
Teemovs Olaf
Teemo vs Olaf is a moderate matchup in LoL patch 26.7. Olaf wins with a 51.3% win rate (+2.6%) over Teemo based on 39 games. Olaf wins the early laning phase while Teemo scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Teemo build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Teemo vs Olaf matchup.
Teemo Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Teemo performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Teemo vs Olaf Matchup?

Teemo vs Olaf Matchup Summary
The Teemo vs Olaf matchup is a very close matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 39 recent matches analyzed, Olaf wins with a 51.3% win rate compared to Teemo's 48.7%, giving Olaf a 2.6 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Olaf controls the early laning stage, but Teemo outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Olaf needs to press advantages before Teemo reaches their power spikes, while Teemo should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Olaf leads by 1,345 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. While Olaf is slightly favored, Teemo can absolutely win this lane through smart trading patterns and wave management. Focus on playing around your cooldowns, conceding CS only when necessary, and capitalizing on Olaf's mistakes. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Teemo vs Olaf Laning Phase Breakdown
Olaf is favored during the laning phase against Teemo, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Olaf holds advantages in farming, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Teemo Build Against Olaf
Boots of Swiftness is the optimal boots choice against Olaf, providing the mobility and stats Teemo needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Teemo against Olaf are Liandry's Torment, Morellonomicon and Malignance. This combination gives Teemo an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 66.7% win rate across 3 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Olaf. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Teemo vs Olaf matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Olaf dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 63.2% win rate — a 26.3 percentage point lead over Teemo. This lopsided early game means Olaf can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Teemo is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 60.0% win rate — 20.0 points above Olaf. Extended games heavily favor Teemo, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Olaf must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Teemo reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Teemo survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Teemo Runes Against Olaf
The Precision primary with Sorcery secondary combination helps Teemo maximize their potential in this closely contested matchup, providing the right mix of offensive and defensive tools to edge out Olaf.
Teemo matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.7. The table below shows Teemo's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Teemo build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48.80% | 250 | 6.4 | 1,047 | 11,972 | 47.5% | 49.7% | |
| 50.85% | 118 | 5.8 | 936 | 12,021 | 46.3% | 53.3% | |
| 47.46% | 118 | 5.4 | 859 | 11,843 | 49.0% | 46.4% | |
| 50.45% | 111 | 6.1 | 1,010 | 11,871 | 36.6% | 58.6% | |
| 47.13% | 87 | 6.0 | 1,083 | 11,891 | 37.9% | 51.7% | |
| 46.43% | 84 | 6.3 | 1,085 | 12,225 | 30.3% | 56.9% | |
| 48.78% | 83 | 5.9 | 1,090 | 11,788 | 44.1% | 52.1% | |
| 53.75% | 80 | 6.0 | 1,018 | 12,742 | 48.1% | 56.6% | |
| 48.10% | 79 | 5.8 | 907 | 11,690 | 40.7% | 51.9% | |
| 31.65% | 79 | 6.0 | 755 | 10,458 | 26.3% | 36.6% | |
| 46.15% | 78 | 4.9 | 1,067 | 11,196 | 41.4% | 49.0% | |
| 50.65% | 77 | 5.7 | 1,261 | 12,083 | 52.0% | 50.0% | |
