Tryndamerevs Cassiopeia
Tryndamere vs Cassiopeia is a very close matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Tryndamere wins with a 50.0% win rate (+0.0%) over Cassiopeia based on 6 games. Cassiopeia wins the early laning phase while Tryndamere scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Tryndamere build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Tryndamere vs Cassiopeia matchup.
Tryndamere Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Tryndamere performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Cassiopeia(50.0%)Who Wins the Tryndamere vs Cassiopeia Matchup?
Tryndamere vs Cassiopeia Matchup Summary
The Tryndamere vs Cassiopeia matchup is essentially a coin-flip matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 6 recent matches analyzed, Tryndamere wins with a 50.0% win rate compared to Cassiopeia's 50.0%, giving Tryndamere a 0.0 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Cassiopeia controls the early laning stage, but Tryndamere outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Cassiopeia needs to press advantages before Tryndamere reaches their power spikes, while Tryndamere should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Cassiopeia leads by 0.9s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Tryndamere has a statistical edge, but the margin is close enough that respecting Cassiopeia's strengths is important. Trade when cooldowns are favorable, track the enemy jungler, and build toward your strongest item spikes to convert the slight advantage into a decisive lead. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Tryndamere vs Cassiopeia Laning Phase Breakdown
Cassiopeia is favored during the laning phase against Tryndamere, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Cassiopeia holds advantages in farming, damage and crowd control, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Tryndamere Build Against Cassiopeia
Berserker's Greaves is the optimal boots choice against Cassiopeia, providing the mobility and stats Tryndamere needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Tryndamere against Cassiopeia are Maw of Malmortius, Blade of The Ruined King and Ravenous Hydra. This combination gives Tryndamere an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 1 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Cassiopeia. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Tryndamere vs Cassiopeia matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Tryndamere33.3%Cassiopeia66.7%Tryndamere66.7%Cassiopeia33.3%Cassiopeia dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 66.7% win rate — a 33.3 percentage point lead over Tryndamere. This lopsided early game means Cassiopeia can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Tryndamere is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 66.7% win rate — 33.3 points above Cassiopeia. Extended games heavily favor Tryndamere, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Cassiopeia must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Tryndamere reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Tryndamere survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Tryndamere Runes Against Cassiopeia
Domination
Precision
The Domination primary with Precision secondary combination helps Tryndamere maximize their potential in this closely contested matchup, providing the right mix of offensive and defensive tools to edge out Cassiopeia.
Tryndamere matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Tryndamere's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Tryndamere build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.00% | 158 | 7.3 | 897 | 12,875 | 52.8% | 47.7% | |
| 45.60% | 125 | 6.8 | 692 | 11,827 | 45.9% | 45.3% | |
| 51.67% | 120 | 6.7 | 849 | 12,687 | 52.6% | 50.8% | |
| 56.30% | 119 | 6.5 | 847 | 12,257 | 54.7% | 57.6% | |
| 45.54% | 112 | 6.3 | 687 | 12,566 | 42.5% | 47.7% | |
| 44.19% | 86 | 6.2 | 733 | 12,370 | 42.5% | 45.6% | |
| 49.37% | 79 | 7.5 | 871 | 13,814 | 43.8% | 53.2% | |
| 57.14% | 77 | 6.9 | 1,025 | 13,501 | 56.3% | 57.8% | |
| 56.34% | 71 | 7.2 | 1,014 | 13,614 | 51.7% | 59.5% | |
| 35.71% | 70 | 7.0 | 789 | 12,409 | 30.0% | 40.0% | |
| 41.18% | 68 | 7.0 | 895 | 12,716 | 36.4% | 45.7% | |
| 57.35% | 68 | 7.0 | 795 | 12,961 | 70.4% | 48.8% | |
| 50.00% | 64 | 6.3 | 783 | 11,961 | 48.6% | 51.9% | |
