Shacovs Lee Sin
Shaco vs Lee Sin is a moderate matchup in LoL patch 26.7. Lee Sin wins with a 51.7% win rate (+3.3%) over Shaco based on 60 games. Shaco wins the early laning phase while Lee Sin scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Shaco build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Shaco vs Lee Sin matchup.
Shaco Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Shaco performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Lee Sin(48.3%)Who Wins the Shaco vs Lee Sin Matchup?
Shaco vs Lee Sin Matchup Summary
The Shaco vs Lee Sin matchup is a moderate matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 60 recent matches analyzed, Lee Sin wins with a 51.7% win rate compared to Shaco's 48.3%, giving Lee Sin a 3.3 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Shaco controls the early laning stage, but Lee Sin outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Shaco needs to press advantages before Lee Sin reaches their power spikes, while Lee Sin should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Lee Sin leads by 977 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. While Lee Sin is slightly favored, Shaco can absolutely win this lane through smart trading patterns and wave management. Focus on playing around your cooldowns, conceding CS only when necessary, and capitalizing on Lee Sin's mistakes. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Shaco vs Lee Sin Laning Phase Breakdown
Shaco is favored during the laning phase against Lee Sin, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Shaco holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and crowd control, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Shaco Build Against Lee Sin
Ionian Boots of Lucidity is the optimal boots choice against Lee Sin, providing the mobility and stats Shaco needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Shaco against Lee Sin are Liandry's Torment, Cryptbloom and Blackfire Torch. This combination gives Shaco an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 66.7% win rate across 3 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Lee Sin. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Shaco vs Lee Sin matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Shaco52.0%Lee Sin48.0%Shaco45.7%Lee Sin54.3%During the early laning phase (first 15 minutes), Shaco has a meaningful 52.0% win rate, outperforming Lee Sin by 4.0 percentage points. Shaco players should look to press this advantage through aggressive trades, wave priority, and early jungle coordination.
Lee Sin is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 54.3% win rate — 8.6 points above Shaco. Extended games heavily favor Lee Sin, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Shaco must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Lee Sin reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Lee Sin survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Shaco Runes Against Lee Sin
Sorcery
Precision
The Sorcery and Precision rune setup gives Shaco the best tools to compete against Lee Sin in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Shaco matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.7. The table below shows Shaco's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Shaco build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39.50% | 119 | 0.9 | 752 | 14,104 | 36.8% | 40.7% | |
| 53.39% | 118 | 0.9 | 667 | 12,889 | 57.8% | 50.7% | |
| 59.22% | 103 | 0.9 | 638 | 12,835 | 59.5% | 59.0% | |
| 53.92% | 102 | 0.9 | 729 | 12,669 | 46.5% | 59.3% | |
| 52.04% | 98 | 0.9 | 710 | 12,530 | 43.6% | 57.6% | |
| 45.36% | 97 | 0.9 | 721 | 12,769 | 48.7% | 43.1% | |
| 53.93% | 89 | 0.9 | 680 | 13,474 | 48.6% | 57.7% | |
| 44.44% | 81 | 0.9 | 717 | 13,400 | 46.4% | 43.4% | |
| 47.62% | 63 | 0.9 | 744 | 12,975 | 50.0% | 46.3% | |
| 59.68% | 62 | 0.9 | 732 | 12,409 | 58.3% | 60.5% | |
| 50.00% | 60 | 1.4 | 795 | 11,859 | 42.9% | 56.3% | |
| 48.33% | 60 | 0.9 | 725 | 13,309 | 52.0% | 45.7% | |
| 50.00% | 58 | 1.3 | 732 | 12,333 | 47.6% | 51.4% | |
| 52.94% | 51 | 1.0 | 722 | 13,080 | 50.0% | 54.5% | |
