Compositions d'Équipe TFT avec le Meilleur Taux de Première Place

Ce tableau met en évidence les compositions d'équipe TFT avec les plus hauts taux de première place, parfait pour les joueurs cherchant à maximiser leurs chances de gagner les parties. Compositions à double-up champions du Set 17 : Bête de scène (96.0% WR, 1.6 avg), N.O.V.A. (91.0% WR, 2.0 avg), Rebelle (97.9% WR, 1.7 avg). Bête de scène/N.O.V.A. mène avec 96.03% de win rate et 1.62 de placement moyen. N.O.V.A. suit avec 91.00% de win rate. Analyse de 100 compositions à double-up champions avec statistiques de performance en temps réel.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
1.62
Avg Place
96.03%
Top 4 Rate
66.40%
First Place
Moderately Contested
1.98
Avg Place
91.00%
Top 4 Rate
57.67%
First Place
Moderately Contested
1.66
Avg Place
97.86%
Top 4 Rate
55.61%
First Place
Severely Contested
1.80
Avg Place
96.97%
Top 4 Rate
54.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
1.83
Avg Place
97.80%
Top 4 Rate
51.79%
First Place
Highly Contested
1.71
Avg Place
99.26%
Top 4 Rate
49.07%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.14
Avg Place
91.52%
Top 4 Rate
46.49%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.25
Avg Place
91.24%
Top 4 Rate
45.62%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.20
Avg Place
91.30%
Top 4 Rate
44.80%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.04
Avg Place
95.20%
Top 4 Rate
44.72%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.14
Avg Place
92.22%
Top 4 Rate
42.45%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.37
Avg Place
92.42%
Top 4 Rate
33.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.01
Avg Place
76.08%
Top 4 Rate
33.63%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.42
Avg Place
90.13%
Top 4 Rate
33.54%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.81
Avg Place
84.04%
Top 4 Rate
32.53%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.27
Avg Place
95.04%
Top 4 Rate
32.23%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.54
Avg Place
87.70%
Top 4 Rate
32.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.26
Avg Place
95.46%
Top 4 Rate
32.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.76
Avg Place
85.47%
Top 4 Rate
31.83%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.31
Avg Place
92.61%
Top 4 Rate
31.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.27
Avg Place
93.97%
Top 4 Rate
31.16%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.45
Avg Place
91.39%
Top 4 Rate
29.59%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.38
Avg Place
94.26%
Top 4 Rate
29.50%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.47
Avg Place
92.06%
Top 4 Rate
28.97%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.64
Avg Place
62.99%
Top 4 Rate
28.89%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.64
Avg Place
89.00%
Top 4 Rate
27.61%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.95
Avg Place
77.73%
Top 4 Rate
27.50%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.84
Avg Place
82.86%
Top 4 Rate
27.24%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.52
Avg Place
90.38%
Top 4 Rate
26.97%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.99
Avg Place
79.29%
Top 4 Rate
26.43%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.91
Avg Place
82.32%
Top 4 Rate
26.29%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.55
Avg Place
89.60%
Top 4 Rate
25.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.68
Avg Place
87.92%
Top 4 Rate
25.75%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.22
Avg Place
73.93%
Top 4 Rate
25.57%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.22
Avg Place
74.02%
Top 4 Rate
25.47%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.13
Avg Place
76.66%
Top 4 Rate
25.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.39
Avg Place
92.65%
Top 4 Rate
24.93%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.95
Avg Place
81.54%
Top 4 Rate
24.86%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.98
Avg Place
79.95%
Top 4 Rate
24.70%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.64
Avg Place
88.91%
Top 4 Rate
24.64%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.17
Avg Place
77.46%
Top 4 Rate
24.10%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.92
Avg Place
82.80%
Top 4 Rate
24.01%
First Place
Low Contested
3.48
Avg Place
69.26%
Top 4 Rate
23.75%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.30
Avg Place
71.20%
Top 4 Rate
23.73%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.22
Avg Place
75.80%
Top 4 Rate
23.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.08
Avg Place
77.54%
Top 4 Rate
23.19%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.34
Avg Place
72.98%
Top 4 Rate
22.46%
First Place
Low Contested
3.17
Avg Place
77.53%
Top 4 Rate
22.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.88
Avg Place
83.61%
Top 4 Rate
21.58%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.64
Avg Place
65.71%
Top 4 Rate
21.55%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.41
Avg Place
70.77%
Top 4 Rate
21.03%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.26
