Shacovs Ambessa
Shaco vs Ambessa is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.13. Shaco wins with a 58.3% win rate (+16.7%) over Ambessa based on 12 games. Shaco holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Shaco build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Shaco vs Ambessa matchup.
Shaco Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Shaco performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Shaco vs Ambessa Matchup?
Shaco vs Ambessa Matchup Summary
The Shaco vs Ambessa matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 12 recent matches analyzed, Shaco wins with a 58.3% win rate compared to Ambessa's 41.7%, giving Shaco a 16.7 percentage point advantage. Shaco dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Ambessa players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Ambessa leads by 1,258 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Shaco players can confidently pick into Ambessa and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Ambessa away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Shaco vs Ambessa Laning Phase Breakdown
Shaco is favored during the laning phase against Ambessa, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Shaco holds advantages in damage, gold income and crowd control, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Shaco Build Against Ambessa
Boots of Swiftness is the optimal boots choice against Ambessa, providing the mobility and stats Shaco needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Shaco against Ambessa are Voltaic Cyclosword, The Collector and Youmuu's Ghostblade. This combination gives Shaco an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build achieves a solid 50.0% win rate across 2 games, proving it to be a reliable item path when facing Ambessa. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Shaco vs Ambessa matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Shaco57.1%
Ambessa42.9%Shaco60.0%Ambessa40.0%Shaco dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 57.1% win rate — a 14.3 percentage point lead over Ambessa. This lopsided early game means Shaco can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Shaco is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 60.0% win rate — 20.0 points above Ambessa. Extended games heavily favor Shaco, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Shaco holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Ambessa players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Shaco Runes Against Ambessa
Domination
Sorcery
Running Domination primary with Sorcery secondary allows Shaco to press their advantage against Ambessa, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Shaco matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.13. The table below shows Shaco's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Shaco build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48.19% | 83 | 0.8 | 751 | 13,039 | 36.7% | 54.7% | |
| 69.12% | 68 | 0.9 | 754 | 13,828 | 68.4% | 69.4% | |
| 50.75% | 67 | 0.8 | 811 | 13,002 | 45.8% | 53.5% | |
| 50.00% | 66 | 0.9 | 742 | 13,472 | 42.1% | 53.2% | |
| 33.33% | 63 | 0.8 | 651 | 11,126 | 40.0% | 28.9% | |
| 50.00% | 54 | 0.7 | 695 | 12,567 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 61.11% | 54 | 0.7 | 732 | 12,756 | 75.0% | 55.3% | |
| 49.06% | 53 | 0.8 | 663 | 12,415 | 47.1% | 50.0% | |
| 41.67% | 48 | 0.7 | 711 | 12,050 | 52.9% | 35.5% | |
| 58.33% | 48 | 0.9 | 625 | 12,646 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 53.19% | 47 | 0.8 | 666 | 13,076 | 50.0% | 54.8% | |
| 50.00% | 42 | 0.8 | 615 | 12,059 | 55.6% | 45.8% | |
| 58.54% | 41 | 0.9 | 640 | 12,822 | 58.8% | 58.3% | |
| 42.11% | 38 | 0.8 | 722 | 13,720 | 22.2% | 48.3% | |
| 52.94% | 34 | 1.0 | 745 | 14,088 | 54.5% | 52.2% | |
| 32.35% | 34 | 0.7 | 624 | 11,125 | 25.0% | 38.9% | |
| 57.58% | 33 | 0.8 | 762 | 13,411 | 61.5% | 55.0% | |
| 41.94% | 31 | 0.8 | 692 | 11,469 | 50.0% | 36.8% | |
| 55.17% | 29 | 1.0 | 821 | 12,808 | 60.0% | 52.6% | |
| 65.52% | 29 | 0.7 | 665 | 11,292 | 71.4% | 60.0% | |
| 57.14% | 28 | 0.8 | 682 | 11,206 | 58.8% | 54.5% | |
| 42.31% | 26 | 1.6 | 861 | 11,398 | 50.0% | 38.9% | |
| 68.00% | 25 | 1.0 | 834 | 14,286 | 71.4% | 66.7% | |
| 36.00% | 25 | 0.7 | 626 | 12,234 | 20.0% | 46.7% | |
| 28.00% | 25 | 1.4 | 775 | 11,747 | 11.1% | 37.5% | |
| 52.17% | 23 | 2.0 | 658 | 10,880 | 81.8% | 25.0% | |
| 36.36% | 22 | 0.7 | 844 | 13,538 | 28.6% | 40.0% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 1.7 | 616 | 10,720 | 25.0% | 69.2% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 0.8 | 729 | 13,068 | 55.6% | 45.5% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 0.7 | 662 | 11,486 | 14.3% | 66.7% | |
| 31.58% | 19 | 0.8 | 657 | 11,281 | 12.5% | 45.5% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 1.9 | 546 | 10,077 | 71.4% | 54.5% | |
| 44.44% | 18 | 1.6 | 721 | 9,868 | 44.4% | 44.4% | |
| 44.44% | 18 | 0.7 | 707 | 12,841 | 62.5% | 30.0% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 0.7 | 648 | 11,843 | 44.4% | 66.7% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 0.9 | 791 | 13,019 | 50.0% | 27.3% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 1.3 | 787 | 11,880 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 1.3 | 603 | 12,711 | 42.9% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 1.1 | 644 | 11,750 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 0.6 | 713 | 14,204 | 42.9% | 55.6% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 0.8 | 561 | 11,438 | 30.0% | 80.0% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 0.8 | 723 | 12,245 | 33.3% | 44.4% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 1.3 | 604 | 8,604 | 62.5% | 33.3% | |