| 56.34% | 71 | 5.4 | 1,034 | 11,385 | 62.5% | 51.3% | |
| 56.92% | 65 | 5.2 | 949 | 12,145 | 53.6% | 59.5% | |
| 57.81% | 64 | 2.4 | 977 | 12,960 | 45.5% | 64.3% | |
| 39.34% | 61 | 4.9 | 1,038 | 11,714 | 35.7% | 42.4% | |
| 55.93% | 59 | 6.5 | 1,033 | 11,816 | 64.3% | 48.4% | |
| 61.40% | 57 | 6.3 | 980 | 12,344 | 60.0% | 63.0% | |
| 40.00% | 55 | 2.0 | 917 | 13,879 | 37.5% | 41.0% | |
| 44.44% | 54 | 6.4 | 939 | 11,431 | 44.4% | 44.4% | |
| 62.26% | 53 | 6.2 | 1,117 | 13,023 | 55.0% | 66.7% | |
| 45.10% | 51 | 5.1 | 786 | 9,844 | 42.9% | 47.8% | |
| 44.00% | 50 | 5.9 | 948 | 11,534 | 35.0% | 50.0% | |
| 55.10% | 49 | 6.1 | 841 | 11,956 | 61.1% | 51.6% | |
| 45.83% | 48 | 5.6 | 962 | 11,586 | 45.5% | 46.1% | |
| 59.57% | 47 | 2.0 | 842 | 10,410 | 62.5% | 58.1% | |
| 55.56% | 45 | 5.0 | 997 | 12,347 | 68.4% | 46.1% | |
| 44.44% | 45 | 2.7 | 849 | 11,003 | 35.3% | 50.0% | |
| 53.33% | 45 | 6.5 | 1,132 | 12,622 | 58.8% | 50.0% | |
| 56.82% | 44 | 6.3 | 921 | 12,214 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 59.09% | 44 | 6.0 | 969 | 11,695 | 38.1% | 78.3% | |
| 47.62% | 42 | 6.4 | 1,070 | 13,427 | 53.9% | 44.8% | |
| 48.78% | 41 | 2.3 | 1,007 | 13,911 | 61.5% | 42.9% | |
| 36.59% | 41 | 2.0 | 882 | 11,097 | 42.9% | 33.3% | |
| 65.00% | 40 | 5.2 | 888 | 11,030 | 60.9% | 70.6% | |
| 46.15% | 39 | 3.5 | 1,012 | 10,666 | 25.0% | 60.9% | |
| 48.72% | 39 | 5.9 | 904 | 10,039 | 36.8% | 60.0% | |
| 56.41% | 39 | 6.2 | 901 | 11,061 | 52.9% | 59.1% | |
| 55.26% | 38 | 6.3 | 907 | 12,278 | 35.7% | 66.7% | |
| 38.89% | 36 | 6.3 | 1,031 | 13,135 | 25.0% | 45.8% | |
| 54.29% | 35 | 1.2 | 906 | 11,316 | 46.1% | 59.1% | |
| 50.00% | 34 | 5.5 | 1,144 | 13,382 | 18.2% | 65.2% | |
| 58.82% | 34 | 2.2 | 847 | 10,363 | 57.1% | 60.0% | |
| 45.45% | 33 | 2.9 | 862 | 11,254 | 38.5% | 50.0% | |
| 39.39% | 33 | 5.1 | 987 | 11,833 | 46.1% | 35.0% | |
| 57.58% | 33 | 2.0 | 925 | 11,835 | 64.7% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 32 | 5.3 | 1,035 | 12,269 | 54.5% | 47.6% | |
| 40.63% | 32 | 2.3 | 727 | 8,572 | 43.8% | 37.5% | |
| 34.38% | 32 | 2.4 | 849 | 11,482 | 27.3% | 38.1% | |
| 43.75% | 32 | 5.7 | 959 | 11,959 | 28.6% | 55.6% | |
| 59.38% | 32 | 1.9 | 893 | 13,075 | 70.0% | 54.5% | |
| 54.84% | 31 | 5.9 | 887 | 11,196 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 38.71% | 31 | 1.8 | 924 | 11,416 | 35.7% | 41.2% | |
| 66.67% | 30 | 1.8 | 785 | 9,782 | 72.7% | 63.2% | |
| 44.83% | 29 | 5.8 | 896 | 10,991 | 33.3% | 57.1% | |
| 48.28% | 29 | 5.9 | 1,094 | 12,682 | 50.0% | 47.8% | |
| 42.86% | 28 | 1.6 | 752 | 8,212 | 44.4% | 40.0% | |
| 39.29% | 28 | 6.0 | 767 | 10,722 | 16.7% | 56.3% | |
| 37.04% | 27 | 2.3 | 746 | 8,892 | 53.3% | 16.7% | |
| 40.00% | 25 | 2.0 | 836 | 10,357 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 24 | 2.6 | 850 | 10,979 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 58.33% | 24 | 3.6 | 743 | 10,598 | 20.0% | 68.4% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 4.9 | 920 | 11,626 | 58.3% | 50.0% | |
| 69.57% | 23 | 4.6 | 936 | 11,265 | 75.0% | 63.6% | |
| 56.52% | 23 | 3.6 | 910 | 12,380 | 33.3% | 71.4% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 5.9 | 1,041 | 11,288 | 20.0% | 58.3% | |
| 45.45% | 22 | 2.3 | 873 | 11,935 | 30.0% | 58.3% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 5.8 | 652 | 9,846 | 41.7% | 60.0% | |
| 38.10% | 21 | 1.4 | 959 | 12,795 | 16.7% | 46.7% | |
| 71.43% | 21 | 6.1 | 1,181 | 11,386 | 70.0% | 72.7% | |
| 30.00% | 20 | 5.8 | 928 | 10,278 | 44.4% | 18.2% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 2.2 | 765 | 10,334 | 62.5% | 58.3% | |
