Melhor colocação média das composições TFT Double Up

Esta tabela classifica as composições de equipe TFT Double Up pela colocação média, mostrando quais comps alcançam consistentemente as melhores posições. Top composições Double Up de 8 campeões Set 17: N.O.V.A. (74.2% WR, 3.4 avg), N.O.V.A. (67.6% WR, 3.5 avg), N.O.V.A. (63.8% WR, 4.0 avg). N.O.V.A./Brawler lidera com 74.19% de win rate e 3.37 de placement médio. N.O.V.A. segue com 67.65% de win rate. Analisando 68 composições Double Up de 8 campeões com estatísticas de desempenho em tempo real.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
3.37
Avg Place
74.19%
Top 4 Rate
24.19%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.53
Avg Place
67.65%
Top 4 Rate
12.75%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.96
Avg Place
63.83%
Top 4 Rate
8.51%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.65
Avg Place
62.97%
Top 4 Rate
21.20%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.69
Avg Place
58.06%
Top 4 Rate
19.35%
First Place
Low Contested
3.93
Avg Place
58.33%
Top 4 Rate
11.67%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.51
Avg Place
67.57%
Top 4 Rate
21.62%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.89
Avg Place
56.88%
Top 4 Rate
16.88%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.91
Avg Place
60.00%
Top 4 Rate
18.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.05
Avg Place
58.62%
Top 4 Rate
11.49%
First Place
Low Contested
4.00
Avg Place
50.00%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.02
Avg Place
59.09%
Top 4 Rate
13.64%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.51
Avg Place
69.77%
Top 4 Rate
16.28%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.08
Avg Place
57.14%
Top 4 Rate
14.29%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.09
Avg Place
58.46%
Top 4 Rate
15.38%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.83
Avg Place
62.45%
Top 4 Rate
16.49%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.99
Avg Place
60.00%
Top 4 Rate
14.00%
First Place
Low Contested
3.84
Avg Place
55.97%
Top 4 Rate
18.66%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.89
Avg Place
61.63%
Top 4 Rate
15.59%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.75
Avg Place
60.00%
Top 4 Rate
20.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.13
Avg Place
33.33%
Top 4 Rate
5.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.30
Avg Place
52.17%
Top 4 Rate
10.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.19
Avg Place
37.50%
Top 4 Rate
6.25%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.43
Avg Place
50.00%
Top 4 Rate
17.39%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.44
Avg Place
46.67%
Top 4 Rate
15.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.44
Avg Place
49.02%
Top 4 Rate
10.83%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.31
Avg Place
49.20%
Top 4 Rate
16.04%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.12
Avg Place
42.42%
Top 4 Rate
3.03%
First Place
Low Contested
4.14
Avg Place
57.14%
Top 4 Rate
19.05%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.59
Avg Place
48.87%
Top 4 Rate
11.65%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.24
Avg Place
54.45%
Top 4 Rate
10.68%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.68
Avg Place
46.77%
Top 4 Rate
6.45%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.65
Avg Place
47.80%
Top 4 Rate
8.29%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.36
Avg Place
52.17%
Top 4 Rate
15.44%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.77
Avg Place
45.54%
Top 4 Rate
13.39%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.22
Avg Place
33.33%
Top 4 Rate
5.88%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.81
Avg Place
37.21%
Top 4 Rate
13.95%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.69
Avg Place
45.24%
Top 4 Rate
16.67%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.49
Avg Place
46.15%
Top 4 Rate
10.26%
First Place
Low Contested
4.80
Avg Place
40.96%
Top 4 Rate
9.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.82
Avg Place
62.50%
Top 4 Rate
19.64%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.02
Avg Place
41.67%
Top 4 Rate
8.33%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.03
Avg Place
36.21%
Top 4 Rate
8.62%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.73
Avg Place
47.13%
Top 4 Rate
8.49%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.71
Avg Place
44.12%
Top 4 Rate
8.82%
First Place
Low Contested
5.63
Avg Place
36.84%
Top 4 Rate
5.26%
First Place
Moderately Contested
-
5.18
Avg Place
32.97%
Top 4 Rate
7.14%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.80
Avg Place
25.00%
Top 4 Rate
5.95%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.00
Avg Place
32.35%
Top 4 Rate
8.82%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.95
Avg Place
41.67%
Top 4 Rate
6.67%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.21
Avg Place
34.15%
Top 4 Rate
9.76%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.23
Avg Place
32.14%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.24
Avg Place
29.41%
Top 4 Rate
5.88%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.97
Avg Place
39.39%
Top 4 Rate
9.09%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.30
Avg Place
32.54%
Top 4 Rate
7.69%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.36
Avg Place
28.57%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.37
Avg Place
32.61%
Top 4 Rate
8.70%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.40
Avg Place
27.91%
Top 4 Rate
9.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.83
Avg Place
18.75%
Top 4 Rate
4.17%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.52
Avg Place
28.26%
Top 4 Rate
4.35%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.87
Avg Place
23.38%
Top 4 Rate
7.79%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.57
Avg Place
29.13%
Top 4 Rate
4.85%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.49
Avg Place
26.38%
Top 4 Rate
5.51%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.80
Avg Place
20.00%
Top 4 Rate
6.67%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.87
Avg Place
19.49%
Top 4 Rate
4.24%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.57
Avg Place
28.57%
Top 4 Rate
2.86%
First Place
Moderately Contested
6.22
Avg Place
12.70%
Top 4 Rate
3.17%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.52
Avg Place
25.81%
Top 4 Rate
3.23%
First Place
Moderately Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 68 team compositions sorted by average placement to find the most consistent compositions for reliable top 4 finishes, based on 9.9K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 44.5% and average placement of 4.68 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is N.O.V.A./Brawler with Viktor as the primary carry, achieving a 74.2% win rate. Following closely is Replicator/N.O.V.A. at 69.8% win rate, and N.O.V.A./Brawler at 67.6%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • N.O.V.A./Brawler (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Viktor
  • Replicator/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Jax
  • N.O.V.A./Brawler (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Viktor

