Shacovs Ambessa
Shaco vs Ambessa is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Ambessa wins with a 59.2% win rate (+18.4%) over Shaco based on 49 games. Ambessa holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Shaco build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Shaco vs Ambessa matchup.
Shaco Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Shaco performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Ambessa(40.8%)Who Wins the Shaco vs Ambessa Matchup?
Shaco vs Ambessa Matchup Summary
The Shaco vs Ambessa matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 49 recent matches analyzed, Ambessa wins with a 59.2% win rate compared to Shaco's 40.8%, giving Ambessa a 18.4 percentage point advantage. Ambessa dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Shaco players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Ambessa leads by 1,092 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Ambessa has a strong advantage in this matchup. Shaco players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Ambessa overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Shaco vs Ambessa Laning Phase Breakdown
Ambessa is favored during the laning phase against Shaco, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Ambessa holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Shaco Build Against Ambessa
Berserker's Greaves is the optimal boots choice against Ambessa, providing the mobility and stats Shaco needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Shaco against Ambessa are The Collector, Youmuu's Ghostblade and Infinity Edge. This combination gives Shaco an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build has a 33.3% win rate across 3 games. While the overall matchup may be difficult, this item path gives Shaco the best chance to compete against Ambessa. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Shaco vs Ambessa matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Shaco36.4%Ambessa63.6%Shaco42.1%Ambessa57.9%Ambessa dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 63.6% win rate — a 27.3 percentage point lead over Shaco. This lopsided early game means Ambessa can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Ambessa is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 57.9% win rate — 15.8 points above Shaco. Extended games heavily favor Ambessa, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Ambessa holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Shaco players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Shaco Runes Against Ambessa
Domination
Sorcery
The Domination and Sorcery rune setup gives Shaco the best tools to compete against Ambessa in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Shaco matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Shaco's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Shaco build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.29% | 349 | 0.8 | 725 | 12,594 | 49.3% | 52.7% | |
| 47.08% | 291 | 0.8 | 753 | 12,535 | 34.8% | 54.8% | |
| 47.25% | 273 | 0.8 | 703 | 12,650 | 51.0% | 45.2% | |
| 50.00% | 246 | 0.8 | 706 | 12,585 | 48.4% | 51.0% | |
| 48.57% | 245 | 0.9 | 693 | 12,413 | 48.0% | 49.0% | |
| 44.21% | 233 | 0.8 | 684 | 12,474 | 41.0% | 45.8% | |
| 48.03% | 229 | 0.8 | 748 | 12,321 | 52.4% | 45.5% | |
| 42.86% | 224 | 0.8 | 690 | 12,431 | 47.2% | 40.8% | |
| 54.68% | 203 | 0.8 | 721 | 12,753 | 52.3% | 56.5% | |
| 50.60% | 166 | 0.9 | 709 | 12,717 | 54.1% | 48.6% | |
| 46.95% | 164 | 0.9 | 808 | 13,211 | 38.2% | 51.4% | |
| 46.46% | 127 | 0.9 | 723 | 12,648 | 40.9% | 49.4% | |
| 36.89% | 122 | 0.8 | 727 | 12,744 | 36.7% | 37.0% | |
| 50.00% | 120 | 0.8 | 722 | 12,547 | 57.1% | 46.1% | |
| 46.02% | 113 | 1.0 | 710 | 11,962 | 38.6% | 50.7% | |
| 55.45% | 110 | 0.8 | 740 | 12,350 | 54.2% | 56.5% | |
| 35.85% | 106 | 1.4 | 669 | 9,778 | 28.9% | 41.0% | |
| 50.96% | 104 | 0.8 | 689 | 12,546 | 45.2% | 54.8% | |
| 55.34% | 103 | 1.0 | 673 | 12,785 | 56.8% | 54.5% | |
| 42.27% | 97 | 0.7 | 736 | 12,646 | 34.2% | 47.5% | |
| 45.26% | 95 | 0.9 | 692 | 12,541 | 40.0% | 48.3% | |
| 48.91% | 92 | 0.9 | 658 | 11,952 | 50.0% | 48.0% | |
| 59.34% | 91 | 0.8 | 683 | 12,356 | 71.4% | 51.8% | |
| 53.33% | 90 | 0.8 | 708 | 12,271 | 57.5% | 50.0% | |
| 54.55% | 88 | 0.8 | 726 | 13,424 | 54.5% | 54.5% | |
