Trundlevs Olaf
Trundle vs Olaf is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.11. Olaf wins with a 65.8% win rate (+31.6%) over Trundle based on 38 games. Olaf holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Trundle build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Trundle vs Olaf matchup.
Trundle Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Trundle performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Trundle vs Olaf Matchup?
Trundle vs Olaf Matchup Summary
The Trundle vs Olaf matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 38 recent matches analyzed, Olaf wins with a 65.8% win rate compared to Trundle's 34.2%, giving Olaf a 31.6 percentage point advantage. Olaf dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Trundle players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Trundle leads by 0.2s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Olaf has a strong advantage in this matchup. Trundle players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Olaf overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Trundle vs Olaf Laning Phase Breakdown
Trundle is favored during the laning phase against Olaf, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Trundle holds advantages in farming, gold income and crowd control, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Trundle Build Against Olaf
Plated Steelcaps is the optimal boots choice against Olaf, providing the mobility and stats Trundle needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Trundle against Olaf are Hullbreaker, Blade of The Ruined King and Trinity Force. This combination gives Trundle an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 66.7% win rate across 6 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Olaf. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Trundle vs Olaf matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Trundle35.7%
Olaf64.3%Trundle33.3%Olaf66.7%Olaf dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 64.3% win rate — a 28.6 percentage point lead over Trundle. This lopsided early game means Olaf can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Olaf is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 66.7% win rate — 33.3 points above Trundle. Extended games heavily favor Olaf, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Olaf holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Trundle players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Trundle Runes Against Olaf
Precision
Resolve
The Precision and Resolve rune setup gives Trundle the best tools to compete against Olaf in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Trundle matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.11. The table below shows Trundle's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Trundle build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.45% | 111 | 6.9 | 755 | 12,658 | 47.5% | 52.1% | |
| 50.55% | 91 | 5.6 | 570 | 12,202 | 50.0% | 50.9% | |
| 47.73% | 88 | 6.4 | 877 | 13,314 | 50.0% | 46.4% | |
| 43.53% | 85 | 5.6 | 729 | 12,431 | 40.0% | 46.0% | |
| 51.19% | 84 | 6.2 | 740 | 12,259 | 52.6% | 50.0% | |
| 50.65% | 77 | 6.7 | 650 | 12,317 | 42.4% | 56.8% | |
| 50.65% | 77 | 2.3 | 593 | 12,003 | 43.6% | 57.9% | |
| 55.41% | 74 | 6.0 | 689 | 12,089 | 53.1% | 57.1% | |
| 47.76% | 67 | 3.0 | 702 | 12,070 | 50.0% | 45.7% | |
| 49.25% | 67 | 6.4 | 1,098 | 12,175 | 50.0% | 48.6% | |
| 50.77% | 65 | 5.5 | 804 | 11,766 | 50.0% | 51.4% | |
| 37.10% | 62 | 5.4 | 699 | 12,141 | 38.1% | 36.6% | |
| 39.34% | 61 | 6.4 | 805 | 12,005 | 44.4% | 35.3% | |
| 51.85% | 54 | 6.7 | 810 | 12,383 | 61.5% | 42.9% | |
| 54.72% | 53 | 3.1 | 779 | 11,925 | 52.0% | 57.1% | |
| 56.86% | 51 | 6.3 | 756 | 12,266 | 60.9% | 53.6% | |
| 49.02% | 51 | 6.7 | 714 | 10,939 | 48.3% | 50.0% | |
| 51.02% | 49 | 6.6 | 763 | 12,848 | 57.9% | 46.7% | |
| 40.82% | 49 | 6.1 | 764 | 11,900 | 36.4% | 44.4% | |
| 46.94% | 49 | 1.4 | 586 | 10,894 | 51.7% | 40.0% | |
| 36.73% | 49 | 1.7 | 629 | 12,549 | 34.8% | 38.5% | |
| 47.83% | 46 | 1.4 | 607 | 11,844 | 65.0% | 34.6% | |
| 45.45% | 44 | 6.9 | 690 | 12,120 | 54.5% | 36.4% | |
| 40.91% | 44 | 1.4 | 646 | 12,295 | 33.3% | 46.1% | |
| 55.81% | 43 | 6.9 | 773 | 12,928 | 63.2% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 42 | 6.3 | 736 | 12,402 | 58.8% | 56.0% | |
| 36.59% | 41 | 6.1 | 642 | 11,277 | 38.1% | 35.0% | |
| 57.50% | 40 | 7.0 | 802 | 12,492 | 66.7% | 47.4% | |
| 56.41% | 39 | 1.6 | 560 | 13,731 | 45.5% | 60.7% | |
| 34.21% | 38 | 6.7 | 791 | 12,566 | 35.7% | 33.3% | |
| 57.14% | 35 | 5.4 | 601 | 11,758 | 66.7% | 47.1% | |
| 57.14% | 35 | 1.9 | 589 | 11,609 | 42.1% | 75.0% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 6.4 | 605 | 12,517 | 63.6% | 47.6% | |
| 43.75% | 32 | 6.0 | 765 | 11,534 | 60.0% | 29.4% | |
| 59.38% | 32 | 6.2 | 886 | 12,738 | 56.3% | 62.5% | |
| 48.28% | 29 | 3.6 | 671 | 12,230 | 57.1% | 40.0% | |
| 31.03% | 29 | 2.2 | 569 | 13,476 | 28.6% | 31.8% | |
| 51.72% | 29 | 6.6 | 744 | 12,864 | 64.3% | 40.0% | |
| 41.38% | 29 | 3.4 | 607 | 13,355 | 16.7% | 58.8% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 1.4 | 609 | 13,001 | 61.5% | 46.7% | |
| 44.44% | 27 | 5.4 | 792 | 12,108 | 42.9% | 46.1% | |
| 37.04% | 27 | 1.6 | 581 | 13,114 | 41.7% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 24 | 6.8 | 776 | 12,551 | 78.6% | 50.0% | |
| 58.33% | 24 | 5.5 | 745 | 13,692 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 41.67% | 24 | 6.8 | 822 | 13,460 | 45.5% | 38.5% | |
| 56.52% | 23 | 1.5 | 677 | 13,146 | 45.5% | 66.7% | |
| 60.87% | 23 | 7.6 | 776 | 13,896 | 70.0% | 53.9% | |
| 65.22% | 23 | 5.7 | 757 | 11,957 | 61.5% | 70.0% | |
| 63.64% | 22 | 6.9 | 658 | 12,110 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 1.9 | 584 | 11,806 | 61.5% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 6.2 | 648 | 12,265 | 62.5% | 53.9% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 1.4 | 601 | 12,753 | 71.4% | 38.5% | |
