Tryndamerevs Xin Zhao
Tryndamere vs Xin Zhao is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.11. Tryndamere wins with a 62.2% win rate (+24.3%) over Xin Zhao based on 37 games. Tryndamere holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Tryndamere build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Tryndamere vs Xin Zhao matchup.
Tryndamere Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Tryndamere performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Tryndamere vs Xin Zhao Matchup?
Tryndamere vs Xin Zhao Matchup Summary
The Tryndamere vs Xin Zhao matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 37 recent matches analyzed, Tryndamere wins with a 62.2% win rate compared to Xin Zhao's 37.8%, giving Tryndamere a 24.3 percentage point advantage. Tryndamere dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Xin Zhao players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Xin Zhao leads by 0.5s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Tryndamere players can confidently pick into Xin Zhao and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Xin Zhao away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Tryndamere vs Xin Zhao Laning Phase Breakdown
Tryndamere is favored during the laning phase against Xin Zhao, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Tryndamere holds advantages in farming, damage and gold income, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Tryndamere Build Against Xin Zhao
Berserker's Greaves is the optimal boots choice against Xin Zhao, providing the mobility and stats Tryndamere needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Tryndamere against Xin Zhao are Ravenous Hydra, Phantom Dancer and Mortal Reminder. This combination gives Tryndamere an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build achieves a solid 50.0% win rate across 2 games, proving it to be a reliable item path when facing Xin Zhao. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Tryndamere vs Xin Zhao matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Tryndamere66.7%
Xin Zhao33.3%Tryndamere59.1%Xin Zhao40.9%Tryndamere dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 66.7% win rate — a 33.3 percentage point lead over Xin Zhao. This lopsided early game means Tryndamere can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Tryndamere is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 59.1% win rate — 18.2 points above Xin Zhao. Extended games heavily favor Tryndamere, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Tryndamere holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Xin Zhao players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Tryndamere Runes Against Xin Zhao
Domination
Precision
Running Domination primary with Precision secondary allows Tryndamere to press their advantage against Xin Zhao, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Tryndamere matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.11. The table below shows Tryndamere's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Tryndamere build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53.68% | 190 | 7.3 | 952 | 13,359 | 53.0% | 54.2% | |
| 39.72% | 141 | 7.0 | 643 | 11,976 | 32.2% | 45.1% | |
| 54.69% | 128 | 6.7 | 841 | 12,948 | 55.2% | 54.3% | |
| 59.35% | 123 | 6.6 | 838 | 12,182 | 63.8% | 55.4% | |
| 47.93% | 121 | 6.7 | 728 | 13,631 | 44.7% | 49.4% | |
| 53.70% | 108 | 7.0 | 1,040 | 13,383 | 64.0% | 44.8% | |
| 44.76% | 105 | 6.6 | 755 | 11,681 | 35.2% | 54.9% | |
| 54.90% | 102 | 7.0 | 961 | 13,486 | 63.2% | 50.0% | |
| 53.13% | 96 | 7.1 | 808 | 13,071 | 52.4% | 53.7% | |
| 50.59% | 85 | 7.2 | 1,174 | 12,811 | 50.0% | 51.1% | |
| 51.19% | 84 | 6.8 | 866 | 12,431 | 56.3% | 48.1% | |
| 53.01% | 83 | 7.1 | 848 | 12,288 | 65.8% | 42.2% | |
| 59.04% | 83 | 7.0 | 858 | 12,921 | 60.5% | 57.8% | |
| 55.41% | 74 | 6.5 | 863 | 12,687 | 61.8% | 50.0% | |
| 41.10% | 73 | 7.1 | 860 | 12,381 | 47.1% | 35.9% | |
| 42.86% | 70 | 7.2 | 948 | 12,625 | 37.1% | 48.6% | |
| 49.25% | 67 | 6.9 | 873 | 13,894 | 48.1% | 50.0% | |
| 56.45% | 62 | 7.0 | 827 | 12,151 | 60.0% | 51.9% | |
| 54.39% | 57 | 7.0 | 792 | 12,818 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 56.36% | 55 | 6.9 | 927 | 13,303 | 67.9% | 44.4% | |