| 46.88% | 64 | 7.1 | 873 | 11,607 | 51.5% | 41.9% | |
| 47.62% | 63 | 7.0 | 866 | 13,637 | 47.8% | 47.5% | |
| 40.32% | 62 | 6.8 | 873 | 11,989 | 40.0% | 40.6% | |
| 52.46% | 61 | 7.2 | 869 | 12,557 | 61.3% | 43.3% | |
| 62.07% | 58 | 3.3 | 732 | 12,019 | 57.1% | 69.6% | |
| 61.40% | 57 | 7.2 | 1,224 | 13,196 | 62.5% | 60.6% | |
| 54.39% | 57 | 7.0 | 798 | 12,523 | 59.1% | 51.4% | |
| 53.57% | 56 | 6.8 | 884 | 11,534 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 51.79% | 56 | 6.6 | 845 | 12,547 | 38.5% | 63.3% | |
| 57.69% | 52 | 7.4 | 937 | 13,944 | 61.8% | 50.0% | |
| 37.25% | 51 | 4.2 | 789 | 12,909 | 39.1% | 35.7% | |
| 43.14% | 51 | 7.8 | 884 | 13,858 | 52.9% | 38.2% | |
| 54.90% | 51 | 7.2 | 907 | 12,871 | 54.5% | 55.2% | |
| 48.00% | 50 | 5.6 | 760 | 13,866 | 57.1% | 44.4% | |
| 56.25% | 48 | 6.7 | 914 | 14,074 | 60.0% | 54.5% | |
| 43.48% | 46 | 7.2 | 901 | 12,732 | 57.1% | 32.0% | |
| 58.14% | 43 | 6.9 | 928 | 13,365 | 62.5% | 52.6% | |
| 55.00% | 40 | 5.4 | 939 | 13,825 | 56.3% | 54.2% | |
| 56.41% | 39 | 6.5 | 895 | 13,672 | 50.0% | 61.9% | |
| 52.63% | 38 | 6.8 | 785 | 12,943 | 33.3% | 65.2% | |
| 51.35% | 37 | 6.8 | 842 | 11,978 | 52.4% | 50.0% | |
| 48.65% | 37 | 6.3 | 793 | 14,125 | 50.0% | 47.6% | |
| 50.00% | 36 | 7.3 | 1,014 | 13,946 | 60.0% | 42.9% | |
| 57.14% | 35 | 6.9 | 823 | 13,398 | 52.6% | 62.5% | |
| 37.50% | 32 | 6.4 | 905 | 13,100 | 33.3% | 41.2% | |
| 34.38% | 32 | 7.0 | 954 | 13,277 | 50.0% | 22.2% | |
| 43.75% | 32 | 6.4 | 887 | 12,572 | 45.5% | 42.9% | |
| 40.00% | 30 | 6.8 | 857 | 13,148 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 6.8 | 770 | 12,679 | 50.0% | 64.3% | |
| 64.29% | 28 | 1.7 | 730 | 14,043 | 60.0% | 69.2% | |
| 35.71% | 28 | 6.5 | 738 | 13,109 | 50.0% | 27.8% | |
| 28.57% | 28 | 6.7 | 633 | 12,510 | 54.5% | 11.8% | |
| 48.15% | 27 | 7.4 | 974 | 12,459 | 54.5% | 43.8% | |
| 59.26% | 27 | 3.4 | 860 | 14,176 | 55.6% | 61.1% | |
| 69.23% | 26 | 7.1 | 933 | 14,393 | 71.4% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 26 | 7.1 | 824 | 12,105 | 46.1% | 53.9% | |
| 56.00% | 25 | 2.7 | 678 | 11,992 | 38.5% | 75.0% | |
| 41.67% | 24 | 3.3 | 827 | 14,017 | 62.5% | 31.3% | |
| 37.50% | 24 | 1.9 | 810 | 14,115 | 44.4% | 33.3% | |
| 36.36% | 22 | 6.1 | 872 | 10,937 | 41.7% | 30.0% | |
| 45.45% | 22 | 6.0 | 823 | 13,713 | 28.6% | 53.3% | |
| 66.67% | 21 | 2.7 | 744 | 13,396 | 77.8% | 58.3% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 3.9 | 716 | 11,451 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 2.3 | 673 | 14,350 | 55.6% | 54.5% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 5.8 | 808 | 14,285 | 33.3% | 52.9% | |
| 66.67% | 18 | 7.0 | 933 | 16,412 | 42.9% | 81.8% | |
| 62.50% | 16 | 2.9 | 858 | 13,327 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 3.2 | 776 | 13,072 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 6.7 | 859 | 14,073 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 5.3 | 710 | 12,382 | 33.3% | 44.4% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 6.9 | 780 | 13,065 | 60.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 6.8 | 719 | 13,081 | 100.0% | 30.0% | |
| 28.57% | 14 | 4.9 | 792 | 12,719 | 42.9% | 14.3% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 6.8 | 932 | 12,811 | 25.0% | 40.0% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 5.1 | 760 | 12,188 | 33.3% | 37.5% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 6.7 | 842 | 11,306 | 71.4% | 42.9% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 1.8 | 753 | 12,735 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 76.92% | 13 | 6.8 | 858 | 13,913 | 75.0% | 77.8% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 5.2 | 887 | 14,886 | 50.0% | 44.4% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 7.1 | 710 | 12,270 | 75.0% | 25.0% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 6.3 | 1,070 | 12,677 | 50.0% | 83.3% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 2.1 | 658 | 12,150 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 72.73% | 11 | 6.9 | 859 | 16,218 | 66.7% | 75.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 2.2 | 605 | 12,006 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 18.18% | 11 | 3.8 | 597 | 13,093 | 25.0% | 14.3% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 4.1 | 715 | 13,840 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 2.6 | 714 | 12,429 | 42.9% | 25.0% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 7.7 | 846 | 14,249 | 60.