| 35.00% | 20 | 4.5 | 929 | 13,545 | 37.5% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 4.7 | 867 | 11,549 | 77.8% | 27.3% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 2.5 | 955 | 13,279 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 1.7 | 882 | 12,197 | 22.2% | 63.6% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 6.0 | 840 | 12,605 | 28.6% | 76.9% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 3.5 | 914 | 12,508 | 28.6% | 58.3% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 5.8 | 1,010 | 11,864 | 33.3% | 69.2% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 4.5 | 878 | 12,444 | 44.4% | 70.0% | |
| 27.78% | 18 | 2.4 | 1,021 | 11,321 | 44.4% | 11.1% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 6.2 | 929 | 10,744 | 33.3% | 44.4% | |
| 33.33% | 18 | 5.0 | 865 | 12,260 | 36.4% | 28.6% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 2.1 | 983 | 11,128 | 66.7% | 58.3% | |
| 29.41% | 17 | 3.2 | 1,030 | 12,438 | 20.0% | 33.3% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 3.0 | 910 | 10,627 | 28.6% | 60.0% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 1.9 | 817 | 11,762 | 80.0% | 58.3% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 2.0 | 980 | 10,152 | 28.6% | 40.0% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 5.2 | 827 | 11,197 | 42.9% | 40.0% | |
| 29.41% | 17 | 3.1 | 1,071 | 12,704 | 33.3% | 27.3% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 1.9 | 960 | 11,408 | 16.7% | 50.0% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 3.7 | 967 | 11,742 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 3.8 | 934 | 12,231 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 1.9 | 926 | 11,070 | 25.0% | 45.5% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 5.2 | 868 | 12,983 | 40.0% | 60.0% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 3.2 | 927 | 12,481 | 62.5% | 57.1% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 2.4 | 744 | 11,001 | 75.0% | 54.5% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 1.4 | 962 | 10,856 | 44.4% | 33.3% | |
| 28.57% | 14 | 2.2 | 715 | 10,960 | 40.0% | 22.2% | |
| 78.57% | 14 | 5.7 | 742 | 8,719 | 88.9% | 60.0% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 3.2 | 855 | 10,836 | 16.7% | 50.0% | |
| 21.43% | 14 | 6.5 | 1,003 | 12,220 | 33.3% | 12.5% | |
| 78.57% | 14 | 5.4 | 971 | 12,573 | 66.7% | 87.5% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 6.4 | 1,227 | 13,254 | 25.0% | 60.0% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 3.0 | 770 | 11,357 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 15.38% | 13 | 1.8 | 762 | 8,475 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 5.2 | 902 | 12,646 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 2.1 | 930 | 11,107 | 28.6% | 60.0% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 6.2 | 886 | 11,693 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 2.7 | 989 | 12,833 | 20.0% | 71.4% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 4.6 | 832 | 10,701 | 33.3% | 55.6% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 4.4 | 690 | 10,301 | 0.0% | 42.9% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 1.5 | 1,006 | 12,376 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 81.82% | 11 | 1.7 | 1,154 | 14,270 | 50.0% | 88.9% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 1.0 | 848 | 13,442 | 0.0% | 44.4% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 4.6 | 749 | 11,282 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 2.1 | 870 | 10,693 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 3.2 | 954 | 11,729 | 50.0% | 87.5% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 3.9 | 916 | 10,098 | 71.4% | 66.7% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 2.1 | 1,075 | 13,590 | 80.0% | 80.0% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 5.9 | 1,027 | 13,323 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.6 | 824 | 12,974 | 20.0% | 75.