Składy drużynowe TFT z najwyższym wskaźnikiem wygranych

Ta tabela prezentuje składy drużynowe TFT z najwyższymi wskaźnikami wygranych, pomagając zidentyfikować najbardziej udane składy do wspinania się w rankingu. Top double-up-bohaterowe kompozycje Setu 17: Pretendenci (99.3% WR, 1.7 avg), Zbiry (97.9% WR, 1.7 avg), N.O.V.A. (97.8% WR, 1.8 avg). Pretendenci/N.O.V.A. prowadzi z 99.26% win rate i 1.71 średnią pozycją. Zbiry podąża z 97.86% win rate. Analiza 100 double-up-bohaterowych kompozycji ze statystykami wydajności w czasie rzeczywistym.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
1.71
Avg Place
99.26%
Top 4 Rate
49.07%
First Place
Highly Contested
1.66
Avg Place
97.86%
Top 4 Rate
55.61%
First Place
Severely Contested
1.83
Avg Place
97.80%
Top 4 Rate
51.79%
First Place
Highly Contested
1.80
Avg Place
96.97%
Top 4 Rate
54.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
1.62
Avg Place
96.03%
Top 4 Rate
66.40%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.26
Avg Place
95.46%
Top 4 Rate
32.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.04
Avg Place
95.20%
Top 4 Rate
44.72%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.27
Avg Place
95.04%
Top 4 Rate
32.23%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.38
Avg Place
94.26%
Top 4 Rate
29.50%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.27
Avg Place
93.97%
Top 4 Rate
31.16%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.39
Avg Place
92.65%
Top 4 Rate
24.93%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.31
Avg Place
92.61%
Top 4 Rate
31.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.37
Avg Place
92.42%
Top 4 Rate
33.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.14
Avg Place
92.22%
Top 4 Rate
42.45%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.47
Avg Place
92.06%
Top 4 Rate
28.97%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.14
Avg Place
91.52%
Top 4 Rate
46.49%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.45
Avg Place
91.39%
Top 4 Rate
29.59%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.20
Avg Place
91.30%
Top 4 Rate
44.80%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.25
Avg Place
91.24%
Top 4 Rate
45.62%
First Place
Severely Contested
1.98
Avg Place
91.00%
Top 4 Rate
57.67%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.52
Avg Place
90.38%
Top 4 Rate
26.97%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.42
Avg Place
90.13%
Top 4 Rate
33.54%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.55
Avg Place
89.60%
Top 4 Rate
25.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.91
Avg Place
89.30%
Top 4 Rate
15.72%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.64
Avg Place
89.00%
Top 4 Rate
27.61%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.64
Avg Place
88.91%
Top 4 Rate
24.64%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.68
Avg Place
87.92%
Top 4 Rate
25.75%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.54
Avg Place
87.70%
Top 4 Rate
32.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.76
Avg Place
85.47%
Top 4 Rate
31.83%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.81
Avg Place
84.04%
Top 4 Rate
32.53%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.07
Avg Place
83.74%
Top 4 Rate
16.56%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.88
Avg Place
83.61%
Top 4 Rate
21.58%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.98
Avg Place
83.60%
Top 4 Rate
18.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.84
Avg Place
82.86%
Top 4 Rate
27.24%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.92
Avg Place
82.80%
Top 4 Rate
24.01%
First Place
Low Contested
2.91
Avg Place
82.32%
Top 4 Rate
26.29%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.13
Avg Place
81.76%
Top 4 Rate
12.79%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.95
Avg Place
81.54%
Top 4 Rate
24.86%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.10
Avg Place
81.35%
Top 4 Rate
12.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.19
Avg Place
81.05%
Top 4 Rate
16.49%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.10
Avg Place
80.65%
Top 4 Rate
18.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.98
Avg Place
79.95%
Top 4 Rate
24.70%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.18
Avg Place
79.86%
Top 4 Rate
20.49%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.23
Avg Place
79.36%
Top 4 Rate
12.06%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.99
Avg Place
79.29%
Top 4 Rate
26.43%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.22
Avg Place
79.28%
Top 4 Rate
13.81%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.25
Avg Place
79.28%
Top 4 Rate
12.29%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.27
Avg Place
79.14%
Top 4 Rate
17.27%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.40
Avg Place
78.75%
Top 4 Rate
11.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.27
Avg Place
78.65%
Top 4 Rate
16.34%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.18
Avg Place
78.25%
Top 4 Rate
18.31%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.95
Avg Place