| 47.17% | 53 | 6.3 | 858 | 11,566 | 34.6% | 59.3% | |
| 50.94% | 53 | 7.2 | 984 | 12,347 | 51.7% | 50.0% | |
| 43.14% | 51 | 6.6 | 874 | 12,815 | 39.1% | 46.4% | |
| 66.00% | 50 | 4.0 | 907 | 15,163 | 76.5% | 60.6% | |
| 54.00% | 50 | 7.0 | 723 | 12,256 | 58.3% | 50.0% | |
| 45.83% | 48 | 4.1 | 803 | 13,080 | 31.6% | 55.2% | |
| 45.83% | 48 | 6.7 | 905 | 12,431 | 50.0% | 40.9% | |
| 62.50% | 48 | 7.2 | 864 | 12,857 | 61.9% | 63.0% | |
| 58.70% | 46 | 6.6 | 940 | 12,221 | 52.2% | 65.2% | |
| 46.67% | 45 | 7.3 | 850 | 13,620 | 47.1% | 46.4% | |
| 54.76% | 42 | 7.4 | 1,003 | 14,310 | 60.9% | 47.4% | |
| 50.00% | 38 | 7.7 | 865 | 13,360 | 53.3% | 47.8% | |
| 62.16% | 37 | 5.4 | 932 | 13,310 | 66.7% | 59.1% | |
| 56.76% | 37 | 6.7 | 853 | 12,246 | 50.0% | 63.2% | |
| 43.24% | 37 | 6.3 | 865 | 12,754 | 58.8% | 30.0% | |
| 40.54% | 37 | 7.1 | 825 | 12,755 | 33.3% | 47.4% | |
| 52.78% | 36 | 7.2 | 878 | 14,061 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 58.33% | 36 | 6.3 | 720 | 11,878 | 64.3% | 54.5% | |
| 42.86% | 35 | 6.8 | 859 | 12,827 | 46.7% | 40.0% | |
| 52.94% | 34 | 6.5 | 948 | 11,225 | 54.5% | 50.0% | |
| 61.76% | 34 | 6.8 | 898 | 14,490 | 78.6% | 50.0% | |
| 64.71% | 34 | 6.0 | 692 | 12,431 | 81.3% | 50.0% | |
| 41.38% | 29 | 7.2 | 762 | 12,655 | 33.3% | 47.1% | |
| 51.72% | 29 | 3.0 | 829 | 13,570 | 50.0% | 53.3% | |
| 46.15% | 26 | 2.3 | 733 | 13,306 | 30.0% | 56.3% | |
| 69.23% | 26 | 4.2 | 815 | 13,270 | 69.2% | 69.2% | |
| 68.00% | 25 | 7.1 | 787 | 11,838 | 53.9% | 83.3% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 6.7 | 713 | 11,504 | 16.7% | 84.6% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 4.2 | 1,066 | 14,660 | 71.4% | 44.4% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 7.2 | 840 | 12,796 | 58.3% | 46.1% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 6.4 | 683 | 12,067 | 42.9% | 70.0% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 2.3 | 842 | 14,578 | 30.0% | 57.1% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 7.0 | 849 | 15,411 | 16.7% | 66.7% | |
| 38.10% | 21 | 4.3 | 689 | 10,890 | 45.5% | 30.0% | |
| 33.33% | 21 | 6.9 | 999 | 13,090 | 38.5% | 25.0% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 3.4 | 703 | 13,346 | 40.0% | 72.7% | |
| 33.33% | 21 | 7.3 | 734 | 13,494 | 37.5% | 30.8% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 6.3 | 675 | 12,120 | 77.8% | 36.4% | |
| 73.68% | 19 | 2.4 | 683 | 13,726 | 62.5% | 81.8% | |
| 63.16% | 19 | 7.3 | 657 | 12,275 | 71.4% | 58.3% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 5.3 | 886 | 14,659 | 42.9% | 58.3% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 7.1 | 989 | 14,397 | 71.4% | 45.5% | |
| 44.44% | 18 | 6.7 | 766 | 12,223 | 55.6% | 33.3% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 3.3 | 820 | 14,697 | 40.0% | 38.5% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 4.9 | 712 | 11,788 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 7.1 | 765 | 11,832 | 54.5% | 50.0% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 5.9 | 1,055 | 13,125 | 57.1% | 55.6% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 7.0 | 1,019 | 13,710 | 87.5% | 42.9% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 6.3 | 947 | 15,419 | 80.0% | 60.0% | |
| 73.33% | 15 | 2.0 | 785 | 12,572 | 57.1% | 87.5% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 7.3 | 790 | 13,343 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 2.0 | 650 | 12,565 | 75.0% | 40.0% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 3.4 | 753 | 12,322 | 20.0% | 37.5% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 3.7 | 735 | 14,474 | 40.0% | 62.5% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 6.3 | 823 | 12,075 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 81.82% | 11 | 2.6 | 1,023 | 12,951 | 85.7% | 75.0% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 3.6 | 952 | 14,209 | 66.7% | 85.7% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 7.1 | 908 | 12,470 | 83.3% | 50.