Compositions d'Équipe TFT avec le Meilleur Taux de Première Place
Ce tableau met en évidence les compositions d'équipe TFT avec les plus hauts taux de première place, parfait pour les joueurs cherchant à maximiser leurs chances de gagner les parties. Compositions à double-up champions du Set 17 : Bête de scène (96.0% WR, 1.6 avg), N.O.V.A. (91.0% WR, 2.0 avg), Rebelle (97.9% WR, 1.7 avg). Bête de scène/N.O.V.A. mène avec 96.03% de win rate et 1.62 de placement moyen. N.O.V.A. suit avec 91.00% de win rate. Analyse de 100 compositions à double-up champions avec statistiques de performance en temps réel.
Primary | Champions | Builds | Avg | Top 4 | First | Contested Risk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.62 Avg Place | 96.03% Top 4 Rate | 66.40% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
1.98 Avg Place | 91.00% Top 4 Rate | 57.67% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
1.66 Avg Place | 97.86% Top 4 Rate | 55.61% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
1.80 Avg Place | 96.97% Top 4 Rate | 54.55% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
1.83 Avg Place | 97.80% Top 4 Rate | 51.79% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
1.71 Avg Place | 99.26% Top 4 Rate | 49.07% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.14 Avg Place | 91.52% Top 4 Rate | 46.49% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.25 Avg Place | 91.24% Top 4 Rate | 45.62% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.20 Avg Place | 91.30% Top 4 Rate | 44.80% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.04 Avg Place | 95.20% Top 4 Rate | 44.72% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.14 Avg Place | 92.22% Top 4 Rate | 42.45% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.37 Avg Place | 92.42% Top 4 Rate | 33.71% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.01 Avg Place | 76.08% Top 4 Rate | 33.63% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.42 Avg Place | 90.13% Top 4 Rate | 33.54% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.81 Avg Place | 84.04% Top 4 Rate | 32.53% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.27 Avg Place | 95.04% Top 4 Rate | 32.23% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.54 Avg Place | 87.70% Top 4 Rate | 32.20% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.26 Avg Place | 95.46% Top 4 Rate | 32.15% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.76 Avg Place | 85.47% Top 4 Rate | 31.83% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.31 Avg Place | 92.61% Top 4 Rate | 31.71% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.27 Avg Place | 93.97% Top 4 Rate | 31.16% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.45 Avg Place | 91.39% Top 4 Rate | 29.59% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.38 Avg Place | 94.26% Top 4 Rate | 29.50% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.47 Avg Place | 92.06% Top 4 Rate | 28.97% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.64 Avg Place | 62.99% Top 4 Rate | 28.89% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.64 Avg Place | 89.00% Top 4 Rate | 27.61% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.95 Avg Place | 77.73% Top 4 Rate | 27.50% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.84 Avg Place | 82.86% Top 4 Rate | 27.24% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.52 Avg Place | 90.38% Top 4 Rate | 26.97% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.99 Avg Place | 79.29% Top 4 Rate | 26.43% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.91 Avg Place | 82.32% Top 4 Rate | 26.29% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.55 Avg Place | 89.60% Top 4 Rate | 25.87% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.68 Avg Place | 87.92% Top 4 Rate | 25.75% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.22 Avg Place | 73.93% Top 4 Rate | 25.57% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.22 Avg Place | 74.02% Top 4 Rate | 25.47% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.13 Avg Place | 76.66% Top 4 Rate | 25.21% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.39 Avg Place | 92.65% Top 4 Rate | 24.93% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.95 Avg Place | 81.54% Top 4 Rate | 24.86% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.98 Avg Place | 79.95% Top 4 Rate | 24.70% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.64 Avg Place | 88.91% Top 4 Rate | 24.64% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.17 Avg Place | 77.46% Top 4 Rate | 24.10% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.92 Avg Place | 82.80% Top 4 Rate | 24.01% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.48 Avg Place | 69.26% Top 4 Rate | 23.75% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.30 Avg Place | 71.20% Top 4 Rate | 23.73% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.22 Avg Place | 75.80% Top 4 Rate | 23.20% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.08 Avg Place | 77.54% Top 4 Rate | 23.19% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.34 Avg Place | 72.98% Top 4 Rate | 22.46% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.17 Avg Place | 77.53% Top 4 Rate | 22.15% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.88 Avg Place | 83.61% Top 4 Rate | 21.58% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.64 Avg Place | 65.71% Top 4 Rate | 21.55% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.41 Avg Place | 70.77% Top 4 Rate | 21.03% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.26 Avg Place | 76.38% Top 4 Rate | 20.70% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.96 Avg Place | 58.72% Top 4 Rate | 20.64% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.18 Avg Place | 79.86% Top 4 Rate | 20.49% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.66 Avg Place | 65.12% Top 4 Rate | 19.63% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.29 Avg Place | 77.08% Top 4 Rate | 19.48% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.32 Avg Place | 73.63% Top 4 Rate | 18.75% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.18 Avg Place | 78.25% Top 4 Rate | 18.31% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.34 Avg Place | 74.47% Top 4 Rate | 18.24% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.10 Avg Place | 80.65% Top 4 Rate | 18.21% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.98 Avg Place | 83.60% Top 4 Rate | 18.20% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.25 Avg Place | 73.75% Top 4 Rate | 18.15% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.24 Avg