77.73%
Top 4 Rate
27.50%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.18
Avg Place
77.70%
Top 4 Rate
17.88%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.08
Avg Place
77.54%
Top 4 Rate
23.19%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.17
Avg Place
77.53%
Top 4 Rate
22.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.17
Avg Place
77.46%
Top 4 Rate
24.10%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
77.34%
Top 4 Rate
15.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
77.08%
Top 4 Rate
19.48%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.13
Avg Place
76.66%
Top 4 Rate
25.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.32
Avg Place
76.43%
Top 4 Rate
16.25%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.26
Avg Place
76.38%
Top 4 Rate
20.70%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.29
Avg Place
76.14%
Top 4 Rate
14.05%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.01
Avg Place
76.08%
Top 4 Rate
33.63%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.22
Avg Place
75.80%
Top 4 Rate
23.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.29
Avg Place
75.39%
Top 4 Rate
16.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.45
Avg Place
74.75%
Top 4 Rate
15.03%
First Place
Low Contested
3.52
Avg Place
74.58%
Top 4 Rate
12.41%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.34
Avg Place
74.47%
Top 4 Rate
18.24%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.22
Avg Place
74.02%
Top 4 Rate
25.47%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.22
Avg Place
73.93%
Top 4 Rate
25.57%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.41
Avg Place
73.89%
Top 4 Rate
17.52%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.25
Avg Place
73.75%
Top 4 Rate
18.15%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.32
Avg Place
73.63%
Top 4 Rate
18.75%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.46
Avg Place
73.54%
Top 4 Rate
13.57%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.24
Avg Place
73.53%
Top 4 Rate
17.91%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.34
Avg Place
72.98%
Top 4 Rate
22.46%
First Place
Low Contested
3.45
Avg Place
72.80%
Top 4 Rate
14.76%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.52
Avg Place
72.20%
Top 4 Rate
12.08%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.30
Avg Place
71.20%
Top 4 Rate
23.73%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.54
Avg Place
71.12%
Top 4 Rate
13.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.74
Avg Place
71.06%
Top 4 Rate
7.72%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.41
Avg Place
70.77%
Top 4 Rate
21.03%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.55
Avg Place
70.03%
Top 4 Rate
14.54%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.67
Avg Place
69.93%
Top 4 Rate
11.15%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.48
Avg Place
69.26%
Top 4 Rate
23.75%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.71
Avg Place
68.58%
Top 4 Rate
11.03%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.75
Avg Place
67.05%
Top 4 Rate
8.24%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.75
Avg Place
66.95%
Top 4 Rate
11.76%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.64
Avg Place
65.71%
Top 4 Rate
21.55%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.77
Avg Place
65.31%
Top 4 Rate
16.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.66
Avg Place
65.12%
Top 4 Rate
19.63%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.78
Avg Place
64.84%
Top 4 Rate
14.84%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.94
Avg Place
64.09%
Top 4 Rate
5.79%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.64
Avg Place
62.99%
Top 4 Rate
28.89%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.92
Avg Place
61.30%
Top 4 Rate
16.09%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.03
Avg Place
61.02%
Top 4 Rate
6.66%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.96
Avg Place
58.72%
Top 4 Rate
20.64%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.09
Avg Place
57.03%
Top 4 Rate
17.84%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.15
Avg Place
56.52%
Top 4 Rate
14.35%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.15
Avg Place
56.39%
Top 4 Rate
11.11%
First Place
Moderately Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 100 team compositions sorted by win rate to help you find the strongest compositions for climbing ranked, based on 106.8K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 79.3% and average placement of 3.05 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is Pretendenci/N.O.V.A. with Master Yi as the primary carry, achieving a 99.3% win rate. Following closely is Zbiry/Meeple at 97.9% win rate, and N.O.V.A./Boscy Pojedynkowicze at 97.8%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • Pretendenci/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Master Yi
  • Zbiry/Meeple (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Bard
  • N.O.V.A./Boscy Pojedynkowicze (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Kindred

