%
Top 4 Rate
15.03%
First Place
Low Contested
3.45
Avg Place
72.80%
Top 4 Rate
14.76%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.46
Avg Place
73.54%
Top 4 Rate
13.57%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.48
Avg Place
69.26%
Top 4 Rate
23.75%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.52
Avg Place
74.58%
Top 4 Rate
12.41%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.52
Avg Place
72.20%
Top 4 Rate
12.08%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.54
Avg Place
71.12%
Top 4 Rate
13.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.55
Avg Place
70.03%
Top 4 Rate
14.54%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.64
Avg Place
62.99%
Top 4 Rate
28.89%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.64
Avg Place
65.71%
Top 4 Rate
21.55%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.66
Avg Place
65.12%
Top 4 Rate
19.63%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.67
Avg Place
69.93%
Top 4 Rate
11.15%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.71
Avg Place
68.58%
Top 4 Rate
11.03%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.74
Avg Place
71.06%
Top 4 Rate
7.72%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.75
Avg Place
66.95%
Top 4 Rate
11.76%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.75
Avg Place
67.05%
Top 4 Rate
8.24%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.77
Avg Place
65.31%
Top 4 Rate
16.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.78
Avg Place
64.84%
Top 4 Rate
14.84%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.92
Avg Place
61.30%
Top 4 Rate
16.09%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.94
Avg Place
64.09%
Top 4 Rate
5.79%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.96
Avg Place
58.72%
Top 4 Rate
20.64%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.03
Avg Place
61.02%
Top 4 Rate
6.66%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.09
Avg Place
57.03%
Top 4 Rate
17.84%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.15
Avg Place
56.39%
Top 4 Rate
11.11%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.15
Avg Place
56.52%
Top 4 Rate
14.35%
First Place
Highly Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 100 team compositions sorted by average placement to find the most consistent compositions for reliable top 4 finishes, based on 106.8K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 79.3% and average placement of 3.05 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is Contendiente/N.O.V.A. with Maestro Yi as the primary carry, achieving a 99.3% win rate. Following closely is Pícaro/Meeple at 97.9% win rate, and N.O.V.A./Duelista divino at 97.8%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • Contendiente/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Maestro Yi
  • Pícaro/Meeple (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Bardo
  • N.O.V.A./Duelista divino (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Kindred

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider Bestia fiestera/N.O.V.A. which achieves first place in 66.4% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Most Consistent for Climbing

For players focused on consistent LP gains, Bestia fiestera/N.O.V.A. offers the best average placement at 1.62.Consistent compositions minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing, even if they don't win lobbies as often.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • Contendiente/N.O.V.A.: 99.3% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Pícaro/Meeple: 97.9% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • N.O.V.A./Duelista divino: 97.8% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Replicador/N.O.V.A. with a 1.9% pick rate, though its 74.0% win rate suggests it may be over-contested. Bestia fiestera/Estrella oscura follows at 1.6% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

¡Ayúdanos a mantener la precisión! Si notas estadísticas incorrectas, datos faltantes o cualquier problema, tu retroalimentación mejora directamente la calidad de nuestros datos para toda la comunidad.

Reportar un problema

Comps de equipo TFT - Set 17 FAQ

¿Cuál es la mejor composición de TFT en TFT Set 17?

La mejor composición de TFT en TFT Set 17 es Contendiente/N.O.V.A. con Maestro Yi como carry principal, logrando una tasa de victoria del 99.3% y un promedio de posición de 1.71. Esta composición es efectiva para subir de rango y consistentemente queda en el top 4.

¿Cómo jugar la composición Contendiente/N.O.V.A.?

Para jugar Contendiente/N.O.V.A., concéntrate en construir alrededor de Maestro Yi como tu carry principal. Busca Maestro Yi y unidades de soporte temprano, prioriza objetos que sinergicen con tu carry, y apunta a alcanzar tu pico de poder en nivel 7-8. Esta composición tiene una tasa de selección del 0.1%, haciéndola una opción relativamente no disputada.

¿Qué composiciones son buenas para subir en TFT Set 17?

Para ganancias consistentes de LP en TFT Set 17, Bestia fiestera/N.O.V.A. ofrece el mejor promedio de posición con 1.62. Otras opciones confiables incluyen Pícaro/Meeple (prom. 1.66) y Contendiente/N.O.V.A. (prom. 1.71). Las composiciones consistentes minimizan las posiciones de bottom 4 y proporcionan una subida estable.

¿Cuál es la composición de TFT más fácil de jugar?

Contendiente/N.O.V.A. es una gran opción para jugadores que buscan una subida más fácil. Con una tasa de victoria del 99.3% pero solo 0.1% de tasa de selección, es poco probable que te disputen, haciendo el juego más fácil de navegar. Baja competencia significa que puedes encontrar naturalmente tus unidades sin forzar pivotes.

¿Cuándo forzar una composición vs ser flexible en TFT Set 17?

En TFT Set 17, Replicador/N.O.V.A. tiene una tasa de selección del 1.9%, lo que significa que es muy disputada. Si ves que otros la juegan, considera pivotar a alternativas como Contendiente/N.O.V.A.. Fuerza una composición cuando encuentres unidades y objetos temprano, o cuando no esté disputada. Sé flexible cuando 2+ jugadores compiten por las mismas unidades.

¿Cuál es la composición de TFT más consistente en TFT Set 17?

Bestia fiestera/N.O.V.A. tiene el mejor promedio de posición con 1.62, haciéndola la composición más consistente para subir. Pícaro/Meeple sigue con 1.66, y Contendiente/N.O.V.A. con 1.71. Un promedio de posición más bajo significa menos finales en bottom 4.

¿Es el promedio de posición mejor que la tasa de victoria para subir?

Para ganancias consistentes de LP, el promedio de posición suele ser más confiable que la tasa de victoria pura. Una composición como Bestia fiestera/N.O.V.A. con promedio de posición de 1.62 minimiza las grandes pérdidas de LP por finales en bottom 4. Las composiciones de alta varianza pueden ganar más lobbies pero también quedar 8° más seguido. Para subir, la consistencia usualmente supera las estrategias de apuestas.