Tryndamerevs Aurelion Sol
Tryndamere vs Aurelion Sol is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.7. Tryndamere wins with a 71.4% win rate (+42.9%) over Aurelion Sol based on 7 games. Tryndamere holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Tryndamere build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Tryndamere vs Aurelion Sol matchup.
Tryndamere Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Tryndamere performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Aurelion Sol(71.4%)Who Wins the Tryndamere vs Aurelion Sol Matchup?
Tryndamere vs Aurelion Sol Matchup Summary
The Tryndamere vs Aurelion Sol matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 7 recent matches analyzed, Tryndamere wins with a 71.4% win rate compared to Aurelion Sol's 28.6%, giving Tryndamere a 42.9 percentage point advantage. Tryndamere dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Aurelion Sol players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Tryndamere leads by 1,144 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Tryndamere players can confidently pick into Aurelion Sol and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Aurelion Sol away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Tryndamere vs Aurelion Sol Laning Phase Breakdown
Tryndamere is favored during the laning phase against Aurelion Sol, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Tryndamere holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Tryndamere Build Against Aurelion Sol
Chainlaced Crushers is the optimal boots choice against Aurelion Sol, providing the mobility and stats Tryndamere needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Tryndamere against Aurelion Sol are Profane Hydra, Essence Reaver and Infinity Edge. This combination gives Tryndamere an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Tryndamere vs Aurelion Sol matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Tryndamere66.7%Aurelion Sol33.3%Tryndamere75.0%Aurelion Sol25.0%Tryndamere dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 66.7% win rate — a 33.3 percentage point lead over Aurelion Sol. This lopsided early game means Tryndamere can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Tryndamere is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 75.0% win rate — 50.0 points above Aurelion Sol. Extended games heavily favor Tryndamere, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Tryndamere holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Aurelion Sol players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Tryndamere Runes Against Aurelion Sol
Domination
Precision
Running Domination primary with Precision secondary allows Tryndamere to press their advantage against Aurelion Sol, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Tryndamere matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.7. The table below shows Tryndamere's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Tryndamere build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.67% | 180 | 7.3 | 950 | 13,703 | 49.4% | 53.6% | |
| 58.16% | 98 | 6.5 | 876 | 13,526 | 53.2% | 62.8% | |
| 45.33% | 75 | 6.8 | 643 | 12,489 | 51.6% | 40.9% | |
| 40.58% | 69 | 6.5 | 818 | 12,240 | 29.4% | 51.4% | |
| 55.22% | 67 | 6.8 | 842 | 12,870 | 65.8% | 41.4% | |
| 46.97% | 66 | 7.5 | 959 | 14,321 | 58.6% | 37.8% | |
| 50.00% | 64 | 7.5 | 931 | 13,105 | 38.7% | 60.6% | |
| 40.63% | 64 | 6.5 | 877 | 12,387 | 46.4% | 36.1% | |
| 51.67% | 60 | 6.3 | 1,159 | 13,472 | 51.9% | 51.5% | |
| 37.74% | 53 | 6.4 | 595 | 12,997 | 45.0% | 33.3% | |
| 45.83% | 48 | 7.1 | 846 | 13,877 | 42.9% | 47.1% | |
| 48.89% | 45 | 7.9 | 922 | 13,892 | 50.0% | 47.8% | |
| 56.82% | 44 | 7.0 | 823 | 13,692 | 54.5% | 59.1% | |
| 46.51% | 43 | 6.7 | 879 | 13,461 | 28.6% | 63.6% | |
| 57.14% | 42 | 6.8 | 850 | 13,453 | 68.2% | 45.0% | |
| 45.24% | 42 | 7.4 | 865 | 12,648 | 50.0% | 40.9% | |
| 60.98% | 41 | 6.5 | 835 | 13,346 | 68.4% | 54.5% | |
| 53.66% | 41 | 7.2 | 840 | 13,167 | 50.0% | 56.0% | |
| 51.22% | 41 | 7.1 | 822 | 13,817 | 68.4% | 36.4% | |
| 47.50% | 40 | 6.1 | 778 | 12,385 | 38.9% | 54.5% | |
| 52.50% | 40 | 4.4 | 948 | 13,256 | 52.2% | 52.9% | |
| 43.59% | 39 | 6.5 | 1,041 | 12,824 | 35.3% | 50.0% | |
| 48.72% | 39 | 6.9 | 1,002 | 13,254 | 33.3% | 58.3% | |
| 50.00% | 38 | 6.4 | 920 | 12,454 | 55.6% | 45.0% | |
| 50.00% | 36 | 6.8 | 856 | 12,333 | 47.4% | 52.9% | |
| 50.00% | 34 | 3.0 | 795 | 12,553 | 60.0% | 35.7% | |
| 51.52% | 33 | 7.4 | 913 | 12,852 | 47.1% | 56.3% | |
| 39.39% | 33 | 6.7 | 860 | 11,453 | 35.3% | 43.8% | |
| 63.64% | 33 | 6.9 | 1,000 | 12,592 | 63.2% | 64.3% | |
| 46.88% | 32 | 7.7 | 934 | 14,404 | 41.2% | 53.3% | |
| 48.39% | 31 | 7.0 | 814 | 12,569 | 47.1% | 50.0% | |
| 62.07% | 29 | 6.8 | 829 | 12,993 | 46.7% | 78.6% | |
| 50.00% | 28 | 7.0 | 795 | 12,501 | 56.3% | 41.7% | |
| 59.26% | 27 | 6.1 | 813 | 13,704 | 58.3% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 26 | 7.5 | 862 | 15,018 | 70.0% | 37.5% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 6.5 | 706 | 12,945 | 45.5% | 60.0% | |
| 64.00% | 25 | 6.3 | 834 | 14,271 | 64.3% | 63.6% | |
| 64.00% | 25 | 7.2 | 668 | 12,641 | 64.3% | 63.6% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 1.8 | 699 | 12,469 | 45.5% | 61.5% | |
| 34.78% | 23 | 7.1 | 877 | 13,988 | 40.0% | 30.8% | |
| 52.17% | 23 | 2.3 | 744 | 12,888 | 54.5% | 50.0% | |
| 34.78% | 23 | 6.9 | 1,014 | 14,253 | 42.9% | 31.3% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 4.4 | 856 | 14,685 | 42.9% | 53.3% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 6.2 | 695 | 14,215 | 60.0% | 36.4% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 2.7 | 759 | 12,880 | 44.4% | 58.3% | |
| 63.16% | 19 | 6.7 | 755 | 13,021 | 71.4% | 58.3% | |
| 31.58% | 19 | 2.3 | 689 | 12,999 | 25.0% | 36.4% | |
