Składy drużynowe TFT z najwyższym wskaźnikiem wygranych

Ta tabela prezentuje składy drużynowe TFT z najwyższymi wskaźnikami wygranych, pomagając zidentyfikować najbardziej udane składy do wspinania się w rankingu. Top 9-bohaterowe kompozycje Setu 17: Replikatorzy (97.0% WR, 1.8 avg), Zbiry (95.5% WR, 2.3 avg), N.O.V.A. (94.3% WR, 2.4 avg). Replikatorzy/N.O.V.A. prowadzi z 96.97% win rate i 1.80 średnią pozycją. Zbiry podąża z 95.46% win rate. Analiza 69 9-bohaterowych kompozycji ze statystykami wydajności w czasie rzeczywistym.

Filter by Trait
Filter by Champion
Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
1.80
Avg Place
96.97%
Top 4 Rate
54.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.26
Avg Place
95.46%
Top 4 Rate
32.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.38
Avg Place
94.26%
Top 4 Rate
29.50%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.27
Avg Place
93.97%
Top 4 Rate
31.16%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.39
Avg Place
92.65%
Top 4 Rate
24.93%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.37
Avg Place
92.42%
Top 4 Rate
33.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.14
Avg Place
92.22%
Top 4 Rate
42.45%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.47
Avg Place
92.06%
Top 4 Rate
28.97%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.14
Avg Place
91.52%
Top 4 Rate
46.49%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.20
Avg Place
91.30%
Top 4 Rate
44.80%
First Place
Highly Contested
1.98
Avg Place
91.00%
Top 4 Rate
57.67%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.52
Avg Place
90.38%
Top 4 Rate
26.97%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.55
Avg Place
89.60%
Top 4 Rate
25.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.76
Avg Place
85.47%
Top 4 Rate
31.83%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.81
Avg Place
84.04%
Top 4 Rate
32.53%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.88
Avg Place
83.61%
Top 4 Rate
21.58%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.98
Avg Place
83.60%
Top 4 Rate
18.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.84
Avg Place
82.86%
Top 4 Rate
27.24%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.13
Avg Place
81.76%
Top 4 Rate
12.79%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.10
Avg Place
81.35%
Top 4 Rate
12.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.19
Avg Place
81.05%
Top 4 Rate
16.49%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.10
Avg Place
80.65%
Top 4 Rate
18.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.98
Avg Place
79.95%
Top 4 Rate
24.70%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.18
Avg Place
79.86%
Top 4 Rate
20.49%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.99
Avg Place
79.29%
Top 4 Rate
26.43%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.22
Avg Place
79.28%
Top 4 Rate
13.81%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.25
Avg Place
79.28%
Top 4 Rate
12.29%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.40
Avg Place
78.75%
Top 4 Rate
11.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.18
Avg Place
78.25%
Top 4 Rate
18.31%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.95
Avg Place
77.73%
Top 4 Rate
27.50%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.08
Avg Place
77.54%
Top 4 Rate
23.19%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
77.34%
Top 4 Rate
15.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
77.08%
Top 4 Rate
19.48%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.13
Avg Place
76.66%
Top 4 Rate
25.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.32
Avg Place
76.43%
Top 4 Rate
16.25%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.26
Avg Place
76.38%
Top 4 Rate
20.70%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.29
Avg Place
76.14%
Top 4 Rate
14.05%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.01
Avg Place
76.08%
Top 4 Rate
33.63%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.22
Avg Place
75.80%
Top 4 Rate
23.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.34
Avg Place
74.47%
Top 4 Rate
18.24%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.22
Avg Place
73.93%
Top 4 Rate
25.57%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.41
Avg Place
73.89%
Top 4 Rate
17.52%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.25
Avg Place
73.75%
Top 4 Rate
18.15%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.32
Avg Place
73.63%
Top 4 Rate
18.75%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.46
Avg Place
73.54%
Top 4 Rate
13.57%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.54
Avg Place
71.12%
Top 4 Rate
13.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.74
Avg Place
71.06%
Top 4 Rate
7.72%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.55
Avg Place
70.03%
Top 4 Rate
14.54%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.67
Avg Place
69.93%
Top 4 Rate
11.15%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.48
Avg Place
69.26%
Top 4 Rate
23.75%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.75
Avg Place
66.95%
Top 4 Rate
11.76%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.77
Avg Place
65.31%
Top 4 Rate
16.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.66
Avg Place
65.12%
Top 4 Rate
19.63%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.94
Avg Place
64.09%
Top 4 Rate
5.79%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.64
Avg Place
62.99%
Top 4 Rate
28.89%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.03
Avg Place
61.02%
Top 4 Rate
6.66%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.96
Avg Place
58.72%
Top 4 Rate
20.64%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.09
Avg Place
57.03%
Top 4 Rate
17.84%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.34
Avg Place
54.48%
Top 4 Rate
6.09%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.20
Avg Place
53.08%
Top 4 Rate
10.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.30
Avg Place
52.73%
Top 4 Rate
6.06%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.45
Avg Place
50.00%
Top 4 Rate
5.17%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.63
Avg Place
48.61%
Top 4 Rate
3.61%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.76
Avg Place
44.20%
Top 4 Rate
6.43%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.65
Avg Place
44.05%
Top 4 Rate
5.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.12
Avg Place
36.36%
Top 4 Rate
3.84%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.29
Avg Place
33.61%
Top 4 Rate
2.73%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.75
Avg Place
20.00%
Top 4 Rate
0.39%
First Place
Severely Contested
6.01
Avg Place
19.83%
Top 4 Rate
2.20%
First Place
Severely Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 69 team compositions ranked by performance to help you make informed decisions, based on 67.9K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 72.8% and average placement of 3.37 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is Replikatorzy/N.O.V.A. with Milio as the primary carry, achieving a 97.0% win rate. Following closely is Zbiry/N.O.V.A. at 95.5% win rate, and N.O.V.A./Mroczne Gwiazdy at 94.3%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • Replikatorzy/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Milio
  • Zbiry/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Twisted Fate
  • N.O.V.A./Mroczne Gwiazdy (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Briar