| 58.62% | 87 | 1.0 | 739 | 12,424 | 53.9% | 60.7% | |
| 46.51% | 86 | 0.8 | 669 | 13,090 | 55.6% | 42.4% | |
| 50.00% | 82 | 1.4 | 747 | 9,997 | 57.1% | 46.3% | |
| 60.98% | 82 | 1.1 | 815 | 13,092 | 62.5% | 60.0% | |
| 48.72% | 78 | 0.9 | 689 | 11,807 | 47.4% | 50.0% | |
| 52.56% | 78 | 1.4 | 687 | 9,585 | 48.4% | 55.3% | |
| 51.32% | 76 | 0.8 | 650 | 12,174 | 63.6% | 41.9% | |
| 54.67% | 75 | 1.0 | 740 | 12,750 | 50.0% | 56.9% | |
| 44.59% | 74 | 1.5 | 760 | 10,319 | 39.3% | 47.8% | |
| 58.11% | 74 | 1.5 | 711 | 10,177 | 60.7% | 56.5% | |
| 57.75% | 71 | 1.0 | 669 | 12,863 | 61.5% | 55.6% | |
| 50.00% | 70 | 1.8 | 724 | 12,106 | 70.0% | 42.0% | |
| 55.71% | 70 | 1.2 | 783 | 11,150 | 55.6% | 55.8% | |
| 64.71% | 68 | 0.9 | 724 | 12,730 | 66.7% | 63.6% | |
| 61.19% | 67 | 0.8 | 712 | 12,476 | 46.4% | 71.8% | |
| 55.22% | 67 | 1.4 | 682 | 10,111 | 54.2% | 55.8% | |
| 56.45% | 62 | 1.2 | 729 | 12,237 | 38.9% | 63.6% | |
| 54.84% | 62 | 1.4 | 807 | 12,459 | 63.2% | 51.2% | |
| 53.23% | 62 | 0.9 | 659 | 13,092 | 57.9% | 51.2% | |
| 55.74% | 61 | 1.4 | 752 | 10,894 | 62.5% | 51.4% | |
| 46.67% | 60 | 1.5 | 677 | 9,164 | 43.3% | 50.0% | |
| 44.07% | 59 | 1.4 | 791 | 9,754 | 43.5% | 44.4% | |
| 59.62% | 52 | 1.0 | 760 | 13,278 | 42.9% | 65.8% | |
| 47.06% | 51 | 0.9 | 805 | 12,847 | 26.3% | 59.4% | |
| 42.00% | 50 | 1.5 | 859 | 12,003 | 38.1% | 44.8% | |
| 40.82% | 49 | 1.1 | 740 | 13,120 | 36.4% | 42.1% | |
| 48.98% | 49 | 1.5 | 734 | 11,385 | 54.5% | 47.4% | |
| 48.94% | 47 | 0.9 | 769 | 13,413 | 50.0% | 48.1% | |
| 44.19% | 43 | 0.7 | 772 | 12,815 | 42.9% | 44.8% | |
| 55.81% | 43 | 1.4 | 655 | 9,004 | 65.0% | 47.8% | |
| 58.14% | 43 | 1.5 | 712 | 10,373 | 57.1% | 58.6% | |
| 52.50% | 40 | 1.8 | 817 | 9,694 | 57.9% | 47.6% | |
| 50.00% | 40 | 0.9 | 710 | 12,561 | 23.1% | 63.0% | |
| 53.85% | 39 | 1.5 | 817 | 11,094 | 46.1% | 57.7% | |
| 44.74% | 38 | 1.2 | 760 | 12,342 | 75.0% | 36.7% | |
| 50.00% | 38 | 1.5 | 646 | 10,025 | 61.5% | 44.0% | |
| 44.74% | 38 | 0.8 | 758 | 11,798 | 46.7% | 43.5% | |
| 32.43% | 37 | 1.3 | 720 | 12,549 | 20.0% | 40.9% | |
| 42.86% | 35 | 1.7 | 709 | 10,167 | 53.3% | 35.0% | |
| 57.58% | 33 | 0.9 | 777 | 12,199 | 62.5% | 52.9% | |
| 50.00% | 32 | 1.3 | 617 | 9,519 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 41.94% | 31 | 0.8 | 678 | 11,963 | 28.6% | 52.9% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 1.9 | 787 | 12,385 | 66.7% | 52.4% | |
| 53.33% | 30 | 1.3 | 783 | 11,790 | 72.7% | 42.1% | |
| 55.17% | 29 | 0.9 | 821 | 13,877 | 42.9% | 59.1% | |
| 58.62% | 29 | 1.3 | 689 | 12,495 | 76.9% | 43.8% | |
| 44.83% | 29 | 1.7 | 756 | 11,727 | 54.5% | 38.9% | |
| 39.29% | 28 | 1.4 | 538 | 9,522 | 42.9% | 35.7% | |
| 42.86% | 28 | 1.5 | 729 | 10,043 | 45.5% | 41.2% | |
| 46.43% | 28 | 2.2 | 755 | 10,917 | 50.0% | 44.4% | |
| 55.56% | 27 | 1.5 | 672 | 9,721 | 45.5% | 62.5% | |
| 62.96% | 27 | 1.4 | 774 | 9,959 | 80.0% | 52.9% | |
| 61.54% | 26 | 1.3 | 697 | 11,277 | 45.5% | 73.3% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 1.8 | 824 | 12,997 | 36.4% | 50.0% | |
| 36.00% | 25 | 1.8 | 736 | 12,860 | 14.3% | 44.4% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 1.6 | 703 | 9,414 | 66.7% | 23.1% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 1.1 | 731 | 13,314 | 45.5% | 61.5% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 1.2 | 695 | 9,141 | 66.7% | 46.7% | |
| 39.13% | 23 | 1.4 | 761 | 13,681 | 60.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.87% | 23 | 1.5 | 837 | 11,800 | 66.7% | 57.1% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 1.6 | 854 | 11,091 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 1.4 | 652 | 10,722 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 70.00% | 20 | 4.7 | 750 | 11,293 | 62.5% | 75.0% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 1.5 | 678 | 9,197 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 2.1 | 584 | 9,842 | 40.0% | 37.5% | |
