Top TFT-Comps nach Erstplatzierungsrate

Diese Tabelle zeigt TFT Set 17 Teamkompositionen mit den höchsten Erstplatzierungsraten, perfekt für Spieler, die ihre Siegchancen maximieren wollen. Top 9-Champion Set 17 Kompositionen: Meeple (97.7% WR, 1.8 Ø), Schurke (85.2% WR, 2.2 Ø), Replikator (86.4% WR, 2.5 Ø). Meeple/Sternenvernichter führt mit 97.67% Siegesrate und 1.79 durchschnittlicher Platzierung. Schurke folgt mit 85.19% Siegesrate. Analyse von 66 9-Comp Kompositionen mit Echtzeit-Leistungsstatistiken.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4FirstContested Risk
1.79
Avg Place
97.67%
Top 4 Rate
53.49%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.25
Avg Place
85.19%
Top 4 Rate
49.38%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.50
Avg Place
86.40%
Top 4 Rate
41.60%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.04
Avg Place
96.36%
Top 4 Rate
41.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.45
Avg Place
87.13%
Top 4 Rate
40.35%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.15
Avg Place
92.36%
Top 4 Rate
37.50%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.20
Avg Place
94.21%
Top 4 Rate
37.03%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.52
Avg Place
88.93%
Top 4 Rate
33.22%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.72
Avg Place
85.19%
Top 4 Rate
31.48%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.80
Avg Place
82.27%
Top 4 Rate
31.36%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.66
Avg Place
88.06%
Top 4 Rate
30.75%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.55
Avg Place
88.62%
Top 4 Rate
28.74%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.91
Avg Place
80.97%
Top 4 Rate
27.82%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.00
Avg Place
77.92%
Top 4 Rate
27.79%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.32
Avg Place
70.88%
Top 4 Rate
27.40%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.94
Avg Place
79.23%
Top 4 Rate
26.70%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.97
Avg Place
80.40%
Top 4 Rate
26.13%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.44
Avg Place
93.69%
Top 4 Rate
25.17%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.11
Avg Place
78.05%
Top 4 Rate
24.39%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.14
Avg Place
75.51%
Top 4 Rate
23.81%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.91
Avg Place
60.04%
Top 4 Rate
23.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.52
Avg Place
68.49%
Top 4 Rate
22.81%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.77
Avg Place
87.81%
Top 4 Rate
22.58%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
74.51%
Top 4 Rate
20.95%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.66
Avg Place
66.10%
Top 4 Rate
20.55%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.15
Avg Place
77.81%
Top 4 Rate
19.98%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.09
Avg Place
80.91%
Top 4 Rate
19.82%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.95
Avg Place
80.67%
Top 4 Rate
17.33%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.45
Avg Place
70.10%
Top 4 Rate
17.16%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.65
Avg Place
71.83%
Top 4 Rate
16.90%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.57
Avg Place
69.15%
Top 4 Rate
16.83%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.01
Avg Place
57.94%
Top 4 Rate
16.82%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.87
Avg Place
62.14%
Top 4 Rate
16.43%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.73
Avg Place
69.85%
Top 4 Rate
16.18%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.87
Avg Place
58.74%
Top 4 Rate
16.02%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.68
Avg Place
68.18%
Top 4 Rate
15.45%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.34
Avg Place
74.39%
Top 4 Rate
14.88%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.97
Avg Place
59.61%
Top 4 Rate
14.64%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.51
Avg Place
74.42%
Top 4 Rate
13.95%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.91
Avg Place
62.44%
Top 4 Rate
13.05%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.70
Avg Place
65.63%
Top 4 Rate
12.68%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.02
Avg Place
60.73%
Top 4 Rate
12.57%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.05
Avg Place
60.18%
Top 4 Rate
11.95%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.11
Avg Place
57.14%
Top 4 Rate
11.61%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.79
Avg Place
59.79%
Top 4 Rate
11.34%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.35
Avg Place
76.64%
Top 4 Rate
10.95%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.26
Avg Place
78.95%
Top 4 Rate
10.53%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.55
Avg Place
72.82%
Top 4 Rate
10.45%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.31
Avg Place
50.00%
Top 4 Rate
10.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.46
Avg Place
50.00%
Top 4 Rate
9.46%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.39
Avg Place
52.50%
Top 4 Rate
8.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.20
Avg Place
33.93%
Top 4 Rate
8.04%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.44
Avg Place
76.92%
Top 4 Rate
7.69%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.20
Avg Place
59.09%
Top 4 Rate
7.39%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.61
Avg Place
39.29%
Top 4 Rate
7.14%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.52
Avg Place
48.50%
Top 4 Rate
7.06%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.95
Avg Place
40.08%
Top 4 Rate
6.57%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.44
Avg Place
48.71%
Top 4 Rate
6.03%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.22
Avg Place
58.82%
Top 4 Rate
5.88%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.10
Avg Place
58.62%
Top 4 Rate
5.52%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.19
Avg Place
33.89%
Top 4 Rate
5.34%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.62
Avg Place
31.46%
Top 4 Rate
2.25%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.69
Avg Place
24.14%
Top 4 Rate
2.07%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.38
Avg Place
36.54%
Top 4 Rate
1.92%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.44
Avg Place
30.22%
Top 4 Rate
1.78%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.74
Avg Place
27.08%
Top 4 Rate
1.39%
First Place
Severely Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 66 team compositions sorted by first place rate to find compositions with the highest potential to win lobbies, based on 43.7K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 67.2% and average placement of 3.62 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is Meeple/Sternenvernichter with Fizz as the primary carry, achieving a 97.7% win rate. Following closely is Schurke/Meeple at 96.4% win rate, and Schurke/N.O.V.A. at 94.2%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • Meeple/Sternenvernichter (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Fizz
  • Schurke/Meeple (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Kai'Sa
  • Schurke/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Talon