Avg Place
76.38%
Top 4 Rate
20.70%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.96
Avg Place
58.72%
Top 4 Rate
20.64%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.18
Avg Place
79.86%
Top 4 Rate
20.49%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.66
Avg Place
65.12%
Top 4 Rate
19.63%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.29
Avg Place
77.08%
Top 4 Rate
19.48%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.32
Avg Place
73.63%
Top 4 Rate
18.75%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.18
Avg Place
78.25%
Top 4 Rate
18.31%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.34
Avg Place
74.47%
Top 4 Rate
18.24%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.10
Avg Place
80.65%
Top 4 Rate
18.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.98
Avg Place
83.60%
Top 4 Rate
18.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.25
Avg Place
73.75%
Top 4 Rate
18.15%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.24
Avg Place
73.53%
Top 4 Rate
17.91%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.18
Avg Place
77.70%
Top 4 Rate
17.88%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.09
Avg Place
57.03%
Top 4 Rate
17.84%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.41
Avg Place
73.89%
Top 4 Rate
17.52%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.27
Avg Place
79.14%
Top 4 Rate
17.27%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
75.39%
Top 4 Rate
16.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.07
Avg Place
83.74%
Top 4 Rate
16.56%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.19
Avg Place
81.05%
Top 4 Rate
16.49%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.27
Avg Place
78.65%
Top 4 Rate
16.34%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.32
Avg Place
76.43%
Top 4 Rate
16.25%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.77
Avg Place
65.31%
Top 4 Rate
16.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.92
Avg Place
61.30%
Top 4 Rate
16.09%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.91
Avg Place
89.30%
Top 4 Rate
15.72%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.29
Avg Place
77.34%
Top 4 Rate
15.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.45
Avg Place
74.75%
Top 4 Rate
15.03%
First Place
Low Contested
3.78
Avg Place
64.84%
Top 4 Rate
14.84%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.45
Avg Place
72.80%
Top 4 Rate
14.76%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.55
Avg Place
70.03%
Top 4 Rate
14.54%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.15
Avg Place
56.52%
Top 4 Rate
14.35%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
76.14%
Top 4 Rate
14.05%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.22
Avg Place
79.28%
Top 4 Rate
13.81%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.46
Avg Place
73.54%
Top 4 Rate
13.57%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.54
Avg Place
71.12%
Top 4 Rate
13.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.13
Avg Place
81.76%
Top 4 Rate
12.79%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.52
Avg Place
74.58%
Top 4 Rate
12.41%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.10
Avg Place
81.35%
Top 4 Rate
12.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.25
Avg Place
79.28%
Top 4 Rate
12.29%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.20
Avg Place
55.44%
Top 4 Rate
12.09%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.52
Avg Place
72.20%
Top 4 Rate
12.08%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.23
Avg Place
79.36%
Top 4 Rate
12.06%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.75
Avg Place
66.95%
Top 4 Rate
11.76%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.40
Avg Place
78.75%
Top 4 Rate
11.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.62
Avg Place
45.77%
Top 4 Rate
11.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.67
Avg Place
69.93%
Top 4 Rate
11.15%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.15
Avg Place
56.39%
Top 4 Rate
11.11%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.71
Avg Place
68.58%
Top 4 Rate
11.03%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.40
Avg Place
54.00%
Top 4 Rate
10.86%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.20
Avg Place
53.08%
Top 4 Rate
10.00%
First Place
Highly Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 100 team compositions sorted by first place rate to find compositions with the highest potential to win lobbies, based on 105.1K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 78.7% and average placement of 3.07 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is Challenger/N.O.V.A. with Maître Yi as the primary carry, achieving a 99.3% win rate. Following closely is Rebelle/Meeple at 97.9% win rate, and N.O.V.A./Duelliste divine at 97.8%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • Challenger/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Maître Yi
  • Rebelle/Meeple (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Bard
  • N.O.V.A./Duelliste divine (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Kindred

