Ashevs Samira
Ashe vs Samira is a moderate matchup in LoL patch 26.4. Samira wins with a 52.1% win rate (+4.1%) over Ashe based on 318 games. Ashe wins the early laning phase while Samira scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Ashe build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Ashe vs Samira matchup.
Ashe Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Ashe performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Samira(47.9%)Who Wins the Ashe vs Samira Matchup?
Ashe vs Samira Matchup Summary
The Ashe vs Samira matchup is a moderate matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 318 recent matches analyzed, Samira wins with a 52.1% win rate compared to Ashe's 47.9%, giving Samira a 4.1 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Ashe controls the early laning stage, but Samira outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Ashe needs to press advantages before Samira reaches their power spikes, while Samira should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Ashe leads by 1.5s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. While Samira is slightly favored, Ashe can absolutely win this lane through smart trading patterns and wave management. Focus on playing around your cooldowns, conceding CS only when necessary, and capitalizing on Samira's mistakes. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Ashe vs Samira Laning Phase Breakdown
Samira is favored during the laning phase against Ashe, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Samira holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Ashe50.3%Samira49.7%Ashe45.3%Samira54.7%The early game (first 15 minutes) is a toss-up between Ashe and Samira, with Ashe holding a razor-thin 50.3% win rate edge (+0.6%). Individual skill and jungle proximity will matter more than champion advantage in the early laning phase.
Samira is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 54.7% win rate — 9.5 points above Ashe. Extended games heavily favor Samira, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
The power dynamics shift as the game progresses — Ashe has the edge early, but Samira gradually takes over. However, the margins are slim enough that either champion can win at any stage with the right plays. Focus on taking advantages when you have them rather than waiting for a specific game phase.
Best Ashe Runes Against Samira
Precision
Inspiration
The Precision and Inspiration rune setup gives Ashe the best tools to compete against Samira in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Ashe matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.4. The table below shows Ashe's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Ashe build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.02% | 1,529 | 6.3 | 758 | 12,909 | 50.6% | 47.7% | |
| 49.87% | 1,124 | 6.4 | 802 | 13,095 | 53.2% | 47.0% | |
| 50.15% | 1,035 | 6.0 | 754 | 13,086 | 53.1% | 48.0% | |
| 50.93% | 869 | 6.2 | 785 | 13,046 | 53.8% | 48.8% | |
| 56.57% | 583 | 6.5 | 855 | 13,301 | 59.1% | 53.9% | |
| 51.23% | 532 | 6.5 | 839 | 13,668 | 51.6% | 51.0% | |
| 56.30% | 525 | 6.5 | 849 | 13,647 | 53.5% | 58.6% | |
| 48.13% | 404 | 5.9 | 747 | 12,724 | 56.0% | 42.0% | |
| 53.30% | 395 | 6.4 | 835 | 13,408 | 58.9% | 48.9% | |
| 50.58% | 342 | 6.0 | 760 | 12,525 | 46.1% | 54.8% | |
| 55.66% | 329 | 6.4 | 799 | 13,079 | 61.6% | 50.6% | |
| 47.94% | 318 | 6.1 | 795 | 12,759 | 50.3% | 45.3% | |
| 51.90% | 318 | 6.5 | 782 | 12,906 | 52.4% | 51.5% | |
| 50.32% | 311 | 6.4 | 823 | 13,426 | 52.9% | 48.3% | |
| 52.30% | 306 | 6.5 | 818 | 13,098 | 54.1% | 50.3% | |
| 48.72% | 274 | 6.3 | 800 | 12,684 | 52.2% | 45.3% | |
| 53.25% | 231 | 6.2 | 792 | 12,809 | 50.9% | 55.8% | |
| 49.29% | 213 | 6.2 | 799 | 13,083 | 45.7% | 52.1% | |
| 44.23% | 157 | 5.5 | 810 | 12,166 | 35.7% | 51.2% | |
| 53.25% | 155 | 5.2 | 784 | 12,214 | 52.7% | 53.8% | |
| 49.65% | 144 | 5.2 | 754 | 12,798 | 51.9% | 48.4% | |
| 48.85% | 131 | 6.1 | 825 | 13,521 | 56.6% | 43.6% | |
| 58.91% | 129 | 6.6 | 806 | 13,334 | 53.7% | 64.5% | |
| 45.60% | 126 | 6.5 | 774 | 12,407 | 42.6% | 48.4% | |
| 50.42% | 120 | 6.1 | 876 | 14,047 | 46.5% | 52.6% | |
