Abrams
Taxa de Vitoria
56.3%
Partidas
101
KDA
2.60
Dano a jogadores
30,436

Abrams vs Minavs Mina

Nível de habilidadeTodos os níveis de habilidade
Partidas6,211
Versao6487
Última atualização25 de mai. de 2026

Abrams domina Mina com uma impressionante 56.3% taxa de vitória em Deadlock. Em 101 jogos, Abrams em média obtém 6.2 abates e -7,384 mais dano de jogador por partida. Este confronto favorável permite jogabilidade agressiva e oportunidades de luta antecipadas.

Abrams Matchup Breakdown

Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Abrams performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, combat stats, net worth comparison, and damage analysis — all based on real ranked Deadlock data.

Compare against an opponent
Mina - 56.3% win rateMina(56.3%)
Abrams - 56.3% win rate in this matchup
Abrams
56.3% WR
VS
Mina vs Abrams matchup - 45.7% win rate
Mina
45.7% WR

Who Wins the Abrams vs Mina Matchup?

Abrams wins the Abrams vs Mina matchup
Winner
Abrams
Matches: 101
56.3%
Win Rate
45.7%
6.2
Avg Kills
8.9
7.2
Avg Deaths
6.6
12.5
Avg Assists
10.5
40,458
Avg Net Worth
41,677
30,436
Player DMG
37,819
5,255
Objective DMG
6,251
88.1
Last Hits
96.6

Abrams vs Mina Resumo do confronto

The Abrams vs Mina matchup in Deadlock is um confronto decisivamente unilateral. Based on 101 recent matches analyzed, Abrams wins with a 56.3% win rate compared to Mina's 45.7%, giving Abrams a 10.5 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in damage output, where Mina consistently outperforms. Abrams has overwhelming statistical superiority in this matchup. Mina should avoid direct confrontation, focus entirely on farm and objectives, and wait for team fight scenarios where individual matchup advantages are diluted.

Abrams vs Mina Análise de combate

Mina wins combat stats against Abrams in Deadlock

Mina achieves a clean sweep in the combat department, winning all five metrics against Abrams in the Abrams vs Mina matchup. This comprehensive dominance across KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability demonstrates that Mina holds systematic mechanical advantages in these encounters. Based on analysis of 101 competitive matches, Mina players can approach duels against Abrams with confidence, while Abrams players must completely avoid fair fights and instead focus on ability-based contributions, objective play, and team coordination to remain impactful.

Proporção KDA
2.60Abrams
2.91Mina
Mina holds a moderate KDA edge in this matchup, recording 2.91 compared to Abrams's 2.60. While this 0.31 point difference indicates Mina tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Abrams players can overcome it through superior positioning, ability timing, or simply winning crucial duels. Abrams should focus on burst trade patterns and disengage before extended fights favor Mina's superior sustain.
Abates médios
6.2Abrams
8.9Mina
Mina substantially outfrags Abrams in this matchup, averaging 8.9 kills compared to 6.2 — a difference of nearly 2.7 eliminations per match. When Mina faces Abrams, the data clearly shows Mina finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. Abrams players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Mina in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Mortes médias
7.2Abrams
6.6Mina
Mina survives longer in this matchup, dying 6.6 times per game compared to Abrams's 7.2 deaths. This 0.6 death difference per match means Mina is available more often, contributing to late-game scenarios and objective fights more frequently. Abrams players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests Mina's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
Dano a jogadores
30,436Abrams
37,819Mina
The damage differential between Mina and Abrams is exceptional: 37,819 compared to just 30,436. Mina deals 7,384 more damage per game on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests Mina's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while Abrams struggles to even trade effectively. Abrams players should treat Mina as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or ability-based damage.
Dano a objetivos
5,255Abrams
6,251Mina
Objective damage contribution is similar between Abrams (5,255) and Mina (6,251). Neither hero has a distinct advantage when it comes to taking towers, walkers, or the patron. Team coordination will be more important than hero selection for objective control.

Abrams vs Mina Análise econômica

Patrimônio líquido
40,458Abrams
41,677Mina
Últimos golpes
88.1Abrams
96.6Mina

Mina generates approximately 1,219 more souls than Abrams on average. This moderate economic edge translates to earlier power spikes and item completions, giving Mina a mid-game advantage. Mina secures more last hits (96.6 vs 88.1), while Abrams leads in denies (3.4 vs 2.6). These farming dynamics shape the lane equilibrium and gold distribution.

Itens recomendados para Abrams vs Mina

Abrams build for Mina matchup

Build Abrams vs Mina

This winning build for Abrams against Mina focuses on maximizing your statistical advantages in this favorable matchup. With a 56.3% win rate against Mina, these 7 items help Abrams press the advantage and close out games efficiently. Ritmo de Cura, Surto de Poder, Encantamento Balístico, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 22,400 souls The build includes high-value items that scale well into the late game. Farm efficiently and look for opportunities to extend your lead before completing these power spikes.

