AmbessaMatchups
Données de matchups Ambessa pour League of Legends patch 26.4. Winrates, stats de performance et meilleurs builds pour chaque matchup Ambessa. Découvrez qui Ambessa bat et contre qui Ambessa perd en lane.
Ambessa Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Ambessa performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Données de matchup de Ambessa pour le patch 26.4 de League of Legends. Le tableau ci-dessous montre le taux de victoire, la différence d\'or et les statistiques de performance de Ambessa contre chaque champion dans la méta actuelle. Cliquez sur le nom de n\'importe quel champion pour voir une analyse détaillée face à face incluant le meilleur build de Ambessa, les runes, les statistiques de lane et l\'analyse début vs fin de partie pour ce matchup spécifique.
Adversaire | Taux de victoire | Parties | CS/min | Dégâts/min | Or/partie | TV Debut | TV Fin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45.68% | 162 | 4.0 | 917 | 12,505 | 41.7% | 50.0% | |
| 44.93% | 138 | 1.2 | 718 | 13,165 | 40.6% | 48.6% | |
| 53.68% | 136 | 6.6 | 882 | 11,927 | 51.6% | 55.4% | |
| 51.88% | 133 | 4.6 | 1,182 | 12,276 | 43.5% | 60.9% | |
| 54.26% | 131 | 4.8 | 855 | 12,557 | 54.0% | 54.5% | |
| 45.60% | 126 | 5.4 | 826 | 12,180 | 37.7% | 51.4% | |
| 44.80% | 126 | 1.9 | 771 | 13,646 | 53.5% | 37.3% | |
| 42.61% | 115 | 6.5 | 862 | 10,832 | 42.1% | 43.1% | |
| 49.57% | 115 | 6.2 | 925 | 11,566 | 46.1% | 52.4% | |
| 51.35% | 111 | 5.6 | 851 | 12,024 | 48.1% | 54.2% | |
| 40.00% | 100 | 5.8 | 969 | 11,526 | 43.5% | 37.0% | |
| 43.43% | 99 | 3.4 | 782 | 12,037 | 43.5% | 43.4% | |
| 58.59% | 99 | 1.2 | 769 | 13,788 | 60.8% | 56.3% | |
| 51.58% | 95 | 1.8 | 690 | 13,143 | 45.2% | 56.6% | |
| 48.89% | 90 | 5.2 | 893 | 11,868 | 47.5% | 50.0% | |
| 48.28% | 88 | 6.7 | 750 | 11,580 | 48.6% | 48.1% | |
| 45.88% | 85 | 5.6 | 805 | 11,268 | 48.6% | 43.8% | |
| 50.00% | 84 | 6.7 | 922 | 11,836 | 48.5% | 51.0% | |
| 51.19% | 84 | 1.4 | 767 | 12,940 | 40.5% | 59.6% | |
| 49.38% | 83 | 4.7 | 832 | 12,343 | 51.5% | 47.9% | |
| 46.84% | 80 | 4.5 | 685 | 12,617 | 40.7% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 80 | 6.7 | 1,125 | 11,997 | 61.1% | 59.1% | |
| 36.71% | 79 | 1.9 | 733 | 13,505 | 42.9% | 33.3% | |
| 53.85% | 78 | 6.7 | 908 | 12,222 | 55.6% | 52.4% | |
| 46.15% | 78 | 5.0 | 769 | 12,195 | 37.8% | 53.7% | |
| 45.95% | 74 | 6.0 | 1,030 | 11,769 | 39.5% | 52.8% | |
| 59.46% | 74 | 6.6 | 800 | 11,633 | 53.9% | 65.7% | |
| 45.07% | 73 | 1.2 | 831 | 13,647 | 37.5% | 51.3% | |
| 41.67% | 72 | 7.2 | 885 | 12,999 | 37.0% | 44.4% | |
| 57.14% | 71 | 6.1 | 889 | 11,327 | 57.5% | 56.7% | |
| 54.41% | 70 | 6.2 | 777 | 11,714 | 53.1% | 55.6% | |
| 50.00% | 70 | 1.2 | 870 | 13,216 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 47.06% | 68 | 1.4 | 786 | 12,725 | 47.2% | 46.9% | |
| 46.97% | 66 | 1.6 | 776 | 13,571 | 32.3% | 60.0% | |
| 38.46% | 65 | 3.1 | 772 | 13,028 | 34.6% | 41.0% | |
| 45.31% | 64 | 6.5 | 744 | 11,114 | 24.2% | 67.7% | |
| 42.86% | 63 | 1.4 | 694 | 12,091 | 35.3% | 51.7% | |
| 67.74% | 62 | 6.6 | 938 | 12,627 | 73.3% | 62.5% | |
| 47.54% | 61 | 6.4 | 829 | 12,254 | 60.0% | 35.5% | |
| 45.90% | 61 | 1.7 | 779 | 13,413 | 41.4% | 50.0% | |
| 45.76% | 60 | 6.3 | 811 | 10,714 | 45.5% | 46.1% | |
| 49.15% | 59 | 6.0 | 844 | 11,083 | 40.7% | 56.3% | |
| 42.11% | 57 | 5.3 | 716 | 10,868 | 46.9% | 36.0% | |
| 45.61% | 57 | 1.7 | 823 | 14,138 | 31.8% | 54.3% | |
| 49.12% | 57 | 6.7 | 911 | 11,831 | 51.6% | 46.1% | |
| 48.21% | 56 | 1.0 | 706 | 13,169 | 41.7% | 53.1% | |
| 52.73% | 55 | 2.1 | 834 | 13,851 | 56.7% | 48.0% | |
| 57.69% | 52 | 4.8 | 837 | 12,214 | 56.0% | 59.3% | |