| 45.45% | 111 | 6.2 | 702 | 13,021 | 50.0% | 42.4% | |
| 45.87% | 111 | 6.3 | 843 | 12,989 | 50.9% | 41.1% | |
| 44.76% | 106 | 3.6 | 591 | 10,671 | 37.5% | 49.2% | |
| 46.46% | 99 | 3.7 | 680 | 10,995 | 46.5% | 46.4% | |
| 49.48% | 98 | 5.4 | 706 | 12,114 | 43.9% | 53.6% | |
| 44.16% | 78 | 6.0 | 753 | 12,687 | 42.4% | 45.5% | |
| 42.86% | 71 | 1.6 | 642 | 9,747 | 37.5% | 47.4% | |
| 44.44% | 63 | 5.9 | 766 | 13,316 | 48.1% | 41.7% | |
| 27.59% | 58 | 1.9 | 636 | 9,108 | 16.0% | 36.4% | |
| 40.00% | 55 | 2.0 | 600 | 9,531 | 43.5% | 37.5% | |
| 49.02% | 51 | 4.4 | 680 | 10,897 | 20.0% | 67.7% | |
| 40.00% | 51 | 1.7 | 555 | 9,888 | 41.2% | 39.4% | |
| 44.00% | 50 | 6.0 | 835 | 12,980 | 47.8% | 40.7% | |
| 44.44% | 45 | 1.8 | 533 | 9,149 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 55.00% | 40 | 1.6 | 597 | 9,400 | 45.0% | 65.0% | |
| 42.11% | 38 | 1.8 | 645 | 8,866 | 38.9% | 45.0% | |
| 63.89% | 36 | 6.0 | 740 | 12,726 | 62.5% | 65.0% | |
| 39.39% | 33 | 1.8 | 543 | 9,706 | 18.2% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 30 | 3.4 | 652 | 11,612 | 71.4% | 50.0% | |
| 24.14% | 29 | 2.3 | 576 | 10,151 | 0.0% | 35.0% | |
| 48.28% | 29 | 1.7 | 565 | 9,052 | 42.9% | 53.3% | |
| 44.83% | 29 | 2.2 | 557 | 9,552 | 60.0% | 28.6% | |
| 37.93% | 29 | 1.4 | 577 | 8,987 | 52.9% | 16.7% | |
| 38.46% | 26 | 1.8 | 607 | 9,490 | 40.0% | 36.4% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 5.4 | 826 | 11,655 | 66.7% | 37.5% | |
| 25.00% | 24 | 3.3 | 749 | 10,399 | 23.1% | 27.3% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 1.7 | 676 | 11,073 | 40.0% | 44.4% | |
| 21.74% | 23 | 1.9 | 523 | 9,294 | 0.0% | 35.7% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 2.4 | 721 | 12,015 | 66.7% | 35.3% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 5.4 | 609 | 9,752 | 45.5% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 20 | 6.2 | 692 | 12,539 | 42.9% | 38.5% | |
| 44.44% | 18 | 6.1 | 865 | 13,907 | 50.0% | 41.7% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 6.8 | 934 | 14,214 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 1.5 | 558 | 8,789 | 62.5% | 33.3% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 4.9 | 639 | 11,753 | 57.1% | 30.0% | |
| 62.50% | 16 | 5.4 | 871 | 11,367 | 55.6% | 71.4% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 2.9 | 679 | 10,113 | 66.7% | 30.0% | |
| 46.67% | 16 | 2.9 | 841 | 10,581 | 20.0% | 60.0% | |
| 31.25% | 16 | 2.0 | 655 | 9,706 | 42.9% | 22.2% | |
| 33.33% | 15 | 5.4 | 704 | 12,407 | 40.0% | 30.0% | |
| 33.33% | 15 | 1.5 | 624 | 8,654 | 40.0% | 20.0% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 2.7 | 677 | 10,328 | 40.0% | 40.0% | |
| 33.33% | 15 | 5.5 | 749 | 11,020 | 14.3% | 50.0% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 5.8 | 652 | 10,468 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 5.7 | 786 | 12,569 | 42.9% | 66.7% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 6.6 | 971 | 11,928 | 28.6% | 33.3% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.5 | 509 | 9,658 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 3.3 | 474 | 9,687 | 57.1% | 40.0% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 6.6 | 684 | 12,221 | 60.0% | 71.4% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 5.6 | 735 | 12,579 | 75.0% | 42.9% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 2.8 | 620 | 10,390 | 60.0% | 16.7% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 5.4 | 722 | 14,691 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 3.4 | 674 | 10,200 | 60.0% | 20.0% | |
| 20.00% | 10 | 3.4 | 683 | 10,416 | 33.3% | 14.3% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 5.4 | 770 | 10,052 | 83.3% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 5.7 | 873 | 12,118 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 6.1 | 793 | 11,417 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 1.5 | 554 | 9,170 | 75.0% | 40.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 5.5 | 774 | 10,214 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.3 | 692 | 10,650 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 2.1 | 610 | 11,055 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 5.8 | 823 | 12,933 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 4.5 | 701 | 10,361 | 75.0% | 25.