Compositions d'Équipe TFT avec le Plus Haut Taux de Victoire
Ce tableau présente les compositions d'équipe TFT avec les plus hauts taux de victoire, vous aidant à identifier les comps les plus réussies pour monter en classé. Compositions à double-up champions du Set 17 : Challenger (99.3% WR, 1.7 avg), Rebelle (97.9% WR, 1.7 avg), N.O.V.A. (97.8% WR, 1.8 avg). Challenger/N.O.V.A. mène avec 99.26% de win rate et 1.71 de placement moyen. Rebelle suit avec 97.86% de win rate. Analyse de 100 compositions à double-up champions avec statistiques de performance en temps réel.
Primary | Champions | Builds | Avg | Top 4 | First | Contested Risk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.71 Avg Place | 99.26% Top 4 Rate | 49.07% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
1.66 Avg Place | 97.86% Top 4 Rate | 55.61% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
1.83 Avg Place | 97.80% Top 4 Rate | 51.79% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
1.80 Avg Place | 96.97% Top 4 Rate | 54.55% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
1.62 Avg Place | 96.03% Top 4 Rate | 66.40% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.26 Avg Place | 95.46% Top 4 Rate | 32.15% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.04 Avg Place | 95.20% Top 4 Rate | 44.72% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.27 Avg Place | 95.04% Top 4 Rate | 32.23% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.38 Avg Place | 94.26% Top 4 Rate | 29.50% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.27 Avg Place | 93.97% Top 4 Rate | 31.16% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.39 Avg Place | 92.65% Top 4 Rate | 24.93% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.31 Avg Place | 92.61% Top 4 Rate | 31.71% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.37 Avg Place | 92.42% Top 4 Rate | 33.71% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.14 Avg Place | 92.22% Top 4 Rate | 42.45% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.47 Avg Place | 92.06% Top 4 Rate | 28.97% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.14 Avg Place | 91.52% Top 4 Rate | 46.49% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.45 Avg Place | 91.39% Top 4 Rate | 29.59% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.20 Avg Place | 91.30% Top 4 Rate | 44.80% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.25 Avg Place | 91.24% Top 4 Rate | 45.62% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
1.98 Avg Place | 91.00% Top 4 Rate | 57.67% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.52 Avg Place | 90.38% Top 4 Rate | 26.97% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.42 Avg Place | 90.13% Top 4 Rate | 33.54% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.55 Avg Place | 89.60% Top 4 Rate | 25.87% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.91 Avg Place | 89.30% Top 4 Rate | 15.72% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.64 Avg Place | 89.00% Top 4 Rate | 27.61% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.64 Avg Place | 88.91% Top 4 Rate | 24.64% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.68 Avg Place | 87.92% Top 4 Rate | 25.75% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.54 Avg Place | 87.70% Top 4 Rate | 32.20% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.76 Avg Place | 85.47% Top 4 Rate | 31.83% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.81 Avg Place | 84.04% Top 4 Rate | 32.53% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.07 Avg Place | 83.74% Top 4 Rate | 16.56% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.88 Avg Place | 83.61% Top 4 Rate | 21.58% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.98 Avg Place | 83.60% Top 4 Rate | 18.20% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.84 Avg Place | 82.86% Top 4 Rate | 27.24% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.92 Avg Place | 82.80% Top 4 Rate | 24.01% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
2.91 Avg Place | 82.32% Top 4 Rate | 26.29% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.13 Avg Place | 81.76% Top 4 Rate | 12.79% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.95 Avg Place | 81.54% Top 4 Rate | 24.86% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.10 Avg Place | 81.35% Top 4 Rate | 12.30% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.19 Avg Place | 81.05% Top 4 Rate | 16.49% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.10 Avg Place | 80.65% Top 4 Rate | 18.21% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.98 Avg Place | 79.95% Top 4 Rate | 24.70% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.18 Avg Place | 79.86% Top 4 Rate | 20.49% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.23 Avg Place | 79.36% Top 4 Rate | 12.06% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.99 Avg Place | 79.29% Top 4 Rate | 26.43% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.22 Avg Place | 79.28% Top 4 Rate | 13.81% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.25 Avg Place | 79.28% Top 4 Rate | 12.29% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.27 Avg Place | 79.14% Top 4 Rate | 17.27% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.40 Avg Place | 78.75% Top 4 Rate | 11.30% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.27 Avg Place | 78.65% Top 4 Rate | 16.34% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.18 Avg Place | 78.25% Top 4 Rate | 18.31% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.95 Avg Place | 77.73% Top 4 Rate | 27.50% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.18 Avg Place | 77.70% Top 4 Rate | 17.88% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.08 Avg Place | 77.54% Top 4 Rate | 23.19% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.17 Avg Place | 77.53% Top 4 Rate | 22.15% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.17 Avg Place | 77.46% Top 4 Rate | 24.10% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.29 Avg Place | 77.34% Top 4 Rate | 15.71% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.29 Avg Place | 77.08% Top 4 Rate | 19.48% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.13 Avg Place | 76.66% Top 4 Rate | 25.21% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.32 Avg Place | 76.43% Top 4 Rate | 16.25% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.26 Avg Place | 76.38% Top 4 Rate | 20.70% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.29 Avg Place | 76.14% Top 4 Rate | 14.05% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.01 Avg Place | 