Compositions d'Équipe TFT avec le Plus Haut Taux de Victoire
Ce tableau présente les compositions d'équipe TFT avec les plus hauts taux de victoire, vous aidant à identifier les comps les plus réussies pour monter en classé. Compositions à 9 champions du Set 17 : Challenger (97.4% WR, 2.2 avg), Rebelle (96.4% WR, 2.1 avg), Rebelle (95.9% WR, 2.1 avg). Challenger/Rebelle mène avec 97.42% de win rate et 2.25 de placement moyen. Rebelle suit avec 96.39% de win rate. Analyse de 62 compositions à 9 champions avec statistiques de performance en temps réel.
Primary | Champions | Builds | Avg | Top 4 | First | Contested Risk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.25 Avg Place | 97.42% Top 4 Rate | 31.61% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.06 Avg Place | 96.39% Top 4 Rate | 39.25% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.08 Avg Place | 95.88% Top 4 Rate | 37.05% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.17 Avg Place | 95.67% Top 4 Rate | 34.66% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
1.99 Avg Place | 94.82% Top 4 Rate | 42.42% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.14 Avg Place | 94.75% Top 4 Rate | 37.37% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.20 Avg Place | 94.07% Top 4 Rate | 37.29% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.43 Avg Place | 92.56% Top 4 Rate | 29.35% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.36 Avg Place | 92.29% Top 4 Rate | 30.35% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.41 Avg Place | 91.99% Top 4 Rate | 30.04% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.55 Avg Place | 89.66% Top 4 Rate | 26.17% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.32 Avg Place | 89.49% Top 4 Rate | 39.95% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.47 Avg Place | 88.33% Top 4 Rate | 28.02% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.40 Avg Place | 87.58% Top 4 Rate | 40.35% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.44 Avg Place | 87.13% Top 4 Rate | 39.82% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.73 Avg Place | 86.01% Top 4 Rate | 27.97% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.71 Avg Place | 85.26% Top 4 Rate | 30.52% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.97 Avg Place | 83.85% Top 4 Rate | 25.77% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.84 Avg Place | 83.06% Top 4 Rate | 28.72% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.03 Avg Place | 81.98% Top 4 Rate | 16.47% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.11 Avg Place | 81.06% Top 4 Rate | 17.41% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.14 Avg Place | 80.24% Top 4 Rate | 18.76% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.82 Avg Place | 80.15% Top 4 Rate | 37.13% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.03 Avg Place | 79.64% Top 4 Rate | 23.68% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.05 Avg Place | 79.45% Top 4 Rate | 25.12% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.13 Avg Place | 79.36% Top 4 Rate | 18.53% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.91 Avg Place | 78.77% Top 4 Rate | 29.16% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.16 Avg Place | 78.50% Top 4 Rate | 20.56% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.10 Avg Place | 78.42% Top 4 Rate | 21.98% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.05 Avg Place | 77.94% Top 4 Rate | 26.83% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.10 Avg Place | 77.78% Top 4 Rate | 27.53% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.01 Avg Place | 77.15% Top 4 Rate | 25.22% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.37 Avg Place | 75.92% Top 4 Rate | 16.97% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.23 Avg Place | 75.51% Top 4 Rate | 19.05% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.39 Avg Place | 74.82% Top 4 Rate | 19.56% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.23 Avg Place | 74.27% Top 4 Rate | 23.03% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.30 Avg Place | 74.25% Top 4 Rate | 19.77% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.49 Avg Place | 71.84% Top 4 Rate | 16.65% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.56 Avg Place | 70.89% Top 4 Rate | 14.41% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.50 Avg Place | 69.83% Top 4 Rate | 19.63% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.45 Avg Place | 68.14% Top 4 Rate | 23.67% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.55 Avg Place | 67.92% Top 4 Rate | 20.82% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.66 Avg Place | 67.38% Top 4 Rate | 17.91% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.66 Avg Place | 67.14% Top 4 Rate | 16.30% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.74 Avg Place | 66.70% Top 4 Rate | 11.92% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.83 Avg Place | 66.60% Top 4 Rate | 16.19% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.70 Avg Place | 66.30% Top 4 Rate | 20.65% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.93 Avg Place | 65.47% Top 4 Rate | 7.82% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.74 Avg Place | 64.80% Top 4 Rate | 17.51% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.95 Avg Place | 63.45% Top 4 Rate | 6.99% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.07 Avg Place | 59.35% Top 4 Rate | 7.61% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.90 Avg Place | 59.24% Top 4 Rate | 20.93% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.32 Avg Place | 56.96% Top 4 Rate | 6.03% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.26 Avg Place | 56.43% Top 4 Rate | 4.97% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.32 Avg Place | 55.03% Top 4 Rate | 8.52% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.43 Avg Place | 54.22% Top 4 Rate | 3.21% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.43 Avg Place | 51.97% Top 4 Rate | 5.34% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.43 Avg Place | 49.82% Top 4 Rate | 5.78% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.60 Avg Place | 49.74% Top 4 Rate | 3.95% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.86 Avg Place | 43.02% Top 4 Rate | 3.49% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.85 Avg Place | 42.51% Top 4 Rate | 7.58% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.97 Avg Place | 41.14% Top 4 Rate | 6.69% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
Aidez-nous à maintenir la précision ! Si vous remarquez des statistiques incorrectes, des données manquantes ou d'autres problèmes, vos retours nous aident à améliorer la qualité de nos données pour toute la communauté.
Comps d'équipe TFT - Set 17 FAQ
Quelle est la meilleure composition TFT dans TFT Set 17 ?
La meilleure composition TFT dans TFT Set 17 est Challenger/Rebelle avec Kai'Sa comme carry principal, atteignant un taux de victoire de 97.4% et un placement moyen de 2.25. Cette composition est efficace pour monter en rang et se place régulièrement dans le top 4.
Comment jouer la composition Challenger/Rebelle ?
Pour jouer Challenger/Rebelle, concentrez-vous sur la construction autour de Kai'Sa comme carry principal. Cherchez Kai'Sa et les unités de support tôt, priorisez les objets qui synergisent avec votre carry, et visez votre pic de puissance au niveau 7-8. Cette composition a un taux de pick de 0.1%, ce qui en fait une option relativement non contestée.
Quelles compositions sont bonnes pour monter dans TFT Set 17 ?
Pour des gains de LP réguliers dans TFT Set 17, Rebelle/N.O.V.A. offre le meilleur placement moyen à 1.99. D'autres options fiables incluent Rebelle/N.O.V.A. (moy. 2.06) et Rebelle/N.O.V.A. (moy. 2.08). Les compositions régulières minimisent les finitions bottom 4 et permettent une montée stable.
Quelle est la composition TFT la plus facile à jouer ?
Challenger/Rebelle est une excellente option pour les joueurs cherchant une montée plus facile. Avec un taux de victoire de 97.4% mais seulement 0.1% de pick rate, vous êtes peu susceptible d'être contesté, rendant le jeu plus facile à naviguer. Une faible contestation signifie que vous pouvez naturellement trouver vos unités sans forcer les pivots.
Quand forcer une composition vs être flexible dans TFT Set 17 ?
Dans TFT Set 17, Réplicateur/Pulsar sombre a un taux de pick de 1.4%, ce qui signifie qu'elle est très contestée. Si vous voyez d'autres joueurs la prendre, envisagez de pivoter vers des alternatives comme Challenger/Rebelle. Forcez une composition quand vous avez les unités et objets tôt, ou quand elle n'est pas contestée. Soyez flexible quand 2+ joueurs sont en compétition pour les mêmes unités.