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider N.O.V.A./Boscy Pojedynkowicze which achieves first place in 57.7% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • Replikatorzy/N.O.V.A.: 97.0% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Zbiry/N.O.V.A.: 95.5% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • N.O.V.A./Mroczne Gwiazdy: 94.3% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Meeple/Tkacze Losu with a 1.5% pick rate, and it maintains a strong 83.6% win rate despite high contestation. Pretendenci/N.O.V.A. follows at 0.9% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Pomóż nam utrzymać dokładność! Jeśli zauważysz nieprawidłowe statystyki, brakujące dane lub jakiekolwiek problemy, Twoja opinia bezpośrednio poprawia jakość naszych danych dla całej społeczności.

Zgłoś problem

Kompozycje drużynowe TFT - Set 17 FAQ

Jaka jest najlepsza kompozycja TFT w TFT Set 17?

Najlepszą kompozycją TFT w TFT Set 17 jest Replikatorzy/N.O.V.A. z Milio jako głównym carry, osiągając 97.0% współczynnik wygranych i średnie miejsce 1.80. Ta kompozycja jest skuteczna do wspinaczki i regularnie plasuje się w top 4.

Jak grać kompozycją Replikatorzy/N.O.V.A.?

Aby grać Replikatorzy/N.O.V.A., skup się na budowaniu wokół Milio jako głównego carry. Szukaj Milio i jednostek wspierających wcześnie, priorytetyzuj przedmioty synergizujące z carry i celuj w szczyt mocy na poziomie 7-8. Ta kompozycja ma 0.1% wskaźnik wyboru, co czyni ją relatywnie nierywalizowaną opcją.

Które kompozycje są dobre do wspinaczki w TFT Set 17?

Dla stabilnych zysków LP w TFT Set 17, Replikatorzy/N.O.V.A. oferuje najlepsze średnie miejsce 1.80. Inne niezawodne opcje to N.O.V.A./Boscy Pojedynkowicze (śr. 1.98) i Mroczne Gwiazdy/Osiłki (śr. 2.14). Stabilne kompozycje minimalizują końcówki w bottom 4 i zapewniają stałą wspinaczkę.

Jaka jest najłatwiejsza kompozycja TFT do grania?

Replikatorzy/N.O.V.A. to świetna opcja dla graczy szukających łatwiejszej wspinaczki. Z 97.0% współczynnikiem wygranych ale tylko 0.1% wskaźnikiem wyboru, prawdopodobnie nie będziesz rywalizowany, co ułatwia nawigację. Niska rywalizacja oznacza, że możesz naturalnie znaleźć jednostki bez wymuszania pivotów.

Kiedy forsować kompozycję vs być elastycznym w TFT Set 17?

W TFT Set 17, Meeple/Tkacze Losu ma 1.5% wskaźnik wyboru, co oznacza że jest mocno rywalizowana. Jeśli widzisz innych grających nią, rozważ pivot do alternatyw jak Replikatorzy/N.O.V.A.. Forsuj kompozycję gdy trafisz wczesne jednostki i przedmioty, lub gdy nie jest rywalizowana. Bądź elastyczny gdy 2+ graczy rywalizuje o te same jednostki.