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider Dusze Towarzystwa/N.O.V.A. which achieves first place in 66.4% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Most Consistent for Climbing

For players focused on consistent LP gains, Dusze Towarzystwa/N.O.V.A. offers the best average placement at 1.62.Consistent compositions minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing, even if they don't win lobbies as often.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • Pretendenci/N.O.V.A.: 99.3% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Zbiry/Meeple: 97.9% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • N.O.V.A./Boscy Pojedynkowicze: 97.8% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Replikatorzy/N.O.V.A. with a 1.9% pick rate, though its 74.0% win rate suggests it may be over-contested. Dusze Towarzystwa/Mroczne Gwiazdy follows at 1.6% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Pomóż nam utrzymać dokładność! Jeśli zauważysz nieprawidłowe statystyki, brakujące dane lub jakiekolwiek problemy, Twoja opinia bezpośrednio poprawia jakość naszych danych dla całej społeczności.

Zgłoś problem

Kompozycje drużynowe TFT - Set 17 FAQ

Jaka jest najlepsza kompozycja TFT w TFT Set 17?

Najlepszą kompozycją TFT w TFT Set 17 jest Pretendenci/N.O.V.A. z Master Yi jako głównym carry, osiągając 99.3% współczynnik wygranych i średnie miejsce 1.71. Ta kompozycja jest skuteczna do wspinaczki i regularnie plasuje się w top 4.

Jak grać kompozycją Pretendenci/N.O.V.A.?

Aby grać Pretendenci/N.O.V.A., skup się na budowaniu wokół Master Yi jako głównego carry. Szukaj Master Yi i jednostek wspierających wcześnie, priorytetyzuj przedmioty synergizujące z carry i celuj w szczyt mocy na poziomie 7-8. Ta kompozycja ma 0.1% wskaźnik wyboru, co czyni ją relatywnie nierywalizowaną opcją.

Które kompozycje są dobre do wspinaczki w TFT Set 17?

Dla stabilnych zysków LP w TFT Set 17, Dusze Towarzystwa/N.O.V.A. oferuje najlepsze średnie miejsce 1.62. Inne niezawodne opcje to Zbiry/Meeple (śr. 1.66) i Pretendenci/N.O.V.A. (śr. 1.71). Stabilne kompozycje minimalizują końcówki w bottom 4 i zapewniają stałą wspinaczkę.

Jaka jest najłatwiejsza kompozycja TFT do grania?

Pretendenci/N.O.V.A. to świetna opcja dla graczy szukających łatwiejszej wspinaczki. Z 99.3% współczynnikiem wygranych ale tylko 0.1% wskaźnikiem wyboru, prawdopodobnie nie będziesz rywalizowany, co ułatwia nawigację. Niska rywalizacja oznacza, że możesz naturalnie znaleźć jednostki bez wymuszania pivotów.

Kiedy forsować kompozycję vs być elastycznym w TFT Set 17?

W TFT Set 17, Replikatorzy/N.O.V.A. ma 1.9% wskaźnik wyboru, co oznacza że jest mocno rywalizowana. Jeśli widzisz innych grających nią, rozważ pivot do alternatyw jak Pretendenci/N.O.V.A.. Forsuj kompozycję gdy trafisz wczesne jednostki i przedmioty, lub gdy nie jest rywalizowana. Bądź elastyczny gdy 2+ graczy rywalizuje o te same jednostki.

Które kompozycje mają najwyższe współczynniki wygranych w TFT Set 17?

Top 3 kompozycje według współczynnika wygranych: 1) Pretendenci/N.O.V.A. (99.3%), 2) Zbiry/Meeple (97.9%) i 3) N.O.V.A./Boscy Pojedynkowicze (97.8%). Reprezentują one najsilniejsze kompozycje do maksymalizacji LP w grach rankingowych.

Dlaczego współczynnik wygranych jest ważny dla kompozycji TFT?

Współczynnik wygranych pokazuje jak często kompozycja osiąga top 4, co daje LP w rankingu. Kompozycje z wysokim współczynnikiem wygranych jak Pretendenci/N.O.V.A. (99.3%) regularnie dobrze performują w wielu grach. Jednak rozważ też wskaźnik wyboru—mocno rywalizowane kompozycje mogą performować gorzej w twoich grach jeśli wielu graczy je forsuje.