Composições de Equipe TFT com Maior Taxa de Vitória

Esta tabela mostra as composições de equipe TFT com as maiores taxas de vitória, ajudando você a identificar as comps mais bem-sucedidas para subir no ranqueado. Composições de 8 campeões do Set 17: Ladino (89.3% WR, 2.9 avg), N.O.V.A. (89.0% WR, 2.6 avg), N.O.V.A. (87.9% WR, 2.7 avg). Ladino/N.O.V.A. lidera com 89.30% de win rate e 2.91 de placement médio. N.O.V.A. segue com 89.00% de win rate. Analisando 54 composições de 8 campeões com estatísticas de desempenho em tempo real.

Filter by Trait
Filter by Champion
Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
2.91
Avg Place
89.30%
Top 4 Rate
15.72%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.64
Avg Place
89.00%
Top 4 Rate
27.61%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.68
Avg Place
87.92%
Top 4 Rate
25.75%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.92
Avg Place
82.80%
Top 4 Rate
24.01%
First Place
Low Contested
3.17
Avg Place
77.53%
Top 4 Rate
22.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.17
Avg Place
77.46%
Top 4 Rate
24.10%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.45
Avg Place
74.75%
Top 4 Rate
15.03%
First Place
Low Contested
3.52
Avg Place
74.58%
Top 4 Rate
12.41%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.22
Avg Place
74.02%
Top 4 Rate
25.47%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.34
Avg Place
72.98%
Top 4 Rate
22.46%
First Place
Low Contested
3.45
Avg Place
72.80%
Top 4 Rate
14.76%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.52
Avg Place
72.20%
Top 4 Rate
12.08%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.30
Avg Place
71.20%
Top 4 Rate
23.73%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.71
Avg Place
68.58%
Top 4 Rate
11.03%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.75
Avg Place
67.05%
Top 4 Rate
8.24%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.78
Avg Place
64.84%
Top 4 Rate
14.84%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.92
Avg Place
61.30%
Top 4 Rate
16.09%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.15
Avg Place
56.52%
Top 4 Rate
14.35%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.15
Avg Place
56.39%
Top 4 Rate
11.11%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.20
Avg Place
55.44%
Top 4 Rate
12.09%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.33
Avg Place
54.68%
Top 4 Rate
6.47%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.40
Avg Place
54.00%
Top 4 Rate
10.86%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.65
Avg Place
48.65%
Top 4 Rate
4.00%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.60
Avg Place
47.68%
Top 4 Rate
7.78%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.70
Avg Place
45.99%
Top 4 Rate
5.61%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.62
Avg Place
45.77%
Top 4 Rate
11.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.84
Avg Place
44.95%
Top 4 Rate
3.26%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.70
Avg Place
44.66%
Top 4 Rate
7.57%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.93
Avg Place
41.36%
Top 4 Rate
6.63%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.98
Avg Place
39.64%
Top 4 Rate
7.29%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.11
Avg Place
38.66%
Top 4 Rate
1.49%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.00
Avg Place
38.30%
Top 4 Rate
4.17%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.05
Avg Place
37.81%
Top 4 Rate
5.60%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.01
Avg Place
35.93%
Top 4 Rate
7.46%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.37
Avg Place
32.70%
Top 4 Rate
3.08%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.29
Avg Place
31.73%
Top 4 Rate
4.80%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.38
Avg Place
29.93%
Top 4 Rate
4.82%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.42
Avg Place
29.75%
Top 4 Rate
3.94%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.42
Avg Place
29.59%
Top 4 Rate
3.00%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.48
Avg Place
29.02%
Top 4 Rate
3.11%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.41
Avg Place
28.68%
Top 4 Rate
2.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.51
Avg Place
28.18%
Top 4 Rate
1.34%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.56
Avg Place
27.43%
Top 4 Rate
5.43%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.60
Avg Place
27.22%
Top 4 Rate
1.16%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.37
Avg Place
26.85%
Top 4 Rate
1.68%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.68
Avg Place
25.40%
Top 4 Rate
1.95%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.72
Avg Place
25.12%
Top 4 Rate
1.40%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.69
Avg Place
24.40%
Top 4 Rate
0.89%
First Place
Moderately Contested
6.02
Avg Place
21.36%
Top 4 Rate
0.65%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.74
Avg Place
21.02%
Top 4 Rate
1.20%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.94
Avg Place
20.90%
Top 4 Rate
2.43%
First Place
Low Contested
5.93
Avg Place
20.10%
Top 4 Rate
1.44%
First Place
Highly Contested
6.18
Avg Place
17.28%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
6.26
Avg Place
13.42%
Top 4 Rate
0.39%
First Place
Severely Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 54 team compositions sorted by win rate to help you find the strongest compositions for climbing ranked, based on 72.2K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 47.7% and average placement of 4.61 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is Ladino/N.O.V.A. with Jax as the primary carry, achieving a 89.3% win rate. Following closely is N.O.V.A./Lutador at 89.0% win rate, and N.O.V.A./Lutador at 87.9%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • Ladino/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Jax
  • N.O.V.A./Lutador (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Miss Fortune
  • N.O.V.A./Lutador (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Miss Fortune

