
Gangplankvs Mel
Gangplank vs Mel is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.7. Gangplank wins with a 66.7% win rate (+33.3%) over Mel based on 9 games. Mel wins the early laning phase while Gangplank scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Gangplank build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Gangplank vs Mel matchup.
Gangplank Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Gangplank performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Gangplank vs Mel Matchup?

Gangplank vs Mel Matchup Summary
The Gangplank vs Mel matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 9 recent matches analyzed, Gangplank wins with a 66.7% win rate compared to Mel's 33.3%, giving Gangplank a 33.3 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Mel controls the early laning stage, but Gangplank outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Mel needs to press advantages before Gangplank reaches their power spikes, while Gangplank should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Mel leads by 0.7s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Gangplank players can confidently pick into Mel and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Mel away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Gangplank vs Mel Laning Phase Breakdown
Gangplank is favored during the laning phase against Mel, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Gangplank holds advantages in farming, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Gangplank Build Against Mel
Swiftmarch is the optimal boots choice against Mel, providing the mobility and stats Gangplank needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Gangplank against Mel are Hubris, The Collector and Essence Reaver. This combination gives Gangplank an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build achieves a solid 50.0% win rate across 2 games, proving it to be a reliable item path when facing Mel. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Gangplank vs Mel matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Mel dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 60.0% win rate — a 20.0 percentage point lead over Gangplank. This lopsided early game means Mel can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Gangplank is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 100.0% win rate — 100.0 points above Mel. Extended games heavily favor Gangplank, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Mel must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Gangplank reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Gangplank survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Gangplank Runes Against Mel
Running Inspiration primary with Precision secondary allows Gangplank to press their advantage against Mel, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Gangplank matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.7. The table below shows Gangplank's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Gangplank build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 42.19% | 128 | 7.1 | 987 | 14,071 | 34.5% | 48.0% | |
| 53.45% | 58 | 7.0 | 923 | 14,339 | 45.8% | 58.8% | |
| 48.28% | 58 | 6.8 | 941 | 13,825 | 46.4% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 56 | 7.3 | 810 | 13,738 | 48.1% | 51.7% | |
| 44.44% | 54 | 7.2 | 1,201 | 14,470 | 45.8% | 43.3% | |
| 46.00% | 50 | 7.0 | 1,064 | 14,252 | 65.2% | 29.6% | |
| 53.06% | 49 | 7.5 | 1,003 | 15,063 | 47.6% | 57.1% | |
| 54.17% | 48 | 6.8 | 937 | 13,621 | 57.1% | 52.9% | |
| 47.83% | 46 | 7.3 | 1,161 | 14,960 | 47.4% | 48.1% | |
| 41.30% | 46 | 7.2 | 1,061 | 15,140 | 33.3% | 46.4% | |
| 47.83% | 46 | 6.3 | 899 | 13,254 | 57.9% | 40.7% | |
| 47.73% | 44 | 7.9 | 1,280 | 14,916 | 52.6% | 44.0% | |
| 41.86% | 43 | 7.3 | 1,020 | 15,648 | 42.1% | 41.7% | |
| 58.14% | 43 | 7.1 | 1,027 | 14,664 | 63.2% | 54.2% | |
| 27.50% | 40 | 7.2 | 887 | 13,370 | 17.6% | 34.8% | |
| 47.37% | 38 | 7.3 | 1,085 | 14,698 | 64.7% | 33.3% | |
| 54.05% | 37 | 7.0 | 1,000 | 15,224 | 53.9% | 54.2% | |
| 59.46% | 37 | 7.2 | 938 | 13,877 | 68.8% | 52.4% | |
| 61.11% | 36 | 6.9 | 1,066 | 13,994 | 71.4% | 54.5% | |
| 61.11% | 36 | 7.0 | 975 | 16,166 | 75.0% | 54.2% | |
| 41.67% | 36 | 7.2 | 1,070 | 16,344 | 44.4% | 40.7% | |
| 45.71% | 35 | 7.5 | 1,126 | 15,591 | 53.3% | 40.0% | |
| 40.63% | 32 | 7.5 | 982 | 14,795 | 52.6% | 23.1% | |
| 48.39% | 31 | 6.8 | 1,104 | 14,222 | 40.0% | 52.4% | |
| 50.00% | 30 | 6.8 | 957 | 14,016 | 27.3% | 63.2% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 6.8 | 904 | 14,728 | 46.1% | 64.7% | |
| 48.28% | 29 | 7.3 | 1,046 | 13,758 | 60.0% | 42.1% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 7.3 | 989 | 14,067 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 66.67% | 27 | 7.5 | 1,141 | 14,521 | 71.4% | 61.5% | |
| 46.15% | 26 | 7.8 | 1,156 | 17,698 | 50.0% | 44.4% | |
| 34.62% | 26 | 7.4 | 1,050 | 14,422 | 9.1% | 53.3% | |
| 56.00% | 25 | 7.6 | 912 | 14,387 | 55.6% | 56.3% | |
| 41.67% | 24 | 6.8 | 782 | 13,526 | 36.4% | 46.1% | |
| 58.33% | 24 | 7.2 | 963 | 14,760 | 72.7% | 46.1% | |
| 65.22% | 23 | 7.4 | 923 | 14,801 | 83.3% | 58.8% | |