76.08% Top 4 Rate | 33.63% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.22 Avg Place | 75.80% Top 4 Rate | 23.20% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.29 Avg Place | 75.39% Top 4 Rate | 16.87% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.45 Avg Place | 74.75% Top 4 Rate | 15.03% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.52 Avg Place | 74.58% Top 4 Rate | 12.41% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.34 Avg Place | 74.47% Top 4 Rate | 18.24% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.22 Avg Place | 74.02% Top 4 Rate | 25.47% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.22 Avg Place | 73.93% Top 4 Rate | 25.57% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.41 Avg Place | 73.89% Top 4 Rate | 17.52% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.25 Avg Place | 73.75% Top 4 Rate | 18.15% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.32 Avg Place | 73.63% Top 4 Rate | 18.75% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.46 Avg Place | 73.54% Top 4 Rate | 13.57% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.24 Avg Place | 73.53% Top 4 Rate | 17.91% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.34 Avg Place | 72.98% Top 4 Rate | 22.46% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.45 Avg Place | 72.80% Top 4 Rate | 14.76% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.52 Avg Place | 72.20% Top 4 Rate | 12.08% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.30 Avg Place | 71.20% Top 4 Rate | 23.73% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.54 Avg Place | 71.12% Top 4 Rate | 13.55% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.74 Avg Place | 71.06% Top 4 Rate | 7.72% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.41 Avg Place | 70.77% Top 4 Rate | 21.03% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.55 Avg Place | 70.03% Top 4 Rate | 14.54% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.67 Avg Place | 69.93% Top 4 Rate | 11.15% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.48 Avg Place | 69.26% Top 4 Rate | 23.75% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.71 Avg Place | 68.58% Top 4 Rate | 11.03% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.75 Avg Place | 67.05% Top 4 Rate | 8.24% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.75 Avg Place | 66.95% Top 4 Rate | 11.76% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.64 Avg Place | 65.71% Top 4 Rate | 21.55% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.77 Avg Place | 65.31% Top 4 Rate | 16.15% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.66 Avg Place | 65.12% Top 4 Rate | 19.63% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.78 Avg Place | 64.84% Top 4 Rate | 14.84% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.94 Avg Place | 64.09% Top 4 Rate | 5.79% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.64 Avg Place | 62.99% Top 4 Rate | 28.89% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.92 Avg Place | 61.30% Top 4 Rate | 16.09% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.03 Avg Place | 61.02% Top 4 Rate | 6.66% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.96 Avg Place | 58.72% Top 4 Rate | 20.64% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.09 Avg Place | 57.03% Top 4 Rate | 17.84% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.15 Avg Place | 56.52% Top 4 Rate | 14.35% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.15 Avg Place | 56.39% Top 4 Rate | 11.11% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
Aidez-nous à maintenir la précision ! Si vous remarquez des statistiques incorrectes, des données manquantes ou d'autres problèmes, vos retours nous aident à améliorer la qualité de nos données pour toute la communauté.
Comps d'équipe TFT - Set 17 FAQ
Quelle est la meilleure composition TFT dans TFT Set 17 ?
La meilleure composition TFT dans TFT Set 17 est Challenger/N.O.V.A. avec Maître Yi comme carry principal, atteignant un taux de victoire de 99.3% et un placement moyen de 1.71. Cette composition est efficace pour monter en rang et se place régulièrement dans le top 4.
Comment jouer la composition Challenger/N.O.V.A. ?
Pour jouer Challenger/N.O.V.A., concentrez-vous sur la construction autour de Maître Yi comme carry principal. Cherchez Maître Yi et les unités de support tôt, priorisez les objets qui synergisent avec votre carry, et visez votre pic de puissance au niveau 7-8. Cette composition a un taux de pick de 0.1%, ce qui en fait une option relativement non contestée.
Quelles compositions sont bonnes pour monter dans TFT Set 17 ?
Pour des gains de LP réguliers dans TFT Set 17, Bête de scène/N.O.V.A. offre le meilleur placement moyen à 1.62. D'autres options fiables incluent Rebelle/Meeple (moy. 1.66) et Challenger/N.O.V.A. (moy. 1.71). Les compositions régulières minimisent les finitions bottom 4 et permettent une montée stable.
Quelle est la composition TFT la plus facile à jouer ?
Challenger/N.O.V.A. est une excellente option pour les joueurs cherchant une montée plus facile. Avec un taux de victoire de 99.3% mais seulement 0.1% de pick rate, vous êtes peu susceptible d'être contesté, rendant le jeu plus facile à naviguer. Une faible contestation signifie que vous pouvez naturellement trouver vos unités sans forcer les pivots.
Quand forcer une composition vs être flexible dans TFT Set 17 ?
Dans TFT Set 17, Réplicateur/N.O.V.A. a un taux de pick de 1.9%, ce qui signifie qu'elle est très contestée. Si vous voyez d'autres joueurs la prendre, envisagez de pivoter vers des alternatives comme Challenger/N.O.V.A.. Forcez une composition quand vous avez les unités et objets tôt, ou quand elle n'est pas contestée. Soyez flexible quand 2+ joueurs sont en compétition pour les mêmes unités.
Quelles compositions ont les taux de victoire les plus élevés dans TFT Set 17 ?
Les 3 meilleures compositions par taux de victoire sont : 1) Challenger/N.O.V.A. (99.3%), 2) Rebelle/Meeple (97.9%), et 3) N.O.V.A./Duelliste divine (97.8%). Elles représentent les compositions les plus fortes pour maximiser les LP en classé.
Pourquoi le taux de victoire est-il important pour les compositions TFT ?
Le taux de victoire montre à quelle fréquence une composition atteint le top 4, ce qui fait gagner des LP en classé. Les compositions à haut taux de victoire comme Challenger/N.O.V.A. (99.3%) performent bien régulièrement sur plusieurs parties. Cependant, considérez aussi le taux de pick - les compositions très contestées peuvent sous-performer dans vos parties si plusieurs joueurs les forcent.