| 83.33% | 18 | 1.3 | 922 | 12,400 | 66.7% | 86.7% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 1.5 | 662 | 9,409 | 37.5% | 37.5% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 2.9 | 887 | 12,076 | 60.0% | 54.5% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 0.7 | 682 | 13,926 | 71.4% | 44.4% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 1.3 | 708 | 9,690 | 66.7% | 22.2% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 2.0 | 823 | 12,901 | 25.0% | 45.5% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 2.0 | 827 | 12,213 | 80.0% | 37.5% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 1.8 | 636 | 11,395 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 76.92% | 13 | 0.8 | 636 | 13,091 | 80.0% | 75.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.5 | 686 | 11,153 | 33.3% | 44.4% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 1.4 | 745 | 11,580 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 2.4 | 722 | 11,020 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 1.6 | 666 | 9,586 | 33.3% | 57.1% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 1.9 | 746 | 11,635 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 11.11% | 9 | 2.3 | 504 | 8,462 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 2.2 | 730 | 10,979 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 3.6 | 729 | 10,756 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 3.5 | 786 | 9,269 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 2.5 | 711 | 10,050 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 0.8 | 649 | 12,203 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 2.3 | 570 | 12,033 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 2.8 | 686 | 12,594 | 0.0% | 16.7% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 3.3 | 643 | 13,398 | 0.0% | 28.6% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 2.9 | 668 | 12,878 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 0.7 | 512 | 11,768 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 3.3 | 707 | 12,345 | 100.0% | 80.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.0 | 832 | 8,998 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 100.00% | 6 | 1.4 | 606 | 9,789 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 1.6 | 719 | 9,747 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.9 | 670 | 14,352 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 2.5 | 754 | 12,751 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 3.3 | 693 | 10,326 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.9 | 848 | 12,345 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 2.2 | 543 | 7,261 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 4.9 | 850 | 8,705 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.0 | 744 | 10,438 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Shaco vs Ambessa - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Shaco do against Ambessa in League of Legends?
Ambessa wins the Shaco vs Ambessa matchup with a 59.2% win rate compared to Shaco's 40.8%, a 18.4 percentage point difference. This data is based on 49 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Shaco do against Ambessa in the early game?
In the early game, Ambessa has the advantage against Shaco with a 63.6% win rate versus 36.4%. Ambessa players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Shaco do against Ambessa in the late game?
In the late game, Ambessa takes over the Shaco vs Ambessa matchup with a 57.9% win rate compared to 42.1%. Ambessa scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Shaco vs Ambessa matchup?
Ambessa wins the matchup against Shaco with a 59.2% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 18.4 percentage point advantage means Ambessa is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 49 games analyzed.
What is the best Shaco build against Ambessa?
The best Shaco build against Ambessa includes The Collector, Youmuu's Ghostblade, Infinity Edge with Berserker's Greaves. This build achieves a 33.3% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Shaco runes against Ambessa?
The best Shaco runes against Ambessa use the Domination primary tree with Sorcery secondary. This rune setup achieves a 50.0% win rate in the Shaco vs Ambessa matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Shaco counter Ambessa?
No, Shaco struggles against Ambessa with only a 40.8% win rate. Ambessa has the advantage in this matchup. Shaco players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Ambessa's lead.
How do I play Shaco against Ambessa?
When playing Shaco against Ambessa, play cautiously and avoid Ambessa's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Ambessa has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.