| 47.83% | 23 | 7.2 | 878 | 12,507 | 54.5% | 41.7% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 6.9 | 958 | 13,244 | 37.5% | 46.1% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 7.2 | 936 | 13,775 | 72.7% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 7.3 | 1,054 | 13,421 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 7.1 | 868 | 15,235 | 37.5% | 60.0% | |
| 70.59% | 17 | 6.9 | 970 | 14,009 | 62.5% | 77.8% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 7.1 | 972 | 13,821 | 60.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 7.5 | 1,010 | 15,068 | 57.1% | 25.0% | |
| 71.43% | 14 | 6.9 | 1,104 | 15,620 | 75.0% | 70.0% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 6.9 | 1,059 | 15,407 | 57.1% | 28.6% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 7.5 | 891 | 13,825 | 66.7% | 28.6% | |
| 25.00% | 12 | 6.8 | 971 | 15,474 | 50.0% | 12.5% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 7.7 | 838 | 15,992 | 60.0% | 42.9% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 7.2 | 992 | 15,767 | 75.0% | 57.1% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 7.2 | 1,007 | 14,324 | 60.0% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 6.2 | 797 | 14,123 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 6.6 | 1,033 | 13,002 | 66.7% | 28.6% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 7.2 | 919 | 13,868 | 33.3% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 6.3 | 975 | 15,902 | 40.0% | 60.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 7.0 | 710 | 10,306 | 16.7% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.4 | 866 | 12,504 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 6.4 | 1,209 | 14,349 | 75.0% | 40.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 7.4 | 1,058 | 17,732 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.8 | 747 | 13,051 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.5 | 968 | 14,556 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 7.4 | 1,079 | 12,788 | 60.0% | 75.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 6.8 | 850 | 12,738 | 40.0% | 100.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 7.2 | 974 | 15,475 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 7.3 | 1,169 | 12,628 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 7.5 | 1,037 | 15,096 | 25.0% | 75.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 7.0 | 882 | 14,000 | 33.3% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 7.6 | 986 | 15,819 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.9 | 1,155 | 18,257 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.8 | 1,001 | 14,986 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 7.9 | 1,015 | 14,980 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.0 | 709 | 12,252 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 8.1 | 1,188 | 16,426 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 7.0 | 913 | 13,051 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.8 | 1,152 | 15,448 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 8.0 | 910 | 14,514 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 8.0 | 1,169 | 11,465 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 6.9 | 876 | 11,944 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 7.8 | 844 | 15,819 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.4 | 866 | 15,065 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Gangplank vs Mel - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Gangplank do against Mel in League of Legends?
Gangplank wins the Gangplank vs Mel matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to Mel's 33.3%, a 33.3 percentage point difference. This data is based on 9 recent ranked games in patch 26.7.
How does Gangplank do against Mel in the early game?
In the early game, Mel has the advantage against Gangplank with a 60.0% win rate versus 40.0%. Mel players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Gangplank do against Mel in the late game?
In the late game, Gangplank takes over the Gangplank vs Mel matchup with a 100.0% win rate compared to 0.0%. Gangplank scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Gangplank vs Mel matchup?
Gangplank wins the matchup against Mel with a 66.7% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.7. The 33.3 percentage point advantage means Gangplank is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 9 games analyzed.
What is the best Gangplank build against Mel?
The best Gangplank build against Mel includes Hubris, The Collector, Essence Reaver with Swiftmarch. This build achieves a 50.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Gangplank runes against Mel?
The best Gangplank runes against Mel use the Inspiration primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Gangplank vs Mel matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Gangplank counter Mel?
Yes, Gangplank has a favorable matchup against Mel with a 66.7% win rate. Gangplank strongly counters Mel in lane based on current patch 26.7 data.
How do I play Gangplank against Mel?
When playing Gangplank against Mel, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. Play safe early and scale into your power spikes where you outperform Mel. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.