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • Meeple/Sternenvernichter: 97.7% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Schurke/Meeple: 96.4% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Schurke/N.O.V.A.: 94.2% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Replikator/Sternenvernichter with a 3.7% pick rate, and it maintains a strong 77.8% win rate despite high contestation. Gebieter/Sternenvernichter follows at 1.6% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Helfen Sie uns, die Genauigkeit zu verbessern! Wenn Sie falsche Statistiken, fehlende Daten oder Probleme bemerken, hilft Ihr Feedback direkt dabei, die Qualität unserer Daten für die gesamte Community zu verbessern.

Problem melden

TFT Set 17 Komps FAQ

Was ist die beste TFT-Komposition in TFT Set 17?

Die beste TFT-Komposition in TFT Set 17 ist Meeple/Sternenvernichter mit Fizz als primarem Carry, mit einer Siegrate von 97.7% und einer durchschnittlichen Platzierung von 1.79. Diese Komposition ist effektiv zum Aufsteigen und erreicht konstant Top 4.

Wie spiele ich die Meeple/Sternenvernichter Komposition?

Um Meeple/Sternenvernichter zu spielen, konzentriere dich darauf, Fizz als Hauptcarry aufzubauen. Suche fruh nach Fizz und unterstutzenden Einheiten, priorisiere Items, die mit deinem Carry synergieren, und versuche deinen Powerspike bei Level 7-8 zu erreichen. Diese Komposition hat eine Spielrate von 0.1%, was sie zu einer relativ unumkampften Option macht.

Welche Kompositionen sind gut zum Aufsteigen in TFT Set 17?

Fur konstante LP-Gewinne in TFT Set 17 bietet Meeple/Sternenvernichter die beste durchschnittliche Platzierung mit 1.79. Andere zuverlassige Optionen sind Schurke/Meeple (2.04 avg) und Schurke/N.O.V.A. (2.15 avg). Konstante Kompositionen minimieren Bottom-4-Platzierungen und ermoglichen stetiges Aufsteigen.

Was ist die einfachste TFT-Komposition zum Spielen?

Meeple/Sternenvernichter ist eine gute Option fur Spieler, die einen einfacheren Aufstieg suchen. Mit einer Siegrate von 97.7%, aber nur 0.1% Spielrate, wirst du wahrscheinlich nicht umkampft, was das Spiel einfacher macht. Geringe Konkurrenz bedeutet, dass du deine Einheiten naturlich finden kannst, ohne Wechsel erzwingen zu mussen.

Wann sollte ich eine Komposition forcen vs flexen in TFT Set 17?

In TFT Set 17 hat Replikator/Sternenvernichter eine Spielrate von 3.7%, was bedeutet, dass sie stark umkampft ist. Wenn du siehst, dass andere sie spielen, erwage Alternativen wie Meeple/Sternenvernichter. Force eine Komposition, wenn du fruhe Einheiten und Items triffst, oder wenn sie unumkampft ist. Flexe, wenn du 2+ Spieler siehst, die um dieselben Einheiten konkurrieren.

Welche TFT-Komposition gewinnt am haufigsten Lobbys in TFT Set 17?

Meeple/Sternenvernichter erreicht den ersten Platz in 53.5% der Spiele, was sie zur besten Komposition macht, um Lobbys direkt zu gewinnen. Schurke/Sternenvernichter follows at 49.4% first place rate. Wenn dein Ziel ist zu gewinnen statt nur Top 4, priorisiere diese High-Ceiling-Kompositionen.

Wann sollte ich auf ersten Platz vs Top 4 spielen?

Spiele auf ersten Platz, wenn du eine High-Ceiling-Komposition wie Meeple/Sternenvernichter (53.5% Erstplatzrate) hast und deinen Powerspike mit optimalen Items erreichst. Spiele auf Top 4, wenn du umkampft bist, suboptimale Items hast, oder LP erhalten musst. In Ranked steigt man mit konstanten Top-4-Platzierungen oft schneller als mit Coinflipping auf ersten Platz.