Mina build for Abrams matchup

Build Mina vs Abrams

Mina's counter-build against Abrams attempts to mitigate the matchup disadvantage through smart itemization. Facing an unfavorable matchup, Mina players typically prioritize items that help them survive and scale. Balas Absorventes, Troféus de Caça, Lente Focal, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 36,000 souls Knowing Mina's likely itemization helps you exploit windows where they're weaker and predict their item timing.

Essas builds de itens são otimizadas para o confronto Abrams vs Mina com base em dados de taxa de vitória de 101 partidas competitivas. As escolhas de itens no Deadlock impactam significativamente os resultados dos confrontos — a build certa pode ajudar a superar desvantagens estatísticas ou ampliar vantagens existentes. Lembre-se de adaptar sua build com base no estado do jogo, composições de equipe, itens inimigos e se você está à frente ou atrás em almas.

Abrams tem matchups favoráveis contra 20 heróis e matchups desfavoráveis contra 17 heróis no Deadlock. O matchup mais forte de Abrams é contra Miragem com uma taxa de vitória de 66.7%. O matchup mais difícil é Porteiro com 35.1% de taxa de vitória. Use a tabela abaixo para encontrar detalhes específicos de matchups e recomendações de build.

Abrams matchup win rates and combat stats in Deadlock (Version 6487)
Opponent
Win Rate
Matches
KDA
Kills
Deaths
Player DMG
Net Worth
45.36%1042.186.18.029,70339,873
54.17%1012.616.37.531,16939,713
56.25%1012.606.27.230,43640,458
45.68%942.656.07.229,40738,500
52.22%932.576.67.632,58341,023
49.40%902.375.67.928,66038,087
59.52%892.606.27.331,38440,234
51.81%882.295.07.326,69137,166
53.09%862.896.26.531,21340,145
45.00%842.466.27.830,08340,769
53.85%832.576.27.429,78239,492
42.86%822.376.87.931,51839,796
57.97%762.806.77.132,38840,499
58.33%762.596.37.329,89440,020
58.82%752.616.77.129,74139,166
50.00%752.415.97.428,15339,394
37.68%722.265.47.226,29336,481
61.29%702.806.57.330,32742,011
61.54%682.595.37.029,51439,633
43.94%682.376.67.931,61538,862
49.15%662.616.47.531,12242,609
56.67%632.696.57.030,83140,423
35.09%612.326.77.932,58541,944
55.36%612.315.87.429,02239,352
48.15%572.646.27.029,85039,175
36.54%572.466.27.228,80237,232
46.30%562.556.47.330,36240,277
46.94%522.296.07.529,99739,524
48.98%512.334.96.827,24338,717
54.17%502.496.87.733,01241,449
62.50%502.536.17.331,97141,300
52.17%492.416.87.930,75039,672
43.90%442.205.87.530,06538,044
66.67%423.166.66.131,75141,060
41.67%382.174.98.129,65941,603
57.14%383.124.95.726,87539,306
40.63%342.165.17.627,06438,579

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Ajude-nos a manter a precisão! Se você notar estatísticas incorretas, dados faltantes ou quaisquer problemas, seu feedback melhora diretamente a qualidade dos nossos dados para toda a comunidade.

Reportar problema

Abrams Matchups - FAQ

Qual é o melhor confronto de Abrams no Deadlock?

O melhor confronto de Abrams é contra Miragem, alcançando 66.7% de taxa de vitória. Abrams se destaca neste confronto através de stats de combate superiores e interações de habilidade favoráveis.

Qual é o confronto mais difícil de Abrams?

O confronto mais difícil de Abrams é contra Porteiro, com apenas 35.1% de taxa de vitória. Contra este oponente, Abrams deve focar em coordenação de equipe e itemização defensiva.

Quantos confrontos favoráveis Abrams tem?

Abrams tem 20 confrontos favoráveis (taxa de vitória 50%+) e 17 confrontos desfavoráveis no Deadlock. Entender essas dinâmicas de confronto ajuda você a fazer melhores seleções de herói e adaptar seu estilo de jogo.

Como eu devo jogar Abrams em confrontos difíceis?

Quando jogando Abrams em confrontos difíceis, priorize farm seguro, posicionamento e coordenação de equipe. Ajuste sua build de itens para compensar a desvantagem de confronto e procure por oportunidades de impactar lutas através de habilidades em vez de confrontação direta.

Quais stats devo focar nos confrontos de Abrams?

Stats principais para analisar nos confrontos de Abrams incluem taxa de vitória, proporção de KDA, dano médio do jogador e diferença de patrimônio líquido. Confrontos de dano alto favorecem jogo agressivo, enquanto confrontos de KDA baixa sugerem jogar mais defensivamente e confiar no suporte de equipe.