Composições de Equipe TFT com Maior Taxa de Vitória

Esta tabela mostra as composições de equipe TFT com as maiores taxas de vitória, ajudando você a identificar as comps mais bem-sucedidas para subir no ranqueado. Composições de 9 campeões do Set 17: Desafiante (97.4% WR, 2.2 avg), Ladino (96.4% WR, 2.1 avg), Ladino (95.9% WR, 2.1 avg). Desafiante/Ladino lidera com 97.42% de win rate e 2.25 de placement médio. Ladino segue com 96.39% de win rate. Analisando 62 composições de 9 campeões com estatísticas de desempenho em tempo real.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
2.25
Avg Place
97.42%
Top 4 Rate
31.61%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.06
Avg Place
96.39%
Top 4 Rate
39.25%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.08
Avg Place
95.88%
Top 4 Rate
37.05%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.17
Avg Place
95.67%
Top 4 Rate
34.66%
First Place
Moderately Contested
1.99
Avg Place
94.82%
Top 4 Rate
42.42%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.14
Avg Place
94.75%
Top 4 Rate
37.37%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.20
Avg Place
94.07%
Top 4 Rate
37.29%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.43
Avg Place
92.56%
Top 4 Rate
29.35%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.36
Avg Place
92.29%
Top 4 Rate
30.35%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.41
Avg Place
91.99%
Top 4 Rate
30.04%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.55
Avg Place
89.66%
Top 4 Rate
26.17%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.32
Avg Place
89.49%
Top 4 Rate
39.95%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.47
Avg Place
88.33%
Top 4 Rate
28.02%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.40
Avg Place
87.58%
Top 4 Rate
40.35%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.44
Avg Place
87.13%
Top 4 Rate
39.82%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.73
Avg Place
86.01%
Top 4 Rate
27.97%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.71
Avg Place
85.26%
Top 4 Rate
30.52%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.97
Avg Place
83.85%
Top 4 Rate
25.77%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.84
Avg Place
83.06%
Top 4 Rate
28.72%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.03
Avg Place
81.98%
Top 4 Rate
16.47%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.11
Avg Place
81.06%
Top 4 Rate
17.41%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.14
Avg Place
80.24%
Top 4 Rate
18.76%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.82
Avg Place
80.15%
Top 4 Rate
37.13%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.03
Avg Place
79.64%
Top 4 Rate
23.68%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.05
Avg Place
79.45%
Top 4 Rate
25.12%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.13
Avg Place
79.36%
Top 4 Rate
18.53%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.91
Avg Place
78.77%
Top 4 Rate
29.16%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.16
Avg Place
78.50%
Top 4 Rate
20.56%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.10
Avg Place
78.42%
Top 4 Rate
21.98%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.05
Avg Place
77.94%
Top 4 Rate
26.83%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.10
Avg Place
77.78%
Top 4 Rate
27.53%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.01
Avg Place
77.15%
Top 4 Rate
25.22%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.37
Avg Place
75.92%
Top 4 Rate
16.97%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.23
Avg Place
75.51%
Top 4 Rate
19.05%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.39
Avg Place
74.82%
Top 4 Rate
19.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.23
Avg Place
74.27%
Top 4 Rate
23.03%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.30
Avg Place
74.25%
Top 4 Rate
19.77%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.49
Avg Place
71.84%
Top 4 Rate
16.65%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.56
Avg Place
70.89%
Top 4 Rate
14.41%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.50
Avg Place
69.83%
Top 4 Rate
19.63%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.45
Avg Place
68.14%
Top 4 Rate
23.67%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.55
Avg Place
67.92%
Top 4 Rate
20.82%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.66
Avg Place
67.38%
Top 4 Rate
17.91%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.66
Avg Place
67.14%
Top 4 Rate
16.30%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.74
Avg Place
66.70%
Top 4 Rate
11.92%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.83
Avg Place
66.60%
Top 4 Rate
16.19%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.70
Avg Place
66.30%
Top 4 Rate
20.65%
First Place
Low Contested
3.93
Avg Place
65.47%
Top 4 Rate
7.82%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.74
Avg Place
64.80%
Top 4 Rate
17.51%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.95
Avg Place
63.45%
Top 4 Rate
6.99%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.07
Avg Place
59.35%
Top 4 Rate
7.61%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.90
Avg Place
59.24%
Top 4 Rate
20.93%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.32
Avg Place
56.96%
Top 4 Rate
6.03%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.26
Avg Place
56.43%
Top 4 Rate
4.97%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.32
Avg Place
55.03%
Top 4 Rate
8.52%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.43
Avg Place
54.22%
Top 4 Rate
3.21%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.43
Avg Place
51.97%
Top 4 Rate
5.34%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.43
Avg Place
49.82%
Top 4 Rate
5.78%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.60
Avg Place
49.74%
Top 4 Rate
3.95%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.86
Avg Place
43.02%
Top 4 Rate
3.49%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.85
Avg Place
42.51%
Top 4 Rate
7.58%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.97
Avg Place
41.14%
Top 4 Rate
6.69%
First Place
Moderately Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 62 team compositions ranked by performance to help you make informed decisions, based on 67.9K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 74.6% and average placement of 3.27 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is Desafiante/Ladino with Kai'Sa as the primary carry, achieving a 97.4% win rate. Following closely is Ladino/N.O.V.A. at 96.4% win rate, and Ladino/N.O.V.A. at 95.9%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • Desafiante/Ladino (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Kai'Sa
  • Ladino/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Jax
  • Ladino/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Jax