| 45.10% | 51 | 6.4 | 757 | 11,314 | 36.0% | 53.9% | |
| 54.00% | 50 | 1.5 | 873 | 13,883 | 40.0% | 63.3% | |
| 53.19% | 49 | 1.4 | 815 | 13,115 | 50.0% | 56.5% | |
| 41.67% | 48 | 5.9 | 909 | 12,160 | 36.8% | 44.8% | |
| 52.08% | 48 | 2.0 | 767 | 12,320 | 50.0% | 54.2% | |
| 47.92% | 48 | 1.6 | 843 | 13,945 | 59.1% | 38.5% | |
| 51.06% | 47 | 1.4 | 850 | 13,580 | 40.0% | 59.3% | |
| 53.19% | 47 | 6.5 | 848 | 11,849 | 62.5% | 43.5% | |
| 48.89% | 45 | 3.0 | 758 | 13,414 | 44.4% | 51.9% | |
| 57.14% | 42 | 6.4 | 839 | 11,430 | 55.6% | 58.3% | |
| 47.50% | 40 | 2.1 | 812 | 12,515 | 37.5% | 62.5% | |
| 52.63% | 38 | 2.8 | 881 | 13,489 | 36.8% | 68.4% | |
| 54.05% | 37 | 2.7 | 825 | 14,007 | 64.3% | 47.8% | |
| 45.95% | 37 | 1.6 | 746 | 12,562 | 45.5% | 46.7% | |
| 54.05% | 37 | 5.6 | 848 | 11,517 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 56.76% | 37 | 5.7 | 796 | 12,318 | 60.0% | 52.9% | |
| 60.00% | 35 | 4.1 | 789 | 13,016 | 42.9% | 71.4% | |
| 54.29% | 35 | 5.4 | 822 | 12,216 | 47.1% | 61.1% | |
| 42.86% | 35 | 5.8 | 1,044 | 11,446 | 53.3% | 35.0% | |
| 57.58% | 33 | 1.0 | 685 | 12,040 | 50.0% | 72.7% | |
| 51.52% | 33 | 1.9 | 845 | 12,887 | 47.4% | 57.1% | |
| 39.39% | 33 | 2.5 | 787 | 12,953 | 47.4% | 28.6% | |
| 39.39% | 33 | 6.5 | 678 | 10,943 | 33.3% | 44.4% | |
| 37.50% | 32 | 6.4 | 952 | 10,629 | 47.4% | 23.1% | |
| 37.50% | 32 | 5.6 | 804 | 11,640 | 23.1% | 47.4% | |
| 50.00% | 32 | 6.1 | 799 | 11,326 | 42.1% | 61.5% | |
| 43.75% | 32 | 1.4 | 744 | 12,650 | 33.3% | 57.1% | |
| 58.62% | 30 | 2.3 | 864 | 14,039 | 71.4% | 46.7% | |
| 46.43% | 28 | 1.1 | 788 | 13,169 | 38.5% | 53.3% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 3.0 | 786 | 12,382 | 60.0% | 40.0% | |
| 45.83% | 25 | 6.5 | 798 | 11,541 | 41.7% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 24 | 3.7 | 825 | 13,798 | 75.0% | 56.3% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 1.4 | 801 | 15,055 | 28.6% | 64.7% | |
| 41.67% | 24 | 1.9 | 761 | 13,313 | 40.0% | 42.9% | |
| 45.45% | 23 | 6.2 | 761 | 11,962 | 44.4% | 46.1% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 2.1 | 855 | 13,810 | 27.3% | 58.3% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 2.2 | 869 | 13,045 | 55.6% | 46.1% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 1.4 | 665 | 12,516 | 33.3% | 55.6% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 1.5 | 742 | 13,411 | 62.5% | 46.1% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 1.6 | 718 | 14,140 | 40.0% | 54.5% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 6.2 | 663 | 11,650 | 41.7% | 75.0% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 6.9 | 826 | 11,698 | 46.1% | 42.9% | |
| 44.44% | 19 | 6.5 | 694 | 10,285 | 45.5% | 42.9% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 2.7 | 754 | 13,138 | 44.4% | 40.0% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 5.7 | 654 | 11,962 | 44.4% | 62.5% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 6.5 | 829 | 10,277 | 60.0% | 28.6% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 2.5 | 672 | 13,419 | 28.6% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 3.8 | 791 | 10,777 | 55.6% | 40.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 7.1 | 800 | 12,347 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.3 | 664 | 11,841 | 37.5% | 50.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 4.7 | 1,007 | 12,446 | 75.0% | 28.6% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 5.3 | 770 | 10,836 | 25.0% | 33.3% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 7.2 | 1,000 | 13,359 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 88.89% | 9 | 6.8 | 1,165 | 14,568 | 100.0% | 83.3% | |