Place | 73.53% Top 4 Rate | 17.91% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.18 Avg Place | 77.70% Top 4 Rate | 17.88% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.09 Avg Place | 57.03% Top 4 Rate | 17.84% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.41 Avg Place | 73.89% Top 4 Rate | 17.52% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.27 Avg Place | 79.14% Top 4 Rate | 17.27% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.29 Avg Place | 75.39% Top 4 Rate | 16.87% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.07 Avg Place | 83.74% Top 4 Rate | 16.56% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.19 Avg Place | 81.05% Top 4 Rate | 16.49% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.27 Avg Place | 78.65% Top 4 Rate | 16.34% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.32 Avg Place | 76.43% Top 4 Rate | 16.25% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.77 Avg Place | 65.31% Top 4 Rate | 16.15% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.92 Avg Place | 61.30% Top 4 Rate | 16.09% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.91 Avg Place | 89.30% Top 4 Rate | 15.72% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.29 Avg Place | 77.34% Top 4 Rate | 15.71% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.45 Avg Place | 74.75% Top 4 Rate | 15.03% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.78 Avg Place | 64.84% Top 4 Rate | 14.84% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.45 Avg Place | 72.80% Top 4 Rate | 14.76% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.55 Avg Place | 70.03% Top 4 Rate | 14.54% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.15 Avg Place | 56.52% Top 4 Rate | 14.35% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.29 Avg Place | 76.14% Top 4 Rate | 14.05% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.22 Avg Place | 79.28% Top 4 Rate | 13.81% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.46 Avg Place | 73.54% Top 4 Rate | 13.57% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.54 Avg Place | 71.12% Top 4 Rate | 13.55% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.13 Avg Place | 81.76% Top 4 Rate | 12.79% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.52 Avg Place | 74.58% Top 4 Rate | 12.41% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.10 Avg Place | 81.35% Top 4 Rate | 12.30% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.25 Avg Place | 79.28% Top 4 Rate | 12.29% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.20 Avg Place | 55.44% Top 4 Rate | 12.09% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.52 Avg Place | 72.20% Top 4 Rate | 12.08% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.23 Avg Place | 79.36% Top 4 Rate | 12.06% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.75 Avg Place | 66.95% Top 4 Rate | 11.76% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.40 Avg Place | 78.75% Top 4 Rate | 11.30% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.62 Avg Place | 45.77% Top 4 Rate | 11.15% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.67 Avg Place | 69.93% Top 4 Rate | 11.15% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.15 Avg Place | 56.39% Top 4 Rate | 11.11% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.71 Avg Place | 68.58% Top 4 Rate | 11.03% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.40 Avg Place | 54.00% Top 4 Rate | 10.86% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.20 Avg Place | 53.08% Top 4 Rate | 10.00% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
Aidez-nous à maintenir la précision ! Si vous remarquez des statistiques incorrectes, des données manquantes ou d'autres problèmes, vos retours nous aident à améliorer la qualité de nos données pour toute la communauté.
Comps d'équipe TFT - Set 17 FAQ
Quelle est la meilleure composition TFT dans TFT Set 17 ?
La meilleure composition TFT dans TFT Set 17 est Challenger/N.O.V.A. avec Maître Yi comme carry principal, atteignant un taux de victoire de 99.3% et un placement moyen de 1.71. Cette composition est efficace pour monter en rang et se place régulièrement dans le top 4.
Comment jouer la composition Challenger/N.O.V.A. ?
Pour jouer Challenger/N.O.V.A., concentrez-vous sur la construction autour de Maître Yi comme carry principal. Cherchez Maître Yi et les unités de support tôt, priorisez les objets qui synergisent avec votre carry, et visez votre pic de puissance au niveau 7-8. Cette composition a un taux de pick de 0.1%, ce qui en fait une option relativement non contestée.
Quelles compositions sont bonnes pour monter dans TFT Set 17 ?
Pour des gains de LP réguliers dans TFT Set 17, Bête de scène/N.O.V.A. offre le meilleur placement moyen à 1.62. D'autres options fiables incluent Rebelle/Meeple (moy. 1.66) et Challenger/N.O.V.A. (moy. 1.71). Les compositions régulières minimisent les finitions bottom 4 et permettent une montée stable.
Quelle est la composition TFT la plus facile à jouer ?
Challenger/N.O.V.A. est une excellente option pour les joueurs cherchant une montée plus facile. Avec un taux de victoire de 99.3% mais seulement 0.1% de pick rate, vous êtes peu susceptible d'être contesté, rendant le jeu plus facile à naviguer. Une faible contestation signifie que vous pouvez naturellement trouver vos unités sans forcer les pivots.
Quand forcer une composition vs être flexible dans TFT Set 17 ?
Dans TFT Set 17, Réplicateur/N.O.V.A. a un taux de pick de 1.9%, ce qui signifie qu'elle est très contestée. Si vous voyez d'autres joueurs la prendre, envisagez de pivoter vers des alternatives comme Challenger/N.O.V.A.. Forcez une composition quand vous avez les unités et objets tôt, ou quand elle n'est pas contestée. Soyez flexible quand 2+ joueurs sont en compétition pour les mêmes unités.
Quelle composition TFT gagne le plus souvent les lobbies dans TFT Set 17 ?
Bête de scène/N.O.V.A. atteint la première place dans 66.4% des parties, en faisant la meilleure composition pour gagner les lobbies. N.O.V.A./Duelliste divine suit à 57.7% de taux de première place. Si votre objectif est de gagner plutôt que juste top 4, priorisez ces compositions à haut potentiel.
Quand jouer pour la première place vs top 4 ?
Jouez pour la première quand vous avez une composition à haut potentiel comme Bête de scène/N.O.V.A. (66.4% taux de première) et atteignez votre pic de puissance avec les objets optimaux. Jouez pour le top 4 quand vous êtes contesté, avez des objets sous-optimaux, ou devez préserver vos LP. En classé, des top 4 réguliers montent souvent plus vite que de gambler pour la première.