| 28.57% | 14 | 1.1 | 703 | 13,373 | 20.0% | 33.3% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 0.6 | 826 | 14,119 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 0.8 | 891 | 13,070 | 75.0% | 44.4% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 1.2 | 555 | 8,570 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 1.6 | 724 | 10,141 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 1.0 | 759 | 14,341 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 0.8 | 627 | 14,555 | 66.7% | 44.4% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 0.6 | 783 | 12,012 | 57.1% | 60.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 0.9 | 745 | 11,791 | 60.0% | 57.1% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 0.9 | 718 | 13,926 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 1.2 | 767 | 12,883 | 66.7% | 44.4% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 1.3 | 735 | 11,016 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 2.2 | 761 | 12,490 | 75.0% | 42.9% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 1.5 | 616 | 9,578 | 66.7% | 71.4% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 0.9 | 846 | 12,104 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 0.9 | 741 | 15,418 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 1.4 | 721 | 10,775 | 75.0% | 83.3% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 1.9 | 577 | 9,932 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.3 | 621 | 7,912 | 42.9% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.1 | 843 | 11,885 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 0.9 | 686 | 12,527 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.5 | 742 | 9,624 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.6 | 651 | 9,783 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 1.7 | 657 | 8,040 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 1.1 | 763 | 13,257 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 1.5 | 698 | 6,668 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 1.1 | 731 | 13,103 | 75.0% | 75.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 1.4 | 542 | 8,959 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 0.6 | 654 | 13,300 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 2.4 | 794 | 11,073 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 2.0 | 584 | 8,708 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.4 | 862 | 12,553 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 0.8 | 682 | 11,359 | 66.7% | 25.0% | |
| 0.00% | 6 | 4.4 | 867 | 10,767 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 1.2 | 610 | 9,066 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 1.3 | 886 | 13,106 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.1 | 777 | 11,805 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 1.6 | 993 | 16,432 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 0.8 | 774 | 13,695 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 1.1 | 799 | 9,280 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 1.8 | 693 | 10,072 | 80.0% | 0.0% | |
| 100.00% | 6 | 0.9 | 555 | 13,137 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 0.8 | 817 | 10,920 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.8 | 670 | 12,095 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.2 | 790 | 10,696 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 1.4 | 564 | 8,828 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.1 | 480 | 8,618 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.3 | 678 | 14,177 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Shaco vs Ambessa - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Shaco do against Ambessa in League of Legends?
Shaco wins the Shaco vs Ambessa matchup with a 58.3% win rate compared to Ambessa's 41.7%, a 16.7 percentage point difference. This data is based on 12 recent ranked games in patch 26.13.
How does Shaco do against Ambessa in the early game?
In the early game, Shaco has the advantage against Ambessa with a 57.1% win rate versus 42.9%. Shaco players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Shaco do against Ambessa in the late game?
In the late game, Shaco takes over the Shaco vs Ambessa matchup with a 60.0% win rate compared to 40.0%. Shaco scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Shaco vs Ambessa matchup?
Shaco wins the matchup against Ambessa with a 58.3% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.13. The 16.7 percentage point advantage means Shaco is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 12 games analyzed.
What is the best Shaco build against Ambessa?
The best Shaco build against Ambessa includes Voltaic Cyclosword, The Collector, Youmuu's Ghostblade with Boots of Swiftness. This build achieves a 50.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Shaco runes against Ambessa?
The best Shaco runes against Ambessa use the Domination primary tree with Sorcery secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Shaco vs Ambessa matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Shaco counter Ambessa?
Yes, Shaco has a favorable matchup against Ambessa with a 58.3% win rate. Shaco strongly counters Ambessa in lane based on current patch 26.13 data.
How do I play Shaco against Ambessa?
When playing Shaco against Ambessa, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.