Ekkos GeduldTFT Team Komps
Teamzusammenstellungen mit Ekkos Geduld in TFT Set 16.8. Sieh dir Comps an, bei denen Carry-Einheiten dieses Item für maximale Effektivität ausrüsten.
Discover the best TFT team compositions that utilize Ekkos Geduld as a core item on carry champions. Our data shows 43 viable team comps currently building Ekkos Geduld, with an average win rate of 41.77% across all compositions. The highest performing Ekkos Geduld comp achieves a 97.53% win rate, primarily featuring Göttlicher Duellant, Wanderer, Raufbold traits with Aurelion Sol as the item holder. This table displays all team compositions where Ekkos Geduld is built on a carry unit, sorted by win rate to help you identify the strongest builds. Each comp shows the full team lineup, recommended item builds, active traits, and key performance metrics including placement average, win rate, and pick rate. Use the filters above to toggle between 8 and 9 champion compositions based on your preferred late-game board size.
2.08 Avg Place | 97.53% Top 4 Rate | 36.42% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
2.13 Avg Place | 97.44% Top 4 Rate | 35.26% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
2.90 Avg Place | 83.61% Top 4 Rate | 27.87% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.00 Avg Place | 82.65% Top 4 Rate | 20.41% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
2.98 Avg Place | 79.53% Top 4 Rate | 24.25% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.57 Avg Place | 70.46% Top 4 Rate | 14.12% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.58 Avg Place | 70.05% Top 4 Rate | 13.61% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.82 Avg Place | 69.70% Top 4 Rate | 8.71% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.86 Avg Place | 64.81% Top 4 Rate | 12.41% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.28 Avg Place | 55.73% Top 4 Rate | 8.14% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.26 Avg Place | 53.81% Top 4 Rate | 3.39% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.41 Avg Place | 53.44% Top 4 Rate | 4.21% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.40 Avg Place | 52.98% Top 4 Rate | 6.67% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
- | 4.60 Avg Place | 48.27% Top 4 Rate | 6.44% First Place | Low Contested | |||
4.52 Avg Place | 47.71% Top 4 Rate | 6.86% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.78 Avg Place | 46.50% Top 4 Rate | 6.18% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.83 Avg Place | 42.92% Top 4 Rate | 7.29% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
- | 4.81 Avg Place | 41.72% Top 4 Rate | 13.50% First Place | Low Contested | |||
4.89 Avg Place | 41.57% Top 4 Rate | 6.42% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.93 Avg Place | 39.70% Top 4 Rate | 3.52% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.91 Avg Place | 39.18% Top 4 Rate | 2.86% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.06 Avg Place | 38.41% Top 4 Rate | 1.99% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.09 Avg Place | 37.19% Top 4 Rate | 2.88% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.43 Avg Place | 31.18% Top 4 Rate | 2.69% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
- | 5.26 Avg Place | 30.46% Top 4 Rate | 4.60% First Place | Low Contested | |||
- | 5.27 Avg Place | 30.25% Top 4 Rate | 4.94% First Place | Low Contested | |||
5.36 Avg Place | 29.49% Top 4 Rate | 3.21% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.70 Avg Place | 28.82% Top 4 Rate | 2.94% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.47 Avg Place | 28.80% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.41 Avg Place | 28.65% Top 4 Rate | 0.28% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.85 Avg Place | 25.07% Top 4 Rate | 4.27% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.62 Avg Place | 22.56% Top 4 Rate | 5.26% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.74 Avg Place | 22.16% Top 4 Rate | 2.23% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.80 Avg Place | 22.15% Top 4 Rate | 1.68% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.50 Avg Place | 21.64% Top 4 Rate | 3.73% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.85 Avg Place | 19.58% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.80 Avg Place | 18.72% Top 4 Rate | 0.46% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.04 Avg Place | 18.43% Top 4 Rate | 1.44% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.98 Avg Place | 15.22% Top 4 Rate | 3.26% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.12 Avg Place | 14.66% Top 4 Rate | 1.72% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.12 Avg Place | 13.81% Top 4 Rate | 0.62% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.49 Avg Place | 10.14% Top 4 Rate | 1.45% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.66 Avg Place | 9.22% Top 4 Rate | 0.92% First Place | Low Contested |
Helfen Sie uns, die Genauigkeit zu verbessern! Wenn Sie falsche Statistiken, fehlende Daten oder Probleme bemerken, hilft Ihr Feedback direkt dabei, die Qualität unserer Daten für die gesamte Community zu verbessern.
Ekkos Geduld Team Komps - Häufig gestellte Fragen
Was ist die beste Team-Komposition für Ekkos Geduld in TFT Set 17?
Die beste Team-Komposition mit Ekkos Geduld in TFT Set 17 erreicht eine 97.53% Siegrate mit einer 0.06% Pick-Rate. Diese Komposition nutzt Göttlicher Duellant, Wanderer, and Raufbold Traits und wird in 0.06% der Spiele mit Ekkos Geduld gespielt.
Wie viele Team-Kompositionen nutzen Ekkos Geduld in TFT?
Es gibt 43 brauchbare Team-Kompositionen, die häufig Ekkos Geduld in TFT Set 17 bauen. Ekkos Geduld erscheint in Komps mit einer durchschnittlichen Siegrate von 41.77% über 27,396 analysierte Spiele.
Welche Komp nutzt Ekkos Geduld am häufigsten in TFT?
Die beliebteste Komp für Ekkos Geduld in TFT Set 17 nutzt die Herausforderer, N.O.V.A., and Raufbold Traits mit einer 2.02% Pick-Rate. Diese Komposition erreicht eine 53.44% Siegrate und durchschnittliche Platzierung von 4.41.
Welche Traits funktionieren gut mit Ekkos Geduld in TFT?
Die besten Traits, die mit Ekkos Geduld in TFT Set 17 synergieren, sind Göttlicher Duellant, Wanderer, Raufbold, Kanalisierer, Mecha, Marodeur, Dunkle Dame, and Orakel. Diese Trait-Kombinationen erscheinen in den Team-Kompositionen mit den höchsten Ekkos Geduld Siegraten.