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider N.O.V.A./Lutador which achieves first place in 27.6% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Most Consistent for Climbing

For players focused on consistent LP gains, N.O.V.A./Lutador offers the best average placement at 2.64.Consistent compositions minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing, even if they don't win lobbies as often.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • Ladino/N.O.V.A.: 89.3% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • N.O.V.A./Lutador: 89.0% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • N.O.V.A./Lutador: 87.9% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Ladino/Mipo with a 3.3% pick rate, though its 46.0% win rate suggests it may be over-contested. Replicador/N.O.V.A. follows at 1.9% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Ajude-nos a manter a precisão! Se você notar estatísticas incorretas, dados faltantes ou quaisquer problemas, seu feedback melhora diretamente a qualidade dos nossos dados para toda a comunidade.

Reportar problema

Comps de equipe TFT - Set 17 FAQ

Qual é a melhor composição de TFT no TFT Set 17?

A melhor composição de TFT no TFT Set 17 é Ladino/N.O.V.A. com Jax como carry principal, alcançando uma taxa de vitória de 89.3% e colocação média de 2.91. Esta composição é eficaz para subir de rank e consistentemente fica no top 4.

Como jogar a composição Ladino/N.O.V.A.?

Para jogar Ladino/N.O.V.A., foque em construir em torno de Jax como seu carry principal. Procure Jax e unidades de suporte cedo, priorize itens que sinergizam com seu carry, e mire seu pico de poder no nível 7-8. Esta composição tem uma taxa de pick de 0.1%, tornando-a uma opção relativamente não disputada.

Quais composições são boas para subir no TFT Set 17?

Para ganhos consistentes de LP no TFT Set 17, N.O.V.A./Lutador oferece a melhor colocação média em 2.64. Outras opções confiáveis incluem N.O.V.A./Lutador (média 2.68) e Ladino/N.O.V.A. (média 2.91). Composições consistentes minimizam finais no bottom 4 e proporcionam uma subida estável.

Qual é a composição de TFT mais fácil de jogar?

Ladino/N.O.V.A. é uma ótima opção para jogadores buscando uma subida mais fácil. Com uma taxa de vitória de 89.3% mas apenas 0.1% de taxa de pick, você provavelmente não será contestado, tornando o jogo mais fácil de navegar. Baixa contestação significa que você pode encontrar suas unidades naturalmente sem forçar pivots.

Quando forçar uma composição vs ser flexível no TFT Set 17?

No TFT Set 17, Ladino/Mipo tem uma taxa de pick de 3.3%, o que significa que é muito disputada. Se você ver outros jogando, considere pivotar para alternativas como Ladino/N.O.V.A.. Force uma composição quando acertar unidades e itens cedo, ou quando não estiver disputada. Seja flexível quando 2+ jogadores competem pelas mesmas unidades.

Quais composições têm as maiores taxas de vitória no TFT Set 17?

As 3 composições com maior taxa de vitória são: 1) Ladino/N.O.V.A. (89.3%), 2) N.O.V.A./Lutador (89.0%), e 3) N.O.V.A./Lutador (87.9%). Estas representam as composições mais fortes para maximizar LP em partidas ranqueadas.

Por que a taxa de vitória importa para composições de TFT?

A taxa de vitória mostra com que frequência uma composição alcança o top 4, o que ganha LP em ranqueadas. Composições com alta taxa de vitória como Ladino/N.O.V.A. (89.3%) performam bem consistentemente em muitos jogos. Porém, também considere a taxa de pick—composições muito disputadas podem underperformar nos seus jogos se múltiplos jogadores as forçarem.