Tryndamerevs Gangplank
Tryndamere vs Gangplank is a very close matchup in LoL patch 26.11. Gangplank wins with a 50.8% win rate (+1.5%) over Tryndamere based on 67 games. Gangplank wins the early laning phase while Tryndamere scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Tryndamere build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Tryndamere vs Gangplank matchup.
Tryndamere Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Tryndamere performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Tryndamere vs Gangplank Matchup?
Tryndamere vs Gangplank Matchup Summary
The Tryndamere vs Gangplank matchup is a very close matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 67 recent matches analyzed, Gangplank wins with a 50.8% win rate compared to Tryndamere's 49.3%, giving Gangplank a 1.5 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Gangplank controls the early laning stage, but Tryndamere outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Gangplank needs to press advantages before Tryndamere reaches their power spikes, while Tryndamere should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Tryndamere leads by 944 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. While Gangplank is slightly favored, Tryndamere can absolutely win this lane through smart trading patterns and wave management. Focus on playing around your cooldowns, conceding CS only when necessary, and capitalizing on Gangplank's mistakes. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Tryndamere vs Gangplank Laning Phase Breakdown
Tryndamere is favored during the laning phase against Gangplank, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Tryndamere holds advantages in farming, gold income, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Tryndamere Build Against Gangplank
Berserker's Greaves is the optimal boots choice against Gangplank, providing the mobility and stats Tryndamere needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Tryndamere against Gangplank are Ravenous Hydra, Phantom Dancer and Mortal Reminder. This combination gives Tryndamere an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 66.7% win rate across 3 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Gangplank. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Tryndamere vs Gangplank matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Tryndamere48.1%
Gangplank51.9%Tryndamere50.0%Gangplank50.0%During the early laning phase (first 15 minutes), Gangplank has a meaningful 51.9% win rate, outperforming Tryndamere by 3.7 percentage points. Gangplank players should look to press this advantage through aggressive trades, wave priority, and early jungle coordination.
Late game (25+ minutes) is equally balanced, with Tryndamere at 50.0% win rate — only 0.0 points ahead of Gangplank. Team fight execution and macro play determine the winner at this stage, not champion matchup advantage.
The power dynamics shift as the game progresses — Gangplank has the edge early, but Tryndamere gradually takes over. However, the margins are slim enough that either champion can win at any stage with the right plays. Focus on taking advantages when you have them rather than waiting for a specific game phase.
Best Tryndamere Runes Against Gangplank
Domination
Precision
The Domination primary with Precision secondary combination helps Tryndamere maximize their potential in this closely contested matchup, providing the right mix of offensive and defensive tools to edge out Gangplank.
Tryndamere matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.11. The table below shows Tryndamere's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Tryndamere build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53.68% | 190 | 7.3 | 952 | 13,359 | 53.0% | 54.2% | |
| 39.72% | 141 | 7.0 | 643 | 11,976 | 32.2% | 45.1% | |
| 54.69% | 128 | 6.7 | 841 | 12,948 | 55.2% | 54.3% | |
| 59.35% | 123 | 6.6 | 838 | 12,182 | 63.8% | 55.4% | |
| 47.93% | 121 | 6.7 | 728 | 13,631 | 44.7% | 49.4% | |
| 53.70% | 108 | 7.0 | 1,040 | 13,383 | 64.0% | 44.8% | |
| 44.76% | 105 | 6.6 | 755 | 11,681 | 35.2% | 54.9% | |
| 54.90% | 102 | 7.0 | 961 | 13,486 | 63.2% | 50.0% | |
| 53.13% | 96 | 7.1 | 808 | 13,071 | 52.4% | 53.7% | |
| 50.59% | 85 | 7.2 | 1,174 | 12,811 | 50.0% | 51.1% | |
| 51.19% | 84 | 6.8 | 866 | 12,431 | 56.3% | 48.1% | |
| 53.01% | 83 | 7.1 | 848 | 12,288 | 65.8% | 42.2% | |
| 59.04% | 83 | 7.0 | 858 | 12,921 | 60.5% | 57.8% | |
| 55.41% | 74 | 6.5 | 863 | 12,687 | 61.8% | 50.0% | |
