Ashevs Cassiopeia
Ashe vs Cassiopeia is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.11. Ashe wins with a 66.7% win rate (+33.3%) over Cassiopeia based on 12 games. Cassiopeia wins the early laning phase while Ashe scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Ashe build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Ashe vs Cassiopeia matchup.
Ashe Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Ashe performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Ashe vs Cassiopeia Matchup?
Ashe vs Cassiopeia Matchup Summary
The Ashe vs Cassiopeia matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 12 recent matches analyzed, Ashe wins with a 66.7% win rate compared to Cassiopeia's 33.3%, giving Ashe a 33.3 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Cassiopeia controls the early laning stage, but Ashe outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Cassiopeia needs to press advantages before Ashe reaches their power spikes, while Ashe should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Cassiopeia leads by 456 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Ashe players can confidently pick into Cassiopeia and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Cassiopeia away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Ashe vs Cassiopeia Laning Phase Breakdown
Ashe is favored during the laning phase against Cassiopeia, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Ashe holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and crowd control, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Ashe Build Against Cassiopeia
Crimson Lucidity is the optimal boots choice against Cassiopeia, providing the mobility and stats Ashe needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Ashe against Cassiopeia are Axiom Arc, Serpent's Fang and Muramana. This combination gives Ashe an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 1 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Cassiopeia. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Ashe vs Cassiopeia matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Ashe0.0%
Cassiopeia100.0%Ashe72.7%Cassiopeia27.3%Cassiopeia dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 100.0% win rate — a 100.0 percentage point lead over Ashe. This lopsided early game means Cassiopeia can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Ashe is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 72.7% win rate — 45.5 points above Cassiopeia. Extended games heavily favor Ashe, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Cassiopeia must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Ashe reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Ashe survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Ashe Runes Against Cassiopeia
Precision
Inspiration
Running Precision primary with Inspiration secondary allows Ashe to press their advantage against Cassiopeia, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Ashe matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.11. The table below shows Ashe's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Ashe build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.51% | 1,483 | 6.3 | 760 | 12,566 | 48.6% | 52.0% | |
| 51.46% | 1,030 | 6.0 | 758 | 12,767 | 52.2% | 50.9% | |
| 50.70% | 1,006 | 6.3 | 766 | 12,523 | 50.3% | 51.0% | |
| 49.70% | 988 | 6.3 | 777 | 12,555 | 52.6% | 47.2% | |
| 47.28% | 808 | 6.3 | 827 | 13,047 | 52.7% | 43.5% | |
| 52.80% | 714 | 6.4 | 797 | 12,788 | 51.7% | 53.6% | |
| 54.17% | 515 | 6.4 | 806 | 12,904 | 54.5% | 53.9% | |
| 52.80% | 447 | 6.2 | 803 | 12,586 | 54.6% | 51.4% | |
| 57.22% | 388 | 6.3 | 802 | 12,720 | 57.5% | 57.0% | |
| 47.34% | 376 | 6.2 | 779 | 12,587 | 43.2% | 50.7% | |
| 50.99% | 355 | 6.0 | 781 | 12,126 | 49.4% | 52.4% | |
| 49.71% | 346 | 5.9 | 729 | 12,862 | 53.4% | 47.4% | |
| 51.63% | 337 | 5.8 | 795 | 12,491 | 52.9% | 50.5% | |
| 50.00% | 276 | 6.2 | 785 | 12,903 | 50.8% | 49.3% | |
| 51.64% | 275 | 6.1 | 805 | 12,640 | 46.2% | 56.6% | |
| 54.14% | 266 | 6.4 | 778 | 13,059 | 57.0% | 52.0% | |
| 45.66% | 265 | 5.8 | 772 | 13,063 | 39.4% | 49.7% | |
| 52.90% | 259 | 6.5 | 786 | 13,084 | 52.3% | 53.3% | |
| 48.21% | 224 | 6.5 | 762 | 12,036 | 48.1% | 48.3% | |
| 55.34% | 206 | 6.5 | 830 | 12,620 | 60.4% | 51.3% | |