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 1.3 | 865 | 14,422 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.9 | 937 | 11,642 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 1.6 | 975 | 10,666 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 0.9 | 826 | 12,110 | 40.0% | 75.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.3 | 989 | 12,189 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.9 | 861 | 9,841 | 40.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.9 | 1,022 | 10,329 | 60.0% | 33.3% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 5.4 | 794 | 10,951 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 1.1 | 787 | 11,757 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 0.00% | 8 | 2.1 | 1,062 | 10,926 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.2 | 632 | 8,266 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.4 | 1,352 | 13,398 | 33.3% | 75.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.4 | 1,076 | 14,280 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 4.7 | 1,042 | 10,855 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 2.6 | 893 | 15,085 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.1 | 908 | 13,147 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 5.5 | 901 | 11,893 | 0.0% | 20.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.3 | 1,238 | 12,422 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 6.5 | 945 | 10,587 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 6.6 | 1,020 | 12,049 | 0.0% | 20.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.5 | 660 | 7,205 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.4 | 811 | 9,163 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 4.8 | 843 | 12,035 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.5 | 725 | 12,948 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.7 | 886 | 8,863 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 5.7 | 930 | 12,478 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 1.3 | 867 | 8,973 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Teemo vs Olaf - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Teemo do against Olaf in League of Legends?
Olaf wins the Teemo vs Olaf matchup with a 51.3% win rate compared to Teemo's 48.7%, a 2.6 percentage point difference. This data is based on 39 recent ranked games in patch 26.7.
How does Teemo do against Olaf in the early game?
In the early game, Olaf has the advantage against Teemo with a 63.2% win rate versus 36.8%. Olaf players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Teemo do against Olaf in the late game?
In the late game, Teemo takes over the Teemo vs Olaf matchup with a 60.0% win rate compared to 40.0%. Teemo scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Teemo vs Olaf matchup?
Olaf wins the matchup against Teemo with a 51.3% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.7. The 2.6 percentage point advantage means Olaf is moderately favored in this lane matchup based on 39 games analyzed.
What is the best Teemo build against Olaf?
The best Teemo build against Olaf includes Liandry's Torment, Morellonomicon, Malignance with Boots of Swiftness. This build achieves a 66.7% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Teemo runes against Olaf?
The best Teemo runes against Olaf use the Precision primary tree with Sorcery secondary. This rune setup achieves a 50.0% win rate in the Teemo vs Olaf matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Teemo counter Olaf?
No, Teemo struggles against Olaf with only a 48.7% win rate. Olaf has the advantage in this matchup. Teemo players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Olaf's lead.
How do I play Teemo against Olaf?
When playing Teemo against Olaf, play cautiously and avoid Olaf's power spikes. Focus on safe farming — you outscale Olaf in the late game. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.