| 33.33% | 18 | 7.2 | 699 | 13,840 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 6.6 | 848 | 13,285 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 2.9 | 659 | 13,552 | 42.9% | 60.0% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 4.0 | 770 | 14,056 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 6.8 | 840 | 12,845 | 28.6% | 55.6% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 6.6 | 839 | 12,968 | 55.6% | 57.1% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 6.9 | 911 | 11,273 | 66.7% | 16.7% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 4.3 | 771 | 15,204 | 28.6% | 62.5% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 3.7 | 944 | 15,091 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 7.0 | 740 | 12,916 | 83.3% | 42.9% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 7.3 | 671 | 14,839 | 50.0% | 54.5% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 5.6 | 813 | 13,028 | 60.0% | 25.0% | |
| 76.92% | 13 | 6.8 | 927 | 15,531 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 7.0 | 789 | 13,777 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 6.4 | 625 | 12,468 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 75.00% | 12 | 3.4 | 875 | 13,272 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 91.67% | 12 | 1.8 | 732 | 15,408 | 100.0% | 87.5% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 7.2 | 1,074 | 13,784 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 4.8 | 872 | 14,918 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 2.6 | 847 | 15,172 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 72.73% | 11 | 6.8 | 865 | 14,513 | 100.0% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 5.5 | 1,101 | 15,403 | 33.3% | 75.0% | |
| 10.00% | 10 | 3.9 | 910 | 13,604 | 0.0% | 12.5% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 3.1 | 506 | 9,770 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 3.7 | 684 | 12,610 | 33.3% | 16.7% | |
| 88.89% | 9 | 5.8 | 976 | 16,595 | 100.0% | 83.3% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.7 | 626 | 13,288 | 100.0% | 37.5% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 5.6 | 555 | 9,839 | 40.0% | 75.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.3 | 645 | 9,649 | 25.0% | 60.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 7.8 | 1,163 | 15,669 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 3.6 | 745 | 12,303 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 5.7 | 547 | 12,984 | 0.0% | 28.6% | |
| 12.50% | 8 | 6.5 | 688 | 14,973 | 0.0% | 16.7% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 3.5 | 733 | 12,389 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 6.6 | 743 | 13,196 | 66.7% | 80.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 4.1 | 697 | 12,920 | 33.3% | 25.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 7.7 | 1,044 | 10,869 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.7 | 811 | 13,153 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 4.9 | 568 | 11,972 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.5 | 551 | 12,350 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 6.5 | 612 | 10,008 | 16.7% | 0.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 7.2 | 1,035 | 14,081 | 66.7% | 75.0% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 4.9 | 890 | 11,208 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.7 | 525 | 10,967 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.7 | 793 | 13,712 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 7.8 | 728 | 15,335 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.7 | 756 | 9,352 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.3 | 561 | 11,040 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 2.8 | 936 | 13,611 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 7.3 | 919 | 16,547 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 7.0 | 583 | 9,838 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.8 | 955 | 13,810 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 2.1 | 1,042 | 15,734 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.7 | 852 | 18,874 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Tryndamere vs Aurelion Sol - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Tryndamere do against Aurelion Sol in League of Legends?
Tryndamere wins the Tryndamere vs Aurelion Sol matchup with a 71.4% win rate compared to Aurelion Sol's 28.6%, a 42.9 percentage point difference. This data is based on 7 recent ranked games in patch 26.7.
How does Tryndamere do against Aurelion Sol in the early game?
In the early game, Tryndamere has the advantage against Aurelion Sol with a 66.7% win rate versus 33.3%. Tryndamere players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Tryndamere do against Aurelion Sol in the late game?
In the late game, Tryndamere takes over the Tryndamere vs Aurelion Sol matchup with a 75.0% win rate compared to 25.0%. Tryndamere scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Tryndamere vs Aurelion Sol matchup?
Tryndamere wins the matchup against Aurelion Sol with a 71.4% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.7. The 42.9 percentage point advantage means Tryndamere is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 7 games analyzed.
What is the best Tryndamere build against Aurelion Sol?
The best Tryndamere build against Aurelion Sol includes Profane Hydra, Essence Reaver, Infinity Edge with Chainlaced Crushers. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Tryndamere runes against Aurelion Sol?
The best Tryndamere runes against Aurelion Sol use the Domination primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Tryndamere vs Aurelion Sol matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Tryndamere counter Aurelion Sol?
Yes, Tryndamere has a favorable matchup against Aurelion Sol with a 71.4% win rate. Tryndamere strongly counters Aurelion Sol in lane based on current patch 26.7 data.
How do I play Tryndamere against Aurelion Sol?
When playing Tryndamere against Aurelion Sol, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.