Composições de Equipe TFT com Maior Taxa de Vitória

Esta tabela mostra as composições de equipe TFT com as maiores taxas de vitória, ajudando você a identificar as comps mais bem-sucedidas para subir no ranqueado. Composições de double-up campeões do Set 17: Desafiante (99.3% WR, 1.7 avg), Ladino (97.9% WR, 1.7 avg), N.O.V.A. (97.8% WR, 1.8 avg). Desafiante/N.O.V.A. lidera com 99.26% de win rate e 1.71 de placement médio. Ladino segue com 97.86% de win rate. Analisando 100 composições de double-up campeões com estatísticas de desempenho em tempo real.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
1.71
Avg Place
99.26%
Top 4 Rate
49.07%
First Place
Highly Contested
1.66
Avg Place
97.86%
Top 4 Rate
55.61%
First Place
Severely Contested
1.83
Avg Place
97.80%
Top 4 Rate
51.79%
First Place
Highly Contested
1.80
Avg Place
96.97%
Top 4 Rate
54.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
1.62
Avg Place
96.03%
Top 4 Rate
66.40%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.26
Avg Place
95.46%
Top 4 Rate
32.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.04
Avg Place
95.20%
Top 4 Rate
44.72%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.27
Avg Place
95.04%
Top 4 Rate
32.23%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.38
Avg Place
94.26%
Top 4 Rate
29.50%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.27
Avg Place
93.97%
Top 4 Rate
31.16%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.39
Avg Place
92.65%
Top 4 Rate
24.93%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.31
Avg Place
92.61%
Top 4 Rate
31.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.37
Avg Place
92.42%
Top 4 Rate
33.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.14
Avg Place
92.22%
Top 4 Rate
42.45%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.47
Avg Place
92.06%
Top 4 Rate
28.97%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.14
Avg Place
91.52%
Top 4 Rate
46.49%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.45
Avg Place
91.39%
Top 4 Rate
29.59%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.20
Avg Place
91.30%
Top 4 Rate
44.80%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.25
Avg Place
91.24%
Top 4 Rate
45.62%
First Place
Severely Contested
1.98
Avg Place
91.00%
Top 4 Rate
57.67%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.52
Avg Place
90.38%
Top 4 Rate
26.97%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.42
Avg Place
90.13%
Top 4 Rate
33.54%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.55
Avg Place
89.60%
Top 4 Rate
25.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.91
Avg Place
89.30%
Top 4 Rate
15.72%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.64
Avg Place
89.00%
Top 4 Rate
27.61%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.64
Avg Place
88.91%
Top 4 Rate
24.64%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.68
Avg Place
87.92%
Top 4 Rate
25.75%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.54
Avg Place
87.70%
Top 4 Rate
32.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.76
Avg Place
85.47%
Top 4 Rate
31.83%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.81
Avg Place
84.04%
Top 4 Rate
32.53%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.07
Avg Place
83.74%
Top 4 Rate
16.56%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.88
Avg Place
83.61%
Top 4 Rate
21.58%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.98
Avg Place
83.60%
Top 4 Rate
18.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.84
Avg Place
82.86%
Top 4 Rate
27.24%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.92
Avg Place
82.80%
Top 4 Rate
24.01%
First Place
Low Contested
2.91
Avg Place
82.32%
Top 4 Rate
26.29%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.13
Avg Place
81.76%
Top 4 Rate
12.79%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.95
Avg Place
81.54%
Top 4 Rate
24.86%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.10
Avg Place
81.35%
Top 4 Rate
12.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.19
Avg Place
81.05%
Top 4 Rate
16.49%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.10
Avg Place
80.65%
Top 4 Rate
18.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.98
Avg Place
79.95%
Top 4 Rate
24.70%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.18
Avg Place
79.86%
Top 4 Rate
20.49%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.23
Avg Place
79.36%
Top 4 Rate
12.06%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.99
Avg Place
79.29%
Top 4 Rate
26.43%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.22
Avg Place
79.28%
Top 4 Rate
13.81%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.25
Avg Place
79.28%
Top 4 Rate
12.29%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.27
Avg Place
79.14%
Top 4 Rate
17.27%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.40
Avg Place
78.75%
Top 4 Rate
11.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.27
Avg Place
78.65%
Top 4 Rate
16.34%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.18
Avg Place
78.25%
Top 4 Rate
18.31%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.95
Avg Place
77.73%
Top 4 Rate
27.50%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.18
Avg Place
77.70%
Top 4 Rate
17.88%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.08
Avg Place
77.54%
Top 4 Rate
23.19%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.17
Avg Place
77.53%
Top 4 Rate
22.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.17
Avg Place
77.46%
Top 4 Rate
24.10%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
77.34%
Top 4 Rate
15.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
77.08%
Top 4 Rate
19.48%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.13
Avg Place
76.66%
Top 4 Rate
25.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.32
Avg Place
76.43%
Top 4 Rate
16.25%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.26
Avg Place
76.38%
Top 4 Rate
20.70%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.29
Avg Place
76.14%
Top 4 Rate
14.05%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.01
Avg Place
76.08%
Top 4 Rate
33.63%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.22
Avg Place
75.80%
Top 4 Rate
23.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.29
Avg Place
75.39%
Top 4 Rate
16.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.45
Avg Place
74.75%
Top 4 Rate
15.03%
First Place
Low Contested
3.52
Avg Place
74.58%
Top 4 Rate
12.41%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.34
Avg Place
74.47%
Top 4 Rate
18.24%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.22
Avg Place
74.02%
Top 4 Rate
25.47%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.22
Avg Place
73.93%
Top 4 Rate
25.57%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.41
Avg Place
73.89%
Top 4 Rate
17.52%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.25
Avg Place
73.75%
Top 4 Rate
18.15%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.32
Avg Place
73.63%
Top 4 Rate
18.75%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.46
Avg Place
73.54%
Top 4 Rate
13.57%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.24
Avg Place
73.53%
Top 4 Rate
17.91%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.34
Avg Place
72.98%
Top 4 Rate
22.46%
First Place
Low Contested
3.45
Avg Place
72.80%
Top 4 Rate
14.76%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.52
Avg Place
72.20%
Top 4 Rate
12.08%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.30
Avg Place
71.20%
Top 4 Rate
23.73%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.54
Avg Place
71.12%
Top 4 Rate
13.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.74
Avg Place
71.06%
Top 4 Rate
7.72%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.41
Avg Place
70.77%
Top 4 Rate
21.03%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.55
Avg Place
70.03%
Top 4 Rate
14.54%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.67
Avg Place
69.93%
Top 4 Rate
11.15%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.48
Avg Place
69.26%
Top 4 Rate
23.75%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.71
Avg Place
68.58%
Top 4 Rate
11.03%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.75
Avg Place
67.05%
Top 4 Rate
8.24%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.75
Avg Place
66.95%
Top 4 Rate
11.76%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.64
Avg Place
65.71%
Top 4 Rate
21.55%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.77
Avg Place
65.31%
Top 4 Rate
16.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.66
Avg Place
65.12%
Top 4 Rate
19.63%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.78
Avg Place
64.84%
Top 4 Rate
14.84%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.94
Avg Place
64.09%
Top 4 Rate
5.79%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.64
Avg Place
62.99%
Top 4 Rate
28.89%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.92
Avg Place
61.30%
Top 4 Rate
16.09%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.03
Avg Place
61.02%
Top 4 Rate
6.66%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.96
Avg Place
58.72%
Top 4 Rate
20.64%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.09
Avg Place
57.03%
Top 4 Rate
17.84%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.15
Avg Place
56.52%
Top 4 Rate
14.35%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.15
Avg Place
56.39%
Top 4 Rate
11.11%
First Place
Moderately Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 100 team compositions ranked by performance to help you make informed decisions, based on 106.8K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 79.3% and average placement of 3.05 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is Desafiante/N.O.V.A. with Master Yi as the primary carry, achieving a 99.3% win rate. Following closely is Ladino/Mipo at 97.9% win rate, and N.O.V.A./Duelista Divina at 97.8%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • Desafiante/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Master Yi
  • Ladino/Mipo (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Bardo
  • N.O.V.A./Duelista Divina (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Kindred