| 38.00% | 50 | 1.1 | 762 | 13,866 | 46.7% | 34.3% | |
| 56.25% | 48 | 0.8 | 750 | 13,123 | 57.1% | 55.6% | |
| 56.52% | 46 | 0.9 | 840 | 13,395 | 52.4% | 60.0% | |
| 53.33% | 45 | 0.9 | 751 | 14,119 | 71.4% | 45.2% | |
| 55.56% | 45 | 1.4 | 706 | 10,042 | 40.0% | 68.0% | |
| 59.52% | 42 | 0.8 | 729 | 13,737 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 41.46% | 41 | 0.9 | 780 | 13,483 | 38.9% | 43.5% | |
| 53.66% | 41 | 0.8 | 716 | 12,660 | 50.0% | 56.5% | |
| 65.00% | 40 | 1.4 | 780 | 10,610 | 53.3% | 72.0% | |
| 52.50% | 40 | 1.0 | 739 | 13,263 | 40.0% | 60.0% | |
| 47.50% | 40 | 1.0 | 714 | 11,942 | 37.5% | 54.2% | |
| 55.26% | 38 | 0.9 | 728 | 12,733 | 70.6% | 42.9% | |
| 66.67% | 36 | 0.9 | 819 | 13,644 | 70.0% | 65.4% | |
| 58.33% | 36 | 0.9 | 633 | 12,450 | 64.3% | 54.5% | |
| 61.76% | 34 | 0.9 | 778 | 13,392 | 66.7% | 59.1% | |
| 52.94% | 34 | 1.0 | 625 | 12,324 | 58.3% | 50.0% | |
| 57.58% | 33 | 1.3 | 737 | 12,494 | 76.9% | 45.0% | |
| 36.36% | 33 | 1.4 | 812 | 11,536 | 27.8% | 46.7% | |
| 65.63% | 32 | 1.4 | 673 | 11,953 | 72.7% | 61.9% | |
| 46.88% | 32 | 1.3 | 768 | 12,669 | 66.7% | 29.4% | |
| 59.38% | 32 | 1.0 | 766 | 12,820 | 63.6% | 57.1% | |
| 58.06% | 31 | 0.9 | 733 | 14,139 | 55.6% | 59.1% | |
| 58.06% | 31 | 1.4 | 741 | 10,793 | 75.0% | 47.4% | |
| 45.16% | 31 | 1.3 | 817 | 11,599 | 63.6% | 35.0% | |
| 53.33% | 30 | 0.9 | 777 | 13,199 | 27.3% | 68.4% | |
| 30.00% | 30 | 1.0 | 675 | 11,853 | 16.7% | 38.9% | |
| 50.00% | 30 | 1.0 | 713 | 10,943 | 43.8% | 57.1% | |
| 55.17% | 29 | 0.8 | 782 | 14,018 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 44.83% | 29 | 1.5 | 755 | 10,951 | 46.1% | 43.8% | |
| 50.00% | 28 | 0.8 | 741 | 15,334 | 28.6% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 28 | 0.8 | 705 | 13,461 | 27.3% | 64.7% | |
| 44.44% | 27 | 0.8 | 725 | 13,567 | 14.3% | 55.0% | |
| 50.00% | 26 | 1.4 | 620 | 10,306 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 1.6 | 807 | 10,039 | 44.4% | 58.8% | |
| 38.46% | 26 | 1.6 | 710 | 10,285 | 30.0% | 43.8% | |
| 58.33% | 24 | 0.9 | 728 | 12,820 | 70.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.87% | 23 | 1.0 | 791 | 13,484 | 44.4% | 71.4% | |
| 31.82% | 22 | 1.4 | 835 | 12,568 | 42.9% | 26.7% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 1.1 | 807 | 13,617 | 77.8% | 41.7% | |
| 65.00% | 20 | 1.5 | 676 | 10,833 | 75.0% | 58.3% | |
| 44.44% | 19 | 1.4 | 742 | 12,093 | 30.0% | 62.5% | |
| 36.84% | 19 | 4.2 | 780 | 11,373 | 12.5% | 54.5% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 2.3 | 819 | 12,275 | 57.1% | 54.5% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 1.3 | 647 | 10,715 | 62.5% | 44.4% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 1.7 | 741 | 12,042 | 57.1% | 40.0% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 1.5 | 665 | 9,429 | 25.0% | 44.4% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 1.4 | 760 | 12,275 | 20.0% | 41.7% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 0.8 | 735 | 10,806 | 63.6% | 50.0% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 1.6 | 843 | 10,050 | 55.6% | 62.5% | |
| 18.75% | 16 | 2.4 | 790 | 13,137 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 0.8 | 577 | 12,297 | 66.7% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 1.4 | 679 | 10,013 | 40.0% | 54.5% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 1.6 | 837 | 10,170 | 25.0% | 71.4% | |
| 33.33% | 15 | 1.6 | 702 | 8,414 | 40.0% | 20.0% | |
| 73.33% | 15 | 1.7 | 614 | 8,540 | 60.0% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 1.3 | 736 | 10,117 | 22.2% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 1.0 | 716 | 13,286 | 100.0% | 58.3% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 1.6 | 635 | 10,272 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 1.4 | 852 | 14,352 | 75.0% | 60.0% | |
