Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Omen's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Omen
64.3% WR
VS
Tejo
35.7% WR
Who Wins the Omen vs Tejo Matchup?
Winner
Omen
Matches: 14
64.3%
Win Rate
35.7%
1.78
Avg KDA
1.20
16.3
Avg Kills
12.6
12.9
Avg Deaths
14.3
142.2
DMG/Round
125.7
35.0%
HS %
27.0%
221
Combat Score
185
54.5%
Attack WR
43.8%
56.3%
Defense WR
45.5%
Omen vs Tejo Performance Breakdown
In the Omen vs Tejo matchup, Omen demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 14 analyzed matches, Omen outperforms Tejo in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Omen the statistically favored pick when facing Tejo in ranked Valorant matches.
Fragging Power
1.78Omen
1.20Tejo
Omen significantly outperforms Tejo in fragging efficiency with a 1.78 KDA compared to 1.20. This 0.58 KDA differential indicates that Omen players consistently secure more eliminations while dying less frequently, translating to more impactful rounds and better economy management throughout matches.
Damage Output
142.2Omen
125.7Tejo
Omen delivers substantially higher damage per round (142.2 ADR) compared to Tejo's 125.7 ADR. This 16.5 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Omen a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
54.5%Omen
43.8%Tejo
On the attacking side, Omen dominates with a 54.5% win rate compared to Tejo's 43.8%. This 10.7 percentage point gap indicates Omen is significantly more effective at executing onto sites, whether through superior entry fragging, better utility usage for site takes, or stronger post-plant positioning.
Defense Side
56.3%Omen
45.5%Tejo
Omen excels on the defensive half with a commanding 56.3% win rate, far surpassing Tejo's 45.5%. This 10.7 percentage point advantage demonstrates Omen's superior ability to anchor sites, gather information, and deny enemy executes through effective utility and positioning.
The Omen vs Tejo matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 14 competitive matches analyzed, Omen wins 64.3% of the time compared to Tejo's 35.7%, a 28.6 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Omen consistently outperforms. In this Controller vs Initiator matchup, Omen has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Tejo should never take isolated fights against Omen and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Omen vs Tejo Fragging Analysis
Omen achieves a clean sweep in the fragging department, winning all five combat metrics against Tejo in the Omen vs Tejo matchup. This comprehensive dominance across KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability demonstrates that Omen holds systematic mechanical advantages in these encounters. Based on analysis of 14 competitive matches, Omen players can approach duels against Tejo with confidence, while Tejo players must completely avoid fair fights and instead focus on utility-based contributions, information gathering, and team coordination to remain impactful.
Avg KDA
1.78Omen
1.20Tejo
The KDA disparity between Omen and Tejo is substantial: 1.78 versus 1.20, a commanding 0.58 point difference that reveals Omen's dominance in direct combat exchanges. This matchup data from 14 games shows Omen consistently outfragging and outliving Tejo in these encounters. For Tejo players, the strategic implication is clear: avoid 1v1 gunfights against Omen whenever possible. Instead, leverage team utility, information gathering, and multi-person pushes to neutralize Omen's mechanical advantage. Playing for trades and crossfires becomes essential rather than optional.
Avg Kills
16.3Omen
12.6Tejo
The kill differential between Omen and Tejo is dramatic: 16.3 versus 12.6, representing 3.7 additional kills per game for Omen. This massive gap shows Omen consistently dominates the kill feed when these agents meet. For Tejo players, this data suggests a fundamental mismatch in direct combat scenarios. Success against Omen requires reimagining your role — become the setup player, the information gatherer, the utility specialist — rather than trying to match Omen's fragging output head-to-head.
Avg Deaths
12.9Omen
14.3Tejo
Omen demonstrates markedly better survivability against Tejo, recording 12.9 deaths per game versus 14.3. Dying nearly 1.4 fewer times per match gives Omen significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Tejo players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
142.2Omen
125.7Tejo
Omen significantly outdamages Tejo in head-to-head encounters, posting 142.2 ADR versus 125.7. This 16.5 damage-per-round advantage means Omen consistently wins the damage exchange in firefights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. Tejo players should avoid prolonged dueling with Omen — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage weapons or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate for the raw gunfight disadvantage.
HS %
35.0%Omen
27.0%Tejo
The headshot percentage disparity between Omen and Tejo is substantial: 35.0% compared to 27.0%, a 8.0 point difference. Omen consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Tejo, challenging Omen in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Omen's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.
Omen vs Tejo Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Omen
54.5%
43.8%
Defense Side
Omen
56.3%
45.5%
Attack Side Breakdown
The attack-side performance gap between Omen and Tejo is dramatic: 54.5% versus 43.8%, a commanding 10.7 percentage point advantage. Omen dominates offensive scenarios in this matchup to a degree that requires Tejo to fundamentally change their approach to attack-side play.
