Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Omen's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Omen
48.9% WR
VS
Jett
51.1% WR
Who Wins the Omen vs Jett Matchup?
Winner
Jett
Matches: 221
48.9%
Win Rate
51.1%
1.58
Avg KDA
1.23
15.3
Avg Kills
16.7
14.9
Avg Deaths
16.0
133.4
DMG/Round
146.3
32.3%
HS %
30.2%
205
Combat Score
223
48.7%
Attack WR
48.8%
51.2%
Defense WR
51.3%
Omen vs Jett Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 221 matches reveals that Jett holds a clear advantage over Omen in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Omen shows strength in one category, Jett's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.58Omen
1.23Jett
Omen maintains a noticeable fragging advantage with a 1.58 KDA versus Jett's 1.23. This difference in kill-death-assist ratio suggests Omen players are more reliable in clutch situations and contribute more consistently to round wins through individual playmaking.
Damage Output
133.4Omen
146.3Jett
Jett outputs 146.3 average damage per round, edging out Omen's 133.4 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Jett secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
48.7%Omen
48.8%Jett
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Omen at 48.7% and Jett at 48.8% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
51.2%Omen
51.3%Jett
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Omen posting a 51.2% win rate and Jett at 51.3%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Omen vs Jett matchup in Valorant is a close matchup with a slight statistical edge. Based on 221 competitive matches analyzed, Jett wins 51.1% of the time compared to Omen's 48.9%, a 2.3 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Omen consistently outperforms. In this Controller vs Duelist matchup, Jett holds a minor advantage, but Omen can absolutely secure rounds through good positioning and utility timing. The difference is slim enough that coordinated team plays and winning key aim duels can flip the matchup.
Omen vs Jett Fragging Analysis
Omen edges out Jett in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 221 matches analyzed, this Omen vs Jett matchup remains contestable for both sides. Jett shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Jett's favor.
Avg KDA
1.58Omen
1.23Jett
Omen demonstrates noticeably stronger kill-death-assist performance against Jett, maintaining a 1.58 KDA versus 1.23. This 0.35 point gap reflects Omen's superior ability to secure eliminations while avoiding death in these head-to-head encounters. Jett players facing Omen should prioritize team coordination over solo aggression — look for 2v1 situations, coordinate utility usage with teammates, and focus on trading rather than taking isolated duels where Omen's statistical advantage becomes most pronounced.
Avg Kills
15.3Omen
16.7Jett
Jett secures approximately 1.4 more kills per match than Omen in this head-to-head (16.7 vs 15.3). Over the course of a typical 20+ round game, this translates to Jett contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Jett's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Omen can compensate through superior utility assistance, site anchoring, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
14.9Omen
16.0Jett
Omen demonstrates markedly better survivability against Jett, recording 14.9 deaths per game versus 16.0. Dying nearly 1.1 fewer times per match gives Omen significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Jett players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
133.4Omen
146.3Jett
Jett significantly outdamages Omen in head-to-head encounters, posting 146.3 ADR versus 133.4. This 12.8 damage-per-round advantage means Jett consistently wins the damage exchange in firefights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. Omen players should avoid prolonged dueling with Jett — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage weapons or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate for the raw gunfight disadvantage.
HS %
32.3%Omen
30.2%Jett
Omen demonstrates notably superior headshot accuracy against Jett: 32.3% versus 30.2%. This 2.1 percentage point gap in precision means Omen ends gunfights faster, conserves more ammo, and wins more 50-50 duels where both players see each other simultaneously. Jett faces a real disadvantage in aim duels and should compensate through utility, positioning, or weapon choices that don't require headshot precision (shotguns, Odin spraying through smokes, etc.).
Omen vs Jett Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Jett
48.7%
48.8%
Defense Side
Jett
51.2%
51.3%
Attack Side Breakdown
The attack-side comparison between Omen and Jett reveals near-perfect parity, with Omen winning 48.7% of attacking rounds compared to Jett's 48.8%. This negligible 0.1 percentage point difference indicates neither agent possesses inherent advantages when executing onto sites or pushing through chokepoints. When these agents meet on attack, success depends almost entirely on team coordination, execute timing, and individual mechanical skill rather than agent kit superiority.