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider Alma da Festa/N.O.V.A. which achieves first place in 66.4% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Most Consistent for Climbing

For players focused on consistent LP gains, Alma da Festa/N.O.V.A. offers the best average placement at 1.62.Consistent compositions minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing, even if they don't win lobbies as often.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • Desafiante/N.O.V.A.: 99.3% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Ladino/Mipo: 97.9% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • N.O.V.A./Duelista Divina: 97.8% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Replicador/N.O.V.A. with a 1.9% pick rate, though its 74.0% win rate suggests it may be over-contested. Alma da Festa/Estrela Negra follows at 1.6% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Ajude-nos a manter a precisão! Se você notar estatísticas incorretas, dados faltantes ou quaisquer problemas, seu feedback melhora diretamente a qualidade dos nossos dados para toda a comunidade.

Reportar problema

Comps de equipe TFT - Set 17 FAQ

Qual é a melhor composição de TFT no TFT Set 17?

A melhor composição de TFT no TFT Set 17 é Desafiante/N.O.V.A. com Master Yi como carry principal, alcançando uma taxa de vitória de 99.3% e colocação média de 1.71. Esta composição é eficaz para subir de rank e consistentemente fica no top 4.

Como jogar a composição Desafiante/N.O.V.A.?

Para jogar Desafiante/N.O.V.A., foque em construir em torno de Master Yi como seu carry principal. Procure Master Yi e unidades de suporte cedo, priorize itens que sinergizam com seu carry, e mire seu pico de poder no nível 7-8. Esta composição tem uma taxa de pick de 0.1%, tornando-a uma opção relativamente não disputada.

Quais composições são boas para subir no TFT Set 17?

Para ganhos consistentes de LP no TFT Set 17, Alma da Festa/N.O.V.A. oferece a melhor colocação média em 1.62. Outras opções confiáveis incluem Ladino/Mipo (média 1.66) e Desafiante/N.O.V.A. (média 1.71). Composições consistentes minimizam finais no bottom 4 e proporcionam uma subida estável.

Qual é a composição de TFT mais fácil de jogar?

Desafiante/N.O.V.A. é uma ótima opção para jogadores buscando uma subida mais fácil. Com uma taxa de vitória de 99.3% mas apenas 0.1% de taxa de pick, você provavelmente não será contestado, tornando o jogo mais fácil de navegar. Baixa contestação significa que você pode encontrar suas unidades naturalmente sem forçar pivots.

Quando forçar uma composição vs ser flexível no TFT Set 17?

No TFT Set 17, Replicador/N.O.V.A. tem uma taxa de pick de 1.9%, o que significa que é muito disputada. Se você ver outros jogando, considere pivotar para alternativas como Desafiante/N.O.V.A.. Force uma composição quando acertar unidades e itens cedo, ou quando não estiver disputada. Seja flexível quando 2+ jogadores competem pelas mesmas unidades.