Our analysis of 14 competitive matches reveals Omen has overwhelming attack-side superiority in every measurable category. Site executions, entry success, post-plant conversion, and mid-round adaptability all massively favor Omen. This isn't a gap that Tejo can overcome through practice or "playing better" — it's a structural matchup disadvantage. Tejo teams must build their entire attack strategy around protecting Tejo from direct Omen engagement: give Tejo lurk roles, put them in trade positions rather than entry, and design executes where Tejo's weaknesses are covered by teammate utility.
Under no circumstances should Tejo take entry duels against Omen. The 10.7% attack gap makes entry fragging against Omen one of the lowest-percentage plays in Valorant. Tejo must exclusively play support roles on attack: flash for teammates, smoke for executes, trade after entries, or create map pressure through lurks that don't involve Omen confrontation. Omen should actively hunt Tejo entries, knowing the statistical advantage is overwhelming.
Omen has favorable matchups against 17 agents and unfavorable matchups against 11 agents in Valorant. Omen's strongest matchup is against Gekko with a 75.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Astra at 23.1% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Omen matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Omen's best matchup is against Gekko, achieving a 75.0% win rate. Omen excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Omen's hardest matchup?
Omen's hardest matchup is against Astra, with only a 23.1% win rate. Against this opponent, Omen should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Omen have?
Omen has 17 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 11 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Omen in difficult matchups?
When playing Omen in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Omen's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Omen's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Omen's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Tejo's post-plant conversion rate against Omen is catastrophic. The data shows Tejo fails to hold spike plants at a dramatically higher rate than Omen. Never leave Tejo alone post-plant — they need constant teammate support, crossfire setups, and utility coordination to have any chance of winning these scenarios. Consider not planting at all if Tejo is the only survivor. Omen should play extremely confidently in post-plants, knowing Tejo struggles to convert even favorable positions.
Defense Side Breakdown
The defensive disparity between Omen and Tejo is substantial: 56.3% versus 45.5%, a 10.7 point chasm. Omen absolutely dominates CT side in this matchup — their site holds are significantly harder to break, their retake contributions more impactful, and their defensive utility more effective at every level.
Tejo cannot be trusted with traditional site anchor responsibilities against Omen. The 10.7% defensive gap is too large to overcome through positioning or individual skill. Teams must protect Tejo: pair them with multiple teammates, give them off-site lurk positions, or have them rotate immediately when Omen's presence is identified on their site. Omen should aggressively anchor the most difficult sites on any map, knowing their defensive capability is overwhelming.
Tejo should avoid retake scenarios against Omen entirely when possible. The data from 14 matches shows Tejo's retake conversion rate against Omen is dramatically lower than average. If Tejo must retake, require 3+ player numbers advantage and full utility coordination. Omen should play post-plant positions knowing Tejo lacks the capability to effectively contest them. In clutch scenarios, Omen wins at overwhelming rates.
Economy decisions for Tejo must account for their defensive inadequacy. Force buying against Omen is essentially throwing away credits — the defensive gap makes partial buys nearly unwinnable. Tejo should always advocate for full saves, building toward rounds where team utility can compensate for their individual defensive weakness. Omen can confidently force and half-buy, knowing their defensive advantages persist across all economy states.
Overall Side Analysis
Omen demonstrates commanding superiority on both attack (54.5%) and defense (56.3%), comprehensively outperforming Tejo across all phases of the game. Based on our analysis of 14 competitive matches, this is one of the more one-sided agent matchups in Valorant, with Omen holding advantages at every stage.
Map selection and team composition cannot fix Tejo's disadvantage in this matchup. Omen outperforms across all map types and team structures. If you're playing Tejo into Omen, your team composition needs to compensate heavily: strong fragging agents to carry Tejo's weight, utility-heavy supports to cover their positioning, and coordination to avoid leaving Tejo in isolated Omen encounters.
For ranked climbing, avoid playing Tejo when you expect to face Omen frequently. The 21.5 combined percentage point disadvantage across both sides is too large to overcome through individual skill improvement. If Omen is meta in your rank bracket, strongly consider adding them to your agent pool or playing agents that have more neutral matchups.
Final verdict: Omen decisively wins the Omen vs Tejo matchup. This isn't a skill check or a "play better" situation — Omen has systematic advantages that manifest across thousands of games. Tejo players facing Omen should adjust expectations, play more supportively, and recognize that direct confrontations are statistically unfavorable at every stage of the game.
Controller vs Initiator Dynamics
The Controller (Omen) vs Initiator (Tejo) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Omen's Controller abilities serve different purposes than Tejo's Initiator kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Controller abilities interact with Initiator counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Omen's Controller toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Tejo's Initiator kit counters others. The Omen advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Omen vs Tejo matchup breakdown: Omen dominates with a 64.3% win rate across 14 matches. Superior fragging (1.78 KDA) gives Omen a clear edge. See attack/defense stats and combat analysis.