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 5.6 | 982 | 12,012 | 40.0% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 7.1 | 817 | 14,854 | 50.0% | 71.4% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 5.8 | 709 | 12,526 | 66.7% | 16.7% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 7.1 | 987 | 13,786 | 50.0% | 28.6% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 6.8 | 806 | 13,142 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 7.3 | 664 | 11,471 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 2.2 | 726 | 12,814 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 87.50% | 8 | 3.3 | 811 | 12,787 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 7.3 | 1,021 | 15,477 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 87.50% | 8 | 7.9 | 1,088 | 14,650 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 3.6 | 676 | 11,655 | 83.3% | 0.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 7.6 | 1,002 | 12,719 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 7.1 | 908 | 12,693 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 7.9 | 834 | 11,895 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 1.4 | 848 | 15,066 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.5 | 766 | 11,995 | 33.3% | 75.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.8 | 701 | 12,621 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.8 | 657 | 12,846 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.5 | 852 | 13,552 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.0 | 591 | 14,046 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.3 | 688 | 12,376 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 7.3 | 804 | 13,994 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 7.0 | 945 | 16,869 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.8 | 971 | 15,867 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 904 | 13,661 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.3 | 788 | 11,787 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.0 | 835 | 14,329 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 6.8 | 751 | 16,641 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 2.5 | 654 | 15,474 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.3 | 936 | 16,716 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.8 | 1,079 | 13,622 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 7.5 | 874 | 13,968 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.2 | 961 | 12,290 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 5.1 | 639 | 10,604 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 4.3 | 712 | 10,256 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Tryndamere vs Xin Zhao - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Tryndamere do against Xin Zhao in League of Legends?
Tryndamere wins the Tryndamere vs Xin Zhao matchup with a 62.2% win rate compared to Xin Zhao's 37.8%, a 24.3 percentage point difference. This data is based on 37 recent ranked games in patch 26.11.
How does Tryndamere do against Xin Zhao in the early game?
In the early game, Tryndamere has the advantage against Xin Zhao with a 66.7% win rate versus 33.3%. Tryndamere players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Tryndamere do against Xin Zhao in the late game?
In the late game, Tryndamere takes over the Tryndamere vs Xin Zhao matchup with a 59.1% win rate compared to 40.9%. Tryndamere scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Tryndamere vs Xin Zhao matchup?
Tryndamere wins the matchup against Xin Zhao with a 62.2% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.11. The 24.3 percentage point advantage means Tryndamere is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 37 games analyzed.
What is the best Tryndamere build against Xin Zhao?
The best Tryndamere build against Xin Zhao includes Ravenous Hydra, Phantom Dancer, Mortal Reminder with Berserker's Greaves. This build achieves a 50.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Tryndamere runes against Xin Zhao?
The best Tryndamere runes against Xin Zhao use the Domination primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 66.7% win rate in the Tryndamere vs Xin Zhao matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Tryndamere counter Xin Zhao?
Yes, Tryndamere has a favorable matchup against Xin Zhao with a 62.2% win rate. Tryndamere strongly counters Xin Zhao in lane based on current patch 26.11 data.
How do I play Tryndamere against Xin Zhao?
When playing Tryndamere against Xin Zhao, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.