From a tactical standpoint, neither Omen nor Jett should adjust their standard attacking approach based on this matchup. Both agents can run their typical execute patterns, default rotations, and lurk timings without worrying about a statistical disadvantage. The data from 221 matches suggests that whichever player has better game sense, utility timing, and raw mechanical aim will win attack-side encounters — there's no agent-based shortcut to victory here.
For entry fragging specifically, both Omen and Jett players can confidently take the first duel when executing onto sites. Neither agent's abilities create meaningful first-contact advantages over the other, so entry success comes down to crosshair placement, pre-aim quality, and jiggle-peeking technique. Whether you're playing Omen or Jett, approach site entries with the same confidence you'd have in any other matchup.
Omen has favorable matchups against 16 agents and unfavorable matchups against 12 agents in Valorant. Omen's strongest matchup is against Gekko with a 75.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Astra at 23.1% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Omen matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Omen's best matchup is against Gekko, achieving a 75.0% win rate. Omen excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Omen's hardest matchup?
Omen's hardest matchup is against Astra, with only a 23.1% win rate. Against this opponent, Omen should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Omen have?
Omen has 16 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 12 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Omen in difficult matchups?
When playing Omen in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Omen's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Omen's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Omen's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant scenarios in this matchup are similarly balanced. Neither agent demonstrates superior spike defense or retake denial capabilities against the other based on our attack-side data. When the spike is down, focus on standard post-plant fundamentals: positioning for crossfires, using utility to delay defuses, and communicating enemy positions to teammates. The 0.1% difference is small enough to be statistical noise rather than a meaningful advantage.
Defense Side Breakdown
Defensive performance between Omen and Jett is virtually identical, with Omen holding 51.2% of rounds on CT side and Jett at 51.3%. This 0.1 point margin indicates both agents contribute equally when anchoring sites, retaking, or denying post-plants. Neither possesses defensive utility advantages significant enough to swing matchup outcomes.
Both Omen and Jett can anchor sites with equal effectiveness in this matchup. Whether holding A, B, or mid on any map, neither agent's defensive kit provides meaningful advantages over the other. Site anchor decisions should be based on map knowledge, team composition needs, and personal preference rather than matchup considerations. The 0.1% difference is too small to influence site assignment choices.
Retake scenarios are similarly balanced between Omen and Jett. Neither agent demonstrates superior retake utility, post-plant clearing ability, or clutch potential against the other based on our defensive data from 221 matches. When retaking against either agent, focus on standard retake fundamentals: utility to clear common spots, coordinated timing with teammates, and trading effectively. Don't adjust your retake approach based on whether you're facing Omen or Jett.
Economy decisions and utility usage shouldn't change based on this specific matchup during defense. Both agents have comparable force buy success rates, full buy conversion, and utility effectiveness against each other. Make economy calls based on team needs and general defensive principles rather than Omen vs Jett specific considerations. Your standard defensive utility timing and placement will be equally effective regardless of which agent you're facing.
Overall Side Analysis
Jett maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 48.8% attack win rate and 51.3% defense win rate. While Jett is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Omen remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Omen vs Jett specific factors. The slight Jett advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Omen and Jett are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Jett has a slight statistical edge, but Omen is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Omen, don't switch to Jett just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Controller vs Duelist Dynamics
The Controller (Omen) vs Duelist (Jett) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Omen's Controller abilities serve different purposes than Jett's Duelist kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Controller abilities interact with Duelist counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Omen's Controller toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Jett's Duelist kit counters others. The Jett advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Omen vs Jett is a skill matchup with near-even win rates (48.9% vs 51.1%). Based on 221 matches, see which agent wins in KDA, damage output, attack rounds, and defense rounds to find your edge.
