Composições de Equipe TFT com Maior Taxa de Vitória

Esta tabela mostra as composições de equipe TFT com as maiores taxas de vitória, ajudando você a identificar as comps mais bem-sucedidas para subir no ranqueado. Composições de 8 campeões do Set 17: N.O.V.A. (89.3% WR, 2.6 avg), Ladino (88.5% WR, 2.9 avg), N.O.V.A. (85.4% WR, 2.9 avg). N.O.V.A./Lutador lidera com 89.29% de win rate e 2.64 de placement médio. Ladino segue com 88.52% de win rate. Analisando 55 composições de 8 campeões com estatísticas de desempenho em tempo real.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
2.64
Avg Place
89.29%
Top 4 Rate
29.93%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.91
Avg Place
88.52%
Top 4 Rate
13.88%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.93
Avg Place
85.42%
Top 4 Rate
21.09%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.80
Avg Place
83.41%
Top 4 Rate
28.29%
First Place
Low Contested
3.09
Avg Place
79.75%
Top 4 Rate
23.42%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.18
Avg Place
77.84%
Top 4 Rate
23.07%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.18
Avg Place
75.47%
Top 4 Rate
26.42%
First Place
Low Contested
3.24
Avg Place
73.79%
Top 4 Rate
24.17%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.69
Avg Place
72.63%
Top 4 Rate
10.99%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.28
Avg Place
72.42%
Top 4 Rate
23.74%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.42
Avg Place
72.20%
Top 4 Rate
14.72%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.55
Avg Place
71.68%
Top 4 Rate
12.35%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.76
Avg Place
67.76%
Top 4 Rate
9.79%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.81
Avg Place
66.78%
Top 4 Rate
7.88%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.76
Avg Place
66.51%
Top 4 Rate
18.18%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.83
Avg Place
65.07%
Top 4 Rate
10.93%
First Place
Low Contested
3.76
Avg Place
64.15%
Top 4 Rate
14.57%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.87
Avg Place
59.68%
Top 4 Rate
17.31%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.07
Avg Place
59.04%
Top 4 Rate
14.62%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.25
Avg Place
55.33%
Top 4 Rate
6.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
-
4.31
Avg Place
53.25%
Top 4 Rate
7.53%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.46
Avg Place
50.20%
Top 4 Rate
8.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.53
Avg Place
50.20%
Top 4 Rate
8.84%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.62
Avg Place
47.83%
Top 4 Rate
6.14%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.68
Avg Place
46.67%
Top 4 Rate
5.50%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.71
Avg Place
46.43%
Top 4 Rate
4.30%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.97
Avg Place
42.69%
Top 4 Rate
2.31%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.90
Avg Place
41.42%
Top 4 Rate
8.41%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.99
Avg Place
40.92%
Top 4 Rate
6.52%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.18
Avg Place
39.48%
Top 4 Rate
3.24%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.96
Avg Place
39.34%
Top 4 Rate
4.58%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.97
Avg Place
38.00%
Top 4 Rate
2.50%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.03
Avg Place
37.43%
Top 4 Rate
6.27%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.34
Avg Place
33.60%
Top 4 Rate
2.02%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.51
Avg Place
32.68%
Top 4 Rate
0.39%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.32
Avg Place
32.17%
Top 4 Rate
1.61%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.34
Avg Place
30.13%
Top 4 Rate
3.40%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.52
Avg Place
29.74%
Top 4 Rate
5.20%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.76
Avg Place
28.44%
Top 4 Rate
0.46%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.46
Avg Place
28.13%
Top 4 Rate
5.10%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.48
Avg Place
27.63%
Top 4 Rate
2.63%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.38
Avg Place
27.54%
Top 4 Rate
1.93%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.56
Avg Place
26.46%
Top 4 Rate
1.06%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.61
Avg Place
26.45%
Top 4 Rate
1.24%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.55
Avg Place
26.06%
Top 4 Rate
1.77%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.72
Avg Place
25.43%
Top 4 Rate
0.99%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.56
Avg Place
25.24%
Top 4 Rate
2.59%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.61
Avg Place
24.81%
Top 4 Rate
2.76%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.63
Avg Place
24.61%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.80
Avg Place
22.28%
Top 4 Rate
1.04%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.80
Avg Place
21.69%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.98
Avg Place
19.34%
Top 4 Rate
1.44%
First Place
Highly Contested
6.15
Avg Place
18.99%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
6.06
Avg Place
18.79%
Top 4 Rate
2.73%
First Place
Low Contested
6.22
Avg Place
14.31%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Severely Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 55 team compositions ranked by performance to help you make informed decisions, based on 53.8K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 47.0% and average placement of 4.65 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is N.O.V.A./Lutador with Viktor as the primary carry, achieving a 89.3% win rate. Following closely is Ladino/N.O.V.A. at 88.5% win rate, and N.O.V.A./Lutador at 85.4%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • N.O.V.A./Lutador (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Viktor
  • Ladino/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Jax
  • N.O.V.A./Lutador (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Miss Fortune

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • N.O.V.A./Lutador: 89.3% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Ladino/N.O.V.A.: 88.5% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • N.O.V.A./Lutador: 85.4% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Ladino/Mipo with a 3.3% pick rate, though its 46.7% win rate suggests it may be over-contested. Replicador/N.O.V.A. follows at 1.9% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Ajude-nos a manter a precisão! Se você notar estatísticas incorretas, dados faltantes ou quaisquer problemas, seu feedback melhora diretamente a qualidade dos nossos dados para toda a comunidade.

Reportar problema

Comps de equipe TFT - Set 17 FAQ

Qual é a melhor composição de TFT no TFT Set 17?

A melhor composição de TFT no TFT Set 17 é N.O.V.A./Lutador com Viktor como carry principal, alcançando uma taxa de vitória de 89.3% e colocação média de 2.64. Esta composição é eficaz para subir de rank e consistentemente fica no top 4.

Como jogar a composição N.O.V.A./Lutador?

Para jogar N.O.V.A./Lutador, foque em construir em torno de Viktor como seu carry principal. Procure Viktor e unidades de suporte cedo, priorize itens que sinergizam com seu carry, e mire seu pico de poder no nível 7-8. Esta composição tem uma taxa de pick de 0.1%, tornando-a uma opção relativamente não disputada.

Quais composições são boas para subir no TFT Set 17?

Para ganhos consistentes de LP no TFT Set 17, N.O.V.A./Lutador oferece a melhor colocação média em 2.64. Outras opções confiáveis incluem Alma da Festa/Atirador de Elite (média 2.80) e Ladino/N.O.V.A. (média 2.91). Composições consistentes minimizam finais no bottom 4 e proporcionam uma subida estável.

Qual é a composição de TFT mais fácil de jogar?

N.O.V.A./Lutador é uma ótima opção para jogadores buscando uma subida mais fácil. Com uma taxa de vitória de 89.3% mas apenas 0.1% de taxa de pick, você provavelmente não será contestado, tornando o jogo mais fácil de navegar. Baixa contestação significa que você pode encontrar suas unidades naturalmente sem forçar pivots.

Quando forçar uma composição vs ser flexível no TFT Set 17?

No TFT Set 17, Ladino/Mipo tem uma taxa de pick de 3.3%, o que significa que é muito disputada. Se você ver outros jogando, considere pivotar para alternativas como N.O.V.A./Lutador. Force uma composição quando acertar unidades e itens cedo, ou quando não estiver disputada. Seja flexível quando 2+ jogadores competem pelas mesmas unidades.