| 50.00% | 9 | 6.6 | 813 | 10,253 | 57.1% | 0.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.6 | 938 | 13,185 | 75.0% | 20.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 6.6 | 815 | 11,029 | 14.3% | 100.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 6.0 | 887 | 12,045 | 83.3% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 7.1 | 861 | 11,833 | 60.0% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 2.7 | 638 | 9,688 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 4.3 | 729 | 11,842 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 3.0 | 629 | 11,158 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.8 | 815 | 12,192 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 7.9 | 900 | 12,873 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.9 | 1,089 | 13,358 | 60.0% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.8 | 700 | 12,735 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.3 | 938 | 12,993 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 7.0 | 636 | 11,762 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.5 | 898 | 13,463 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.9 | 1,150 | 13,760 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.7 | 594 | 10,016 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 6.3 | 788 | 14,107 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 6.3 | 615 | 10,487 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.9 | 512 | 8,046 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 650 | 11,908 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
Aidez-nous à maintenir la précision ! Si vous remarquez des statistiques incorrectes, des données manquantes ou d'autres problèmes, vos retours nous aident à améliorer la qualité de nos données pour toute la communauté.
Matchups de Ambessa - Foire aux questions
Quels sont les meilleurs matchups de Ambessa dans League of Legends ?
Les meilleurs matchups de Ambessa dans le patch 26.4 incluent Zaahen, Viego, and Garen. Ambessa a les taux de victoire les plus élevés contre ces champions et peut dominer la lane face à eux. Sélectionnez n\'importe quel adversaire dans le tableau des matchups pour voir les stats détaillées.
Quels sont les pires matchups de Ambessa ?
Les pires matchups de Ambessa incluent Vex, Kog'Maw, and Lux. Ces champions ont des taux de victoire favorables contre Ambessa et peuvent exploiter les faiblesses de Ambessa en lane. Cliquez sur le nom d\'un champion dans le tableau pour voir l\'analyse complète du matchup.
Comment verifier les donnees de matchup de Ambessa ?
Vous pouvez consulter les données de matchup de Ambessa directement sur cette page. Le tableau des matchups montre les taux de victoire et les stats contre chaque champion. Cliquez sur n\'importe quel champion pour voir une analyse détaillée incluant le meilleur build, les runes, les statistiques de lane et l\'analyse début vs fin de partie pour ce matchup spécifique de Ambessa.
Qui Ambessa contre dans League of Legends ?
Ambessa contre Zaahen, Viego, and Garen dans le patch 26.4. Ce sont les matchups les plus favorables de Ambessa où Ambessa a les taux de victoire les plus élevés et les meilleures performances en lane. Utilisez le sélecteur de matchups ci-dessus pour explorer n\'importe quel matchup spécifique de Ambessa en détail.
Qui contre Ambessa en lane ?
Vex, Kog'Maw, and Lux contrent Ambessa en lane pendant le patch 26.4. Ces champions ont les meilleurs taux de victoire contre Ambessa. Consultez l\'onglet contres ou cliquez sur un champion dans le tableau pour voir les stratégies détaillées de matchup et les builds recommandés.