Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Omen's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Analysis of 227 matches reveals that Omen holds a clear advantage over Clove in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Clove shows strength in one category, Omen's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
The Omen vs Clove matchup in Valorant is a moderately favorable matchup. Based on 227 competitive matches analyzed, Omen wins 52.4% of the time compared to Clove's 46.7%, a 5.7 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Omen consistently outperforms. In this Controller vs Controller matchup, Omen has meaningful advantages in this agent head-to-head. Clove players should avoid isolated duels when possible and rely on team utility and trading to overcome the statistical disadvantage.
Omen edges out Clove in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 227 matches analyzed, this Omen vs Clove matchup remains contestable for both sides. Clove shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Clove's favor.
Omen demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Clove in this matchup, converting 49.1% of attacking rounds versus 48.0%. While this 1.1 point edge gives Omen slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Clove players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 227 competitive games suggests Omen's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Clove teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.1% gap.
When taking entry duels, Omen holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Clove players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Omen can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Omen has favorable matchups against 16 agents and unfavorable matchups against 12 agents in Valorant. Omen's strongest matchup is against Gekko with a 75.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Astra at 23.1% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | DMG/Rnd | HS % | Atk WR | Def WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.42% | 227 | 1.64 | 134.5 | 32.1% | 49.1% |
Real-time overlays, automatic match tracking, and exclusive tools — everything you need to climb, free on your PC.
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Omen's best matchup is against Gekko, achieving a 75.0% win rate. Omen excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
Omen's hardest matchup is against Astra, with only a 23.1% win rate. Against this opponent, Omen should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
Omen has 16 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 12 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
When playing Omen in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Omen's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
Key stats to analyze in Omen's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Omen's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Clove should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.1 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Omen shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Clove, winning 52.0% of defense rounds compared to 50.9%. This 1.1 percentage point edge suggests Omen's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Clove players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Omen can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.1% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Clove should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Omen demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Omen converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Clove should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Omen when you can wait for teammates. Omen can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.1% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Clove should be more conservative with eco aggression against Omen and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Omen can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Omen maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 49.1% attack win rate and 52.0% defense win rate. While Omen is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Clove remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Omen vs Clove specific factors. The slight Omen advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Omen and Clove are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Omen has a slight statistical edge, but Clove is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Clove, don't switch to Omen just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Both Omen and Clove fill the Controller role in Valorant team compositions. This role mirror means teams won't face composition issues from having both agents — the question is purely which Controller performs better in direct competition. Our data clearly indicates Omen is the stronger Controller pick when these agents face each other.
In Controller vs Controller encounters, similar ability timing and usage patterns mean both agents often use their kits in comparable ways. The winner typically comes down to which player uses their abilities more efficiently and wins the mechanical duels that follow. Omen's statistical advantage suggests their specific Controller kit translates slightly better to winning these mirror encounters.
| 52.0% |
| 48.87% | 221 | 1.58 | 133.4 | 32.3% | 48.7% | 51.2% |
| 53.55% | 155 | 1.57 | 132.1 | 30.4% | 48.1% | 52.6% |
| 45.39% | 141 | 1.59 | 136.8 | 30.7% | 47.8% | 50.3% |
| 52.13% | 94 | 1.60 | 133.2 | 30.1% | 48.5% | 50.1% |
| 44.09% | 93 | 1.62 | 139.9 | 30.4% | 46.0% | 51.0% |
| 41.11% | 90 | 1.51 | 131.2 | 28.9% | 48.4% | 46.9% |
| 59.04% | 83 | 1.72 | 136.5 | 31.0% | 51.7% | 53.5% |
| 50.67% | 75 | 1.57 | 134.8 | 29.5% | 50.0% | 51.0% |
| 52.94% | 68 | 1.69 | 139.7 | 32.7% | 46.7% | 55.7% |
| 60.71% | 56 | 1.58 | 132.9 | 28.6% | 51.1% | 52.8% |
| 50.00% | 54 | 1.61 | 129.9 | 28.5% | 49.4% | 51.4% |
| 45.10% | 51 | 1.61 | 130.1 | 30.9% | 44.6% | 52.3% |
| 53.06% | 49 | 1.74 | 139.9 | 30.1% | 50.5% | 51.6% |
| 51.43% | 35 | 1.48 | 128.7 | 29.6% | 47.3% | 52.2% |
| 40.91% | 22 | 1.67 | 137.6 | 29.0% | 44.1% | 50.9% |
| 55.00% | 20 | 1.73 | 148.7 | 34.9% | 56.7% | 47.1% |
| 64.29% | 14 | 1.78 | 142.2 | 35.0% | 54.5% | 56.3% |
| 46.15% | 13 | 1.84 | 140.7 | 30.0% | 47.8% | 57.0% |
| 23.08% | 13 | 1.30 | 125.3 | 29.2% | 51.2% | 35.2% |
| 33.33% | 12 | 1.45 | 130.9 | 27.0% | 48.1% | 41.9% |
| 50.00% | 10 | 1.43 | 114.8 | 31.3% | 43.5% | 50.6% |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.41 | 140.6 | 34.2% | 47.5% | 48.1% |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.28 | 122.9 | 33.9% | 44.6% | 46.2% |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.27 | 123.2 | 30.5% | 57.4% | 44.4% |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.42 | 119.3 | 25.6% | 40.9% | 62.0% |
| 75.00% | 4 | 1.59 | 110.2 | 30.4% | 41.7% | 60.4% |
| 33.33% | 3 | 1.79 | 143.5 | 28.6% | 42.1% | 52.9% |
Omen vs Clove head-to-head analysis. Omen holds a 52.4% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 227 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.