| 41.10% | 73 | 7.1 | 860 | 12,381 | 47.1% | 35.9% | |
| 42.86% | 70 | 7.2 | 948 | 12,625 | 37.1% | 48.6% | |
| 49.25% | 67 | 6.9 | 873 | 13,894 | 48.1% | 50.0% | |
| 56.45% | 62 | 7.0 | 827 | 12,151 | 60.0% | 51.9% | |
| 54.39% | 57 | 7.0 | 792 | 12,818 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 56.36% | 55 | 6.9 | 927 | 13,303 | 67.9% | 44.4% | |
| 47.17% | 53 | 6.3 | 858 | 11,566 | 34.6% | 59.3% | |
| 50.94% | 53 | 7.2 | 984 | 12,347 | 51.7% | 50.0% | |
| 43.14% | 51 | 6.6 | 874 | 12,815 | 39.1% | 46.4% | |
| 66.00% | 50 | 4.0 | 907 | 15,163 | 76.5% | 60.6% | |
| 54.00% | 50 | 7.0 | 723 | 12,256 | 58.3% | 50.0% | |
| 45.83% | 48 | 4.1 | 803 | 13,080 | 31.6% | 55.2% | |
| 45.83% | 48 | 6.7 | 905 | 12,431 | 50.0% | 40.9% | |
| 62.50% | 48 | 7.2 | 864 | 12,857 | 61.9% | 63.0% | |
| 58.70% | 46 | 6.6 | 940 | 12,221 | 52.2% | 65.2% | |
| 46.67% | 45 | 7.3 | 850 | 13,620 | 47.1% | 46.4% | |
| 54.76% | 42 | 7.4 | 1,003 | 14,310 | 60.9% | 47.4% | |
| 50.00% | 38 | 7.7 | 865 | 13,360 | 53.3% | 47.8% | |
| 62.16% | 37 | 5.4 | 932 | 13,310 | 66.7% | 59.1% | |
| 56.76% | 37 | 6.7 | 853 | 12,246 | 50.0% | 63.2% | |
| 43.24% | 37 | 6.3 | 865 | 12,754 | 58.8% | 30.0% | |
| 40.54% | 37 | 7.1 | 825 | 12,755 | 33.3% | 47.4% | |
| 52.78% | 36 | 7.2 | 878 | 14,061 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 58.33% | 36 | 6.3 | 720 | 11,878 | 64.3% | 54.5% | |
| 42.86% | 35 | 6.8 | 859 | 12,827 | 46.7% | 40.0% | |
| 52.94% | 34 | 6.5 | 948 | 11,225 | 54.5% | 50.0% | |
| 61.76% | 34 | 6.8 | 898 | 14,490 | 78.6% | 50.0% | |
| 64.71% | 34 | 6.0 | 692 | 12,431 | 81.3% | 50.0% | |
| 41.38% | 29 | 7.2 | 762 | 12,655 | 33.3% | 47.1% | |
| 51.72% | 29 | 3.0 | 829 | 13,570 | 50.0% | 53.3% | |
| 46.15% | 26 | 2.3 | 733 | 13,306 | 30.0% | 56.3% | |
| 69.23% | 26 | 4.2 | 815 | 13,270 | 69.2% | 69.2% | |
| 68.00% | 25 | 7.1 | 787 | 11,838 | 53.9% | 83.3% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 6.7 | 713 | 11,504 | 16.7% | 84.6% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 4.2 | 1,066 | 14,660 | 71.4% | 44.4% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 7.2 | 840 | 12,796 | 58.3% | 46.1% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 6.4 | 683 | 12,067 | 42.9% | 70.0% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 2.3 | 842 | 14,578 | 30.0% | 57.1% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 7.0 | 849 | 15,411 | 16.7% | 66.7% | |
| 38.10% | 21 | 4.3 | 689 | 10,890 | 45.5% | 30.0% | |
| 33.33% | 21 | 6.9 | 999 | 13,090 | 38.5% | 25.0% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 3.4 | 703 | 13,346 | 40.0% | 72.7% | |
| 33.33% | 21 | 7.3 | 734 | 13,494 | 37.5% | 30.8% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 6.3 | 675 | 12,120 | 77.8% | 36.4% | |
| 73.68% | 19 | 2.4 | 683 | 13,726 | 62.5% | 81.8% | |
| 63.16% | 19 | 7.3 | 657 | 12,275 | 71.4% | 58.3% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 5.3 | 886 | 14,659 | 42.9% | 58.3% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 7.1 | 989 | 14,397 | 71.4% | 45.5% | |
| 44.44% | 18 | 6.7 | 766 | 12,223 | 55.6% | 33.3% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 3.3 | 820 | 14,697 | 40.0% | 38.5% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 4.9 | 712 | 11,788 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 7.1 | 765 | 11,832 | 54.5% | 50.0% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 5.9 | 1,055 | 13,125 | 57.1% | 55.6% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 7.0 | 1,019 | 13,710 | 87.5% | 42.9% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 6.3 | 947 | 15,419 | 80.0% | 60.0% | |
| 73.33% | 15 | 2.0 | 785 | 12,572 | 57.1% | 87.5% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 7.3 | 790 | 13,343 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 2.0 | 650 | 12,565 | 75.0% | 40.0% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 3.4 | 753 | 12,322 | 20.0% | 37.5% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 3.7 | 735 | 14,474 | 40.0% | 62.5% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 6.3 | 823 | 12,075 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 81.82% | 11 | 2.6 | 1,023 | 12,951 | 85.7% | 75.0% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 3.6 | 952 | 14,209 | 66.7% | 85.7% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 7.1 | 908 | 12,470 | 83.3% | 50.