| 49.21% | 191 | 6.7 | 847 | 12,983 | 52.9% | 46.1% | |
| 45.52% | 145 | 4.5 | 674 | 11,469 | 37.7% | 50.0% | |
| 49.21% | 126 | 6.4 | 729 | 12,468 | 38.9% | 56.9% | |
| 50.42% | 119 | 4.3 | 662 | 11,439 | 54.9% | 47.1% | |
| 48.11% | 106 | 6.1 | 824 | 13,246 | 39.5% | 52.9% | |
| 56.25% | 96 | 5.6 | 712 | 12,399 | 44.4% | 63.3% | |
| 38.30% | 94 | 6.1 | 735 | 10,994 | 35.2% | 42.5% | |
| 54.84% | 93 | 6.6 | 765 | 13,061 | 66.7% | 47.4% | |
| 41.30% | 92 | 5.3 | 788 | 11,634 | 39.6% | 43.2% | |
| 54.44% | 90 | 6.4 | 811 | 13,021 | 42.2% | 66.7% | |
| 49.43% | 87 | 6.2 | 693 | 12,026 | 44.2% | 54.5% | |
| 46.05% | 76 | 6.3 | 851 | 12,945 | 36.4% | 53.5% | |
| 53.33% | 60 | 4.5 | 719 | 11,681 | 50.0% | 55.3% | |
| 40.82% | 49 | 6.1 | 792 | 12,988 | 50.0% | 34.5% | |
| 44.68% | 47 | 5.5 | 652 | 11,663 | 29.4% | 53.3% | |
| 44.19% | 43 | 4.4 | 847 | 10,562 | 27.8% | 56.0% | |
| 39.53% | 43 | 5.5 | 728 | 12,222 | 41.2% | 38.5% | |
| 62.79% | 43 | 6.0 | 711 | 12,979 | 81.0% | 45.5% | |
| 58.54% | 41 | 6.5 | 819 | 13,697 | 57.1% | 59.3% | |
| 33.33% | 39 | 2.7 | 718 | 10,547 | 31.3% | 34.8% | |
| 50.00% | 36 | 1.8 | 590 | 9,452 | 46.1% | 52.2% | |
| 45.71% | 35 | 1.9 | 620 | 9,811 | 14.3% | 66.7% | |
| 37.14% | 35 | 1.8 | 578 | 9,162 | 42.9% | 33.3% | |
| 58.06% | 31 | 6.0 | 897 | 13,270 | 75.0% | 47.4% | |
| 53.33% | 30 | 6.0 | 770 | 13,108 | 55.6% | 52.4% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 6.4 | 759 | 13,322 | 55.6% | 43.8% | |
| 50.00% | 24 | 1.7 | 601 | 8,401 | 43.8% | 62.5% | |
| 41.67% | 24 | 2.1 | 619 | 8,137 | 27.3% | 53.9% | |
| 52.17% | 23 | 6.4 | 651 | 11,619 | 50.0% | 54.5% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 3.6 | 604 | 11,467 | 77.8% | 30.8% | |
| 33.33% | 21 | 1.9 | 416 | 8,623 | 30.0% | 36.4% | |
| 38.10% | 21 | 5.7 | 745 | 12,113 | 22.2% | 50.0% | |
| 38.10% | 21 | 1.6 | 516 | 8,156 | 41.7% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 2.0 | 548 | 9,076 | 44.4% | 41.7% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 6.2 | 696 | 13,710 | 50.0% | 52.9% | |
| 31.58% | 19 | 5.3 | 696 | 10,386 | 27.3% | 37.5% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 1.8 | 560 | 7,680 | 71.4% | 36.4% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 6.3 | 859 | 14,487 | 66.7% | 28.6% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 3.0 | 652 | 9,426 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 31.25% | 16 | 2.1 | 597 | 9,474 | 33.3% | 30.0% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 5.9 | 888 | 13,076 | 62.5% | 50.0% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 5.5 | 669 | 11,686 | 28.6% | 62.5% | |
| 33.33% | 15 | 5.7 | 845 | 13,072 | 28.6% | 37.5% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 1.7 | 579 | 9,727 | 25.0% | 40.0% | |
| 21.43% | 14 | 2.3 | 566 | 7,578 | 25.0% | 16.7% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 5.5 | 977 | 13,882 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 1.5 | 659 | 10,042 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 1.7 | 541 | 8,372 | 33.3% | 42.9% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 2.2 | 642 | 9,434 | 60.0% | 25.0% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 6.1 | 746 | 11,385 | 25.0% | 55.6% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 5.9 | 841 | 10,787 | 66.7% | 28.6% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 5.0 | 611 | 9,660 | 14.3% | 60.0% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 6.7 | 843 | 14,255 | 0.0% | 72.7% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 2.6 | 787 | 10,612 | 66.7% | 62.5% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 6.1 | 785 | 14,290 | 100.0% | 55.6% | |
| 18.18% | 11 | 3.2 | 485 | 9,917 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 1.9 | 483 | 8,693 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 5.1 | 861 | 10,973 | 75.0% | 28.6% | |