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider N.O.V.A./Fateweaver which achieves first place in 25.0% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • N.O.V.A./Brawler: 74.2% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Replicator/N.O.V.A.: 69.8% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • N.O.V.A./Brawler: 67.6% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Rogue/N.O.V.A. with a 2.1% pick rate, and it maintains a strong 61.6% win rate despite high contestation. Challenger/N.O.V.A. follows at 1.4% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Ajude-nos a manter a precisão! Se você notar estatísticas incorretas, dados faltantes ou quaisquer problemas, seu feedback melhora diretamente a qualidade dos nossos dados para toda a comunidade.

Reportar problema

Comps TFT Double Up - Set 17 FAQ

Qual é a melhor comp TFT Double Up em TFT Set 17?

A melhor comp TFT Double Up em TFT Set 17 é N.O.V.A./Brawler com Viktor como carry principal, alcançando 74.2% de taxa de vitória e 3.37 de colocação média. Esta composição é eficaz para subir de elo com um parceiro.

Como jogar a comp N.O.V.A./Brawler no Double Up?

Para jogar N.O.V.A./Brawler no Double Up, coordene-se com seu parceiro. Foque em construir ao redor de Viktor como carry principal. Esta comp tem 0.1% de taxa de escolha, tornando-a uma opção relativamente não disputada. Coordene assistências e itens compartilhados com seu parceiro.

Quais comps de Double Up são boas para subir em TFT Set 17?

Para ganhos consistentes de LP em TFT Set 17 Double Up, N.O.V.A./Brawler oferece a melhor colocação média em 3.37. Outras opções confiáveis incluem Replicator/N.O.V.A. (média 3.51) e Rogue/N.O.V.A. (média 3.51). Coordene-se com seu parceiro para evitar disputar as mesmas unidades.

Qual é a comp TFT Double Up mais fácil de jogar?

N.O.V.A./Brawler é uma ótima opção para jogadores buscando uma subida mais fácil. Com uma taxa de vitória de 74.2% mas apenas 0.1% de taxa de pick, você provavelmente não será contestado, tornando o jogo mais fácil de navegar. Baixa contestação significa que você pode encontrar suas unidades naturalmente sem forçar pivots.

Meu parceiro e eu devemos jogar a mesma comp no Double Up?

No TFT Set 17 Double Up, geralmente é melhor jogar comps diferentes para evitar disputar unidades. Rogue/N.O.V.A. é a mais popular com 2.1% de taxa de escolha. Considere que seu parceiro jogue N.O.V.A./Brawler como opção complementar.