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 5.3 | 1,042 | 14,869 | 0.0% | 85.7% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 6.3 | 948 | 10,015 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 1.9 | 710 | 11,538 | 100.0% | 16.7% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 4.3 | 771 | 12,459 | 66.7% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.1 | 685 | 10,512 | 40.0% | 66.7% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 6.0 | 785 | 11,902 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.4 | 730 | 10,651 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 3.9 | 633 | 10,623 | 33.3% | 25.0% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 4.2 | 581 | 10,118 | 0.0% | 20.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 5.5 | 643 | 8,294 | 40.0% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.3 | 999 | 12,448 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 2.9 | 842 | 10,653 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.0 | 700 | 11,429 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 5.8 | 830 | 14,699 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.9 | 691 | 9,941 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.8 | 638 | 11,814 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.4 | 696 | 13,449 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 6.4 | 719 | 10,986 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 2.7 | 776 | 12,035 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 670 | 12,001 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.5 | 747 | 11,421 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 5.9 | 702 | 11,876 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 6.1 | 722 | 11,792 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 4.3 | 561 | 10,615 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.5 | 579 | 12,832 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.9 | 820 | 12,079 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.3 | 756 | 11,694 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.3 | 790 | 12,202 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 6.6 | 747 | 8,345 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.8 | 717 | 9,889 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Ashe vs Samira - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Ashe do against Samira in League of Legends?
Samira wins the Ashe vs Samira matchup with a 52.1% win rate compared to Ashe's 47.9%, a 4.1 percentage point difference. This data is based on 318 recent ranked games in patch 26.4.
How does Ashe do against Samira in the early game?
In the early game, Ashe has the advantage against Samira with a 50.3% win rate versus 49.7%. Ashe players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Ashe do against Samira in the late game?
In the late game, Samira takes over the Ashe vs Samira matchup with a 54.7% win rate compared to 45.3%. Samira scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Ashe vs Samira matchup?
Samira wins the matchup against Ashe with a 52.1% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.4. The 4.1 percentage point advantage means Samira is moderately favored in this lane matchup based on 318 games analyzed.
What is the best Ashe build against Samira?
The best Ashe build against Samira includes optimized core items. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Ashe runes against Samira?
The best Ashe runes against Samira use the Precision primary tree with Inspiration secondary. This rune setup achieves a 50.0% win rate in the Ashe vs Samira matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Ashe counter Samira?
No, Ashe struggles against Samira with only a 47.9% win rate. Samira has the advantage in this matchup. Ashe players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Samira's lead.
How do I play Ashe against Samira?
When playing Ashe against Samira, play cautiously and avoid Samira's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Samira has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.