| 81.82% | 11 | 5.9 | 637 | 11,913 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 5.6 | 696 | 13,598 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 4.8 | 819 | 10,996 | 25.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 5.4 | 840 | 11,561 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 2.0 | 576 | 11,185 | 50.0% | 14.3% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 4.2 | 838 | 11,273 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 2.4 | 673 | 10,803 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 3.3 | 667 | 9,969 | 100.0% | 14.3% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 6.3 | 831 | 12,533 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.6 | 656 | 9,251 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 6.1 | 849 | 11,366 | 75.0% | 75.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 2.4 | 549 | 8,218 | 20.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.4 | 556 | 9,690 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 4.4 | 822 | 12,655 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.1 | 880 | 14,706 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.5 | 977 | 11,115 | 80.0% | 0.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 4.5 | 893 | 11,952 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 2.5 | 676 | 7,963 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.6 | 838 | 11,653 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.5 | 847 | 11,281 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.3 | 694 | 10,338 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 1.3 | 534 | 9,073 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.0 | 879 | 11,918 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.1 | 747 | 11,280 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.1 | 970 | 9,234 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.5 | 687 | 9,722 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.7 | 999 | 12,388 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 6.8 | 651 | 11,508 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.2 | 922 | 12,633 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 3.3 | 551 | 11,196 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 4.6 | 778 | 11,418 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 4.7 | 767 | 9,161 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 6.1 | 819 | 12,766 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.9 | 858 | 7,751 | 25.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 3.9 | 482 | 9,858 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 689 | 7,244 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.2 | 805 | 14,257 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 6.9 | 788 | 13,920 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 7.0 | 791 | 12,552 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Ashe vs Cassiopeia - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Ashe do against Cassiopeia in League of Legends?
Ashe wins the Ashe vs Cassiopeia matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to Cassiopeia's 33.3%, a 33.3 percentage point difference. This data is based on 12 recent ranked games in patch 26.11.
How does Ashe do against Cassiopeia in the early game?
In the early game, Cassiopeia has the advantage against Ashe with a 100.0% win rate versus 0.0%. Cassiopeia players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Ashe do against Cassiopeia in the late game?
In the late game, Ashe takes over the Ashe vs Cassiopeia matchup with a 72.7% win rate compared to 27.3%. Ashe scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Ashe vs Cassiopeia matchup?
Ashe wins the matchup against Cassiopeia with a 66.7% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.11. The 33.3 percentage point advantage means Ashe is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 12 games analyzed.
What is the best Ashe build against Cassiopeia?
The best Ashe build against Cassiopeia includes Axiom Arc, Serpent's Fang, Muramana with Crimson Lucidity. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Ashe runes against Cassiopeia?
The best Ashe runes against Cassiopeia use the Precision primary tree with Inspiration secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Ashe vs Cassiopeia matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Ashe counter Cassiopeia?
Yes, Ashe has a favorable matchup against Cassiopeia with a 66.7% win rate. Ashe strongly counters Cassiopeia in lane based on current patch 26.11 data.
How do I play Ashe against Cassiopeia?
When playing Ashe against Cassiopeia, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. Play safe early and scale into your power spikes where you outperform Cassiopeia. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.