| 28.57% | 14 | 1.4 | 708 | 10,065 | 57.1% | 0.0% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 1.7 | 671 | 11,070 | 66.7% | 57.1% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 1.6 | 799 | 10,310 | 20.0% | 75.0% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 1.2 | 671 | 10,089 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 1.6 | 858 | 14,575 | 50.0% | 70.0% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 1.7 | 755 | 12,848 | 25.0% | 62.5% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 0.9 | 816 | 13,568 | 40.0% | 71.4% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 1.6 | 836 | 10,737 | 16.7% | 83.3% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 0.9 | 637 | 11,748 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 2.0 | 682 | 12,462 | 0.0% | 71.4% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 1.2 | 664 | 12,695 | 20.0% | 50.0% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 1.4 | 784 | 13,928 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 1.4 | 749 | 10,225 | 57.1% | 25.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 1.9 | 825 | 11,463 | 100.0% | 62.5% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 1.7 | 757 | 11,168 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 0.7 | 678 | 13,789 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 2.2 | 891 | 12,719 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 3.6 | 956 | 12,259 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 4.4 | 760 | 10,789 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.8 | 721 | 11,059 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 1.3 | 686 | 9,533 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 0.4 | 627 | 11,259 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 1.3 | 822 | 10,189 | 100.0% | 80.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 0.9 | 575 | 9,580 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 1.6 | 812 | 14,290 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 0.7 | 596 | 10,086 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 1.6 | 697 | 12,292 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.2 | 542 | 12,904 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.6 | 729 | 13,848 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.9 | 600 | 10,098 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 0.5 | 616 | 13,639 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 3.3 | 580 | 9,347 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Shaco vs Lee Sin - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Shaco do against Lee Sin in League of Legends?
Lee Sin wins the Shaco vs Lee Sin matchup with a 51.7% win rate compared to Shaco's 48.3%, a 3.3 percentage point difference. This data is based on 60 recent ranked games in patch 26.7.
How does Shaco do against Lee Sin in the early game?
In the early game, Shaco has the advantage against Lee Sin with a 52.0% win rate versus 48.0%. Shaco players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Shaco do against Lee Sin in the late game?
In the late game, Lee Sin takes over the Shaco vs Lee Sin matchup with a 54.3% win rate compared to 45.7%. Lee Sin scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Shaco vs Lee Sin matchup?
Lee Sin wins the matchup against Shaco with a 51.7% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.7. The 3.3 percentage point advantage means Lee Sin is moderately favored in this lane matchup based on 60 games analyzed.
What is the best Shaco build against Lee Sin?
The best Shaco build against Lee Sin includes Liandry's Torment, Cryptbloom, Blackfire Torch with Ionian Boots of Lucidity. This build achieves a 66.7% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Shaco runes against Lee Sin?
The best Shaco runes against Lee Sin use the Sorcery primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 80.0% win rate in the Shaco vs Lee Sin matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Shaco counter Lee Sin?
No, Shaco struggles against Lee Sin with only a 48.3% win rate. Lee Sin has the advantage in this matchup. Shaco players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Lee Sin's lead.
How do I play Shaco against Lee Sin?
When playing Shaco against Lee Sin, play cautiously and avoid Lee Sin's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Lee Sin has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.