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider Bête de scène/N.O.V.A. which achieves first place in 66.4% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Most Consistent for Climbing

For players focused on consistent LP gains, Bête de scène/N.O.V.A. offers the best average placement at 1.62.Consistent compositions minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing, even if they don't win lobbies as often.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • Challenger/N.O.V.A.: 99.3% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Rebelle/Meeple: 97.9% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • N.O.V.A./Duelliste divine: 97.8% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Réplicateur/N.O.V.A. with a 1.9% pick rate, though its 74.0% win rate suggests it may be over-contested. Bête de scène/Pulsar sombre follows at 1.6% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Aidez-nous à maintenir la précision ! Si vous remarquez des statistiques incorrectes, des données manquantes ou d'autres problèmes, vos retours nous aident à améliorer la qualité de nos données pour toute la communauté.

Signaler un problème

Comps d'équipe TFT - Set 17 FAQ

Quelle est la meilleure composition TFT dans TFT Set 17 ?

La meilleure composition TFT dans TFT Set 17 est Challenger/N.O.V.A. avec Maître Yi comme carry principal, atteignant un taux de victoire de 99.3% et un placement moyen de 1.71. Cette composition est efficace pour monter en rang et se place régulièrement dans le top 4.

Comment jouer la composition Challenger/N.O.V.A. ?

Pour jouer Challenger/N.O.V.A., concentrez-vous sur la construction autour de Maître Yi comme carry principal. Cherchez Maître Yi et les unités de support tôt, priorisez les objets qui synergisent avec votre carry, et visez votre pic de puissance au niveau 7-8. Cette composition a un taux de pick de 0.1%, ce qui en fait une option relativement non contestée.

Quelles compositions sont bonnes pour monter dans TFT Set 17 ?

Pour des gains de LP réguliers dans TFT Set 17, Bête de scène/N.O.V.A. offre le meilleur placement moyen à 1.62. D'autres options fiables incluent Rebelle/Meeple (moy. 1.66) et Challenger/N.O.V.A. (moy. 1.71). Les compositions régulières minimisent les finitions bottom 4 et permettent une montée stable.

Quelle est la composition TFT la plus facile à jouer ?

Challenger/N.O.V.A. est une excellente option pour les joueurs cherchant une montée plus facile. Avec un taux de victoire de 99.3% mais seulement 0.1% de pick rate, vous êtes peu susceptible d'être contesté, rendant le jeu plus facile à naviguer. Une faible contestation signifie que vous pouvez naturellement trouver vos unités sans forcer les pivots.

Quand forcer une composition vs être flexible dans TFT Set 17 ?

Dans TFT Set 17, Réplicateur/N.O.V.A. a un taux de pick de 1.9%, ce qui signifie qu'elle est très contestée. Si vous voyez d'autres joueurs la prendre, envisagez de pivoter vers des alternatives comme Challenger/N.O.V.A.. Forcez une composition quand vous avez les unités et objets tôt, ou quand elle n'est pas contestée. Soyez flexible quand 2+ joueurs sont en compétition pour les mêmes unités.

Quelle composition TFT gagne le plus souvent les lobbies dans TFT Set 17 ?

Bête de scène/N.O.V.A. atteint la première place dans 66.4% des parties, en faisant la meilleure composition pour gagner les lobbies. N.O.V.A./Duelliste divine suit à 57.7% de taux de première place. Si votre objectif est de gagner plutôt que juste top 4, priorisez ces compositions à haut potentiel.

Quand jouer pour la première place vs top 4 ?

Jouez pour la première quand vous avez une composition à haut potentiel comme Bête de scène/N.O.V.A. (66.4% taux de première) et atteignez votre pic de puissance avec les objets optimaux. Jouez pour le top 4 quand vous êtes contesté, avez des objets sous-optimaux, ou devez préserver vos LP. En classé, des top 4 réguliers montent souvent plus vite que de gambler pour la première.