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 6.6 | 894 | 14,366 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 5.2 | 876 | 14,590 | 33.3% | 57.1% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 6.7 | 799 | 12,386 | 25.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 2.3 | 908 | 16,574 | 0.0% | 55.6% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 3.8 | 918 | 14,154 | 100.0% | 28.6% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.7 | 715 | 12,890 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 5.0 | 1,022 | 13,838 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 7.2 | 913 | 12,216 | 66.7% | 83.3% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 7.8 | 942 | 12,183 | 66.7% | 60.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.2 | 830 | 10,929 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 7.6 | 797 | 11,652 | 80.0% | 33.3% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 2.7 | 672 | 12,486 | 75.0% | 75.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 5.0 | 665 | 10,923 | 40.0% | 100.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.3 | 559 | 8,917 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 100.00% | 7 | 7.7 | 910 | 10,989 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.8 | 702 | 13,029 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 7.3 | 795 | 15,757 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 4.1 | 614 | 9,994 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.9 | 731 | 14,056 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.7 | 588 | 8,978 | 40.0% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 8.3 | 989 | 15,550 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.4 | 977 | 14,874 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.0 | 638 | 12,500 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.1 | 733 | 8,456 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.3 | 895 | 14,831 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 1.6 | 612 | 15,807 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.1 | 593 | 13,333 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 636 | 11,858 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.8 | 615 | 13,318 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Tryndamere vs Cassiopeia - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Tryndamere do against Cassiopeia in League of Legends?
Tryndamere wins the Tryndamere vs Cassiopeia matchup with a 50.0% win rate compared to Cassiopeia's 50.0%, a 0.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 6 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Tryndamere do against Cassiopeia in the early game?
In the early game, Cassiopeia has the advantage against Tryndamere with a 66.7% win rate versus 33.3%. Cassiopeia players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Tryndamere do against Cassiopeia in the late game?
In the late game, Tryndamere takes over the Tryndamere vs Cassiopeia matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to 33.3%. Tryndamere scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Tryndamere vs Cassiopeia matchup?
Tryndamere wins the matchup against Cassiopeia with a 50.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 0.0 percentage point advantage means Tryndamere is slightly favored in this lane matchup based on 6 games analyzed.
What is the best Tryndamere build against Cassiopeia?
The best Tryndamere build against Cassiopeia includes Maw of Malmortius, Blade of The Ruined King, Ravenous Hydra with Berserker's Greaves. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Tryndamere runes against Cassiopeia?
The best Tryndamere runes against Cassiopeia use the Domination primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Tryndamere vs Cassiopeia matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Tryndamere counter Cassiopeia?
Yes, Tryndamere has a favorable matchup against Cassiopeia with a 50.0% win rate. Tryndamere slightly edges out Cassiopeia in lane based on current patch 26.10 data.
How do I play Tryndamere against Cassiopeia?
When playing Tryndamere against Cassiopeia, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. Play safe early and scale into your power spikes where you outperform Cassiopeia. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.