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider Ladino/N.O.V.A. which achieves first place in 42.4% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Most Consistent for Climbing

For players focused on consistent LP gains, Ladino/N.O.V.A. offers the best average placement at 1.99.Consistent compositions minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing, even if they don't win lobbies as often.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • Desafiante/Ladino: 97.4% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Ladino/N.O.V.A.: 96.4% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Ladino/N.O.V.A.: 95.9% win rate with only 0.3% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Replicador/Estrela Negra with a 1.4% pick rate, though its 66.7% win rate suggests it may be over-contested. Árbitro/Replicador follows at 1.1% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Ajude-nos a manter a precisão! Se você notar estatísticas incorretas, dados faltantes ou quaisquer problemas, seu feedback melhora diretamente a qualidade dos nossos dados para toda a comunidade.

Reportar problema

Comps de equipe TFT - Set 17 FAQ

Qual é a melhor composição de TFT no TFT Set 17?

A melhor composição de TFT no TFT Set 17 é Desafiante/Ladino com Kai'Sa como carry principal, alcançando uma taxa de vitória de 97.4% e colocação média de 2.25. Esta composição é eficaz para subir de rank e consistentemente fica no top 4.

Como jogar a composição Desafiante/Ladino?

Para jogar Desafiante/Ladino, foque em construir em torno de Kai'Sa como seu carry principal. Procure Kai'Sa e unidades de suporte cedo, priorize itens que sinergizam com seu carry, e mire seu pico de poder no nível 7-8. Esta composição tem uma taxa de pick de 0.1%, tornando-a uma opção relativamente não disputada.

Quais composições são boas para subir no TFT Set 17?

Para ganhos consistentes de LP no TFT Set 17, Ladino/N.O.V.A. oferece a melhor colocação média em 1.99. Outras opções confiáveis incluem Ladino/N.O.V.A. (média 2.06) e Ladino/N.O.V.A. (média 2.08). Composições consistentes minimizam finais no bottom 4 e proporcionam uma subida estável.

Qual é a composição de TFT mais fácil de jogar?

Desafiante/Ladino é uma ótima opção para jogadores buscando uma subida mais fácil. Com uma taxa de vitória de 97.4% mas apenas 0.1% de taxa de pick, você provavelmente não será contestado, tornando o jogo mais fácil de navegar. Baixa contestação significa que você pode encontrar suas unidades naturalmente sem forçar pivots.

Quando forçar uma composição vs ser flexível no TFT Set 17?

No TFT Set 17, Replicador/Estrela Negra tem uma taxa de pick de 1.4%, o que significa que é muito disputada. Se você ver outros jogando, considere pivotar para alternativas como Desafiante/Ladino. Force uma composição quando acertar unidades e itens cedo, ou quando não estiver disputada. Seja flexível quando 2+ jogadores competem pelas mesmas unidades.