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 5.6 | 982 | 12,012 | 40.0% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 7.1 | 817 | 14,854 | 50.0% | 71.4% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 5.8 | 709 | 12,526 | 66.7% | 16.7% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 7.1 | 987 | 13,786 | 50.0% | 28.6% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 6.8 | 806 | 13,142 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 7.3 | 664 | 11,471 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 2.2 | 726 | 12,814 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 87.50% | 8 | 3.3 | 811 | 12,787 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 7.3 | 1,021 | 15,477 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 87.50% | 8 | 7.9 | 1,088 | 14,650 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 3.6 | 676 | 11,655 | 83.3% | 0.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 7.6 | 1,002 | 12,719 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 7.1 | 908 | 12,693 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 7.9 | 834 | 11,895 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 1.4 | 848 | 15,066 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.5 | 766 | 11,995 | 33.3% | 75.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.8 | 701 | 12,621 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.8 | 657 | 12,846 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.5 | 852 | 13,552 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.0 | 591 | 14,046 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.3 | 688 | 12,376 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 7.3 | 804 | 13,994 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 7.0 | 945 | 16,869 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.8 | 971 | 15,867 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 904 | 13,661 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.3 | 788 | 11,787 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.0 | 835 | 14,329 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 6.8 | 751 | 16,641 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 2.5 | 654 | 15,474 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.3 | 936 | 16,716 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.8 | 1,079 | 13,622 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 7.5 | 874 | 13,968 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.2 | 961 | 12,290 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 5.1 | 639 | 10,604 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 4.3 | 712 | 10,256 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Tryndamere vs Gangplank - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Tryndamere do against Gangplank in League of Legends?
Gangplank wins the Tryndamere vs Gangplank matchup with a 50.8% win rate compared to Tryndamere's 49.3%, a 1.5 percentage point difference. This data is based on 67 recent ranked games in patch 26.11.
How does Tryndamere do against Gangplank in the early game?
In the early game, Gangplank has the advantage against Tryndamere with a 51.9% win rate versus 48.1%. Gangplank players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Tryndamere do against Gangplank in the late game?
In the late game, Tryndamere takes over the Tryndamere vs Gangplank matchup with a 50.0% win rate compared to 50.0%. Tryndamere scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Tryndamere vs Gangplank matchup?
Gangplank wins the matchup against Tryndamere with a 50.8% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.11. The 1.5 percentage point advantage means Gangplank is slightly favored in this lane matchup based on 67 games analyzed.
What is the best Tryndamere build against Gangplank?
The best Tryndamere build against Gangplank includes Ravenous Hydra, Phantom Dancer, Mortal Reminder with Berserker's Greaves. This build achieves a 66.7% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Tryndamere runes against Gangplank?
The best Tryndamere runes against Gangplank use the Domination primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 83.3% win rate in the Tryndamere vs Gangplank matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Tryndamere counter Gangplank?
No, Tryndamere struggles against Gangplank with only a 49.3% win rate. Gangplank has the advantage in this matchup. Tryndamere players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Gangplank's lead.
How do I play Tryndamere against Gangplank?
When playing Tryndamere against Gangplank, play cautiously and avoid Gangplank's power spikes. Focus on safe farming — you outscale Gangplank in the late game. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.