Diese Tabelle ordnet TFT Set 17 Teamkompositionen nach ihrer durchschnittlichen Platzierung und zeigt, welche Comps konsistent Top-Platzierungen erreichen. Top 9-Champion Set 17 Kompositionen: Meeple (97.7% WR, 1.8 Ø), Schurke (98.2% WR, 1.9 Ø), Schurke (100.0% WR, 2.0 Ø). Meeple/Sternenvernichter führt mit 97.67% Siegesrate und 1.79 durchschnittlicher Platzierung. Schurke folgt mit 98.20% Siegesrate. Analyse von 66 9-Comp Kompositionen mit Echtzeit-Leistungsstatistiken.

Primary
Champions
Builds
Traits
AvgWinFirstPick
1.79
Avg Place
97.67%
Win Rate
53.49%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
1.92
Avg Place
98.20%
Win Rate
44.14%
First Place
0.07%
Pick Rate
1.95
Avg Place
100.00%
Win Rate
36.47%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
2.18
Avg Place
96.85%
Win Rate
36.04%
First Place
0.14%
Pick Rate
2.25
Avg Place
85.19%
Win Rate
49.38%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
2.34
Avg Place
88.00%
Win Rate
40.00%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
2.39
Avg Place
94.27%
Win Rate
26.87%
First Place
0.59%
Pick Rate
2.44
Avg Place
91.60%
Win Rate
27.73%
First Place
0.08%
Pick Rate
2.55
Avg Place
84.79%
Win Rate
38.14%
First Place
0.25%
Pick Rate
2.67
Avg Place
83.13%
Win Rate
39.76%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
2.77
Avg Place
89.41%
Win Rate
18.24%
First Place
0.11%
Pick Rate
2.91
Avg Place
79.63%
Win Rate
25.00%
First Place
0.14%
Pick Rate
2.96
Avg Place
80.61%
Win Rate
25.54%
First Place
1.11%
Pick Rate
2.98
Avg Place
79.65%
Win Rate
30.53%
First Place
0.15%
Pick Rate
2.98
Avg Place
83.02%
Win Rate
22.64%
First Place
0.07%
Pick Rate
2.99
Avg Place
73.91%
Win Rate
31.30%
First Place
0.08%
Pick Rate
3.06
Avg Place
77.95%
Win Rate
23.62%
First Place
0.08%
Pick Rate
3.09
Avg Place
76.85%
Win Rate
24.30%
First Place
0.51%
Pick Rate
3.11
Avg Place
78.05%
Win Rate
24.39%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
3.15
Avg Place
80.81%
Win Rate
12.12%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
3.19
Avg Place
76.16%
Win Rate
19.55%
First Place
3.15%
Pick Rate
3.22
Avg Place
77.82%
Win Rate
18.12%
First Place
0.56%
Pick Rate
3.30
Avg Place
74.05%
Win Rate
21.26%
First Place
0.36%
Pick Rate
3.36
Avg Place
68.44%
Win Rate
27.78%
First Place
0.29%
Pick Rate
3.38
Avg Place
72.34%
Win Rate
21.28%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
3.39
Avg Place
74.83%
Win Rate
13.96%
First Place
0.29%
Pick Rate
3.42
Avg Place
81.40%
Win Rate
16.28%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
3.44
Avg Place
76.92%
Win Rate
7.69%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
3.50
Avg Place
74.47%
Win Rate
8.51%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
3.51
Avg Place
74.42%
Win Rate
13.95%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
3.52
Avg Place
71.63%
Win Rate
13.48%
First Place
0.09%
Pick Rate
3.55
Avg Place
66.32%
Win Rate
8.42%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
3.55
Avg Place
70.65%
Win Rate
6.52%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
3.56
Avg Place
71.94%
Win Rate
15.83%
First Place
0.09%
Pick Rate
3.57
Avg Place
77.27%
Win Rate
11.36%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
3.61
Avg Place
68.88%
Win Rate
18.98%
First Place
0.67%
Pick Rate
3.70
Avg Place
64.78%
Win Rate
19.89%
First Place
0.83%
Pick Rate
3.72
Avg Place
69.94%
Win Rate
15.61%
First Place
0.11%
Pick Rate
3.73
Avg Place
65.71%
Win Rate
14.29%
First Place
0.11%
Pick Rate
3.77
Avg Place
65.71%
Win Rate
15.87%
First Place
0.21%
Pick Rate
3.83
Avg Place
63.16%
Win Rate
25.73%
First Place
0.22%
Pick Rate
3.93
Avg Place
65.66%
Win Rate
6.06%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
3.98
Avg Place
59.33%
Win Rate
12.23%
First Place
0.43%
Pick Rate
4.00
Avg Place
59.48%
Win Rate
12.14%
First Place
0.75%
Pick Rate
4.02
Avg Place
64.84%
Win Rate
12.09%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
4.06
Avg Place
61.68%
Win Rate
11.18%
First Place
0.72%
Pick Rate
4.20
Avg Place
57.99%
Win Rate
7.10%
First Place
0.11%
Pick Rate
4.22
Avg Place
58.82%
Win Rate
5.88%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
4.31
Avg Place
50.00%
Win Rate
10.00%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
4.36
Avg Place
51.09%
Win Rate
10.87%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
4.36
Avg Place
47.20%
Win Rate
8.88%
First Place
0.14%
Pick Rate
4.37
Avg Place
47.90%
Win Rate
12.61%
First Place
0.08%
Pick Rate
4.41
Avg Place
54.43%
Win Rate
5.06%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
4.45
Avg Place
47.17%
Win Rate
7.55%
First Place
0.07%
Pick Rate
4.50
Avg Place
49.83%
Win Rate
7.61%
First Place
0.19%
Pick Rate
4.52
Avg Place
52.08%
Win Rate
2.08%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
4.61
Avg Place
39.29%
Win Rate
7.14%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
4.74
Avg Place
46.75%
Win Rate
1.18%
First Place
0.11%
Pick Rate
4.98
Avg Place
38.33%
Win Rate
6.22%
First Place
1.46%
Pick Rate
5.22
Avg Place
34.17%
Win Rate
3.33%
First Place
0.08%
Pick Rate
5.30
Avg Place
30.50%
Win Rate
4.79%
First Place
0.74%
Pick Rate
5.38
Avg Place
36.54%
Win Rate
1.92%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
5.45
Avg Place
34.02%
Win Rate
1.03%
First Place
0.13%
Pick Rate
5.62
Avg Place
31.46%
Win Rate
2.25%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
5.71
Avg Place
23.40%
Win Rate
4.26%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
5.83
Avg Place
24.78%
Win Rate
0.00%
First Place
0.07%
Pick Rate