| 63.16% | 19 | 6.5 | 1,091 | 13,552 | 80.0% | 44.4% | |
| 36.84% | 19 | 5.9 | 750 | 12,651 | 60.0% | 28.6% | |
| 36.84% | 19 | 6.7 | 546 | 11,896 | 25.0% | 45.5% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 4.6 | 544 | 9,841 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 6.7 | 546 | 12,294 | 40.0% | 55.6% | |
| 66.67% | 18 | 5.8 | 709 | 11,276 | 75.0% | 60.0% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 6.9 | 796 | 14,694 | 50.0% | 53.9% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 3.0 | 699 | 13,527 | 100.0% | 53.9% | |
| 25.00% | 16 | 1.9 | 590 | 13,391 | 50.0% | 16.7% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 5.7 | 616 | 12,672 | 50.0% | 45.5% | |
| 20.00% | 15 | 1.2 | 525 | 11,726 | 16.7% | 22.2% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 1.3 | 756 | 12,708 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 26.67% | 15 | 2.4 | 578 | 13,365 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 3.3 | 630 | 10,277 | 50.0% | 71.4% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 2.2 | 644 | 13,429 | 20.0% | 44.4% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 1.4 | 581 | 13,773 | 66.7% | 37.5% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 2.2 | 552 | 12,119 | 66.7% | 62.5% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 6.9 | 830 | 15,916 | 50.0% | 45.5% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 2.0 | 640 | 13,574 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 5.8 | 634 | 13,977 | 75.0% | 60.0% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 2.4 | 613 | 11,276 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 23.08% | 13 | 1.4 | 631 | 12,369 | 14.3% | 33.3% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 6.5 | 769 | 14,131 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 5.6 | 620 | 10,041 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 2.5 | 677 | 11,463 | 40.0% | 28.6% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 6.7 | 771 | 10,707 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 4.5 | 477 | 12,717 | 60.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 2.2 | 748 | 11,493 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 7.1 | 706 | 13,796 | 80.0% | 0.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 5.1 | 614 | 12,577 | 20.0% | 25.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 2.0 | 546 | 13,323 | 33.3% | 83.3% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 6.0 | 889 | 12,031 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 1.2 | 497 | 10,398 | 20.0% | 25.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 2.0 | 356 | 8,392 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 12.50% | 8 | 6.9 | 764 | 13,121 | 0.0% | 16.7% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 1.8 | 534 | 11,015 | 0.0% | 42.9% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.3 | 676 | 14,130 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.1 | 512 | 11,908 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 3.5 | 626 | 11,773 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.0 | 611 | 10,252 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 5.9 | 753 | 14,206 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.9 | 453 | 10,729 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.5 | 394 | 9,764 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 7.8 | 693 | 13,534 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 3.4 | 459 | 11,476 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 2.0 | 442 | 10,986 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 4.1 | 867 | 11,783 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.6 | 562 | 12,052 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.8 | 667 | 14,367 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 3.3 | 417 | 10,691 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 3.1 | 431 | 10,143 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 7.0 | 723 | 10,425 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Trundle vs Olaf - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Trundle do against Olaf in League of Legends?
Olaf wins the Trundle vs Olaf matchup with a 65.8% win rate compared to Trundle's 34.2%, a 31.6 percentage point difference. This data is based on 38 recent ranked games in patch 26.11.
How does Trundle do against Olaf in the early game?
In the early game, Olaf has the advantage against Trundle with a 64.3% win rate versus 35.7%. Olaf players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Trundle do against Olaf in the late game?
In the late game, Olaf takes over the Trundle vs Olaf matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to 33.3%. Olaf scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Trundle vs Olaf matchup?
Olaf wins the matchup against Trundle with a 65.8% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.11. The 31.6 percentage point advantage means Olaf is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 38 games analyzed.
What is the best Trundle build against Olaf?
The best Trundle build against Olaf includes Hullbreaker, Blade of The Ruined King, Trinity Force with Plated Steelcaps. This build achieves a 66.7% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Trundle runes against Olaf?
The best Trundle runes against Olaf use the Precision primary tree with Resolve secondary. This rune setup achieves a 28.6% win rate in the Trundle vs Olaf matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Trundle counter Olaf?
No, Trundle struggles against Olaf with only a 34.2% win rate. Olaf has the advantage in this matchup. Trundle players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Olaf's lead.
How do I play Trundle against Olaf?
When playing Trundle against Olaf, play cautiously and avoid Olaf's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Olaf has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.