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 66 team compositions sorted by average placement to find the most consistent compositions for reliable top 4 finishes, based on 25.6K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 66.6% and average placement of 3.68 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is Schurke/Meeple with Kai'Sa as the primary carry, achieving a 100.0% win rate. Following closely is Schurke/N.O.V.A. at 98.2% win rate, and Meeple/Sternenvernichter at 97.7%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • Schurke/Meeple (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Kai'Sa
  • Schurke/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Twisted Fate
  • Meeple/Sternenvernichter (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Fizz

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider Meeple/Sternenvernichter which achieves first place in 53.5% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Most Consistent for Climbing

For players focused on consistent LP gains, Meeple/Sternenvernichter offers the best average placement at 1.79.Consistent compositions minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing, even if they don't win lobbies as often.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • Schurke/Meeple: 100.0% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Schurke/N.O.V.A.: 98.2% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Meeple/Sternenvernichter: 97.7% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Replikator/Sternenvernichter with a 3.1% pick rate, and it maintains a strong 76.2% win rate despite high contestation. Gebieter/Sternenvernichter follows at 1.5% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Helfen Sie uns, die Genauigkeit zu verbessern! Wenn Sie falsche Statistiken, fehlende Daten oder Probleme bemerken, hilft Ihr Feedback direkt dabei, die Qualität unserer Daten für die gesamte Community zu verbessern.

Problem melden

TFT Set 17 Komps FAQ

Was ist die beste TFT-Komposition in TFT Set 17?

Die beste TFT-Komposition in TFT Set 17 ist Schurke/Meeple mit Kai'Sa als primarem Carry, mit einer Siegrate von 100.0% und einer durchschnittlichen Platzierung von 1.95. Diese Komposition ist effektiv zum Aufsteigen und erreicht konstant Top 4.

Wie spiele ich die Schurke/Meeple Komposition?

Um Schurke/Meeple zu spielen, konzentriere dich darauf, Kai'Sa als Hauptcarry aufzubauen. Suche fruh nach Kai'Sa und unterstutzenden Einheiten, priorisiere Items, die mit deinem Carry synergieren, und versuche deinen Powerspike bei Level 7-8 zu erreichen. Diese Komposition hat eine Spielrate von 0.1%, was sie zu einer relativ unumkampften Option macht.

Welche Kompositionen sind gut zum Aufsteigen in TFT Set 17?

Fur konstante LP-Gewinne in TFT Set 17 bietet Meeple/Sternenvernichter die beste durchschnittliche Platzierung mit 1.79. Andere zuverlassige Optionen sind Schurke/N.O.V.A. (1.92 avg) und Schurke/Meeple (1.95 avg). Konstante Kompositionen minimieren Bottom-4-Platzierungen und ermoglichen stetiges Aufsteigen.

Was ist die einfachste TFT-Komposition zum Spielen?

Schurke/Meeple ist eine gute Option fur Spieler, die einen einfacheren Aufstieg suchen. Mit einer Siegrate von 100.0%, aber nur 0.1% Spielrate, wirst du wahrscheinlich nicht umkampft, was das Spiel einfacher macht. Geringe Konkurrenz bedeutet, dass du deine Einheiten naturlich finden kannst, ohne Wechsel erzwingen zu mussen.

Wann sollte ich eine Komposition forcen vs flexen in TFT Set 17?

In TFT Set 17 hat Replikator/Sternenvernichter eine Spielrate von 3.1%, was bedeutet, dass sie stark umkampft ist. Wenn du siehst, dass andere sie spielen, erwage Alternativen wie Schurke/Meeple. Force eine Komposition, wenn du fruhe Einheiten und Items triffst, oder wenn sie unumkampft ist. Flexe, wenn du 2+ Spieler siehst, die um dieselben Einheiten konkurrieren.

Was ist die konstanteste TFT-Komposition in TFT Set 17?

Meeple/Sternenvernichter hat die beste durchschnittliche Platzierung von 1.79, was sie zur konstantesten Komposition zum Aufsteigen macht. Schurke/N.O.V.A. follows at 1.92 und Schurke/Meeple at 1.95. Niedrigere durchschnittliche Platzierung bedeutet weniger Bottom-4-Platzierungen.

Ist durchschnittliche Platzierung besser als Siegrate zum Aufsteigen?

Fur konstante LP-Gewinne ist die durchschnittliche Platzierung oft zuverlassiger als reine Siegrate. Eine Komposition wie Meeple/Sternenvernichter mit 1.79 durchschnittlicher Platzierung minimiert grosse LP-Verluste durch Bottom-4-Platzierungen. Hochvarianz-Kompositionen gewinnen vielleicht mehr Lobbys, aber landen auch ofter auf Platz 8. Zum Aufsteigen schlagt Konstanz normalerweise Coinflip-Strategien.